Patient experience and repeatability of measurements made with the Pentacam HR in patients with keratoconus.

BACKGROUND: To investigate whether the repeatability of measurements with the Pentacam HR in patients with keratoconus is improved by patients gaining more experience of the measurement situation. Such an improvement could enhance the accuracy with which progressive keratoconus can be detected. METHODS: Four replicate measurements were performed on Day 0 and on Day 3. Parameters commonly used in the diagnosis of progressive keratoconus were included in the analysis, namely the flattest central keratometry value (K1), the steepest central keratometry value (K2), the maximum keratometry value (Kmax), and the parameters A, B and C from the Belin ABCD Progression Display. In addition, quality parameters used by the Pentacam HR to assess the quality of the measurements were included, namely the analysed area (front + back), 3D (front + back), XY, Z, and eye movements. RESULTS: Neither the diagnostic parameters nor the quality parameters showed any statistically significant improvement on Day 3 compared to Day 0. The quality parameter "eye movements" deteriorated significantly with increasing Kmax. CONCLUSION: Gaining experience of the measurement situation did not increase the accuracy of the measurements. Further investigations should be performed to determine whether the increasing number of eye movements with increasing disease severity has a negative effect on the repeatability of the measurements.

Comparison of corneal shape changes and aberrations induced By FS-LASIK and SMILE for myopia.

PURPOSE: To compare corneal curvatures, corneal power calculations, and higher-order aberrations (HOAs) of femtosecond laser-assisted LASIK (FS-LASIK) with small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) following surgery for moderate to high myopia. METHODS: A retrospective study of 736 eyes of 368 patients treated with SMILE and 148 eyes of 74 patients treated with FS-LASIK. Preoperative mean spherical equivalent was -7.3 ± 1.5 diopters in the SMILE group and -7.6 ± 1.3 diopters in the FS-LASIK group. Corneal curvatures, corneal power calculations performed by ray tracing, and HOAs measured with Scheimpflug technology before and 3 months after surgery were analyzed. RESULTS: Corneal curvatures changed significantly in the anterior corneal surface, but not in the posterior corneal surface, in both groups; after SMILE, the sagittal curvature was constant for the central 4-mm diameter, in contrast to FS-LASIK where the curvature showed a gradual steepening with increasing diameter. Corneal power calculations were different across the cornea depending on the measurement diameter between the two groups postoperatively. Measured over a 5-mm zone on the total cornea, FS-LASIK induced 0.11 µm more coma (P < .001) and 0.13 µm higher spherical aberration (P < .001) as compared to SMILE; similar results in other HOAs were seen for the anterior corneal surface. Negligible differences in HOAs were induced on the posterior corneal surface. CONCLUSIONS: SMILE and FS-LASIK produced distinct changes in anterior corneal shape evident in different postoperative corneal curvatures and power measurements between the two groups. Postoperative HOAs were much lower after SMILE as compared to FS-LASIK.

Assessing the corneal power change after refractive surgery using Scheimpflug imaging.

PURPOSE: To investigate whether the Pentacam HR could accurately predict the surgically induced refractive change in patients operated with small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) for myopia or femto-second laser in situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK) for myopia or hyperopic astigmatism. METHODS: Data from three groups consisting of (1) 410 myopic eyes of 410 patients operated with SMILE, (2) 111 myopic eyes of 111 patients operated with FS-LASIK, and (3) 40 eyes of 40 patients with hyperopic astigmatism operated with FS-LASIK were retrospectively analysed. The change in manifest refraction due to surgery was compared with the objectively measured change in corneal power by the Pentacam HR in three different ways: Sagittal Power (calculated as for placido topographers), True Net Power (calculated by a Gaussian optics formula), and Total Corneal Refractive Power (calculated by ray tracing). Multiple linear regression analysis was performed to investigate which parameters influenced the Pentacam HR's prediction of the change in subjective refraction due to surgery. RESULTS: The Total Corneal Refractive Power Apex, Zone calculation in a diameter of 4.0 mm effectively predicted the surgically induced refractive change for all three patient groups. The spherical equivalent was predicted with an error of 0.08 ± 0.41 D for the SMILE eyes, 0.05 ± 0.61 D for the myopic eyes operated with FS-LASIK, and -0.15 ± 0.49 D for the hyperopic astigmatic eyes treated with FS-LASIK. Regression showed that preoperative refractive error had a significant impact on the prediction error of the Pentacam HR. CONCLUSIONS: Ray tracing calculations based on Scheimpflug imaging accurately assessed the change in manifest refraction due to corneal laser surgery.

Topography-guided photorefractive keratectomy for irregular astigmatism after small incision lenticule extraction.

PURPOSE: To report the outcome of topography-guided photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) after complicated small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE). METHODS: Retrospective case series of 5 eyes with irregular topography and ghost images after complicated SMILE. All eyes received transepithelial topography-guided PRK. Two eyes were treated with 0.02% mitomycin C. Patients were examined after a minimum of 3 months with evaluation of uncorrected (UDVA) and corrected (CDVA) distance visual acuity, Pentacam tomography (Oculus Optikgeräte, Wetzlar, Germany), and whole-eye aberrometry. RESULTS: In 3 eyes, subjective symptoms were diminished and UDVA, CDVA, topography, and corneal wavefront aberrations were improved. The remaining 2 eyes developed significant haze with worsened topography and wavefront aberrations. One eye experienced a two-line reduction in CDVA. Eyes with haze development had not been treated with mitomycin C. CONCLUSIONS: Transepithelial topography-guided PRK may reduce visual symptoms after complicated SMILE if postoperative haze can be controlled. To reduce the risk of haze development, application of mitomycin C may be considered.

Central corneal sublayer pachymetry and biomechanical properties after refractive femtosecond lenticule extraction.

PURPOSE: To compare central corneal sublayer pachymetry and biomechanical properties after femtosecond lenticule extraction (FLEX) and small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE). METHODS: A prospective, randomized, single-masked clinical trial of 35 patients treated for moderate to high myopia with FLEX in one eye and SMILE in the other. Anterior segment optical coherence tomography imaging (Heidelberg Spectralis; Heidelberg Engineering GmbH, Heidelberg, Germany) was used to measure central corneal thickness (CCT) and epithelial, flap/cap, and residual stromal bed thickness centrally. The Ocular Response Analyzer (Reichert Ophthalmic Instruments, Buffalo, NY) was used to assess corneal hysteresis (CH) and corneal resistance factor (CRF). Patients were examined before and 6 months after surgery. RESULTS: Mean decrease in CCT was 105 µm in FLEX-treated eyes and 106 µm in SMILE-treated eyes (P = .70), which is equivalent to approximately 14 µm/diopters corrected. Mean central epithelial thickness increased 7 ± 6 µm in FLEX-treated eyes and 6 ± 5 µm in SMILE-treated eyes (P = .64). Achieved mean flap/cap thickness was 4 ± 6 µm from the expected thickness in FLEX-treated eyes and 4 ± 9 µm in SMILE-treated eyes (P = .37). CH was reduced 2.7 ± 1.3 mm Hg in FLEX-treated eyes and 3.3 ± 1.2 mm Hg in SMILE-treated eyes (P = .08). CRF was reduced 4.5 ± 1.2 mm Hg in FLEX-treated eyes and 4.6 ± 1.2 mm Hg in SMILE-treated eyes (P = .71). CH and CRF were highly correlated with CCT, but not patient age. CONCLUSIONS: In this paired-eye study, the flap-based FLEX and cap-based SMILE resulted in almost identical changes in central corneal sublayer pachymetry and biomechanical properties for moderate to high myopia 6 months after treatment.

Surface quality of human corneal lenticules after SMILE assessed using environmental scanning electron microscopy.

PURPOSE: To assess the cut quality of the anterior and posterior surfaces of intrastromal refractive lenticules removed during small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE). METHODS: The VisuMax femtosecond laser (500 kHz; Carl Zeiss Meditec, Dublin, CA) was used to perform SMILE on 8 eyes of 5 individuals to correct only myopia (no cylinder). The cut energy index was 26 (equivalent to an energy of 130 nJ) with a 2.5 × 2.5 µm spot/track separation. The lenticule diameter was 6.5 mm with a minimum edge thickness of 15 µm and the cap diameter was 7.3 mm with an intended thickness of 120 µm. After laser treatment, the lenticule was loosened with a spatula and removed with forceps. The extracted lenticules were placed in 2% formalin and sent for imaging with an environmental scanning electron microscope. Images of the anterior and posterior surfaces of the lenticules were obtained at multiple magnifications (100×, 250×, and 500×). Surface quality was evaluated by an investigator who specializes in electron microscopy using three criteria: overall surface regularity, percent of surface irregularity, and position of irregular area. RESULTS: Both the anterior and posterior surfaces of the extracted lenticules were smooth and absent of surface irregularities. The cut edges also appeared uniform. Jagged edges were seen in several images, but were clearly caused by the forceps during extraction. CONCLUSIONS: Using the VisuMax laser to perform SMILE produces smooth cuts absent of surface irregularities.

Early findings in a randomised controlled trial on crosslinking protocols using isoosmolar and hypoosmolar riboflavin for the treatment of progressive keratoconus.

PURPOSE: To present baseline characteristics and to present the perioperative corneal thickness during corneal crosslinking (CXL) treatment for progressive keratoconus and to describe how the addition of sterile water (SW) efficaciously can maintain the corneal thickness. The treatment efficacy will be evaluated when the 1-year follow-up is complete. METHODS: A randomised clinical study using epithelium-off CXL with continuous UVA irradiation (9 mW/cm2) and two kinds of riboflavin solutions: (i) isoosmolar dextran-based riboflavin (n = 27) and (ii) hypoosmolar dextran-free riboflavin (n = 27). INCLUSION CRITERIA: progressive keratoconus with an increase in maximum keratometry value (Kmax) of 1.0 dioptre (12 months) or 0.5 dioptres (6 months). Corneae thinner than 400 µm were also included. OUTCOME PARAMETERS: Perioperative corneal thickness and the effect of adding SW. RESULTS: Seventy-four per cent of the patients in the isoosmolar group and 15% in the hypoosmolar group required the addition of SW, which effectively maintained a corneal thickness of 400 µm in all cases during CXL. The addition of SW was primarily needed during the irradiation procedure and not the preoperative soaking period. CONCLUSIONS: Especially during the CXL irradiation phase, isoosmolar riboflavin causes a significant dehydrating effect leading to corneal thinning during CXL. The customised addition of SW is efficacious in maintaining the corneal thickness during CXL and could increase the safety of the procedure.

Long-term outcomes of photorefractive keratectomy for low to high myopia: 13 to 19 years of follow-up.

PURPOSE: To evaluate long-term outcomes after photorefractive keratectomy (PRK). METHODS: A retrospective follow-up study of patients who received PRK at 5.0- to 6.5-mm optical zones, using the Summit broad beam excimer laser (Summit Technology, Inc., Waltham, MA) at Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark, between 1992 and 1998. One randomly selected eye of each patient was used in the statistical analyses. Re-treated eyes were excluded. RESULTS: One hundred sixty eyes were included. Mean follow-up time was 16 years (range: 13 to 19 years). Mean preoperative spherical equivalent was -4.84 ± 2.95 diopters (D) (range: -20.25 to -1.25 D). At last follow-up examination, achieved refraction was -1.00 ± 1.56 D (range: -10.75 to +1.00 D) from attempted refraction, and the change in mean refractive error from 6 months postoperatively was less than 1.00 D. Results from a subgroup of unilateral treated patients indicated that myopic progression was the main reason for the residual refractive error. For eyes with low myopia (n = 124), the proportion of eyes within ± 1.0 D of attempted refraction was 72%, and for eyes with high myopia (-6.00 D or more, n = 36) it was 47%. Forty-five percent had uncorrected distance visual acuity of 20/20 or better at last follow-up examination. Three eyes (2%) lost two or more lines and 13 eyes (8%) gained two or more lines of corrected distance visual acuity. Fourteen percent had haze (grade 0.5 to 2). Eighty-one percent were satisfied with the surgery. CONCLUSION: PRK for low degrees of myopia seemed safe and effective up to 19 years after surgery with conventional broad beam laser ablation. Refractive predictability was significantly lower and the occurrence of haze was higher in eyes with high myopia.

Subbasal nerve morphology, corneal sensation, and tear film evaluation after refractive femtosecond laser lenticule extraction.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to compare corneal subbasal nerve morphology, corneal sensation, and tear film parameters after femtosecond lenticule extraction (FLEX) and small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE). METHODS: A prospective, randomized, single-masked, paired-eye design clinical trial of 35 patients treated for moderate to high myopia with FLEX in one eye and SMILE in the other. In both techniques, an intrastromal lenticule was cut by a femtosecond laser and manually extracted. In FLEX, a LASIK-like flap allowed removal of the lenticule, whereas in SMILE, it was removed through a small incision. In-vivo confocal microscopy was used to acquire images of the central corneal subbasal nerve plexus, from which nerve density, total nerve number, and nerve tortuosity were analyzed. Corneal sensation was measured using Cochet-Bonnet esthesiometry. A visual analog scale, tear osmolarity, non-invasive tear film break-up time (keratograph) tear meniscus height (anterior segment OCT), Schirmer's test, and fluorescein tear film break-up time were used to evaluate tear film and ocular surface symptoms. Patients were examined before and 6 months after surgery. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences in baseline parameters between FLEX and SMILE (p > 0.050). With regard to changes from before to 6 months after surgery, mean reduction in subbasal nerve density was 14.22 ± 6.24 mm/mm(2) in FLEX eyes, and 9.21 ± 7.80 mm/mm(2) in SMILE eyes (p < 0.05). The total number of nerves decreased more in FLEX eyes than in SMILE eyes (p < 0.05). No change was found when comparing tortuosity (p > 0.05). Corneal sensation was reduced with 0.38 ± 0.49 cm in FLEX eyes, and 0.10 ± 0.34 cm in SMILE eyes (p < 0.01). No differences were found between FLEX and SMILE in tear film evaluation tests (p > 0.05). Significantly more patients felt postoperative foreign body sensation in the FLEX eye within the first days after surgery, as compared to the SMILE eye. CONCLUSIONS: Six months after surgery, the less invasive SMILE technique seemed better at sparing the central corneal nerves as compared to FLEX. Corneal sensation was only significantly reduced in FLEX eyes. There were no differences between FLEX and SMILE when comparing tear film evaluation tests 6 months after surgery.

Impact of Small Incision Lenticule Extraction for High Myopia on Intraocular Pressure Measurements With Pneumotonometry.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the medium-term impact of small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) on air-puff tonometry (APT) and how it may be corrected. METHODS: In this controlled prospective study, 69 eyes from 69 patients treated with SMILE for high myopia (mean: -7.22 diopters) were included. Central corneal thickness (CCT), spherical equivalent refraction (SEQ), corneal power, and intraocular pressure (IOP) (assessed by APT) were measured before and 3 months after surgery. RESULTS: The measured IOP decreased significantly after SMILE surgery (mean: -6.43 mm Hg), indicating a significant underestimation of the true IOP by APT. There was a significant correlation between change in SEQ, CCT, and apparent IOP. Correcting the apparent IOP measurement by applying a multiple regression correction did not provide significantly better estimates compared to adding 6.4 mm Hg to the measurement. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that previous SMILE surgery should be considered when interpreting APT measurements, because the measurements underestimate the true IOP. Multiple regressions cannot estimate the true IOP with certainty. For screening purposes, adding 6.4 mm Hg to the apparent IOP of a patient treated for high myopia may be sufficient. [J Refract Surg. 2023;39(9):606-611.].

The intra- and inter-day repeatability of corneal densitometry measurements in subjects with keratoconus and in healthy controls.

The healthy cornea is transparent, however, disease can affect its structure, rendering it more or less opaque. The ability to assess the clarity of the cornea objectively could thus be of considerable interest for keratoconus patients. It has previously been suggested that densitometry can be used to diagnose early keratoconus, and that the values of densitometry variables increase with increasing disease severity, indicating that densitometry could also be used to assess progressive keratoconus. Previous studies have only assessed the repeatability of corneal densitometry measurements on the same day, which does not reflect the clinical setting in which changes are evaluated over time. We have therefore evaluated the inter-day repeatability of densitometry measurements in both patients with keratoconus and healthy controls. Measurements in the middle layer of the 2-6 mm zone of the cornea showed the best repeatability. Although an objective measure of the corneal transparency could be interesting, the generally poor repeatability of densitometry measurements limits their use. The repeatability of corneal clarity measurements could be improved by using other approaches such as optical coherence tomography, but this remains to be investigated. Such improvements would allow the more widespread use of corneal densitometry in clinical practice.

Predictors for the outcome of small-incision lenticule extraction for Myopia.

PURPOSE: To study the influence of patient- and surgery-related parameters on the predictability, efficacy, and safety of small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) for treatment of myopia. METHODS: This prospective, clinical quality, control study comprised 670 eyes from 335 patients with myopia up to -10.00 diopters (D) (spherical equivalent refraction) and astigmatism up to 2.00 D treated with SMILE in both eyes and followed for 3 months. RESULTS: Preoperative mean spherical equivalent refraction was -7.19±1.30 D. In eyes with emmetropia as the target refraction, 84% obtained uncorrected distance visual acuity ≤ 0.10 logMAR (20/25 or better Snellen equivalent) at 3 months. Mean corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) improved from -0.03 to -0.05 logMAR (P<.01). Two or more lines of CDVA were lost in 2.4% (16 eyes). The achieved refraction was 0.25±0.44 D less than attempted after 3 months, and 80% (537 eyes) and 94% (631 eyes) were within ±0.50 and ±1.00 D of attempted correction, respectively. Multiple linear regression analyses revealed that spherical equivalent refraction undercorrection was predicted by increasing patient age (0.10 D per decade; P<.01) and steeper corneal curvature (0.04 D per D; P<.01). Safety and efficacy of the procedure were minimally affected by age, gender, and simultaneous cylinder correction. CONCLUSIONS: Undercorrection of 0.25 D and small effects of patient age and corneal curvature suggest that the standard nomogram for SMILE need only minor adjustments. This study suggests that safety and efficacy are not influenced to any clinically significant degree by easily discernible patient factors.

Corneal power, thickness, and stiffness: results of a prospective randomized controlled trial of PRK and LASIK for myopia.

PURPOSE: To compare the short-, medium-, and long-term changes in corneal optical power and corneal aberrations, central corneal thickness, and corneal "stiffness" assessed by pneumotonometry readings in patients having laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) or photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) for myopia. SETTING: Department of Ophthalmology, Arhus University Hospital, Arhus, Denmark. METHODS: One eye of each of 45 patients with myopia ranging from -6.00 to -8.00 diopters (D) (spherical equivalent spectacle refraction [SER]) was randomized to LASIK (n=25; mean SER -7.12 D +/- 0.57 [SD]) or PRK (n=20; mean SER -6.91 +/- 0.57 D). Data were collected prospectively before and 1, 3, 6, 12, and 36 months after surgery. Measurements included corneal topography (TMS-1, Tomey), corneal thickness (ultrasound pachymetry), and apparent intraocular pressure (IOP) (pneumotonometry). Retreatments were not performed during the first year, and retreated eyes were excluded from the 3-year follow-up. Changes in corneal power and aberrations, thickness, and apparent IOP were calculated in a pair-wise manner for 3 time periods: short term (preoperative to 1 month after surgery), medium term (1 to 12 months after surgery), and long term (1 to 3 years after surgery). RESULTS: In the short term, corneal power decreased equally in LASIK and PRK eyes. Spherical aberrations and coma-like aberrations increased equally, while corneal thickness decreased significantly less in LASIK eyes than in PRK eyes. The apparent IOP decreased more in LASIK eyes than in PRK eyes. In the medium term, corneal power increased significantly in both groups. Spherical aberrations decreased significantly in PRK eyes but not in LASIK eyes. From 1 to 12 months, corneal thickness increased more in PRK eyes than in LASIK eyes. During this period, the apparent IOP increased significantly in LASIK eyes. In the long term, corneal power and corneal aberrations did not change significantly in either group. Corneal thickness increased slightly but significantly in both groups. The apparent IOP increased significantly more in PRK eyes. CONCLUSIONS: Differences between LASIK and PRK related to time-dependent events affecting corneal shape and structural integrity were present. Peripheral changes in flap hydration in LASIK eyes and epithelial and/or stromal thickening in PRK eyes appeared to be the most important factors in optical power changes in the first year after treatment. The changes in apparent IOP suggest that some interlamellar healing occurred during the first year after LASIK. After LASIK and PRK, corneal bending stiffness seemed permanently decreased, although some restiffening may occur in PRK eyes in the long term.

Prospective randomized study of corneal aberrations 1 year after radial keratotomy or photorefractive keratectomy.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the optical properties of the cornea 1 year after either radial keratotomy (RK) or photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) in a randomized group of patients with low myopia. METHODS: Ninety-six patients with myopia between -0.75 and -5.00 D were randomized to either radial keratotomy (n = 46) or photorefractive keratectomy (n = 50). Topography maps were obtained 1 year after surgery and analyzed by computation of total corneal wavefront aberration and Zernike polynomial coefficients for pupil sizes of 2, 4, and 6 mm. The 4-mm pupil size was used for optimization of the model. RESULTS: The total corneal wavefront aberrations after RK and PRK were similar and not statistically different. Wavefront aberrations arising from astigmatism or defocus accounted for approximately 70% of the total wavefront error at all pupil sizes in both groups. All types of aberrations, and in particular spherical aberration, increased significantly with increasing pupil size. Higher-order wavefront aberrations were almost twice as high after RK than after PRK at pupil sizes of 4 and 6 mm. Spherical aberration and coma were slightly higher after PRK than after RK. CONCLUSIONS: Pupil size had a major effect on corneal aberrations after RK and PRK. The most important aberrations were sphero-cylindrical, in which eyes became significantly more myopic with increasing pupil size. The image forming properties of the cornea are better after PRK compared with RK due to the lesser amount of higher-order aberrations.

[Supervision]. / Supersyn.

Within the past year, the idea of supervision has been introduced and promoted in the media by the manufacturers of wavefront-guided excimer lasers for refractive surgery. The concept is related to the ability of obtaining supernormal visual acuity and contrast sensitivity by correction of higher order aberrations in the biological optics of the human eye. However, the ocular aberrations fluctuate continuously and dynamically over time with the functional state of several of the individual optical components, including: thickness of the tear film, size of the pupil, and the degree of lens accommodation. These temporal variations represent major obstacles for achieving aberration-free images. In addition, the central perception of ideal aberration-free images may be hindered by neuronal limitations in the retina and brain. So far, only a few patients have experienced an increase in best corrected visual acuity following wavefront-guided refractive surgery. Also in the first prospective clinical trials with myopic individuals, only modest differences in visual performance have been detected between wavefront-guided and conventional treatment. Thus, immediate expectations from the new technology should be tuned down; supervision is not waiting around the corner.

Pseudophakic monovision: optimal distribution of refractions.

PURPOSE: To determine the optimal distribution of refractions in monofocal, pseudophakic monovision. METHODS: A previously reported mathematical method for describing defocus for a single eye (Acta Ophthalmol, 89, 2011, 111) is expanded to the binocular situation. The binocular distribution of refractions yielding the least defocus over the most extended fixation intervals is identified by mathematical optimization. The results are tested in a group of 22 pseudophakic patients. RESULTS: For the fixation interval 0.25-6.0 m, the optimal refractions are pure spheres of -0.27D for the distance eye and -1.15D for near eye. The mathematically derived defocus structure is confirmed in the clinical series. CONCLUSIONS: The reported mathematical method enables identification of the optimal distribution of refractions over any fixation interval. Monovision with refractions of approximately -0.25 and -1.25D may lead to spectacle independence for distance and intermediate vision. Binocular problems--such as monovision suppression, reduced stereoacuity and binocular inhibition--are likely to be minimal with the suggested anisometropia of 1.0D. This moderate monovision is fully reversible with spectacle correction, as the induced aniseikonia is minimal and it therefore represents a safe alternative to multifocal intraocular lenses (IOLs).

Factors affecting the decision for refractive surgery in patients with high degrees of ametropia.

PURPOSE: To evaluate reasons referred patients do not have refractive surgery. SETTING: University Eye Clinic, Department of Ophthalmology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. METHODS: The case records of patients referred for refractive surgery from January 2011 to December 2012 were examined for explanatory reasons. Data measured at the clinical preexamination of those who did and those who did not have refractive surgery were compared. A logistic regression model was used to assess the measured data's influence on the decision to have or not have refractive surgery. RESULTS: Of the 2150 patients whose records were reviewed, 939 (43.7%) refrained from having refractive surgery. The most common reason was a change of mind (40.7%) followed by low central corneal thickness (CCT) (12.6%) and unstable refraction (10.8%). The 939 patients who refrained from surgery had significantly higher astigmatism and lower intraocular pressure, CCT, and corrected distance visual acuity than the patients who had surgery. The patients who changed their minds were not significantly different in any parameter from the patients who had refractive surgery. Using an outcome threshold of 0.5, the logistic regression model classified 63.04% of the patients correctly. CONCLUSIONS: Reasons for refraining from refractive surgery were numerous, with a change of mind after the preexamination being the most common. Patients who changed their minds were very similar to those who had surgery, indicating that personal factors were important determinants. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE: No author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.

Efficacy, safety, predictability, contrast sensitivity, and aberrations after femtosecond laser lenticule extraction.

PURPOSE: To compare femtosecond lenticule extraction and small-incision lenticule extraction to treat moderate to high myopia. SETTING: Department of Ophthalmology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark. DESIGN: Prospective clinical single-masked paired-eye study. METHODS: An intrastromal lenticule was cut by a femtosecond laser and manually extracted. In femtosecond lenticule extraction, a laser in situ keratomileusis-like flap allowed removal of the lenticule, whereas in small-incision lenticule extraction, it was removed through a small incision. Follow-up was 6 months. RESULTS: Thirty-five patients were treated with femtosecond lenticule extraction in 1 eye and small-incision lenticule extraction in the other. The mean preoperative spherical equivalent was -7.6 diopters (D) ± 1.0 (SD) (range -6.0 to -9.9 D). After both procedures, 90% of eyes had an uncorrected distance visual acuity of 20/40 or better 1 day postoperatively, increasing to 100% after 6 months. At 6 months, the mean corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) improved significantly by approximately 1.5 letters on the logMAR chart. No eyes lost or gained 2 lines or more of CDVA after either procedure. The achieved refraction was a mean of -0.04 ± 0.38 D from the attempted refraction after femtosecond lenticule extraction and -0.09 ± 0.39 D after small-incision lenticule extraction. After both procedures, 88% of eyes were within ±0.50 D. Contrast sensitivity was unchanged. The changes in higher-order aberrations were similar. CONCLUSION: The all-femtosecond laser flap-based and cap-based techniques produced almost identical results up to 6 months postoperatively in eyes with moderate to high myopia.