Telehealth-Delivered Allied Health Interventions: A Rapid Umbrella Review of Systematic Reviews.

Introduction: Telehealth is used by allied health professionals to deliver health care remotely. This umbrella review addressed the following questions: (1) What telehealth interventions have been implemented to deliver allied health care? (2) What are the reported clinical benefits, and challenges of the implementation of telehealth delivered allied health interventions? (3) What are the reported experiences of patients and clinicians? Methods: A rapid umbrella systematic review method was utilized. Following a search of five electronic databases, only systematic reviews reporting on telehealth-delivery allied health interventions published in the past 10 years were included. Reported outcomes included clinical effectiveness, implementation factors, and patient/clinician experiences. Methodological quality was established using the A MeaSurement Tool to Assess systematic Reviews 2. Results: After applying eligibility criteria to 571 studies, 26 studies were included. Findings indicate that telehealth-delivered allied health interventions may obtain similar clinical outcomes as compared with face-to-face appointments. Patients reported less stress and valued the reduced need to travel when telehealth was used. Patient satisfaction with telehealth delivered care was equal to face-to-face care, and no differences were noted in the capacity to build therapeutic alliance when using telehealth. Difficulties with technology use were reported by clinicians and patients. Clinicians were identified as needing increased time management skills. Cautious interpretation of findings is recommended due to the quality rating of low to critical low for the majority of individual reviews. Conclusions: Telehealth-delivered care might obtain similar clinical outcomes to face-to-face care; however, difficulties may arise during broad implementation. It is recommended that health services be strategic to overcome implementation barriers and provide targeted support to enable effective, equitable, and sustained allied health service delivery via telehealth.

Access to and effectiveness of clinical supervision for allied health workers: A cross-sectional survey.

INTRODUCTION: Clinical supervision supports patient care and health worker wellbeing. However, access to effective clinical supervision is not equitable. We aimed to explore the access and effectiveness of clinical supervision in allied health workers. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey design using the Manchester Clinical Supervision Scale (MCSS-26), including open-ended survey responses, to collect data on effectiveness. Multivariable regression was conducted to determine how MCSS-26 scores differed across discipline, work location and setting. Open-ended responses were analysed using content analysis. RESULTS: 1113 workers completed the survey, with 319 (28%) reporting they did not receive supervision; this group were more likely to hold management positions, work in a medical imaging discipline and practice in a regional or rural location. For those who received supervision, MCSS-26 scores significantly differed between disciplines and work settings; psychologists and those practising in private practice settings (i.e. fee-for-service) reported the highest levels of effectiveness. Suggested strategies to enhance effectiveness included the use of alternate supervision models, dedicated time for supervision, and training. CONCLUSION: Targeted subgroups for improving access include senior staff, medical imaging professionals, and those working across regional and rural settings. Where supervision was least effective, strategies to address behaviours with organisational support may be required.

Research training incorporating education and mentoring for rural and regional allied health professionals: An evaluation study.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: Building rural health workforce research capacity is critical to addressing rural health inequalities. Research training is a mainstay research capacity building strategy. This paper describes the delivery and evaluation of a research training program for rural and regional allied health professions (AHPs). DESIGN: A mentored research training program was delivered to AHPs employed public health services in rural and regional Victoria, Australia. The program was evaluated using the Evidence-Based Practice Knowledge Attitudes and Practice (EBP-KAP) tool at baseline and 3 months post-training. Semi-structured interviews undertaken at 3 and 16 months post-training explored participants' perspectives of the training, their development and application of EBP and research skills. Survey data were analysed descriptively, and interview data were analysed using a framework approach. FINDINGS: Thirty-four individuals from 14 organisations attended the first workshop and 31 attended the second. Thirty-one participants completed the survey at baseline and nine at 3 months post-training. Sixteen interviews were undertaken with 11 participants, five participating at both time points. Participants had positive EBP attitudes at both time points. Overall, participants' knowledge and incorporation of EBP into their practice, and retrieval of evidence was unchanged 3 months post-training. Themes identified in the interview data were as follows: (1) individual research capacity enhanced through supported practice, (2) organisational factors influence individuals' progression of research and (3) individual contributions towards research capacity within the organisation. CONCLUSION: A mentored rural research training program promoted the application of EBP skills at the individual level and contributed to organisational research capacity.

The effect of behaviour change interventions on changes in physical activity and anthropometrics in ambulatory hospital settings: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to investigate whether behaviour change interventions promote changes in physical activity and anthropometrics (body mass, body mass index and waist circumference) in ambulatory hospital populations. METHODS: Randomised controlled trials were collected from five bibliographic databases (MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) and PsycINFO). Meta-analyses were conducted using change scores from baseline to determine mean differences (MD), standardised mean differences (SMD) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). The Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach was used to evaluate the quality of the evidence. RESULTS: A total of 29 studies met the eligibility criteria and 21 were included in meta-analyses. Behaviour change interventions significantly increased physical activity (SMD: 1.30; 95% CI: 0.53 to 2.07, p < 0.01), and resulted in significant reductions in body mass (MD: -2.74; 95% CI: - 4.42 to - 1.07, p < 0.01), body mass index (MD: -0.99; 95% CI: - 1.48 to - 0.50, p < 0.01) and waist circumference (MD: -2.21; 95% CI: - 4.01 to - 0.42, p = 0.02). The GRADE assessment indicated that the evidence is very uncertain about the effect of behaviour change interventions on changes in physical activity and anthropometrics in ambulatory hospital patients. CONCLUSIONS: Behaviour change interventions initiated in the ambulatory hospital setting significantly increased physical activity and significantly reduced body mass, body mass index and waist circumference. Increased clarity in interventions definitions and assessments of treatment fidelity are factors that need attention in future research. PROSPERO registration number: CRD42020172140.

Using the cognitive interviewing process to improve survey design by allied health: A qualitative study.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Allied health professionals frequently use surveys to collect data for clinical practice and service improvement projects. Careful development and piloting of purpose-designed surveys is important to ensure intended measuring (that respondents correctly interpret survey items when responding). Cognitive interviewing is a specific technique that can improve the design of self-administered surveys. The aim of this study was to describe the use of the cognitive interviewing process to improve survey design, which involved a purpose-designed, online survey evaluating staff use of functional electrical stimulation. METHODS: A qualitative study involving one round of cognitive interviewing with three occupational therapists and three physiotherapists. RESULTS: The cognitive interviewing process identified 11 issues with the draft survey, which could potentially influence the validity and quality of responses. The raised issues included difficulties with: processing the question to be able to respond, determining a response to the question, retrieving relevant information from memory and comprehending the written question. Twelve survey amendments were made following the cognitive interviewing process, comprising four additions, seven revisions and one correction. CONCLUSIONS: The cognitive interviewing process applied during the development of a purpose-designed survey enabled the identification of potential problems and informed revisions to the survey prior to its use.

Using functional electrical stimulation with stroke survivors: A survey of Victorian occupational therapists and physiotherapists.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Functional electrical stimulation (FES) improves active movement of the hemiplegic upper and lower limbs following stroke. The use of FES by Australian allied health clinicians in stroke rehabilitation is, however, unknown. The purpose of this study was to understand the use of FES in clinical practice. Reasons for the use of FES and potential variables that influence decision-making were also investigated. METHODS: Cross-sectional study of Victorian allied health clinicians, using a snowball recruitment method. Ninety-seven eligible therapists completed the anonymous online survey. Data were analysed using frequency distributions. RESULTS: The majority of respondents were occupational therapists (n = 60; 62%). Approximately half of the respondents (n = 50; 52%) reported using FES in the past two years to improve a stroke survivor's ability to use their arm in daily activities. Respondents suggested that receiving workplace training from colleagues to learn how to use FES is the preferred method of education. Of those who received education (n = 80), 50 participants reported using FES in their practice. CONCLUSION: There is variable use of FES in stroke rehabilitation to increase active movement after stroke. While there was moderate agreement about when to use FES and useful education approaches for learning to use FES, further research is needed to better understand strategies which could be implemented to support increased FES use in stroke rehabilitation.

Functional electrical stimulation improves activity after stroke: a systematic review with meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of functional electrical stimulation (FES) in improving activity and to investigate whether FES is more effective than training alone. DATA SOURCES: Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Ovid Medline, EBSCO Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Ovid EMBASE, Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro), and Occupational Therapy Systematic Evaluation of Effectiveness. STUDY SELECTION: Randomized and controlled trials up to June 22, 2014, were included following predetermined search and selection criteria. DATA EXTRACTION: Data extraction occurred by 2 people independently using a predetermined data collection form. Methodologic quality was assessed by 2 reviewers using the PEDro methodologic rating scale. Meta-analysis was conducted separately for the 2 research objectives. DATA SYNTHESIS: Eighteen trials (19 comparisons) were eligible for inclusion in the review. FES had a moderate effect on activity (standardized mean difference [SMD], .40; 95% confidence interval [CI], .09-.72) compared with no or placebo intervention. FES had a moderate effect on activity (SMD, .56; 95% CI, .29-.92) compared with training alone. When subgroup analyses were performed, FES had a large effect on upper-limb activity (SMD, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.33-1.05) and a small effect on walking speed (mean difference, .08m/s; 95% CI, .02-.15) compared with control groups. CONCLUSIONS: FES appears to moderately improve activity compared with both no intervention and training alone. These findings suggest that FES should be used in stroke rehabilitation to improve the ability to perform activities.

The use of mentoring for knowledge translation by allied health: a scoping review.

OBJECTIVE: To describe how allied health professionals have used mentoring as a knowledge translation strategy to inform practice. INTRODUCTION: Mentoring has been reported to be used by nursing and medicine as a knowledge translation strategy. It is not known if allied health professionals have also used mentoring to improve their use of research in practice, or what the key mentoring characteristics are that guide its application in allied health settings. Improved understanding of the barriers and facilitators to mentoring in allied health settings may be used to guide the design of future mentoring programs to assist knowledge translation. INCLUSION CRITERIA: Eligible studies must have included allied health professionals, and used the concept of mentoring to support knowledge translation in the context of healthcare. Primary empirical and synthesized studies were eligible. METHODS: An a-priori protocol was followed to complete a search of six databases (MEDLINE [OVID], EMBASE [OVID], CINAHL [EBSCO], PsycInfo [OVID], PDQ-Evidence ( www.pdq-evidence.org ), and Cochrane on the 9 March 2021. Screening for eligibility was conducted by two authors at the title and abstract stage and the full text stage. Selection criteria and the data extraction tool were established prior to the search. Findings are presented in narrative and tabular formats. RESULTS: A total of 2053 studies met the inclusion criteria for screening and nine were determined to be eligible for inclusion. Mentoring has been used by allied health professionals to improve the translation of interventional research evidence by clinicians, and to establish clinician skills and knowledge relating to knowledge translation processes. Mentoring was predominantly used as part of a multifaceted knowledge translation strategy alongside educational strategies. Mentoring characteristics such as structure, context, goals, resourcing and dosage varied depending on the context of translation. The specific barriers reported to using mentoring were varied, whereas the facilitators to mentoring were primarily related to the mentor's approach and expertise. The impact of mentoring was primarily measured through the mentee's experience of mentoring. CONCLUSIONS: Allied health professionals have used mentoring as a knowledge translation strategy to enhance the use of research evidence in their practice and to learn the process of knowledge translation. Mentoring is mostly used in conjunction with other strategies in practice, such as education. The limited number of identified barriers and facilitators to using mentoring as a knowledge translation strategy supports the need for future research to deepen our understanding about the mentoring process.

Family support role in hospital rapid response teams: a scoping review.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this review was to identify and understand the primary research investigating the family support role in hospital rapid response teams. INTRODUCTION: Individual studies have described the benefits of providing emotional and psychosocial support to family members of a person receiving emergency medical care from a rapid response team in a hospital setting. To the authors' knowledge, there are no studies that have identified and described these studies together. INCLUSION CRITERIA: All empirical qualitative and quantitative papers investigating a family support role delivered in a rapid response team in a hospital setting were included. METHODS: This review followed a published a priori protocol. The databases searched were MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase (Ovid), CINAHL (EBSCO), Cochrane Library, and OpenGrey. The search strategy was not limited by publication date or by language. The title and abstract of all citations were reviewed by two authors independently to assess against the inclusion criteria. The full text of the studies meeting the inclusion criteria were retrieved and reviewed by two authors independently. Data from eligible studies were extracted by two authors separately using a predetermined data extraction form and summarized in tabular and narrative format. RESULTS: After a full-text review of 110 studies, six studies met all inclusion criteria. The studies were set in four countries. All rapid response teams were set in hospital locations. Charted data demonstrated that the family support role had been investigated predominantly by qualitative study designs from the perspective of staff delivering the support. One study reported health outcomes of family members who received family support. In all studies, the family support role was part of a resuscitation rapid response team. Family support was provided at all stages of the resuscitation procedure. The family support role was not consistently defined, with the activities of the family support person reported differently between studies. Twenty-five varying support activities were described, such as attending to the family members'comfort needs, explaining the process of resuscitation, and providing guidance to the family member. In all studies, the family support role was available to support the family witnessing the resuscitation. The family support role was delivered by professionals from varying disciplines, including social workers, nurses, health care workers, and health care chaplains. CONCLUSIONS: Family support roles are varied and are carried out by health professionals of diverse backgrounds, highlighting the importance of considering the support and training needs of the person performing the role. Future research using evaluation methods is recommended to deepen the understanding about the family support role in hospital-based rapid response teams.

Understanding the research capacity and culture of a regional allied health workforce.

The aim of this study was to understand the research capacity and culture of a regional allied health workforce over time. A cross-sectional study design was used, with data collected using the validated Research Capacity and Culture (RCC) tool. The results were compared with an earlier administration of the RCC survey. The findings demonstrate that allied health professionals (AHPs) perceive that the organisation's capability of conducting research is at a higher level than that of teams and individuals. Over a 4-year period the profile of the research culture of an allied health workforce in a regional health service was described similarly. The highest rated motivator for conducting research (to develop skills) and barrier to conducting research (other work roles take priority) were unchanged between 2018 and 2014. AHPs have maintained the previous viewpoint that there is research capacity at the health service and opportunities to develop the research culture. The findings of the 2018 data compared with the 2014 data highlight that specific and targeted research capacity-building strategies need to be used in order to create an active and vibrant research culture.

The family support role in hospital rapid response teams: a scoping review protocol.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this review is to identify and understand how a family support role has been delivered in rapid response teams in hospital settings. INTRODUCTION: A family support role in a hospital rapid response team is a designated position that is responsible for supporting the family members of people being medically attended to during a hospital rapid response. Support may include the provision of guidance to the family regarding a hospital procedure, support whilst witnessing the rapid response, or assisting the family to process their emotional response. This review will assist in identifying the ways in which the family support role is delivered in rapid response teams within a hospital environment. INCLUSION CRITERIA: Family support must be delivered by a person who has a designated family support role within a rapid response team in a hospital setting. Studies will not be limited to geographical location, gender, or culture. Studies are not limited to year of publication or methodological design. METHODS: Databases will include MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase (Ovid), CINAHL, and Cochrane. Gray literature will be searched with predetermined search criteria. Two independent authors will be used to screen articles and perform data extraction on a predetermined data extraction form. A narrative Summary of Findings is planned, alongside a presentation of the data in diagrammatic or tabular form.

Mentoring for knowledge translation in allied health: a scoping review protocol.

OBJECTIVE: The primary objective of this review is to identify how allied health staff have used mentoring as a knowledge translation strategy to support practice change. Secondary objectives include identifying barriers and enablers to using mentoring as a knowledge translation strategy, and the methods used to evaluate the strategy. INTRODUCTION: Mentoring provides professional support and guidance while attending to the learning needs of the individual. Mentoring has been described in previous knowledge synthesis reviews as a strategy for nursing and medicine practitioners to improve capability and capacity to participate in knowledge translation to create practice change. To the authors' knowledge, a synthesis of the use of mentoring as a knowledge translation strategy by allied health staff has not been reported. INCLUSION CRITERIA: This scoping review will consider all studies that describe the use of mentoring with allied health staff to support practice change as directed by research evidence. The scoping review will not investigate the use of mentoring to increase the conduct of research in a clinical setting, nor will studies be included if the majority of participants are students. METHODS: A three-step search strategy will be undertaken. Two independent authors will screen articles and perform data extraction. The results will be presented in a narrative Summary of Findings, alongside a presentation of the data in diagrammatic or tabular form. The findings will inform future use of mentoring as a knowledge translation strategy in a regional health service.