Using next-generation sequencing to redefine BRCAness in triple-negative breast cancer.

BRCAness is considered a predictive biomarker to platinum and poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors. However, recent trials showed that its predictive value was limited in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) treated with platinum. Moreover, tumors with mutations of DNA damage response (DDR) genes, such as homologous recombination (HR) genes, could be sensitive to platinum and PARP inhibitors. Thus, we aim to explore the relationship between mutation status of DDR genes and BRCAness in TNBC. We sequenced 56 DDR genes in 120 TNBC and identified BRCAness by array comparative genomic hybridization. The sequencing results showed that 13, 14, and 14 patients had BRCA, non-BRCA HR, and non-HR DDR gene mutations, respectively. Array comparative genomic hybridization revealed that BRCA-mutated and HR gene-mutated TNBC shared similar BRCAness features, both having higher numbers and longer length of large-scale structural aberration (LSA, >10 Mb) and similar altered chromosomal regions of LSA. These suggested non-BRCA HR gene-mutated TNBC shared similar characteristics with BRCA-mutated TNBC, indicating non-BRCA HR gene-mutated TNBC sensitive to platinum and PARP inhibitors. Among tumors with mutation of non-HR DDR genes, 3 PTEN and 1 MSH6 mutation also contained significant LSAs (BRCAness); however, they had different regions of genomic alteration to BRCA and HR gene-mutated tumors, might explain prior findings that PTEN- and MSH6-mutated cancer cells not sensitive to PARP inhibitors. Therefore, we hypothesize that the heterogeneous genomic background of BRCAness indicates different responsiveness to platinum and PARP inhibitors. Direct sequencing DDR genes in TNBC should be applied to predict their sensitivity toward platinum and PARP inhibitors.

Circulating Tumor DNA as a Predictive Marker of Recurrence for Patients With Stage II-III Breast Cancer Treated With Neoadjuvant Therapy.

BACKGROUND: Patients with stage II to III breast cancer have a high recurrence rate. The early detection of recurrent breast cancer remains a major unmet need. Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) has been proven to be a marker of disease progression in metastatic breast cancer. We aimed to evaluate the prognostic value of ctDNA in the setting of neoadjuvant therapy (NAT). METHODS: Plasma was sampled at the initial diagnosis (defined as before NAT) and after breast surgery and neoadjuvant therapy(defined as after NAT). We extracted ctDNA from the plasma and performed deep sequencing of a target gene panel. ctDNA positivity was marked by the detection of alterations, such as mutations and copy number variations. RESULTS: A total of 95 patients were enrolled in this study; 60 patients exhibited ctDNA positivity before NAT, and 31 patients exhibited ctDNA positivity after NAT. A pathologic complete response (pCR) was observed in 13 patients, including one ER(+)Her2(-) patient, six Her2(+) patients and six triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) patients. Among the entire cohort, multivariate analysis showed that N3 classification and ctDNA positivity after NAT were independent risk factors that predicted recurrence (N3, hazard ratio (HR) 3.34, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.26 - 8.87, p = 0.016; ctDNA, HR 4.29, 95% CI 2.06 - 8.92, p < 0.0001). The presence of ctDNA before NAT did not affect the rate of recurrence-free survival. For patients with Her2(+) or TNBC, patients who did not achieve pCR were associated with a trend of higher recurrence (p = 0.105). Advanced nodal status and ctDNA positivity after NAT were significant risk factors for recurrence (N2 - 3, HR 3.753, 95% CI 1.146 - 12.297, p = 0.029; ctDNA, HR 3.123, 95% CI 1.139 - 8.564, p = 0.027). Two patients who achieved pCR had ctDNA positivity after NAT; one TNBC patient had hepatic metastases six months after surgery, and one Her2(+) breast cancer patient had brain metastasis 13 months after surgery. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggested that the presence of ctDNA after NAT is a robust marker for predicting relapse in stage II to III breast cancer patients.