Efficacy and Safety of Additional S-1 Chemotherapy to S-1 Plus Oxaliplatin Regimen Chemotherapy for Stage III Gastric Carcinoma after Radical Resection.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the efficacy and safety of additional S-1 chemotherapy to S-1 plus oxaliplatin (SOX) regimen chemotherapy for Stage III gastric carcinoma (GC) after radical resection. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 161 patients who were pathologically diagnosed as Stage III GC after D2 gastrectomy and received SOX regimen adjuvant chemotherapy between January 2012 and April 2016 were included in this retrospective study. SOX regimen postoperative chemotherapy was composed of Oxaliplatin and S-1, administrated every 3 weeks for 8 scheduled courses. After SOX chemotherapy, 76 patients preferred additional chemotherapy with S-1 (the ACT group), while additional S-1 chemotherapy was not given to the other 85 patients (control group). The ACT with S-1 was administrated every 3 weeks for 8 scheduled courses. Treatment was terminated in case of life-threatening adverse events or tumor progression, or patients' demand for termination. Progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and adverse events were analyzed. RESULTS: ACT group obtained markedly improved 3-year PFS [p = 0.04; hazard ratio (HR) for disease progression, 0.58; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.34-0.98] and OS than the control group (p = 0.0469; HR for death, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.32-0.99). No chemotherapy-related mortality occurred. Patients of the ACT group suffered more common and severer hand-foot syndrome (HFS) (p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Additional S-1 chemotherapy may be helpful for improving the disease progression and survival for patients with Stage III GC after radical resection with an acceptable safety profile.

Prophylactic hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy improved survival after curative resection in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: To explore the effect of prophylactic hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) on survival probability after curative resection in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). METHODOLOGY: 85 patients with HCC were randomly assigned to HAIC group (42 cases) and control group (43 patients), all the database of two groups had no significant difference. Patients in HAIC groups underwent hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy (5-FU 1000 mg/m2 on day 1, Oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2 on day 1 and Gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 on day 1 and 8) starting 3 weeks after operation with intervals of 4 weeks. All patients were followed up for 3 years and intrahepatic recurrence-free survival, disease-free survival rate and overall survival rate were recorded. RESULTS: Intrahepatic recurrence rate of HAIC group and the control group was respectively 19.05% and 39.53%, P < 0.05. Disease-free survival rate was respectively 57.14% and 44.19%, P < 0.05. Overall survival rate was 66.67% and 46.51%, P < 0.05. All patients in HAIC group tolerated the therapy. No adverse effect above grade 3 was reported in HAIC group. CONCLUSION: HAIC effectively and safely prevents intrahepatic recurrence and improves the prognosis of patients with HCC after curative resection.

Percutaneous transhepatic biliary stenting vs. surgical bypass in advanced malignant biliary obstruction: cost- effectiveness analysis.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: This study aims to compare the clinical outcomes and costs between percutaneous transhepatic biliary stenting (PTBS) and surgical bypass. METHODOLOGY: We randomly assigned 142 patients with unresectable malignant biliary obstruction between 2005 and 2010 to receive PTBS or surgical bypass as palliative treatment. PTBS was successfully performed in 70 patients who formed the PTBS group (failed in 7 patients). Sixty five patients underwent surgical bypass treatment. Additional gastrojejunostomy was performed in five patients. The effectiveness of biliary drainage, hospital stay, complications, cost, survival time and mortality were compared. RESULTS: Patients in PTBS group had shorter hospital stay and lower initial and overall expense than the surgical group (p<0.05). There was no significant difference in effectiveness of biliary drainage (p=0.9307) or survival time between two groups (p=0.4826). Early complications of PTBS group was significantly lower than surgical group (3/75 vs. 11/65, p=0.0342). Late complication in PTBS group did not differ significantly from surgical group (9/70 vs. 6/65, p=0.6823). The survival curves in the two groups showed no significant difference (p=0.1032). CONCLUSIONS: PTBD is a better palliative treatment than surgical bypass for unresectable malignant biliary obstruction for its high effectiveness of biliary drainage and acceptable expense and complication.

Hepatic vagotomy blunts liver regeneration after hepatectomy by downregulating the expression of interleukin-22.

BACKGROUND: Rapid regeneration of the residual liver is one of the key determinants of successful partial hepatectomy (PHx). At present, there is a lack of recognized safe, effective, and stable drugs to promote liver regeneration. It has been reported that vagus nerve signaling is beneficial to liver regeneration, but the potential mechanism at play here is not fully understood. AIM: To explore the effect and mechanism of hepatic vagus nerve in liver regeneration after PHx. METHODS: A PHx plus hepatic vagotomy (Hv) mouse model was established. The effect of Hv on liver regeneration after PHx was determined by comparing the liver regeneration levels of the PHx-Hv group and the PHx-sham group mice. In order to further investigate the role of interleukin (IL)-22 in liver regeneration inhibition mediated by Hv, the levels of IL-22 in the PHx-Hv group and the PHx-sham group was measured. The degree of liver injury in the PHx-Hv group and the PHx-sham group mice was detected to determine the role of the hepatic vagus nerve in liver injury after PHx. RESULTS: Compared to control-group mice, Hv mice showed severe liver injury and weakened liver regeneration after PHx. Further research found that Hv downregulates the production of IL-22 induced by PHx and blocks activation of the signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3) pathway then reduces the expression of various mitogenic and anti-apoptotic proteins after PHx. Exogenous IL-22 reverses the inhibition of liver regeneration induced by Hv and alleviates liver injury, while treatment with IL-22 binding protein (an inhibitor of IL-22 signaling) reduce the concentration of IL-22 induced by PHx, inhibits the activation of the STAT3 signaling pathway in the liver after PHx, thereby hindering liver regeneration and aggravating liver injury in PHx-sham mice. CONCLUSION: Hv attenuates liver regeneration after hepatectomy, and the mechanism may be related to the fact that Hv downregulates the production of IL-22, then blocks activation of the STAT3 pathway.

Prophylactic adjuvant hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy reduced hepatic metastases from Stage III colorectal cancer after curative resection.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: This study aims to investigate the safety and efficacy of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) on liver metastases of Stage III colorectal cancer patients after curative resection. METHODOLOGY: We randomly assigned 287 Stage III colorectal cancer patients after curative resection between 2002 and 2008 to receive 2 cycles of HAIC plus 4 cycles of systemic chemotherapy (combined therapy) or 6 cycles of systemic chemotherapy alone (monotherapy). Both the HAIC and systemic chemotherapy regimen consisted of a 2-hour infusion of Oxaliplatin (85mg/m2) on day 1 followed by folinic acid 200mg/m2 as a 2-hour infusion on days 2 and 3 and by 5-fluorouracil 2400mg/m2 as a 48-hour infusion on days 2 and 3. The treatment repeated every 4 weeks. The disease-free survival, overall survival and liver metastases-free survival were compared. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in adverse effects between two groups. Significant differences were found in 3-year disease-free survival (Combined therapy, 75.00%; Monotherapy, 63.27%; p=0.0035), overall survival (Combined therapy, 84.29%; Monotherapy, 65.31%; p=0.0006) and liver metastases-free survival (Combined therapy, 80.00%; Monotherapy, 69.39%; p=0.0451). CONCLUSIONS: HAIC effectively and safely prevents metachronous liver metastases and improves the prognosis of patients with Stage III colorectal cancer after curative resection.

[Dual regulation effect of somatostatin on immunity in patients with severe sepsis caused by abdominal diseases].

OBJECTIVE: to investigate the effect of somatostatin on inflammatory immune disorders and prognosis in patients with severe sepsis caused by abdominal diseases. METHODS: fifty-three patients with severe abdominal sepsis (age > 18 years, APACHE-II score > 15) from June 2005 to June 2009 were randomly divided into Somatostatin group (n = 23) and SSC Group (n = 30). Fifteen healthy volunteers of the same age range were chosen as Control group. The SSC group was treated with classical SSC therapy, and the Somatostatin Group was treated with the same regime plus 14-peptide somatostatin continuous infusion at the dose of 6 mg/24 h for 7 days. The serum levels of interleukin-10 (IL-10), tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) were determined by using ELISA. CD(4)(+), CD(8)(+) T cell subsets were determined by fluorescence activated cell sorter(FACS) and CD(4)(+)/CD(8)(+) was calculated. APACHE-II score was observed on admission (d1) and day 3, 7 and 14 after treatment. Morality rates in 28 days in two groups were recorded. RESULTS: compared with Control group, IL-10 and TNF-α levels were significantly elevated in patients with severe abdominal sepsis (P < 0.05), while CD(4)(+), CD(8)(+) T cell and CD(4)(+)/CD(8)(+) decreased significantly (P < 0.05). Compared with the Somatostatin group CD(4)(+), CD(8)(+) T cell and CD(4)(+)/CD(8)(+) on d7 and d14 in SSC Group were significantly increased (P < 0.05), while IL-10 and TNF-α decreased significantly(P < 0.05). APACHE-II scores on d3, d7, d14 of Somatostatin group were significantly lower than those of SSC group, and 28 d mortality rate also declined. CONCLUSIONS: in patients with severe abdominal sepsis, systemic inflammatory response and immune suppression exist simultaneously. Somatostatin has a dual immunomodulatory activity in these patients.