Goggle Versus Remote-Camera Video Head Impulse Test Device Comparison.

OBJECTIVES: This study compared remote versus goggle video head impulse testing (vHIT) outcomes to validate remote-camera vHIT, which is gaining popularity in difficult to test populations. DESIGN: Seventeen controls and 10 individuals with vestibular dysfunction participated. Each participant completed remote-camera and goggle vHIT. The main outcome parameters were canal gain, frequency of corrective saccades, and a normal versus abnormal rating. RESULTS: Horizontal and vertical canal vHIT gain was significantly lower in the vestibular compared with the control group; remote-camera gains were significantly lower compared with goggle gain for the vestibular group only. The devices categorized control versus vestibular canals identically except for one vertical canal. In the vestibular group, there was not a significant difference in the percentage of compensatory saccades between devices. CONCLUSION: These data provide validation that results obtained with a remote-camera device are similar to those obtained using a standard goggle device.

Effect of Real-Ear Adjusted Stimuli on Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potential Variability in Children and Young Adults.

OBJECTIVES: There is large variability in cervical and ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potential (c- and oVEMP) amplitudes. One potential source of variability is differences in ear canal shape and size. Real ear-to-coupler difference (RECD) values are used to measure the acoustic environment of an individual's ear canal. RECD may be a useful measure to calibrate air conducted VEMP stimuli, which are elicited at high intensities and may put patients at risk of unsafe sound exposure. A recommendation for avoiding unsafe exposure is to use a 125 dB SPL stimulus for individuals with an equivalent ear canal volume (ECV) ≥ 0.9 mL and a 120 dB SPL stimulus for individuals with a smaller ECV. The purpose of this project was to determine if using a stimulus calibrated in the ear using RECD values significantly reduces intra-subject and inter-subject VEMP amplitude variability. We hypothesized that using a RECD-calibrated stimulus would significantly reduce inter-subject amplitude variability but not significantly reduce intra-subject variability. We further hypothesized that an RECD-adjusted VEMP stimulus would better protect against delivering unsafe sound exposure compared to the method of using ECV alone. DESIGN: Eleven children (4 to 9 years), 10 adolescents (10 to 18 years), and 10 young adults (20 to 40 years) with normal hearing, tympanometry, vestibular and neurological function participated. On all subjects, RECD was measured twice per ear to account for test-retest reliability. cVEMP and oVEMP were then recorded bilaterally with a 500 Hz tone burst at a traditional and an adjusted VEMP intensity level. The traditional intensity level was 125 dB SPL for individuals with ≥ 0.9 mL ECV and 120 dB SPL for individuals with ≤ 0.8 mL ECV. The adjusted intensity level was calculated by subtracting the average 500 Hz RECD measured values from the 500 Hz normative RECD value. This value was applied as a correction factor to a 125 dB SPL stimulus. Peak to peak amplitudes were recorded and used to calculate asymmetry ratios. RESULTS: Young children had significantly smaller ECVs compared to adolescents and young adults. Young children had larger RECDs; however, this was not significant in post hoc analyses. The method of calibration had no significant effect on intra-subject variability for cVEMP [ F (1, 27)= 0.996, p = 0.327] or oVEMP [ F (1, 25)= 1.679, p = 0.206]. The method of calibration also had no significant effect on inter-subject amplitude variability for cVEMP [ F (1, 120)= 0.721, p = 0.397] or oVEMP [ F (1, 120)= 0.447, p = 0.505]. Both methods of calibration adequately protected against unsafe exposure levels. However, there were subjects with ECVs ≥ 0.9 mL who approached unsafe exposure levels from the ECV-calibrated stimulus, suggesting there may be rare cases in which a 125 dB SPL stimulus is unsafe, even for patients with larger ECVs. CONCLUSIONS: The calibration method made no significant difference in intra- or inter-subject variability, indicating that the acoustic environment of the outer ear is not significantly contributing to VEMP amplitude variability. The RECD-adjusted stimulus is effective in protecting against unsafe exposure levels for two trials of both c- and oVEMPs. There may be instances where more than two trials of each test are required, which increases the effective stimulation level. Clinicians should be cautious when delivering VEMPs and not unnecessarily expose patients to unsafe levels of sound.

Age Effects of Bone Conduction Vibration Vestibular-evoked Myogenic Potentials (VEMPs) Using B81 and Impulse Hammer Stimuli.

OBJECTIVE: Recently developed, the Radioear B81 bone oscillator allows for higher bone conduction vibration output; however, normative data are lacking regarding its use in vestibular-evoked myogenic potential (VEMP) testing. The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of age on cervical and ocular VEMP (c- and oVEMP) responses using the B81 and to compare with air conduction stimuli (ACS) and impulse hammer (IH) VEMP response characteristics. DESIGN: c- and oVEMP were completed with ACS, B81, and IH stimuli in healthy participants (age range = 10 to 87 years, n = 85). RESULTS: Regardless of stimulus type, c- and oVEMP amplitudes and response rates decreased with age. For cVEMP response rates, ACS performed better or equal to B81, which was superior to the IH. For cVEMP corrected amplitude, ACS had significantly higher amplitudes compared with B81 and IH. There was no difference in cVEMP corrected amplitude between B81 and IH. For oVEMP, response rates were comparable between stimuli with the largest disparity in response rates occurring in the oldest groups where IH outperformed both ACS and B81. For oVEMP amplitude, IH had significantly higher amplitudes compared with B81 and ACS. There was no difference in oVEMP amplitude between B81 and ACS. CONCLUSIONS: Age significantly affected c- and oVEMP amplitudes regardless of stimulus type (ACS, B81, IH). All stimuli are appropriate for eliciting c- and oVEMP in the young individuals. While ACS resulted in higher cVEMP corrected amplitudes, either ACS or B81 are appropriate for older individuals. However, for oVEMPs, higher response rates and larger amplitudes were noted for IH followed by B81 and ACS. Overall, the B81 performed well across the lifespan for c- and oVEMPs and may be a reasonable bone conduction vibration option for patients with absent ACS VEMPs, but at this time is not recommended as a replacement to ACS.

Bone Conduction Vibration Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potential (VEMP) Testing: Reliability in Children, Adolescents, and Young Adults.

OBJECTIVES: Bone conduction vibration (BCV) vestibular evoked myogenic potentials (VEMP) are clinically desirable in children for multiple reasons. However, no accepted standard exists for stimulus type and the reliability of BCV devices has not been investigated in children. The objective of the current study was to determine which BCV VEMP method (B-71, impulse hammer, or Mini-shaker) yields the highest response rates and reliability in a group of adults, adolescents, and children. It was hypothesized that the Mini-shaker would yield the highest response rates and reliability because it provides frequency specificity, higher output levels without distortion, and the most consistent force output as compared to the impulse hammer and B-71. DESIGN: Participants included 10 child (ages 5 to 10), 11 adolescent (ages 11 to 18), and 11 young adult (ages 23 to 39) normal controls. Cervical VEMP (cVEMP) and ocular VEMP (oVEMP) were measured in response to suprathreshold air-conducted, 500 Hz tone bursts and 3 types of BCV (B-71, impulse hammer, and Mini-shaker) across 2 test sessions to assess reliability. RESULTS: For cVEMP, response rates were 100% for all methods in all groups with the exception of the adult group in response to the impulse hammer (95%). For oVEMP, response rates varied by group and BCV method. For cVEMP, reliability was highest in adults using the Mini-shaker, in adolescents using the impulse hammer, and in children using the B-71. For oVEMP, reliability was highest in adults using the Mini-shaker, in adolescents using the Mini-shaker or impulse hammer, and in children using the impulse hammer. Age positively correlated with air-conducted oVEMP amplitude, but not cVEMP amplitude or cVEMP corrected amplitude. Age negatively correlated with all BCV VEMP amplitudes with the exception of cVEMP corrected amplitude in response to the Mini-shaker. CONCLUSIONS: All BCV methods resulted in consistent cVEMP responses (response rates 95 to 100%) with at least moderate reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient ≥ 0.5) for all groups. Similarly, all BCV methods resulted in consistent oVEMP responses (89 to 100%) with at least moderate reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient ≥ 0.5) except for the B-71 in adults.

Effect of Cochlear Implantation on Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potentials and Wideband Acoustic Immittance.

OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to determine if absent air conduction stimuli vestibular evoked myogenic potential (VEMP) responses found in ears after cochlear implantation can be the result of alterations in peripheral auditory mechanics rather than vestibular loss. Peripheral mechanical changes were investigated by comparing the response rates of air and bone conduction VEMPs as well as by measuring and evaluating wideband acoustic immittance (WAI) responses in ears with cochlear implants and normal-hearing control ears. The hypothesis was that the presence of a cochlear implant can lead to an air-bone gap, causing absent air conduction stimuli VEMP responses, but present bone conduction vibration VEMP responses (indicating normal vestibular function), with changes in WAI as compared with ears with normal hearing. Further hypotheses were that subsets of ears with cochlear implants would (a) have present VEMP responses to both stimuli, indicating normal vestibular function and either normal or near-normal WAI, or (b) have absent VEMP responses to both stimuli, regardless of WAI, due to true vestibular loss. DESIGN: Twenty-seven ears with cochlear implants (age range 7 to 31) and 10 ears with normal hearing (age range 7 to 31) were included in the study. All ears completed otoscopy, audiometric testing, 226 Hz tympanometry, WAI measures (absorbance), air conduction stimuli cervical and ocular VEMP testing through insert earphones, and bone conduction vibration cervical and ocular VEMP testing with a mini-shaker. Comparisons of VEMP responses to air and bone conduction stimuli, as well as absorbance responses between ears with normal hearing and ears with cochlear implants, were completed. RESULTS: All ears with normal hearing demonstrated 100% present VEMP response rates for both stimuli. Ears with cochlear implants had higher response rates to bone conduction vibration compared with air conduction stimuli for both cervical and ocular VEMPs; however, this was only significant for ocular VEMPs. Ears with cochlear implants demonstrated reduced low-frequency absorbance (500 to 1200 Hz) as compared with ears with normal hearing. To further analyze absorbance, ears with cochlear implants were placed into subgroups based on their cervical and ocular VEMP response patterns. These groups were (1) present air conduction stimuli response, present bone conduction vibration response, (2) absent air conduction stimuli response, present bone conduction vibration response, and (3) absent air conduction stimuli response, absent bone conduction vibration response. For both cervical and ocular VEMPs, the group with absent air conduction stimuli responses and present bone conduction vibration responses demonstrated the largest decrease in low-frequency absorbance as compared with the ears with normal hearing. CONCLUSIONS: Bone conduction VEMP response rates were increased compared with air-conduction VEMP response rates in ears with cochlear implants. Ears with cochlear implants also demonstrate changes in low-frequency absorbance consistent with a stiffer system. This effect was largest for ears that had absent air conduction but present bone conduction VEMPs. These findings suggest that this group, in particular, has a mechanical change that could lead to an air-bone gap, thus, abolishing the air conduction VEMP response due to an alteration in mechanics and not a true vestibular loss. Clinical considerations include using bone conduction vibration VEMPs and WAI for preoperative and postoperative testing in patients undergoing cochlear implantation.

Air-Conducted Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potential Testing in Children, Adolescents, and Young Adults: Thresholds, Frequency Tuning, and Effects of Sound Exposure.

OBJECTIVES: Pediatric vestibular evaluations incorporate cervical and ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potential (c- and oVEMP, respectively) testing; however, in children, c- and oVEMP thresholds have been minimally investigated and frequency tuning is unknown. Children are also at risk for unsafe sound exposure secondary to VEMP. While it is unknown if VEMP threshold testing leads to cochlear changes, it is possible that this risk increases due to the increased number of trials needed to obtain a threshold. Obtaining VEMP thresholds at various frequencies in children provides further information for pediatric normative VEMP data. Assessing for cochlear changes after VEMP threshold testing would provide information on the safety of threshold VEMP testing in children. The objectives of this study were to (1) characterize c- and oVEMP thresholds in children, adolescents, and young adults with normal hearing using 500 and 750 Hz tone burst (TB) stimuli, (2) compare frequency tuning of 500 and 750 Hz TB, and (3) assess whether cochlear changes exist after VEMP threshold testing. It is hypothesized that children, adolescents, and young adults would not show age-related changes to the vestibular system. Therefore, reliable VEMP thresholds would be seen below maximum acoustical stimulation levels (e.g., <125 dB SPL) and frequency tuning will be similar for 500 and 750 Hz TB stimuli. DESIGN: Ten children (age 4-9), 10 adolescents (age 10-19), and 10 young adults (age 20-29) with normal hearing and tympanometry participated. All subjects received c- and oVEMP testing at maximum stimulation and threshold. To address frequency tuning, but not exceed recommended sound exposure allowance, subjects received a 500 Hz TB stimulus in one ear and a 750 Hz TB stimulus in the other ear. Subjects completed tympanometry pre-VEMP, and audiometric threshold testing, distortion product otoacoustic emission testing, and subjective questionnaire pre- and post-VEMP to study the effect of VEMP exposure on cochlear function for each stimulus frequency. RESULTS: (1) cVEMP thresholds were determined for both stimulus frequencies for children (500 Hz = 106 dB SPL; 750 Hz = 106 dB SPL), adolescents (500 Hz = 107.5 dB SPL; 750 Hz = 109.5 dB SPL), and young adults (500 Hz = 111.5 dB SPL; 750 Hz = 112 dB SPL). oVEMP thresholds were also obtained in response to both stimulus frequencies for children (500 Hz = 111.1 dB SPL; 750 Hz = 112.2 dB SPL), adolescents (500 Hz = 112.5 dB SPL; 750 Hz = 114.5 dB SPL), and young adults (500 Hz = 116 dB SPL; 750 Hz = 117 dB SPL). Similar thresholds were found between groups except for children who had significantly lower thresholds compared with adults for cVEMP (500 Hz: p = 0.002; 750 Hz: p = 0.004) and oVEMP (500 Hz: p = 0.01; 750 Hz: p = 0.02). In addition, equivalent ear-canal volume and VEMP thresholds were linearly correlated. (2) There was no significant effect of stimulus frequency on VEMP response rates, latencies, peak to peak amplitudes, or thresholds, suggesting similar frequency tuning for 500 and 750 Hz. (3) There were no significant effects of VEMP threshold testing on cochlear function for either stimulus frequency. CONCLUSIONS: Children, adolescents, and young adults show VEMP thresholds below high stimulation levels and had similar frequency tuning between 500 and 750 Hz. Use of 750 Hz could be regarded as the safer stimuli due to its shorter duration and thus reduced sound exposure. Children with smaller ear-canal volume had present responses at maximum stimulation and lower thresholds, suggesting that VEMP testing could be initiated at lower acoustic levels to minimize sound exposure and optimize testing.

Effects of High Sound Exposure During Air-Conducted Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potential Testing in Children and Young Adults.

OBJECTIVES: Vestibular evoked myogenic potential (VEMP) testing is increasingly utilized in pediatric vestibular evaluations due to its diagnostic capability to identify otolith dysfunction and feasibility of testing. However, there is evidence demonstrating that the high-intensity stimulation level required to elicit a reliable VEMP response causes acoustic trauma in adults. Despite utility of VEMP testing in children, similar findings are unknown. It is hypothesized that increased sound exposure may exist in children because differences in ear-canal volume (ECV) compared with adults, and the effect of stimulus parameters (e.g., signal duration and intensity) will alter exposure levels delivered to a child's ear. The objectives of this study are to (1) measure peak to peak equivalent sound pressure levels (peSPL) in children with normal hearing (CNH) and young adults with normal hearing (ANH) using high-intensity VEMP stimuli, (2) determine the effect of ECV on peSPL and calculate a safe exposure level for VEMP, and (3) assess whether cochlear changes exist after VEMP exposure. DESIGN: This was a 2-phase approach. Fifteen CNH and 12 ANH participated in phase I. Equivalent ECV was measured. In 1 ear, peSPL was recorded for 5 seconds at 105 to 125 dB SPL, in 5-dB increments for 500- and 750-Hz tone bursts. Recorded peSPL values (accounting for stimulus duration) were then used to calculate safe sound energy exposure values for VEMP testing using the 132-dB recommended energy allowance from the 2003 European Union Guidelines. Fifteen CNH and 10 ANH received cervical and ocular VEMP testing in 1 ear in phase II. Subjects completed tympanometry, pre- and postaudiometric threshold testing, distortion product otoacoustic emissions, and questionnaire addressing subjective otologic symptoms to study the effect of VEMP exposure on cochlear function. RESULTS: (1) In response to high-intensity stimulation levels (e.g., 125 dB SPL), CNH had significantly higher peSPL measurements and smaller ECVs compared with ANH. (2) A significant linear relationship between equivalent ECV (as measured by diagnostic tympanometry) and peSPL exists and has an effect on total sound energy exposure level; based on data from phase I, 120 dB SPL was determined to be an acoustically safe stimulation level for testing in children. (3) Using calculated safe stimulation level for VEMP testing, there were no significant effect of VEMP exposure on cochlear function (as measured by audiometric thresholds, distortion product otoacoustic emission amplitude levels, or subjective symptoms) in CNH and ANH. CONCLUSIONS: peSPL sound recordings in children's ears are significantly higher (~3 dB) than that in adults in response to high-intensity VEMP stimuli that are commonly practiced. Equivalent ECV contributes to peSPL delivered to the ear during VEMP testing and should be considered to determine safe acoustic VEMP stimulus parameters; children with smaller ECVs are at risk for unsafe sound exposure during routine VEMP testing, and stimuli should not exceed 120 dB SPL. Using 120 dB SPL stimulus level for children during VEMP testing yields no change to cochlear function and reliable VEMP responses.

Vestibular, Visual Acuity, and Balance Outcomes in Children With Cochlear Implants: A Preliminary Report.

OBJECTIVES: There is a high incidence of vestibular loss in children with cochlear implants (CCI). However, the relationship between vestibular loss and various outcomes is unknown in children. The objectives of this study are to (1) determine whether age-related changes in peripheral vestibular tests occur; (2) quantify peripheral vestibular function in children with normal hearing and CCI; and (3) determine whether amount of vestibular loss predicts visual acuity and balance performance. DESIGN: Eleven CCI and 12 children with normal hearing completed the following tests of vestibular function: ocular and cervical vestibular-evoked myogenic potential to assess utricle and saccule function and the video head impulse test to assess semicircular canal function. The relationship between amount of vestibular loss and the following balance and visual acuity outcomes was assessed: dynamic gait index, single-leg stance, the sensory organization test, and tests of visual acuity, including dynamic visual acuity and the gaze stabilization test. RESULTS: (1) There were no significant age-related changes in peripheral vestibular testing with the exception of the n23 cervical vestibular-evoked myogenic potential latency, which was moderately correlated with age. (2) CCI had significantly higher rates of vestibular loss for each test of canal and otolith function. (3) Amount of vestibular loss predicted performance on single-leg stance, the dynamic gait index, some conditions of the sensory organization test, and the dynamic visual acuity test. Age was also a contributing factor for predicting the performance of almost all outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Preliminarily, children with vestibular loss do not recover naturally to levels of their healthy peers, particularly with activities that utilize vestibular input; they have poorer visual acuity and balance function.

Optimizing ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potential testing for superior semicircular canal dehiscence syndrome: electrode placement.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the sensitivity and specificity of ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potentials (oVEMPs) using 2 electrode montages for the diagnosis of superior canal dehiscence syndrome (SCDS). SUBJECTS: 16 SCDS patients (17 affected-SCDS ears, 15 contralateral-SCDS ears) and 12 controls (24 ears). METHODS: oVEMPs were recorded in response to 500-Hz tone bursts using 2 electrode montages. For both montages the active electrode was placed approximately 5 mm below each eye and a ground electrode on the sternum. For montage 1 (standard), the reference electrode was centered 2 cm below each active electrode. For montage 2, the reference electrode was placed on the chin. RESULTS: For either montage, the separation between oVEMP amplitudes in affected-SCDS ears and controls was significant (p < 0.001), with excellent sensitivity and specificity (>90%). CONCLUSION: oVEMP recordings with the standard montage remain a reliable method for evaluation of SCDS.

Electrode Montage for Bilateral Cervical Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potential (cVEMP) Testing.

BACKGROUND: Cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potentials (cVEMPs) are predominantly ipsilateral, myogenic responses originating from saccular activation. Some individuals have contralateral-crossed cVEMP responses with monaural air-conducted stimulation (ACS) which can contaminate cVEMP responses with bilateral stimulation. While the origin of the contralateral-crossed response is under debate, its presence has implications for cVEMP testing with midline bone conduction vibration (BCV). PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to determine the origin of the contralateral-crossed cVEMP response. It was hypothesized that the crossed response is due to electrode contamination and would disappear with a modified electrode montage. RESEARCH DESIGN: Cross-sectional research study. STUDY SAMPLE: Fifteen healthy participants (30 ears; mean age: 27.4 19-39; 10 females). DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Participants completed cVEMP testing using three stimulation methods (monoaural ACS, binaural ACS, and midline BCV) and two electrode montages (sternum reference and Fp reference). RESULTS: In the monoaural ACS with sternum reference condition, 53.3% ears had contralateral-crossed cVEMP responses that were in-phase with the ipsilateral response for all but 3 ears. Whereas in the monoaural ACS with Fp reference condition, 3% had a contralateral-crossed cVEMP response. ACS and BCV cVEMP corrected amplitudes were significantly larger in the sternum reference conditions, which is attributed to artificial enhancement from the in-phase contralateral-crossed responses. CONCLUSIONS: The significant reduction of contralateral-crossed responses in the Fp reference condition suggests that the contralateral-crossed cVEMP response is due to reference electrode contamination and may be a more appropriate reference placement when completing cVEMPs with midline BCV. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to determine the origin of the contralateral-crossed cVEMP response. It was hypothesized that the crossed response is due to electrode contamination and would disappear with a modified electrode montage. RESEARCH DESIGN: Cross-sectional research study. STUDY SAMPLE: Fifteen healthy participants (30 ears; mean age: 27.4 19-39; 10 females). DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Participants completed cVEMP testing using three stimulation methods (monoaural ACS, binaural ACS, and midline BCV) and three electrode montages (sternum reference, Fp reference, and active on Fp). RESULTS: In the monoaural ACS with sternum reference condition, 53.3% ears had contralateral-crossed cVEMP responses that were in-phase with the ipsilateral response for all but 3 ears. Whereas in the monoaural ACS with Fp reference condition, 3% had a contralateral-crossed cVEMP response. No participants demonstrated responses using Fp for the active electrode suggesting this is a neutral site. ACS and BCV cVEMP corrected amplitudes were significantly larger in the sternum reference conditions, which is attributed to artificial enhancement from the in-phase contralateral-crossed responses. CONCLUSIONS: The significant reduction of contralateral-crossed responses in the Fp reference condition suggests that the contralateral-crossed cVEMP response is due to reference electrode contamination and may be a more appropriate reference placement when completing cVEMPs with midline BCV.

Clinical Utility of Remote Camera Video Head Impulse Testing Children Less Than 3 Years.

The purpose of this case report is to highlight both the feasibility and clinical utility of remote camera video head impulse testing (vHIT) in children <3 years. Five cases are described where remote camera vHIT was used to quantify ear specific semicircular function in children at risk for vestibular dysfunction. Remote camera vHIT is a helpful clinical tool for quantifying ear specific semicircular function in children between 6 and 31 months. Remote camera vHIT is feasible and provides ear specific information regarding semicircular canal function, which can be used to augment or validate the presence of vestibular dysfunction in children <3 years. Laryngoscope, 2024.

The effects of vestibular dysfunction on balance and self-concept in children with cochlear implants.

OBJECTIVES: Children with cochlear implants (CCI) have an increased rate of vestibular dysfunction. Vestibular dysfunction is associated with decreased balance and dynamic visual acuity ability. Hearing loss alone is associated with reduced speech perception and vocabulary in children. In adults, vestibular dysfunction is associated with reduced quality of life; however, similar relationships have not been studied in children with vestibular dysfunction. Therefore, the objective of the present study was to evaluate the effect of hearing loss and vestibular dysfunction on self-concept in CCI (n = 33) compared to children with normal hearing (CNH, n = 38). It was hypothesized that children with vestibular dysfunction would have reduced self-concept beyond that from hearing loss, secondary to the presence of balance and visual acuity deficits. METHODS: The Piers-Harris Children's Self-Concept Scale - 2, speech perception, vocabulary, video head impulse test (vHIT), rotary chair, balance using the Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency (BOT-2), and dynamic visual acuity (DVA) testing were completed on all participants. RESULTS: In the 34 CCI, 24 had normal vestibular function, 6 had unilateral vestibular dysfunction, and 4 had bilateral vestibular dysfunction. There were no significant mean differences in the Piers-Harris Children's Self-Concept Scale - 2 between groups. A Principal Component Analysis (PCA) was conducted on the predictor variables (average horizontal canal vHIT gain, BOT-2 score, DVA, speech perception, and vocabulary) resulting in two factors; factor 1 represented "vestibular" components (vHIT, BOT-2, and DVA) and factor 2 represented "auditory-language" components (speech perception and vocabulary). In addition to age and gender, the 2 PCA factors were analyzed using multivariate regression with stepwise selection to determine which factors best predicted self-concept. The PCA auditory-language factor was the only significant predictor of self-concept. CONCLUSIONS: Auditory-language, not vestibular related factors, contribute to the self-concept of CCI. While adults with vestibular dysfunction have reduced quality of life, it could be that children with vestibular dysfunction have some psychosocial resilience.

Stability of Vestibular Testing in Children With Hearing Loss.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the stability of rotary chair, video head impulse test (vHIT), and vestibular evoked myogenic potential (VEMP) responses in children with normal hearing (NH) and children with cochlear implants (CIs). METHOD: Retrospective analysis of 66 children (33 males, M age = 11.4 years, range: 3-18 years) seen in a tertiary clinic and/or research laboratory who completed rotary chair, VEMP, and vHIT across two test sessions between 2012 and 2019. The stability of these measures was compared between two groups: children with NH (n = 35) and children with CI (n = 31). For each outcome, the session difference was calculated by subtracting Session 1 from Session 2. RESULTS: For rotary chair (gain and phase) and vHIT (gain), linear mixed-effects models revealed that there were no significant interactions or main effects for group (CI vs. NH), time between session, gender, or age on the session difference, suggesting that the outcomes of these measures are stable across sessions. For cervical and ocular VEMP amplitude, there was a significant interaction between group and time between sessions on the session difference. Specifically, children with NH demonstrated larger amplitudes at Session 2, whereas children with CI demonstrated smaller amplitudes at Session 2. Next, test findings were classified as normal, unilaterally abnormal, or bilaterally abnormal for Sessions 1 and 2. Misclassification was defined as a mismatch of classification between sessions. Rotary chair and vHIT had the fewest misclassifications, whereas cervical VEMPs had the most misclassifications in children with CI and ocular VEMPs had the most misclassifications in children with NH. Misclassifications in children with CI were mostly consistent with progressive vestibular loss, whereas misclassifications in children with NH were mostly consistent with improved vestibular function. CONCLUSIONS: Stability and misclassification rates varied between tests and groups. Overall, rotary chair and vHIT outcomes were stable in both groups; however, VEMPs differentially changed between groups, improving in children with NH and declining in children with CI. Furthermore, despite relative stability, some children with CI evidenced progressive vestibular loss on all measures suggesting that vestibular testing should be completed serially due to the possibility of progression.

Does vestibular loss result in cognitive deficits in children with cochlear implants?

BACKGROUND: In adults, vestibular loss is associated with cognitive deficits; however, similar relationships have not been studied in children. OBJECTIVE: Evaluate the effect of vestibular loss on working memory and executive function in children with a cochlear implant (CCI) compared to children with normal hearing (CNH). METHODS: Vestibular evoked myogenic potential, video head impulse, rotary chair, and balance testing; and the following clinical measures: vision, hearing, speech perception, language, executive function, and working memory. RESULTS: Thirty-eight CNH and 37 CCI participated (26 with normal vestibular function, 5 with unilateral vestibular loss, 6 with bilateral vestibular loss). Children with vestibular loss demonstrated the poorest balance performance. There was no significant reduction in working memory or executive function performance for either CCI group with vestibular loss; however, multivariate regression analysis suggested balance performance was a significant predictor for several working memory subtests and video head impulse gain was a significant predictor for one executive function outcome. CONCLUSIONS: CCI with vestibular loss did not have significantly reduced working memory or executive function; however, balance performance was a significant predictor for several working memory subtests. Degree of hearing loss should be considered, and larger sample sizes are needed.

Using Functional Outcomes to Predict Vestibular Loss in Children.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine: (1) the relationship between vestibular loss severity and functional performance, (2) which functional performance outcomes best predict vestibular loss, and (3) which vestibular rate sensors (canals vs. otoliths) provide the most weighting during different functional measures. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective. SETTING: Tertiary referral center. PATIENTS: Fifty-seven children with normal hearing (mean age: 12.3 years, 32 males) and 55 children with cochlear implants (mean age 12.8 years, 29 males). INTERVENTION: Diagnostic. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Video head impulse test, cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potential (cVEMP), ocular VEMP (oVEMP), single leg stance, Standing Balance Test, active and passive dynamic visual acuity, and the balance subtest of the Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency (BOT-2). RESULTS: Performance worsened as vestibular loss severity worsened for all functional outcomes except the standing balance test conditions 1 and 2. The best outcomes for classifying children with vestibular loss were the single leg stance (cut-off criterion: 5 seconds; sensitivity and specificity of 88% and 86%) and the BOT-2 balance subtest (cut-off criterion of 27.5 points; sensitivity and specificity of 88% and 88%). Average horizontal canal vHIT gain was a significant predictor of all functional outcomes while neither corrected cVEMP amplitude nor oVEMP amplitude predicted performance. CONCLUSION: Functional performance declines as vestibular loss severity worsens. Single leg stance is fast and efficient for predicting vestibular loss in school age children. Average horizontal canal vHIT best predicts functional performance; if using a tiered approach, horizontal canal vHIT should be completed first.

The Dizzy Child.

Dizziness occurs in children with an estimated prevalence of 0.45% to 15.0%. Vestibular disorders in the pediatric population can impact gross motor function development, visual acuity, and contribute to psychological distress. Appropriate case history and focused direct examination can be helpful when determining the etiology of dizziness. Vestibular testing can be completed in children and guide management of suspected vestibular dysfunction. Vestibular dysfunction is commonly seen in patients with sensorineural hearing loss. Migraine disorders are the most common cause of dizziness in childhood. Etiologies of dizziness in children differ from those commonly seen in adults.

The Relationship Between Rotary Chair and Video Head Impulse Testing in Children and Young Adults With Cochlear Implants.

Purpose Conflicts among video head impulse testing (vHIT) and rotary chair have occurred; therefore, the purpose of this study was to determine the relationship between rotary chair and vHIT outcome parameters to understand when these two tests disagree and determine if one or both test outcomes are needed in children. Method Data from 141 child and young adult subjects (73 males, 68 females, M age = 15 years, range: 6-35) were retrospectively reviewed. Of those, 56 had a cochlear implant and 85 were normal controls. All subjects completed rotary chair and vHIT, which were categorized as (a) normal vestibular function, (b) unilateral vestibular loss, or (c) bilateral vestibular loss. vHIT tracings were analyzed to determine if gain and corrective saccade velocity, frequency, or latency were helpful parameters for determining vestibular loss. Results Of the 141 subjects, the misclassification rate was 13/141 (9%). All normal control subjects were classified as having normal rotary chair and normal vHIT. In subjects with a cochlear implant (n = 56), the misclassification rate was 13/56 (23%). There were four misclassification patterns. Using rotary chair as the gold standard, receiver operating characteristic analysis revealed optimal cut-points for vHIT gain (< 0.84), corrective saccade frequency (≥ 50%), amplitude (≥ 75°/s), and latency (≤ 320 ms). Using these vHIT cut-points improved the agreement between rotary chair and vHIT, resulting in an overall misclassification rate of 10/141 (7%) and 9/56 (16%) in subjects with a cochlear implant. Conclusions When testing children, caloric testing is often not an option due to tolerability or time. However, discordant results occur between rotary chair and vHIT. These data suggest vHIT is a sufficient first-tier assessment. If abnormal, rotary chair is not necessary. If normal, rotary chair can be helpful for uncovering other indicators of vestibular loss. When interpreting vHIT, including gain and all corrective saccade outcomes may improve sensitivity.

Effect of Gaze Angle During the Vertical Video Head Impulse Test Across Two Devices in Healthy Adults and Subjects With Vestibular Loss.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of gaze angle on vertical vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR) gain using two different video head impulse (vHIT) devices in healthy adults and subjects with bilateral vestibular loss (BVL). STUDY DESIGN: Prospective study. SETTING: Hospital research laboratory. SUBJECTS: Twenty-four healthy adults (mean [standard deviation {SD}] age = 32 [4.8]; 23-42; 8 men) and four subjects with previously diagnosed BVL (mean age [SD] = 32 [8.2]; 21-40; 3 men) participated. INTERVENTION: Vertical canal vHIT was administered with two different devices using three gaze angles (-45 degrees, 0 degree, +45 degrees). These devices have different gain calculation algorithms and different head and gaze angle protocols. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Vertical canal gain and presence or absence of reset saccades. RESULTS: A significant stepwise reduction in vHIT gain was noted as gaze moved away from the plane of the canals stimulated (from -45 degrees to 0 degree, to +45 degrees) for both healthy adults and subjects with BVL. vHIT gain was able to separate the two groups using gaze angles -45 degrees and 0 degree. CONCLUSIONS: In spite of their differences in gain algorithm and recommended head position and gaze angle, each device was able to appropriately separate healthy adults from subjects with BVL with high sensitivity/specificity.

Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potential (VEMP) Test-retest Reliability in Children.

OBJECTIVE: Vestibular evoked myogenic potentials (VEMPs) are short-latency muscle potentials measured from the neck (cervical VEMP; cVEMP) or under the eyes (ocular VEMP; oVEMP), which provide information regarding function of the saccule and utricle, respectively. VEMPs are reliable when performed in adults; however, reliability of VEMPs in children is unknown. Therefore, the purpose of the study was to determine the test-retest reliability of c- and oVEMP testing in normal control children. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective. SETTING: Hospital. PATIENTS: Ten adults, 14 adolescent children and 13 young children with normal hearing. INTERVENTIONS: c- and oVEMP testing were completed across two test sessions in response to air-conduction 500 Hz tone-burst and impulse hammer stimuli. Additionally, oVEMP was completed using eyes-open and eyes-closed conditions. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Intraclass correlation coefficients were calculated to determine the reliability of c- and oVEMP outcomes. RESULTS: When using air-conduction stimuli, c- and oVEMP amplitudes are reliable across test sessions in normal control children and adults. With impulse hammer stimuli, cVEMP amplitudes showed high reliability; however, oVEMP amplitudes showed low reliability in both eyes-open and eyes-closed conditions. Comparison between eyes-open and eyes-closed oVEMP conditions revealed shorter latencies and higher peak-to-peak amplitudes in the eyes-open condition. CONCLUSIONS: In this small cohort of normal control children, cVEMPs are reliable using air-conduction and impulse hammer stimuli and oVEMPs are reliable using air-conduction stimuli in the eyes-open condition. oVEMP in eyes-closed conditions were less reliable compared with eyes-open conditions and resulted in a large number of absent responses.

Optimization of Cervical and Ocular Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potential Testing Using an Impulse Hammer in Adults, Adolescents, and Children.

OBJECTIVE: To characterize cervical and ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potential (c- and oVEMP) responses using an impulse hammer (IH) in adults and pediatrics at standardized force levels and evaluate: the relationship of force level on VEMP amplitude, sternocleidomastoid (SCM) contraction on cVEMP amplitude, required number of tap stimuli, and subject comfort. Using these data, optimal testing parameters were selected. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective study. SETTING: Tertiary referral center. PATIENTS: Seventy-eight healthy adults, adolescents, and children with no hearing or vestibular deficits. INTERVENTIONS: All subjects received c- and oVEMP testing using IH and 500 Hz tone burst air conduction stimuli. Adults received hard, medium, and soft force levels. Adolescents and children received medium and soft force levels. A comfort questionnaire was administered pre- and post-testing. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: IH VEMP response parameters (response rates, latency, cVEMP pre-stimulus SCM Electromyography [EMG], and peak-to-peak amplitude) were assessed per force level. Subjective reporting for patient comfort was also assessed. RESULTS: VEMP response rates ranged from 92 to 100%. Force had a linear relationship with VEMP amplitude. SCM contraction had a linear relationship with raw cVEMP amplitude; however, dissipated with amplitude normalization. Force level did not impact the number of taps needed. A minimum peak force of 15 to 20 N, accounting for SCM contraction, and using a lower EMG monitoring limit for cVEMP is recommended to elicit reliable responses. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, IH VEMP is appropriate and comfortable to use in adults and pediatrics and can be useful when an air conduction stimulus is contraindicated or not preferred.