Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Eur Respir J ; 34(2): 365-70, 2009 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19251778

RESUMO

High cervical spinal cord injuries induce extreme handicap and tactile isolation. Tracheotomised tetraplegic patients are also bound to be olfaction deprived. By restoring negative pressure inspiration, diaphragm pacing (DP) should improve olfaction. We tested olfaction in 10 consecutive tetraplegics during positive pressure mechanical ventilation and DP, using the University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test (UPSIT). Quality of life was assessed using the Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS). Self-perceived benefits of DP were studied using an in-house questionnaire. Olfaction was very poor during positive pressure mechanical ventilation (UPSIT, mean+/-SD 17.1+/-6.4, anosmia or severe microsmia). It improved during DP (35.2+/-1.9, normosmia or mild microsmia; p<0.0001) and SWLS was 18.5+/-4.2. Nine patients stated that DP had improved their quality of life. This was driven by better mobility (ranked first), improved self-image and relationships with others (ranked second), improved olfaction and better feeling of security (both ranked third). Improved olfaction is among the benefits of DP and should be mentioned to patients considered for this therapy. Furthermore, attention to olfaction is warranted in tracheotomised ventilator-dependent patients, as a putative path towards improvement of quality of life.


Assuntos
Diafragma/fisiopatologia , Quadriplegia/fisiopatologia , Quadriplegia/reabilitação , Olfato , Adulto , Terapia por Estimulação Elétrica/métodos , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Nervo Frênico/fisiopatologia , Pressão , Qualidade de Vida , Respiração Artificial , Inquéritos e Questionários
2.
Ann Intensive Care ; 6(1): 60, 2016 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27389016

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Simulation-based teaching offers promising and diverse teaching possibilities. We aim to assess whether the death of the manikin increased anxiety amongst learner compared to similar simulation-based course where the manikin stays alive. METHODS: We conducted a cluster randomized study amongst multidisciplinary teams of emergency workers. Teams of physicians, nurses, and healthcare assistants were randomly assigned to participate in a simulation-based course where the simulated patient died (death group) or not (life group). We assessed anxiety at 1 month after the teaching using Spielberger STAI-state anxiety questionnaire. We compared reduction of anxiety when facing a life-threatening situation in both groups. RESULTS: We included 25 teams for a total of 129 participants. We analysed 63 participants in the death group and 57 in the life group. Baseline characteristics were similar in both groups, including baseline anxiety (STAI-state score 39.6 (7.8) in the death group vs 38.6 (7.1) in the life group). We report a significant reduction in both groups 1 month after the training: 6.6 (7.8) vs 6 (8.0), mean difference 0.5 (-2.4; 3.4). At 3 months, we report a significant greater reduction of anxiety in the death group (mean difference 4 [0.1; 7.9]). CONCLUSION: We observed in our sample that unexpected simulated patient death did not increase anxiety amongst multidisciplinary emergency workers.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA