Light Therapy in Chronic Migraine.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review assesses the effectiveness and safety of light therapy, particularly green light therapy, as an emerging non-pharmacological treatment for chronic migraine (CM). It aims to highlight alternative or complementary approaches to traditional pharmacological remedies, focusing the need for diverse treatment options. RECENT FINDINGS: Despite sensitivity to light being a defining feature of migraine, light therapy has shown promising signs in providing substantial symptom relief. Studies have provided insights into green light therapy's role in managing CM. These studies consistently demonstrate its efficacy in reducing the frequency, severity, and symptoms of migraines. Additional benefits observed include improvements in sleep quality and reductions in anxiety. Importantly, green light therapy has been associated with minimal side effects, indicating its potential as a suitable option for migraine sufferers. In addition to green light, other forms of light therapy, such as infrared polarized light, low-level laser therapy (LLLT), and intravascular irradiation of blood (ILIB), are also being explored with potential therapeutic effects. Light therapies, especially green light therapy, are recognized as promising, safe, and non-pharmacological interventions for treating CM. They have been shown to be effective in decreasing headache frequency and enhancing the overall quality of life. However, current studies, often limited by small sample sizes, prompt more extensive clinical trials to better understand the full impact of light therapies. The exploration of other light-based treatments, such as LLLT and ILIB, warrants further research to broaden the scope of effective migraine management strategies.

Idiopathic intracranial hypertension in Asians: a retrospective dual-center study.

BACKGROUND: There have been limited data on idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) in Asians and there remain uncertainties whether a cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) pressure of 250 mm CSF is an optimum diagnostic cutoff. The aims of the present study included (1) characterization of IIH patients in Taiwan, (2) comparisons among different diagnostic criteria for IIH, and (3) comparisons between patients with CSF pressures of > 250 and 200-250 mm CSF. METHODS: This retrospective study involved IIH patients based on the modified Dandy criteria from two tertiary medical centers in Taiwan. Clinical manifestations were retrieved from electronic medical records, and findings on ophthalmologic examination and magnetic resonance images (MRIs) were reviewed. RESULTS: A total of 102 patients (71 F/31 M, mean age 33.4 ± 12.2 years, mean CSF pressure 282.5 ± 74.5 mm CSF) were identified, including 46 (45.1%) with obesity (body-mass index ≥ 27.5), and 57 (62.6%) with papilledema. Overall, 80 (78.4%), 55 (53.9%), 51 (50.0%), and 58 (56.9%) patients met the Second and Third Edition of International Classification of Headache Disorders, Friedman, and Korsbæk criteria, respectively. Patients in the 200-250 mm CSF group (n = 40) were less likely to have papilledema (48.5% vs. 70.7%, p = 0.035), transient visual obscuration (12.5% vs. 33.9%, p = 0.005), and horizontal diplopia (10.0% vs. 30.6%, p = 0.006), and had fewer signs on MRIs (2.2 ± 1.3 vs. 2.8 ± 1.0, p = 0.021) when compared with those with CSF pressures > 250 mm CSF (n = 62). However, the percentages of patients with headache (95.0% vs. 87.1%, p = 0.109) at baseline, chronic migraine at six months (31.6% vs. 25.0%, p = 0.578), and visual field defect (86.7% vs. 90.3%, p = 0.709) were similar. CONCLUSIONS: It was found that obesity and papilledema were less common in Asian IIH patients when compared with Caucasian patients. Although patients with CSF pressures of 200-250 mm CSF had a less severe phenotype, the risks of having headache or visual loss were comparable to those in the > 250 mm CSF group. It is possible that a diagnostic cutoff of > 200 mm CSF could be more suitable for Asians, although further studies are still needed.

Update on gepants for the treatment of chronic migraine.

Chronic migraine (CM) is a profoundly debilitating condition that has detrimental clinical and social outcomes. Over the past two decades, novel small-molecule calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) receptor antagonists, known as gepants, and CGRP monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) have been developed, ushering in a new era of migraine-specific treatment. In this review, we discuss the literature investigating the role of gepants for the treatment of CM. Numerous completed and ongoing clinical studies have conclusively demonstrated the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of several gepants for the acute treatment of migraine. However, preventive trials involving gepants have focused on patients with episodic migraine, with atogepant being the only gepant approved for CM prevention by the US Food and Drug Administration at the time of writing. Although some preliminary positive results have been reported, further research is still required to achieve additional advancements in the future. In summary, the effectiveness of gepants for treating individuals with CM are highly expected. This review highlights the development and current progress of gepants for the treatment of CM, focusing both on their role as acute abortive agents and preventive measures and on their concomitant use with other antimigraine medications, such as CGRP mAbs or triptans.