Efficacy of endoscopic surveillance for pharyngeal mucosa during endoscopic resection for pharyngeal carcinoma: a multicenter prospective study.

INTRODUCTION: Since patients with pharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) often have multiple pharyngeal lesions, evaluation of pharyngeal lesions before endoscopic resection (ER) is important. However, detailed endoscopic observation of the entire pharyngeal mucosa under conscious sedation is difficult. We examined the usefulness of endoscopic surveillance with narrow band imaging (NBI) and lugol staining for detection of pharyngeal sublesions during ER for pharyngeal SCC under general anesthesia (endoscopic surveillance during treatment; ESDT). METHODS: From January 2021 through June 2022, we examined 78 patients who were diagnosed with superficial pharyngeal SCC and underwent ER. They underwent the ESDT and for patients who were diagnosed with new lesions of pharyngeal SCC or high-grade dysplasia (HGD) that were not detected in the endoscopic examination before treatment, ER were performed simultaneously for new lesions and the main lesions. The primary endpoint of this study was the detection rate of new lesions of pharyngeal SCC or HGD in the ESDT. RESULTS: Fifteen of the 78 patients were diagnosed as having undetected new pharyngeal lesions in the ESDT and 10 (12.8%) (95% CI 6.9-22.2%) were histopathologically confirmed to have new lesions of pharyngeal SCC or HGD. Among the 13 lesions of SCC or HGD, 8 were found by NBI observation; however, 5 were undetectable using NBI but detectable by lugol staining. All of the 13 lesions had endoscopic findings of pink color sign on lugol staining. CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic surveillance for pharyngeal sublesions during ER for pharyngeal SCC is feasible and useful.

Hyperechogenicity and histopathological features of focal liver lesions.

The identification and accurate diagnosis of focal liver lesions are important in modern medicine, where diagnostic radiology plays an essential role. This review aimed to examine the hyperechogenicity and histopathological features of focal liver lesions. Hyperechogenic liver lesions can be either benign or malignant. Evidence shows that hyperechogenicity is caused by factors such as fat deposition, sinusoidal dilation, peliotic changes, and pseudoglandular patterns. Fat deposition is a common cause of increased echogenicity in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Meanwhile, sinusoidal dilation and peliotic changes are more frequently observed in larger HCC nodules. Pseudoglandular patterns, characterized by the reflection of ultrasound waves at the walls of numerous acini, are associated with hyperechogenicity in well-to-moderately differentiated HCCs. Moreover, this review comprehensively examined the histological features that may cause hyperechogenic internal echoes in not only HCCs but also localized liver lesions (metastases of adenocarcinoma and neuroendocrine neoplasm, intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, cavernous hemangioma, focal nodular hyperplasia, and angiomyolipoma). To make an accurate diagnosis and provide appropriate management, it is important to understand the histopathological basis for hyperechogenicity in focal liver lesions. By maximizing the accuracy of imaging studies and enhancing the radiology-pathology correlation, unnecessary biopsies can be avoided, thereby reducing potential complications and mortality. This review can help facilitate the effective management of patients with focal liver lesions, thereby resulting in timely and appropriate treatment decision-making.

The white ring sign is useful for differentiating between fundic gland polyps and gastric adenocarcinoma of the fundic gland type.

Background and study aims Gastric adenocarcinoma of the fundic gland type (GA-FG) is characterized by an elevated lesion with vessel dilation exhibiting branching architecture (DVBA). However, this feature is also found in fundic gland polyps (FGPs), posing a challenge in their differentiation. In this study, we aimed to investigate the clinicopathological features of gastric elevated lesions with DVBA and assess the efficacy of the white ring sign (WRS) as a novel marker for distinguishing between FGPs and GA-FGs. Methods We analyzed 159 gastric elevated lesions without DVBA and 51 gastric elevated lesions with DVBA, further dividing the latter into 39 in the WRS-positive group and 12 in the WRS-negative group. The clinicopathological features, diagnostic accuracy, and inter-rater reliability were analyzed. Results Univariate and multivariate analyses for gastric elevated lesions with DVBA identified the histological type consistent with FGPs and GA-FGs, along with the presence of round pits in the background gastric mucosa, as independent predictors. FGPs were present in 92.3% (36/39) of the WRS-positive group and GA-FGs were observed in 50.0% (6/12) of the WRS-negative group. WRS positivity and negativity exhibited high diagnostic accuracy, with 100% sensitivity, 80.0% specificity, and 94.1% accuracy for FGPs, and 100% sensitivity, 86.7% specificity, and 88.2% accuracy for GA-FGs. Kappa values for WRS between experts and nonexperts were 0.891 and 0.841, respectively, indicating excellent agreement. Conclusions WRS positivity and negativity demonstrate high diagnostic accuracy and inter-rater reliability for FGPs and GA-FGs, respectively, suggesting that WRS is a useful novel marker for distinguishing between FGPs and GA-FGs.