Extensive myocardial calcifications: a systematic literature review of a rare pathological phenomenon.

Introduction: Myocardial calcifications (MC) represent a relatively rare pathological process, which may accompany different cardiovascular conditions and can be broadly categorized as dystrophic or metastatic. Myocardial infarction (MI) has been traditionally regarded as the main cause of MC overall; however, no updated comprehensive data on the relative incidence of different forms of MC is available. The purpose of this systematic review of the literature is to analyze the currently available evidence on MC in terms of pathophysiology, diagnosis, and clinical presentation. Methods and results: A total of 241 studies including a total of 368 patients affected by extensive MC were included in the final review. The majority of patients (69.8%) presented with dystrophic MC. Endomyocardial fibrosis (EMF) represents the single most common etiology of MC (24.2%), while sepsis/acute systemic inflammatory syndrome (SIRS) and chronic kidney disease were identified as the second and third most common causes respectively. The relative incidence of etiologies also varies across the years, with MI being more represented before 1990, and sepsis/SIRS becoming the single most common cause of MC after 1990. Multimodality imaging was used in the work-up of MC in 42.7% of cases. The most commonly employed imaging modality overall was echocardiography (51.9%), while after 1990 computed tomography scan became the most widely used tool (70.1%). Conclusion: The present systematic review provides new insights into the pathophysiology of MC. Previously thought to be mainly a consequence of ischemic heart disease, our data indicate that other diseases, namely EMF and sepsis/SIRS, are indeed the main conditions associated with MC. The importance of multimodality imaging in the work-up of MC is also highlighted.

Impact of Sex on Severity Assessment and Cardiac Remodeling in Primary Mitral Regurgitation.

Background: Women with severe primary mitral regurgitation (MR) have lower surgery rates than men and could suffer from delayed referral for mitral valve (MV) intervention, exposing them to an increased risk of postoperative adverse outcomes. Objectives: The purpose of this study was to assess the sex-based differences in patients with primary MR. Methods: The study sample consisted of 420 patients (median age: 62 years, 26% women) with primary MR due to valve prolapse referred for preoperative assessment who underwent transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) and cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging. Multiple endpoints (abnormally increased left ventricular size, NYHA functional class III/IV, severe left atrial [LA] dilatation, pulmonary hypertension) were studied using areas under the curves and logistic regression models. Results: Women were older than men, had higher NYHA functional class and larger indexed LA volumes (all P ≤ 0.031), despite displaying lower MR effective regurgitant orifice area, regurgitant volumes (RegVol), and ventricular volumes than men (all P ≤ 0.002). The optimal cut-off values of RegVol associated with abnormally increased left ventricular size according to reference normal values were lower in women (TTE: 67 ml, CMR: 50 ml) than in men (TTE: 77 ml, CMR: 65 ml). MR regurgitant fraction, but not RegVol, was associated in women and men with NYHA functional class III/IV, severe LA dilatation, and pulmonary hypertension (all areas under the curves, P ≤ 0.024). Conclusions: Despite having hallmarks of more advanced valvular heart disease, women with significant primary MR demonstrate lower mitral RegVol and ventricular volumes than men. In contrast, the systematic calculation of MR regurgitant fraction could standardize MR quantification irrespective of sex.

Is there a role for cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging in the assessment of biological aortic valves?

Patients with biological aortic valves (following either surgical aortic valve replacement [SAVR] or trans catheter aortic valve implantation [TAVI]) require lifelong follow-up with an imaging modality to assess prosthetic valve function and dysfunction. Echocardiography is currently the first-line imaging modality to assess biological aortic valves. In this review, we discuss the potential role of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) as an additional imaging modality in situations of inconclusive or equivocal echocardiography. Planimetry of the prosthetic orifice can theoretically be measured, as well as the effective orifice area, with potential limitations, such as CMR valve-related artefacts and calcifications in degenerated prostheses. The true benefit of CMR is its ability to accurately quantify aortic regurgitation (paravalvular and intra-valvular) with a direct and reproducible method independent of regurgitant jet morphology to accurately assess reverse remodelling and non-invasively detect focal and interstitial diffuse myocardial fibrosis. Following SAVR or TAVI for aortic stenosis, interstitial diffuse fibrosis can regress, accompanied by structural and functional improvement that CMR can accurately assess.