An open label, randomized phase 2 trial assessing the impact of food on the tolerability of abemaciclib in patients with advanced breast cancer.

PURPOSE: Abemaciclib, a CDK4 & 6 inhibitor, is indicated for advanced breast cancer treatment. Diarrhea is a frequently associated adverse event of abemaciclib. The study objective was to investigate if food intake impacts local gastrointestinal toxicity. METHODS: This Phase 2 study (I3Y-MC-JPCP, NCT03703466) randomized 72 patients 1:1:1 to receive abemaciclib 200 mg monotherapy twice daily (1) with a meal, (2) in a modified fasting state or (3) without regard to food. Primary endpoints included: incidence of investigator assessed severe (≥ Grade 3), prolonged (> 7 days) Grade 2 diarrhea, treatment discontinuation, dose modifications, and loperamide utilization during the first 3 cycles of treatment. Patient outcomes were captured via a daily electronic diary. Pharmacokinetics (PK) are reported. RESULTS: Incidence of investigator assessed severe diarrhea (Grade ≥ 3) was 1.4% (1 patient in Arm 1). Median duration of Grade 3 diarrhea was 1 day by both investigator assessment (1 patient in Arm 1) and patient-reported assessment (1 patient each in Arms 1 and 3). Median duration of investigator-assessed Grade 2 diarrhea was 2 days overall. No patient discontinued treatment due to diarrhea. Nine patients (12.7%) had a dose reduction, and 7 patients (9.9%) had a dose omission due to diarrhea. Ninety-four percent of patients used loperamide at least once. Abemaciclib PK was comparable across the 3 arms. CONCLUSION: The results suggest that diarrhea incidence associated with abemaciclib was unrelated to timing of food intake, was predominantly low grade, of short duration and well managed with loperamide and dose modifications.

The Physiological and Ergogenic Effects of Khat (Catha edulis Forsk) Extract.

BACKGROUND: Khat (Catha edulis Forsk) is a natural psychoactive substance which contains two main addictive substances; Cathine and Cathinone. Khat is widely used in east Africa and southern Arabian Peninsula. Khat chewers believe that it improves work capacity and increases energy level and alertness. That is why we aimed in this study to investigate the physiological and ergogenic effects of khat extract. METHODS: This study is an experimental study conducted at the Substance Abuse Research Centre in Jazan University, Saudi Arabia. Thirty healthy young volunteers were randomly assigned into two experimental groups. The first group ingested 45 g of grounded khat leaves extract mixed with juice in the first session then placebo (juice only) in the second session. While the second group ingested the placebo in the first session and the grounded khat leaves with juice in the second session. Experiments were done between December 2012 and March 2013. We recorded the blood pressure, heart rate, grip strength, and reaction time every 15 min for 75 min after each ingestion. The study proposal was reviewed and approved by Research Ethics Committee (REC) of the Medical Research Centre in Jazan University. RESULTS: The results showed the consumption of 45 g of grounded khat leaves contributed to the increase in blood pressure (SBP & DBP) and reaction time (p < 0.05); but had no significant effect on heart rate and grip strength (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this study showed that Khat has an acute effect on some physiological parameters. These findings support the prohibition of cathinone and cathine by the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA, 2016).

A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, phase 2 study of maintenance enzastaurin with 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin plus bevacizumab after first-line therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Enzastaurin and bevacizumab have demonstrated synergistic antitumor effects and, in phase 1 studies, the combination was well tolerated. This phase 2 study assessed enzastaurin with 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin plus bevacizumab as maintenance therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer (MCRC). METHODS: Patients with locally advanced or MCRC and stable or responding disease after completing 6 cycles of first-line chemotherapy randomly received a loading dose of enzastaurin 1125 mg, followed by 500 mg/d subsequent doses or placebo. Both arms received 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin (leucovorin 400 mg/m(2) intravenously [IV], 5-fluorouracil 400-mg/m(2) bolus, 5-fluorouracil 2400 mg/m(2) IV) plus bevacizumab 5 mg/kg IV, every 2 weeks. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS), from randomization. Overall survival (OS) and PFS were also assessed from start of first-line therapy. Enrollment was stopped, and the final analysis was conducted after 73 PFS events. RESULTS: Fifty-eight patients were randomized to enzastaurin and 59 to placebo. For the enzastaurin and placebo arms, respectively, the median cycles received were 9 and 10, and the median PFS was 5.8 and 8.1 months (hazard ratio [HR], 1.35; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.84-2.16; P = .896). Median OS was not calculable because of high censoring (77.6% enzastaurin; 91.5% placebo). The median PFS from start of first-line therapy was 8.9 months for enzastaurin and 11.3 months for placebo (HR, 1.39; 95% CI, 0.86-2.23; P = .913). More enzastaurin patients developed thrombosis or embolism compared with placebo (15.8% and 1.7%; P = .008). One possibly enzastaurin-related death occurred because of arrhythmia. CONCLUSIONS: Enzastaurin combined with bevacizumab-based therapy is tolerable, but does not improve PFS during maintenance therapy in patients with MCRC compared with bevacizumab-based therapy alone.

Pemetrexed in combination with cisplatin versus cisplatin monotherapy in patients with recurrent or metastatic head and neck cancer: final results of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 study.

BACKGROUND: Recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) is associated with poor survival. Platinum-based chemotherapy is often a first-line treatment. Pemetrexed has shown single-agent activity in SCCHN and in combination with cisplatin for other tumors. This trial examined the efficacy of pemetrexed-cisplatin for SCCHN. METHODS: In a double-blind phase 3 trial, patients with recurrent or metastatic SCCHN and no prior systemic therapy for metastatic disease were randomized to pemetrexed (500 mg/m(2) ) plus cisplatin (75 mg/m(2) ; n = 398) or placebo plus cisplatin (75 mg/m(2) ; n = 397) to assess overall survival (OS) and secondary endpoints. RESULTS: Median OS was 7.3 months in the pemetrexed-cisplatin arm and 6.3 months in the placebo-cisplatin arm (hazard ratio [HR], 0.87; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.75-1.02; P = .082). Median progression-free survival (PFS, months) was similar in both treatment arms (pemetrexed-cisplatin, 3.6; placebo-cisplatin, 2.8; HR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.76-1.03; P = .166). Among patients with performance status 0 or 1, pemetrexed-cisplatin (n = 347) led to longer OS and PFS than placebo-cisplatin (n = 343; 8.4 vs 6.7 months; HR, 0.83; P = .026; 4.0 vs 3.0 months; HR, 0.84; P = .044, respectively). Among patients with oropharyngeal cancers, pemetrexed-cisplatin (n = 86) resulted in longer OS and PFS than placebo-cisplatin (n = 106; 9.9 vs 6.1 months; HR, 0.59; P = .002; 4.0 vs 3.4 months; HR, 0.73; P = .047, respectively). Pemetrexed-cisplatin toxicity was consistent with studies in other tumors. CONCLUSIONS: Pemetrexed-cisplatin compared with placebo-cisplatin did not significantly improve survival for the intent-to-treat population. However, in a prespecified subgroup analysis, pemetrexed-cisplatin showed OS and PFS advantage for patients with performance status 0 or 1 or oropharyngeal cancers.

Abemaciclib in combination with pembrolizumab for HR+, HER2- metastatic breast cancer: Phase 1b study.

This nonrandomized, open-label, multi-cohort Phase 1b study (NCT02779751) investigated the safety and efficacy of abemaciclib plus pembrolizumab with/without anastrozole in patients with hormone receptor-positive (HR+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) metastatic breast cancer (MBC) without prior CDK4 and 6 inhibitor exposure. Patients were divided into two cohorts: treatment naïve (cohort 1) and pretreated (cohort 2). Patients received abemaciclib plus pembrolizumab with (cohort 1) or without (cohort 2) anastrozole over 21-day cycles. The primary objective was safety, and secondary objectives included efficacy and pharmacokinetics (PK). Cohort 1/2 enrolled 26/28 patients, respectively. Neutropenia (30.8/28.6%), AST increase (34.6/17.9%), ALT increase (42.3/10.7%), and diarrhea (3.8/10.7%) were the most frequent grade ≥3 adverse events in cohort 1/2, respectively. A total of two deaths occurred, which investigators attributed to treatment-related adverse events (AEs), both in cohort 1. Higher rates of all grade and grade ≥3 interstitial lung disease (ILD)/pneumonitis were observed compared to previously reported with abemaciclib and pembrolizumab monotherapy. The PK profiles were consistent between cohorts and with previous monotherapy studies. In cohorts 1/2, the overall response rate and disease control rate were 23.1/28.6% and 84.6/82.1%, respectively. Median progression-free survival and overall survivals were 8.9 (95% CI: 3.9-11.1) and 26.3 months (95% CI: 20.0-31.0) for cohort 2; cohort 1 data are immature. Abemaciclib plus pembrolizumab demonstrated antitumor activity, but high rates of ILD/pneumonitis and severe transaminase elevations occurred with/without anastrozole compared to the previous reporting. Benefit/risk analysis does not support further evaluation of this combination in the treatment of HR+, HER2- MBC.

Abemaciclib in Combination With Pembrolizumab for Stage IV KRAS-Mutant or Squamous NSCLC: A Phase 1b Study.

INTRODUCTION: Abemaciclib is an oral, selective small-molecule CDK 4 and 6 inhibitor. In preclinical models, abemaciclib synergized with programmed cell death protein-1 blockade to enhance antitumor efficacy. Here, we report the safety and anticancer activity of abemaciclib plus pembrolizumab in two cohorts with NSCLC. METHODS: This nonrandomized, open-label, phase 1b study included patients with previously untreated programmed death-ligand 1-positive, KRAS-mutant nonsquamous metastatic NSCLC (cohort A); squamous NSCLC after one previous platinum-containing chemotherapy regimen for metastatic disease (cohort B); and two breast cancer cohorts (disclosed separately). Patients received 150 mg abemaciclib every 12 hours plus 200 mg pembrolizumab intravenously on day 1 every 21 days. The primary objective was safety; secondary objectives included objective response rate, disease control rate, progression-free survival, and overall survival. Clinical Trial Number: NCT02779751. RESULTS: Each cohort enrolled 25 patients. Grades greater than or equal to 3 treatment-emergent adverse events in cohorts A and B were reported by 20 (80%) and 19 patients (76%), respectively. Six patients in cohort A (24.0%) and two patients in cohort B (8.0%) had a confirmed partial response; disease control rate was 56% and 64%, respectively. Median progression-free survival was 7.6 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.6-not estimable) and 3.3 months (95% CI: 1.4-5.2); median overall survival was 27.8 months (95% CI: 9.9-not estimable) and 6.0 months (95% CI: 3.7-13.1) in cohorts A and B, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of abemaciclib and pembrolizumab in stage IV NSCLC resulted in greater toxicity compared with that previously reported for each individual treatment. Risk-benefit profile does not warrant further evaluation of the combination in this population.

Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of pemetrexed plus cisplatin in chemonaive patients with locally advanced or metastatic malignant pleural mesothelioma or non-small cell lung cancer.

PURPOSE: Pemetrexed is approved as monotherapy and in combination with cisplatin. The established combination dose was identified before the addition of folic acid and vitamin B(12) to the treatment regimen. We evaluated the toxicity and pharmacokinetics (PK) of higher pemetrexed doses with cisplatin and vitamin supplementation. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma or non-small cell lung cancer received pemetrexed doses from 500 to 900 mg/m(2) + 75 mg/m(2) cisplatin once every 21 days. Folic acid and vitamin B(12) were administered per label recommendations. RESULTS: Twenty-one patients received a combined total of 84 cycles. The maximum tolerated dose was 900 mg/m(2) pemetrexed + 75 mg/m(2) cisplatin. Dose-limiting toxicities at this dose included grade 3 anemia, bronchopneumonia, and neutropenia, and 1 death from sepsis secondary to grade 4 febrile neutropenia, considered possibly related to study drugs. The recommended dose was 800 mg/m(2) pemetrexed + 75 mg/m(2) cisplatin. Pemetrexed PK were consistent across doses; pemetrexed did not seem to affect total or free platinum PK. CONCLUSIONS: Pemetrexed with vitamin supplementation was safe and well tolerated at higher doses than the currently established 500 mg/m(2) + 75 mg/m(2) cisplatin. Based on this study, the recommended dose would be 800 mg/m(2) pemetrexed + 75 mg/m(2) cisplatin. However, recent studies showed a lack of improved efficacy for 900 or 1,000 mg/m(2) single-agent pemetrexed versus 500 mg/m(2) and a lack of PK/pharmacodynamic exposure-response relationship for the pemetrexed/cisplatin combination across pemetrexed exposures corresponding to this dose range. Based on currently available evidence, we recommend retaining the established dose.

A Randomized Phase III Study of Abemaciclib Versus Erlotinib in Patients with Stage IV Non-small Cell Lung Cancer With a Detectable KRAS Mutation Who Failed Prior Platinum-Based Therapy: JUNIPER.

INTRODUCTION: JUNIPER compared the efficacy and safety of abemaciclib, a selective cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 inhibitor, with erlotinib in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring a Kirsten rat sarcoma (KRAS) mutation. METHODS: JUNIPER was a Phase III, multicenter, randomized, open-label trial of abemaciclib versus erlotinib in patients with stage IV NSCLC and a detectable mutation in codons 12 or 13 of the KRAS oncogene, who progressed after platinum-based chemotherapy and 1 additional therapy (could include immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy). Randomized patients (3:2) received either 200 mg abemaciclib twice daily or 150 mg erlotinib once daily with best supportive care until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS); secondary endpoints included overall response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and safety. RESULTS: Between December 2014 and April 2017, 453 patients were randomly assigned to receive abemaciclib (N = 270) or erlotinib (N = 183). Median OS was 7.4 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 6.5, 8.8) with abemaciclib and 7.8 months (95% CI: 6.4, 9.5) with erlotinib (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.968 [95% CI: 0.768, 1.219]; p = .77). Median PFS was 3.6 months (95% CI: 2.8, 3.8) with abemaciclib and 1.9 months (95% CI: 1.9, 2.0) with erlotinib (HR = 0.583 [95% CI: 0.470, 0.723]; p <.000001). ORR was 8.9% and 2.7% (p = .010), and the disease control rate was 54.4% and 31.7% (p <.001) with abemaciclib and erlotinib, respectively. Safety results reflected the known safety profiles of abemaciclib and erlotinib. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, the primary endpoint of OS was not met; PFS and ORR were improved with manageable toxicity in the abemaciclib arm. The increases in response rates and PFS support further investigation of abemaciclib in other NSCLC subpopulations or in combination with other agents. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: www.ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier: NCT02152631.

The Impact of Staging by Positron-Emission Tomography on Overall Survival and Progression-Free Survival in Patients With Locally Advanced NSCLC.

INTRODUCTION: We investigated the potential impact of stage migration because of positron-emission tomography (PET) scan staging on survival in the locally advanced (stage IIIA/B) NSCLC setting. METHODS: In PROCLAIM, 598 patients with stage IIIA/B nonsquamous NSCLC (intent-to-treat population) were randomized to either pemetrexed plus cisplatin and concurrent thoracic radiotherapy for 3 cycles followed by 4 cycles of pemetrexed consolidation or etoposide plus cisplatin and concurrent thoracic radiotherapy for 2 cycles followed by a consolidation platinum-based doublet regimen for up to 2 cycles. Baseline PET scan (PET Yes versus No) was one of the stratification factors. Subgroup analyses (PET Yes versus No) of overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were conducted on the intent-to-treat population regardless of treatment, as the study did not show superior efficacy for either arm. RESULTS: Majority (491 of 598; 82.1%) of patients had a baseline PET scan staging performed. A longer median OS (PET Yes versus No: 27.2 versus 20.8; hazard ratio = 0.81, p = 0.130) and an improved median PFS (PET Yes versus No: 11.3 versus 9.2; hazard ratio = 0.73, p = 0.012) were observed for patients with PET scans compared to those with conventional staging in both treatment arms. CONCLUSIONS: Both a significantly improved PFS and a numerically longer OS in the PET Yes subgroup, compared to patients with conventional staging, are consistent with improved survival due to stage migration. The magnitude of differences in OS and PFS based on PET scan is a reminder of the potential for factors other than the therapeutic intervention to affect outcomes.

A randomized phase II trial of pemetrexed plus irinotecan (ALIRI) versus leucovorin-modulated 5-FU plus irinotecan (FOLFIRI) in first-line treatment of locally advanced or metastatic colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: This multicenter, randomized trial compared overall response rate between pemetrexed plus irinotecan (ALIRI) and leucovorin-modulated 5-fluorouracil plus irinotecan (FOLFIRI) in patients with advanced colorectal cancer. Secondary objectives included overall and progression-free survival, duration of response, toxicities, and biomarkers. PATIENTS AND METHODS: ALIRI patients received pemetrexed 500 mg/m(2) and irinotecan 350 mg/m(2) with vitamin supplementation on day 1 of each 21-day cycle. FOLFIRI patients received irinotecan 180 mg/m(2) on days 1, 15, 29; on days 1, 2, 15, 16, 29, 30, patients received leucovorin 200 mg/m(2), bolus 5-fluorouracil 400 mg/m(2), and 5-fluorouracil 600 mg/m(2) as 22-hour infusion. RESULTS: Of 132 patients randomly assigned, 130 patients (64 = ALIRI, 66 = FOLFIRI) received > or =1 dose of treatment. Response rates (ALIRI = 20.0%, FOLFIRI = 33.3%) were not significantly different between arms (p = 0.095). Progression-free survival was 5.7 months for ALIRI and 7.7 months for FOLFIRI (p < 0.001). Neutropenia, fatigue, diarrhea, nausea, and vomiting were the major toxicities. There were 5 drug-related deaths (ALIRI = 4, FOLFIRI = 1). Biomarker analysis failed to reveal that any of the 18 preselected genes were clearly associated with tumor response. CONCLUSIONS: Neither efficacy nor safety improved on the ALIRI arm compared to the FOLFIRI arm. Progression-free survival on FOLFIRI was significantly longer compared to ALIRI. Potential biomarkers capable of predicting response to either regimen in advanced or metastatic colorectal carcinoma need further characterization.

A multicenter phase II study of single-agent enzastaurin in previously treated multiple myeloma.

Enzastaurin is an oral serine/threonine kinase inhibitor of the protein kinase C (PKC) and phosphatidylinositol 3 (PI3) kinase/Akt pathways that induces apoptosis in multiple myeloma (MM) cell lines in a caspase-independent manner. A phase II study was conducted to assess response rate, time to progression (TTP), safety and biomarker association with clinical outcomes after monotherapy with the PKC inhibitor enzastaurin in previously treated patients with MM. Eligible patients (n = 14) were treated with enzastaurin 250 mg twice daily after receiving loading doses on day 1. One minimal response was observed. The median TTP was 5.11 months. There were two grade 3 adverse events, anemia and prolonged QTc interval, and no grade 4 adverse events. Single-agent enzastaurin was well tolerated but not effective in this heavily pretreated population with MM.

Pemetrexed in head and neck cancer: a systematic review.

Pemetrexed has been evaluated as a novel chemotherapeutic for head and neck cancer (HNC). In this review, we examined the efficacy and tolerability of pemetrexed in patients with HNC. Relevant English-language literature was identified via PubMed and a review of published abstracts from the American Society of Clinical Oncology and European Society for Medical Oncology annual meetings from January 2000 through September 2012. Search terms were "pemetrexed" (or "LY231514") and "head and neck cancer." Completed prospective phase I to III trials of pemetrexed alone or in combination with other agents or radiotherapy evaluating objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and/or overall survival (OS) were eligible; ten studies were reviewed. Results for ORR, PFS, and/or OS in patients receiving pemetrexed in combination with other chemotherapeutic agents and/or radiotherapy were promising in the first-line treatment setting. Pemetrexed was associated with acceptable grade 3-4 hematologic toxicities; it did not result in nonhematologic toxicities commonly seen with cisplatin, such as nephrotoxicity, ototoxicity, and neuropathy. In a single phase III randomized trial, although median OS was longer for patients treated with pemetrexed plus cisplatin (7.3 months) versus cisplatin plus placebo (6.3 months), the difference did not reach statistical significance (P=.082). Results of this review suggest that pemetrexed is an active chemotherapeutic in combination with other agents or radiotherapy in patients with HNC. In particular, the role of pemetrexed as a radiosensitizer and potential alternative to cisplatin warrants investigation. More research is needed to clearly define the role of pemetrexed in HNC treatment.

Pemetrexed in combination with cisplatin versus cisplatin monotherapy in East Asian patients with recurrent or metastatic head and neck cancer: Results of an exploratory subgroup analysis of a phase III trial.

AIM: An exploratory subgroup analysis of East Asian (EA) patients in a phase III trial was conducted to assess efficacy and safety trends based on ethnicity. METHODS: The 795 patients with recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck included 111 EA patients randomized to pemetrexed-cisplatin (n = 55) and placebo-cisplatin (n = 56) and 684 non- EA patients randomized to pemetrexed-cisplatin (n = 343) and placebo-cisplatin (n = 341). Treatment differences in median overall survival and progression-free survival were compared using a stratified log-rank test. Survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: The median overall survival in the pemetrexed-cisplatin and placebo-cisplatin arms of the EA group (6.8 and 5.7 months, respectively [P = 0.275]) was similar to that in the global population (7.3 and 6.3 months, respectively [P = 0.082]); the median progression-free survival in the pemetrexed-cisplatin and placebo-cisplatin arms in the EA group (2.8 and 1.9 months, respectively [P = 0.748]) was similar to that in the global population (3.6 and 2.8 months, respectively [P = 0.166]). Compared to the findings in the global population, overall survival for the EA group receiving prior platinum-based therapy was longer (P = 0.042 vs P = 0.065). There was no significant interaction between treatment arms and ethnicity. CONCLUSION: Consistent with findings in the global population, pemetrexed-cisplatin did not improve survival compared with placebo-cisplatin for the EA group. However, in a subgroup analysis, pemetrexed-cisplatin showed an overall survival advantage in EA patients receiving prior platinum-based therapy.

A multicenter phase II study of single-agent enzastaurin in previously treated Waldenstrom macroglobulinemia.

PURPOSE: Enzastaurin is a serine/threonine kinase inhibitor that showed antiangiogenic, antiproliferative, and proapoptotic properties in vitro and antitumor activity in vivo in a xenograft Waldenström macroglobulinemia (WM) model. These findings provided the rationale for a multicenter phase II trial of oral enzastaurin in previously treated patients with WM. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Patients who were treated with 1 to 5 prior regimens and who had a baseline immunoglobulin M level 2 times or more the upper limit of normal received oral enzastaurin 250 mg twice daily (500 mg total) after a single loading dose (day 1, cycle 1) of 375 mg 3 times daily (1,125 mg total) for 8 cycles of 28 days each or until progressive disease. Six patients who progressed during treatment with enzastaurin had dexamethasone added per protocol. RESULTS: From July 2008 to December 2010, 42 patients were enrolled. The objective response rate (RR) was 38.1% (2 partial and 14 minor responses). One patient had grade 3 leukopenia and one patient died during the study from septic shock; both events were considered drug related. A statistically significant association between RR and interleukin 15 (IL-15) was observed, suggesting that higher concentration levels of IL-15 may be associated with better response. CONCLUSION: Enzastaurin was active and well tolerated in previously treated patients with WM. Because of the small sample size of this uncontrolled study, further assessment of the relationship between IL-15 and response to enzastaurin in patients with WM is required. These results warrant further investigation of enzastaurin for the treatment of WM.