RESUMO
BACKGROUND: High blood pressure (BP) is associated with poor outcome in acute spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage. Little is known about the predictive value of prehospital BP in intracerebral hemorrhage. We aimed to investigate the relationship between prehospital BP and clinical and radiological outcomes. METHODS: This is a retrospective, hospital-based study of all adult intracerebral hemorrhage patients admitted within 24 hours of symptom onset to a large primary stroke centre during 2012 to 2019. The first prehospital and on-admission BP were recorded as systolic BP, diastolic BP, mean arterial pressure, and pulse pressure. The absolute differences between prehospital and on-admission BP were calculated (BPchange). Primary outcomes were in-hospital death, early neurological deterioration, and hematoma expansion. Associations between prehospital BP, BPchange, and outcomes were explored by regression with adjustment for relevant confounders. RESULTS: We included 426 patients aged median 76 (interquartile range 67-85) years and 203 (48%) were female. Median prehospital systolic BP was 179 (interquartile range 158-197) and diastolic BP was 100 (interquartile range 86-112) mm Hg. In-hospital death occurred in 121/426 (28%), early neurological deterioration in 107/295 (36%), and hematoma expansion in 50/185 (27%) patients. There were linear associations between 5 mm Hg increment of prehospital systolic BP (odds ratio 1.06, [95% CI, 1.01-1.12]) and mean arterial pressure (odds ratio 1.08, [95% CI, 1.01-1.15]) and in-hospital death, and between 5 mm Hg increment of prehospital diastolic BP (odds ratio 1.10, [95% CI, 1.00-1.21]) and mean arterial pressure (odds ratio 1.09, [95% CI, 1.00-1.18]) and hematoma expansion. There was a nonlinear association between prehospital systolic BP and in-hospital death. No consistent associations between prehospital BPchange and outcomes were found. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with acute intracerebral hemorrhage, elevated prehospital BP parameters were associated with in-hospital death and hematoma expansion. Changes in prehospital BP were not consistently associated with outcome. A possible U-shaped association between prehospital BP and in-hospital death needs further investigation.
Assuntos
Hemorragia Cerebral , Serviços Médicos de Emergência , Adulto , Humanos , Feminino , Idoso , Masculino , Pressão Sanguínea/fisiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Hemorragia Cerebral/diagnóstico por imagem , Hemorragia Cerebral/terapia , Hemorragia Cerebral/complicações , Hematoma/complicações , Anti-Hipertensivos/uso terapêuticoRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: Thrombolytic treatment in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) reduces stroke-related disability. Nearly 40% of all patients with AIS (<4.5 h) receive thrombolysis, but there is a large variation in the use between hospitals. Little is known about reasons and predictors for not giving thrombolytic treatment. Therefore, we aimed to investigate reasons for non-thrombolysis in patients admitted within 4.5 h. METHODS: All patients with AIS (<4.5 h) admitted to Akershus University Hospital, Norway, between January 2015 and December 2017 were examined. Patient characteristics and reasons for not giving thrombolysis were registered. Descriptive statistics and logistic regression analyses were performed. RESULTS: Of 535 patients admitted with AIS (<4.5 h), 250 (47%) did not receive thrombolysis and of these only 26% had an absolute contraindication to treatment. Among the 74% with relative contraindications, the most common reasons given were mild and improving symptoms. Previous stroke (OR 3.32, 95%CI 1.99-5.52), arriving between 3 h and 4.5 h after onset (OR 7.76, 95%CI 3.73-16.11) or having mild symptoms (OR 2.33, 95%CI 1.56-3.49) were all significant predictors of not receiving thrombolytic treatment in the multivariable logistic regression model. CONCLUSION: A large proportion of patients with AIS do not receive thrombolysis. This study highlights up-to-date findings that arriving late in the time window, mild symptoms, and previous stroke are strong predictors of non-treatment. It is uncertain whether there is an underuse of thrombolysis in AIS. Increasing the utility of thrombolysis in the 4.5 h time window must be weighed against possible harms.
Assuntos
Isquemia Encefálica , AVC Isquêmico , Acidente Vascular Cerebral , Isquemia Encefálica/complicações , Isquemia Encefálica/diagnóstico , Isquemia Encefálica/tratamento farmacológico , Fibrinolíticos/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/diagnóstico , Terapia Trombolítica , Ativador de Plasminogênio Tecidual/uso terapêutico , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: The aim of the present study was to investigate how the initial phase of the COVID-19 pandemic affected the hospital stroke management and research in Norway. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All neurological departments with a Stroke Unit in Norway (n = 17) were invited to participate in a questionnaire survey. The study focused on the first lockdown period, and all questions were thus answered in regard to the period between 12 March and 15 April 2020. RESULTS: The responder rate was 94% (16/17). Eighty-one % (13/16) reported that the pandemic affected their department, and 63% (10/16) changed their stroke care pathways. The number of new acute admissions in terms of both strokes and stroke mimics decreased at all 16 departments. Fewer patients received thrombolysis and endovascular treatment, and multidisciplinary stroke rehabilitation services were less available. The mandatory 3 months of follow-up of stroke patients was postponed at 73% of the hospitals. All departments conducting stroke research reported a stop in ongoing projects. CONCLUSION: In Norway, hospital-based stroke care and research were impacted during the initial phase of the COVID-19 pandemic, with likely repercussions for patient care and outcomes. In the future, stroke departments will require contingency plans in order to protect the entire stroke treatment chain.
Assuntos
COVID-19/epidemiologia , Controle de Doenças Transmissíveis/métodos , Reabilitação do Acidente Vascular Cerebral/métodos , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/epidemiologia , Inquéritos e Questionários , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Controle de Doenças Transmissíveis/tendências , Seguimentos , Hospitalização/tendências , Humanos , Noruega/epidemiologia , Pandemias/prevenção & controle , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/terapia , Reabilitação do Acidente Vascular Cerebral/tendênciasRESUMO
BACKGROUND: There was a significant decrease in stroke admissions during the first phase of the COVID-19 pandemic. There are concerns that stroke patients have not sought medical attention and in the months after the lockdown suffer recurrent severe strokes. The aims of this study were to investigate how stroke admission rates and distributions of severity varied before, during and after the lockdown in a representative Norwegian hospital population. METHODS: All patients discharged from Akershus University Hospital with a diagnosis of transient ischemic attack (TIA) or acute stroke from January to September 2020 were identified by hospital chart review. RESULTS: We observed a transient decrease in weekly stroke admissions during lockdown from an average of 21.4 (SD 4.7) before to 15.0 (SD 4.2) during and 17.2 (SD 3.3) after (p < 0.011). The proportion of mild ischemic and haemorrhagic strokes was also lower during lockdown with 66% before, 57% during and 68% after (p = 0.011). CONCLUSION: The period of COVID-19 lockdown was associated with a temporary reduction in total admissions of strokes. In particular, there were fewer with TIA and mild stroke. Given the need to prevent the worsening of symptoms and risk of recurrence, it is necessary to emphasise the importance to seek medical care even in states of emergency.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/epidemiologia , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Noruega/epidemiologia , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Quarentena , SARS-CoV-2RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Herpes zoster oticus is a rare neurological disease caused by reactivation of varicella-zoster virus in the facial nerve. CASE PRESENTATION: A woman in her 60 s presented with left-sided seventh and eighth cranial neuropathy. A vesicular rash in her left ear and palate appeared one week after symptom onset. Lumbar puncture revealed cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) pleocytosis, mononuclear cells only, with PCR positive for varicella zoster virus. Inflammation of the cochlear and vestibular systems and along the facial nerve was detected by MRI. Antiviral treatment with valacyclovir in combination with prednisolone was initiated. After one month with outpatient rehabilitation, the vertigo had ceased, but hearing loss and facial paralysis persisted. INTERPRETATION: Early diagnosis and treatment of herpes zoster oticus as a cause of facial palsy when accompanied by ear rash, pain or signs of other cranial nerve involvement may improve overall prognosis.
Assuntos
Paralisia Facial , Herpes Zoster da Orelha Externa , Herpes Zoster , Antivirais/uso terapêutico , Paralisia Facial/diagnóstico , Paralisia Facial/tratamento farmacológico , Paralisia Facial/etiologia , Feminino , Herpes Zoster/complicações , Herpes Zoster/diagnóstico , Herpes Zoster/tratamento farmacológico , Herpes Zoster da Orelha Externa/diagnóstico , Herpes Zoster da Orelha Externa/tratamento farmacológico , Herpesvirus Humano 3 , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Sistema VestibularRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: There are concerns that public anxiety around COVID-19 discourages patients from seeking medical help. The aim of this study was to see how lockdown due to the pandemic affected the number of admissions of acute stroke. METHODS: All patients discharged from Akershus University Hospital with a diagnosis of transient ischemic attack (TIA) or acute stroke were identified by hospital chart review. January 3 to March 12 was defined as before, and March 13 to April 30 as during lockdown. RESULTS: There were 21.8 admissions/week before and 15.0 admissions/week during the lockdown (P < .01). Patients had on average higher NIHSS during the lockdown than before (5.9 vs. 4.2, P = .041). In the multivariable logistic regression model for ischemic stroke (adjusted for sex, age, living alone and NIHSS ≤ 5), there was an increased OR of 2.05 (95% CI 1.10-3.83, P = .024) for not reaching hospital within 4.5 hours during the lockdown as compared to the period before the lockdown. CONCLUSION: There was a significant reduction in number of admissions for stroke and TIAs during the lockdown due to the COVID-19 pandemic in Norway.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/epidemiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Noruega , SARS-CoV-2RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Stroke has several causes and the diagnostic investigation can be challenging. Neurosyphilis occurs when Treponema pallidum infects the central nervous system, and is a rare cause of stroke. CASE PRESENTATION: A man in in his late forties with diabetes mellitus and overweight presented with headache, speech impairment and right-sided stroke symptoms. He also had cognitive impairment and psychiatric symptoms. He underwent intravenous thrombolysis, and standardised stroke investigation was without clear findings. Cerebral MRI demonstrated non-specific subtle changes in the primary motor cortex in the left frontal lobe. However, lumbar puncture revealed elevated white blood cell count, and syphilis tests were positive. INTERPRETATION: Diagnosis of syphilis is often difficult and requires specific suspicion. Due to increasing incidence of the disease and its therapeutic consequences, alertness around the condition is important. Neurosyphilis should be suspected in young patients with stroke symptoms in the absence of risk factors and/or with cryptogenic strokes, especially in the presence of risk factors for syphilis infection and in patients from endemic areas.
Assuntos
Neurossífilis , Distúrbios da Fala , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neurossífilis/complicações , Neurossífilis/diagnóstico , Paresia/etiologia , Distúrbios da Fala/etiologia , Sorodiagnóstico da Sífilis , Treponema pallidumAssuntos
Fibrilação Atrial/complicações , Forame Oval Patente/complicações , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/etiologia , Adulto , Fibrilação Atrial/diagnóstico , Fibrilação Atrial/tratamento farmacológico , Ecocardiografia Transesofagiana , Eletrocardiografia Ambulatorial , Forame Oval Patente/diagnóstico por imagem , Forame Oval Patente/terapia , Humanos , Ataque Isquêmico Transitório/etiologia , Ataque Isquêmico Transitório/prevenção & controle , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Recidiva , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/diagnóstico por imagem , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/prevenção & controleRESUMO
Background In acute intracerebral hemorrhage, both elevated blood pressure (BP) and antithrombotic treatment are associated with poor outcome. Our aim was to explore interactions between antithrombotic treatment and prehospital BP. Methods and Results This observational, retrospective study included adult patients with spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage diagnosed by computed tomography within 24 hours, admitted to a primary stroke center during 2012 to 2019. The first recorded prehospital/ambulance systolic and diastolic BP were analyzed per 5 mm Hg increment. Clinical outcomes were in-hospital mortality, shift on the modified Rankin Scale at discharge, and mortality at 90 days. Radiological outcomes were initial hematoma volume and hematoma expansion. Antithrombotic (antiplatelet and/or anticoagulant) treatment was analyzed both together and separately. Modification of associations between prehospital BP and outcomes by antithrombotic treatment was explored by multivariable regression with interaction terms. The study included 200 women and 220 men, median age 76 (interquartile range, 68-85) years. Antithrombotic drugs were used by 252 of 420 (60%) patients. Compared with patients without, patients with antithrombotic treatment had significantly stronger associations between high prehospital systolic BP and in-hospital mortality (odds ratio [OR], 1.14 versus 0.99, P for interaction 0.021), shift on the modified Rankin Scale (common OR, 1.08 versus 0.96, P for interaction 0.001), and hematoma volume (coef. 0.03 versus -0.03, P for interaction 0.011). Conclusions In patients with acute, spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage, antithrombotic treatment modifies effects of prehospital BP. Compared with patients without, patients with antithrombotic treatment have poorer outcomes with higher prehospital BP. These findings may have implications for future studies on early BP lowering in intracerebral hemorrhage.