Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
País/Região como assunto
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Assunto da revista
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
New Phytol ; 200(2): 350-365, 2013 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23844931

RESUMO

Considerable uncertainty surrounds the fate of Amazon rainforests in response to climate change. Here, carbon (C) flux predictions of five terrestrial biosphere models (Community Land Model version 3.5 (CLM3.5), Ecosystem Demography model version 2.1 (ED2), Integrated BIosphere Simulator version 2.6.4 (IBIS), Joint UK Land Environment Simulator version 2.1 (JULES) and Simple Biosphere model version 3 (SiB3)) and a hydrodynamic terrestrial ecosystem model (the Soil-Plant-Atmosphere (SPA) model) were evaluated against measurements from two large-scale Amazon drought experiments. Model predictions agreed with the observed C fluxes in the control plots of both experiments, but poorly replicated the responses to the drought treatments. Most notably, with the exception of ED2, the models predicted negligible reductions in aboveground biomass in response to the drought treatments, which was in contrast to an observed c. 20% reduction at both sites. For ED2, the timing of the decline in aboveground biomass was accurate, but the magnitude was too high for one site and too low for the other. Three key findings indicate critical areas for future research and model development. First, the models predicted declines in autotrophic respiration under prolonged drought in contrast to measured increases at one of the sites. Secondly, models lacking a phenological response to drought introduced bias in the sensitivity of canopy productivity and respiration to drought. Thirdly, the phenomenological water-stress functions used by the terrestrial biosphere models to represent the effects of soil moisture on stomatal conductance yielded unrealistic diurnal and seasonal responses to drought.


Assuntos
Ciclo do Carbono , Carbono/metabolismo , Modelos Biológicos , Árvores/fisiologia , Água/fisiologia , Biomassa , Brasil , Dióxido de Carbono/metabolismo , Ritmo Circadiano , Desidratação , Secas , Ecossistema , Oxigênio/metabolismo , Fotossíntese/fisiologia , Folhas de Planta/fisiologia , Solo , Árvores/crescimento & desenvolvimento , Clima Tropical , Madeira
2.
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci ; 368(1619): 20120155, 2013 Jun 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23610166

RESUMO

A mosaic of protected areas, including indigenous lands, sustainable-use production forests and reserves and strictly protected forests is the cornerstone of conservation in the Amazon, with almost 50 per cent of the region now protected. However, recent research indicates that isolation from direct deforestation or degradation may not be sufficient to maintain the ecological integrity of Amazon forests over the next several decades. Large-scale changes in fire and drought regimes occurring as a result of deforestation and greenhouse gas increases may result in forest degradation, regardless of protected status. How severe or widespread these feedbacks will be is uncertain, but the arc of deforestation in south-southeastern Amazonia appears to be particularly vulnerable owing to high current deforestation rates and ecological sensitivity to climate change. Maintaining forest ecosystem integrity may require significant strengthening of forest conservation on private property, which can in part be accomplished by leveraging existing policy mechanisms.


Assuntos
Conservação dos Recursos Naturais/métodos , Ecossistema , Clima Tropical , Brasil , Dióxido de Carbono/análise , Secas , Política Ambiental , Incêndios , Efeito Estufa , Chuva , Árvores
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA