RESUMO
Objective: This study was conducted to investigate the bidirectional causal relationship between obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and temporomandibular disorders (TMD). Methods: Using an online pooled dataset of genome-wide association studies (GWAS), a two-sample bi-directional Mendelian randomization (MR) method was implemented. Inverse variance weighting was used as the primary analyses approach, and other methods of MR Egger, weighted median method, MR-Egger, Simple mode, and Weighted mode analysis were conducted as supplements to evaluate the causal relationship between OSA and TMD with odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI). Furthermore, the Cochran Q, MR-Egger, and MR-PRESSO approaches were used to perform the heterogeneity test and multiple validity. Results: The general results of the forward MR analysis indicated that OSA had a significant causal influence on TMD (OR=1.241, 95% CI: 1.009-1.526, P=0.041), but no significant correlation was observed in the reverse MR analysis (IVW: OR=0.975, 95% CI=0.918-1.036, P=0.411). Conclusion: In summary, our research demonstrated a hereditary causative relationship between OSA and TMD, indicating that appropriate intervention is required for both prevention and treatment of TMD.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Early screening and accurate staging of diabetic retinopathy (DR) can reduce blindness risk in type 2 diabetes patients. DR's complex pathogenesis involves many factors, making ophthalmologist screening alone insufficient for prevention and treatment. Often, endocrinologists are the first to see diabetic patients and thus should screen for retinopathy for early intervention. AIM: To explore the efficacy of non-mydriatic fundus photography (NMFP)-enhanced telemedicine in assessing DR and its various stages. METHODS: This retrospective study incorporated findings from an analysis of 93 diabetic patients, examining both NMFP-assisted telemedicine and fundus fluorescein angiography (FFA). It focused on assessing the concordance in DR detection between these two methodologies. Additionally, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were generated to determine the optimal sensitivity and specificity of NMFP-assisted telemedicine, using FFA outcomes as the standard benchmark. RESULTS: In the context of DR diagnosis and staging, the kappa coefficients for NMFP-assisted telemedicine and FFA were recorded at 0.775 and 0.689 respectively, indicating substantial intermethod agreement. Moreover, the NMFP-assisted telemedicine's predictive accuracy for positive FFA outcomes, as denoted by the area under the ROC curve, was remarkably high at 0.955, within a confidence interval of 0.914 to 0.995 and a statistically significant P-value of less than 0.001. This predictive model exhibited a specificity of 100%, a sensitivity of 90.9%, and a Youden index of 0.909. CONCLUSION: NMFP-assisted telemedicine represents a pragmatic, objective, and precise modality for fundus examination, particularly applicable in the context of endocrinology inpatient care and primary healthcare settings for diabetic patients. Its implementation in these scenarios is of paramount significance, enhancing the clinical accuracy in the diagnosis and therapeutic management of DR. This methodology not only streamlines patient evaluation but also contributes substantially to the optimization of clinical outcomes in DR management.