It's not just about the money: recruitment and retention of clinical staff in general dental practice - part 1: dentists.

Increasing difficulties in recruitment and retention of dentists and dental care professionals in general dental practice in the UK is affecting delivery of NHS dental services. Reports of dissatisfaction among the general dental practice workforce indicate there is a significant risk to the future dental workforce supply which will affect access to dental care and worsen oral health inequalities. Understanding the factors related to job satisfaction and dissatisfaction of dental professionals would be useful in managing recruitment and retention issues and ensure a dental workforce exists which is able to meet the needs of the population. The aim of this literature review was to identify factors which contribute to job satisfaction and dissatisfaction of clinical staff in general dental practice. Database searching was conducted systematically through PubMed/Medline, Scopus, Ovid, and the National Grey Literature Collection. Part 1 of this two-part series discusses the factors relating to dentists. Twenty-two relevant articles were identified, which were qualitatively analysed using Herzberg's motivation-hygiene theory as an analysis tool. Target-driven and restrictive contractual arrangements are a major factor contributing to dissatisfaction of dentists, as well as time pressures, poor quality equipment, and unfair remuneration. Dental contract reform should aim to minimise factors contributing to dissatisfaction and increase factors which increase satisfaction, if sufficient numbers of dentists are to be persuaded to continue to provide state-funded dentistry.

It's not just about the money: recruitment and retention of clinical staff in general dental practice - part 2: dental care professionals.

As described in the first paper of this two-part series, increasing difficulties in recruitment and retention of dentists and dental care professionals (DCPs) in general dental practice in the UK is affecting delivery of NHS dental services. There is a significant risk to the future dental workforce supply which will affect access to dental care and worsen oral health inequalities. Understanding what factors contribute to job satisfaction and prevent job dissatisfaction of dental professionals would be useful in managing recruitment and retention issues. The aim of this literature review was to identify factors which contribute to job satisfaction of DCPs in general dental practice. Database searching was conducted systematically through PubMed/Medline, Scopus, Ovid, and the National Grey Literature Collection. Eleven relevant articles were identified, which were qualitatively analysed using Herzberg's motivation-hygiene theory as an analysis tool. Unfair remuneration is a major contributor to dissatisfaction of DCPs, but job satisfaction could be promoted through increased recognition, variety of work, and opportunities to progress. Dental contract reform in the UK should aim to minimise factors contributing to dissatisfaction and increase factors which increase satisfaction, including the development of an acceptable remuneration model for NHS dentistry that facilitates skill mix.

A pilot study to evaluate the impact of digital imaging on the delivery of oral hygiene instruction.

AIMS: To determine whether personalised Oral Hygiene Advice (OHA) using an intra-oral-camera (IOC) combined with standard OHA as provided in general dental practice reduces plaque levels after 4 weeks more than the provision of standard OHA. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 22 healthy adult participants diagnosed with gingivitis took part in this pilot parallel-designed, randomised, examiner-blind, 2x-treatment, study regarding their home-care oral hygiene habits and attitudes to oral health. An IOC-image was taken and plaque, gingival and bleeding scores were recorded. Test group participants received standard OHA with IOC-images to indicate areas for improvement, control group participants received standard OHA. Questionnaires and plaque, gingival and bleeding scores were repeated after 4 weeks. Plaque was scored from the IOC-images and scores compared to clinical plaque scores. RESULTS: Lifestyle habits, attitudes to oral health, plaque (0.63vs0.61, control vs test) and bleeding scores (1.17vs0.96, control vs test) were similar at baseline. After 4-weeks, plaque scores improved more in test as compared to control group (39.4vs20.6%, p<0.05, while gingival and bleeding scores approached significance. There was no difference in lifestyle habits between groups, but the test group reported significantly greater confidence in adhering to their bespoke oral health plan. Agreement between the clinical and IOC plaque scores was good. CONCLUSIONS: Use of IOC further personalises the prevailing standard of oral hygiene advice and generates great patient engagement with pictorial reports to facilitate a more in-depth patient explanation of their gingival health, resulting in significant plaque reduction and improved gingival health compared to the standard OHA alone.

Randomised controlled trial demonstrating the impact of behaviour change intervention provided by dental professionals to improve gingival health.

AIMS: To determine impact of oral hygiene behaviour change intervention compared to the prevailing standard of oral hygiene advice provided in general dental practice, on bleeding on probing (BOP) in gingivitis patients, over 3-months. The effect of providing power-brushes was also evaluated. MATERIALS AND METHODS: NHS dental practices were cluster-randomised to intervention or control (2:1). Dentists at intervention sites received behaviour modification training. Participants were stratified to high (≥20% BOP) or low (<20% BOP) presence of gingivitis and a subset assigned a power-brush. BOP and plaque scores were assessed at baseline and 3-months. RESULTS: A total of 538 participants (369:169; intervention: control) completed the study. BOP reduced in both gingivitis groups with significantly greater reduction in intervention compared to control group (BOP:38% vs 19%, p = 0.0236); Borderline significance favouring the intervention was demonstrated for the low gingivitis group (BOP:37% vs 15%, p = 0.0523). A highly significant reduction in BOP (intervention vs control) was demonstrated for volunteers who swapped from manual to power-brush (44% vs 37%, p = 0.0039). Plaque score improved more in control than intervention group (Plaque:37% vs 44%, p = 0.00215). CONCLUSIONS: Behaviour change techniques were readily mastered by the dental professional researchers. The introduction of an oral hygiene behaviour change intervention significantly reduced gingivitis in volunteer patients compared to control at 3 months. Swapping to a power-brush significantly favoured BOP reduction compared to manual brush continuation although plaque reduction did not follow expectation in comparison to BOP scores. Behaviour change techniques should routinely be considered in patient care. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Plaque-induced gingivitis is highly prevalent in the UK despite being preventable with good oral hygiene. Its continuum, periodontitis, negative impacts quality of life. This study suggests oral hygiene behavioural interventions (GPS) significantly reduce gingivitis and that GPS introduction will improve oral health and may improve quality of life.