Combined percutaneous radiofrequency ablation and ethanol injection of renal tumours: midterm results.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of combined percutaneous, image-guided, radiofrequency (RF) ablation and ethanol injection of renal tumours, and to present our midterm results. METHODS: Since February 2002, 27 consecutive patients (22 men, 5 women; age range: 39-84 yr; mean: 69) with 28 renal tumours (mean diameter: 2.87cm) were treated with combined percutaneous RF and ethanol ablation, and were prospectively evaluated. Twenty-five patients were considered nonsurgical candidates because of comorbid conditions (16 patients) or had previous nephrectomy (9 patients), and 2 had refused surgery. Thirty-three ablation sessions were performed, with computed tomography (26 sessions), ultrasound (6), or combined magnetic resonance imaging/fluoroscopic guidance in 1. Absolute ethanol (0.5-3ml; mean: 1.7) was injected into the tumour immediately before treatment with radiofrequency. Mean follow-up period was 18.6 mo (range: 3-56). RESULTS: Twenty-seven of the 28 tumours were completely ablated with either one (21 tumours) or two treatment sessions (6 tumours). One patient with residual disease refused further treatment. Only three minor complications, including a subcapsular haematoma and two patients with loin pain, occurred; all three patients were treated conservatively. None of the complications was related to the ethanol injection. During the follow-up period, no evidence of local recurrence or metastatic disease was seen. Creatinine levels have not changed significantly in any of the patients following ablation. CONCLUSIONS: Combined use of percutaneous RF and ethanol ablation is a safe and effective alternative treatment for selective patients with renal tumours.

Magnetic resonance renal angiography and venography: an analysis of 111 consecutive scans before donor nephrectomy.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) renal angiography in predicting vascular anatomy before donor nephrectomy, to determine the significance of missed vessels and to ascertain whether vessels are missed because of technical limitations or errors in interpretation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In all, 111 consecutive living donations were assessed; the anatomy on MRI before donation was compared with that at nephrectomy. The significance of additional arteries and veins was recorded at the time of donation, with extra vessels either anastomosed or sacrificed. Finally, the scans in which extra vessels had not been identified were re-examined to establish whether these could be identified retrospectively. RESULTS: In all, 93 kidneys had a single renal artery and 18 had two. All lower pole arteries were anastomosed and all upper pole arteries were sacrificed. Nine arteries were identified before surgery (five were to the lower pole), and nine were missed (four to the lower pole). There were 13 kidneys with more than one vein. Four of these were seen on MRI. However, an extra vein was anastomosed in only one case. On review of the imaging, three arteries were missed because of human error and six due to technical limitations. Of the nine missed veins, only three were easily identified retrospectively. Overall, using MRI as a preoperative investigation for the 111 consecutive cases, the surgeon encountered a previously unidentified accessory artery in nine (8%), and this required anastomosis in four (4%). CONCLUSION: MR angiography has the advantage over computed tomography (CT) of having virtually no side-effects, and if the small possibility is accepted of missing extra vessels because of technical limitation or interpretation, it is a good investigation. However, in light of the failure to visualize all arteries transplanted, we have started to use multi-slice (16-channel) CT to see if its improved spatial resolution alters the results.