RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To compare the Danish Emergency Process Triage (DEPT) with a quick clinical assessment (Eyeball triage) as predictors of short-term mortality in patients in the emergency department (ED). METHODS: The investigation was designed as a prospective cohort study conducted at North Zealand University Hospital. All patient visits to the ED from September 2013 to December 2013 except minor injuries were included. DEPT was performed by nurses. Eyeball triage was a quick non-systematic clinical assessment based on patient appearance performed by phlebotomists. Both triage methods categorised patients as green (not urgent), yellow, orange or red (most urgent). Primary analysis assessed the association between triage level and 30-day mortality for each triage method. Secondary analyses investigated the relation between triage level and 48-hour mortality as well as the agreement between DEPT and Eyeball triage. RESULTS: A total of 6383 patient visits were included. DEPT was performed for 6290 (98.5%) and Eyeball triage for 6382 (~100%) of the patient visits. Only patients with both triage assessments were included. The hazard ratio (HR) for 48-hour mortality for patients categorised as yellow was 0.9 (95% CI 0.4 to 1.9) for DEPT compared with 4.2 (95% CI 1.2 to 14.6) for Eyeball triage (green is reference). For orange the HR for DEPT was 2.2 (95% CI 1.1 to 4.4) and 17.1 (95% CI 5.1 to 57.1) for Eyeball triage. For red the HR was 30.9 (95% CI 12.3 to 77.4) for DEPT and 128.7 (95% CI 37.9 to 436.8) for Eyeball triage. For 30-day mortality the HR for patients categorised as yellow was 1.7 (95% CI 1.2 to 2.4) for DEPT and 2.4 (95% CI 1.6 to 3.5) for Eyeball triage. For orange the HR was 2.6 (95% CI 1.8 to 3.6) for DEPT and 7.6 (95% CI 5.1 to 11.2) for Eyeball triage, and for red the HR was 19.1 (95% CI 10.4 to 35.2) for DEPT and 27.1 (95% CI 16.9 to 43.5) for Eyeball triage. Agreement between the two systems was poor (kappa 0.05). CONCLUSION: Agreement between formalised triage and clinical assessment is poor. A simple clinical assessment by phlebotomists is superior to a formalised triage system to predict short-term mortality in ED patients.
Assuntos
Avaliação em Enfermagem/normas , Medição de Risco/métodos , Triagem/normas , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Competência Clínica/normas , Estudos de Coortes , Dinamarca , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/organização & administração , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/tendências , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Mortalidade/tendências , Avaliação em Enfermagem/métodos , Estudos Prospectivos , Sistema de Registros/estatística & dados numéricos , Medição de Risco/normas , Triagem/métodosRESUMO
This study aimed to develop and validate "the Imprint method,", a technique for sampling microbes from chronic wounds while preserving their two-dimensional spatial organization. We used nylon filters to sample bacteria and compared with sampling using Eswabs in 12 patients. The Imprint method identified a mean of 0.93 unique species more than Eswab (4.3 ± 2.2 and 3.4 ± 1.4 unique species, respectively; mean ± SD; n = 30). Accuracy between the Eswab and the Imprint method was 93.2% and in cases of disagreement between methods, Imprint had a higher sensitivity in 6/8 of the most prevalent species. In vitro validation confirmed that the Imprint method could transfer bacterial colonies while replicating their two-dimensional organization and the area covered by bacteria on the plate sampled. Clinical testing demonstrated that the imprint method is a rapid and feasible technique that identified more unique bacterial species than Eswab with a good agreement between methods but that Imprint was better at detecting important pathogens such as Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. The Imprint method is a novel technique that cultures and records the two-dimensional organization of microbes, providing an alternative or supplement to conventional surface culture using Eswab.
Assuntos
Bactérias , Infecções Estafilocócicas , Humanos , Staphylococcus aureus , Manejo de Espécimes/métodos , Infecções Estafilocócicas/microbiologia , Pseudomonas aeruginosaRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Chronic wounds affect 1%-2% of the global population, with rising incidence due to ageing and lifestyle-related diseases. Bacterial biofilms, found in 80% of chronic wounds, and scattered single-cell bacteria may hinder healing. Microbes are believed to negatively impact healing by exacerbating inflammation and host immune response. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The primary objective of the chronic wound characterisation (CWC) study is to investigate chronic wounds through a prospective observational cohort study exploring bacterial community composition, inflammatory responses and the influence of bacteria on wound-healing trajectories. The CWC study will be investigated through two cohorts: the predictive and in-depth.The predictive cohort includes patients with a chronic wound scheduled for mechanical debridement. The debrided material will be collected for dual RNA sequencing and 16s ribosomal RNA gene sequencing, as well as samples for microbial culturing and a photo to assess the wound. Clinical data is recorded, and healing and/or other clinical endpoints are established through medical records.The in-depth cohort includes and follows patients undergoing split-thickness skin grafting. Extensive sampling (ESwabs, biopsies, tape strips, debrided material and a sample of the skin graft) will be performed on surgery and patients will be seen at two follow-up visits. Samples will be analysed through culturing and next-generation sequencing methods. A biobank will be established comprising longitudinal clinical samples and clinical data. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study has been approved by the board of health ethics, Capital Region of Denmark, under protocol number H-20032214. The study findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and showcased at both national and international conferences and meetings within the domains of microbiology, wound healing and infection.
Assuntos
Bancos de Espécimes Biológicos , Cicatrização , Humanos , Estudos Prospectivos , Doença Crônica , Inflamação/microbiologia , Desbridamento/métodos , Microbiota , Transplante de Pele , Bactérias/genética , Bactérias/isolamento & purificação , Biofilmes , Estudos Observacionais como Assunto , RNA Ribossômico 16S/genética , Projetos de Pesquisa , Ferimentos e Lesões/microbiologiaRESUMO
Bacterial biofilms residing in chronic wounds are thought to have numerous survival strategies, making them extremely difficult to eradicate and resulting in long-term infections. However, much of our knowledge regarding biofilm persistence stems from in vitro models and experiments performed in vivo in animal models. While the knowledge obtained from such experiments is highly valuable, its direct translation to the human clinical setting should be undertaken with caution. In this review, we highlight knowledge obtained from human clinical samples in different aspects of biofilm survival strategies. These strategies have been divided into segments of the following attributes: altered transcriptomic profiles, spatial distribution, the production of extracellular polymeric substances, an altered microenvironment, inter-and intra-species interactions, and heterogeneity in the bacterial population. While all these attributes are speculated to contribute to the enhanced persistence of biofilms in chronic wounds, only some of them have been demonstrated to exist in human wounds. Some of the attributes have been observed in other clinical diseases while others have only been observed in vitro. Here, we have strived to clarify the limitations of the current knowledge in regard to this specific topic, without ignoring important in vitro and in vivo observations.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Prioritization of acutely ill patients in the Emergency Department remains a challenge. We aimed to evaluate whether routine blood tests can predict mortality in unselected patients in an emergency department and to compare risk prediction with a formalized triage algorithm. METHODS: A prospective observational cohort study of 12,661 consecutive admissions to the Emergency Department of Nordsjælland University Hospital during two separate periods in 2010 (primary cohort, n = 6279) and 2013 (validation cohort, n = 6383). Patients were triaged in five categories by a formalized triage algorithm. All patients with a full routine biochemical screening (albumin, creatinine, c-reactive protein, haemoglobin, lactate dehydrogenase, leukocyte count, potassium, and sodium) taken at triage were included. Information about vital status was collected from the Danish Central Office of Civil registration. Multiple logistic regressions were used to predict 30-day mortality. Validation was performed by applying the regression models on the 2013 validation cohort. RESULTS: Thirty-day mortality was 5.3%. The routine blood tests had a significantly stronger discriminative value on 30-day mortality compared to the formalized triage (AUC 88.1 [85.7;90.5] vs. 63.4 [59.1;67.5], p < 0.01). Risk stratification by routine blood tests was able to identify a larger number of low risk patients (n = 2100, 30-day mortality 0.1% [95% CI 0.0;0.3%]) compared to formalized triage (n = 1591, 2.8% [95% CI 2.0;3.6%]), p < 0.01. CONCLUSIONS: Routine blood tests were strongly associated with 30-day mortality in acutely ill patients and discriminatory ability was significantly higher than with a formalized triage algorithm. Thus routine blood tests allowed an improved risk stratification of patients presenting in an emergency department.
Assuntos
Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Testes Hematológicos , Ferimentos e Lesões/mortalidade , Idoso , Algoritmos , Feminino , Hospitalização , Hospitais Universitários , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Estudos Prospectivos , Curva ROC , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Triagem , Ferimentos e Lesões/sangue , Ferimentos e Lesões/diagnósticoRESUMO
Formalized triage has been implemented in all Danish emergency departments. The validation behind formalized triage has focused on investigating predictive validity, i.e. correspondence between triage category and different outcome measures. Reliability is primarily investigated in terms of inter-rater reliability on written patient cases, and several studies have methodological limitations questioning their clinical relevance. Currently, there is no evidence establishing that formalized triage is superior to informally structured triage with regards to clinical end points.
Assuntos
Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/organização & administração , Triagem/normas , Dinamarca , Medicina Baseada em Evidências , Humanos , Reprodutibilidade dos TestesRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Patient crowding in emergency departments (ED) is a common challenge and associated with worsened outcome for the patients. Previous studies on biomarkers in the ED setting has focused on identification of high risk patients, and and the ability to use biomarkers to identify low-risk patients has only been sparsely examined. The broader aims of the TRIAGE study are to develop methods to identify low-risk patients appropriate for early ED discharge by combining information from a wide range of new inflammatory biomarkers and vital signs, the present baseline article aims to describe the formation of the TRIAGE database and characteristize the included patients. METHODS: We included consecutive patients ≥ 17 years admitted to hospital after triage staging in the ED. Blood samples for a biobank were collected and plasma stored in a freezer (-80 °C). Triage was done by a trained nurse using the Danish Emergency Proces Triage (DEPT) which categorizes patients as green (not urgent), yellow (urgent), orange (emergent) or red (rescusitation). Presenting complaints, admission diagnoses, comorbidities, length of stay, and 'events' during admission (any of 20 predefined definitive treatments that necessitates in-hospital care), vital signs and routine laboratory tests taken in the ED were aslo included in the database. RESULTS: Between September 5(th) 2013 and December 6(th) 2013, 6005 patients were included in the database and the biobank (94.1 % of all admissions). Of these, 1978 (32.9 %) were categorized as green, 2386 (39.7 %) yellow, 1616 (26.9 %) orange and 25 (0.4 %) red. Median age was 62 years (IQR 46-76), 49.8 % were male and median length of stay was 1 day (IQR 0-4). No events were found in 2658 (44.2 %) and 158 (2.6 %) were admitted to intensive or intermediate-intensive care unit and 219 (3.6 %) died within 30 days. A higher triage acuity level was associated with numerous events, including acute surgery, endovascular intervention, i.v. treatment, cardiac arrest, stroke, admission to intensive care, hospital transfer, and mortality within 30 days (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The TRIAGE database has been completed and includes data and blood samples from 6005 unselected consecutive hospitalized patients. More than 40 % experienced no events and were therefore potentially unnecessary hospital admissions.