Safety of cetirizine ophthalmic solution 0.24% for the treatment of allergic conjunctivitis in adult and pediatric subjects.

PURPOSE: The studies reported here aimed to assess the safety and tolerability of cetirizine ophthalmic solution 0.24%, a new topical ophthalmic medication approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of ocular itching associated with allergic conjunctivitis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Three clinical studies evaluated cetirizine ophthalmic solution 0.24% administration: a Phase I prospective, single-center, open-label, pharmacokinetic (PK) study (N=11) evaluating single-dose administration and twice-daily (BID) administration for 1 week in healthy adults, and two Phase III, multi-center, randomized, double-masked, vehicle-controlled, parallel-group studies evaluating the safety and tolerability in adult and pediatric populations (2-18 years of age) for up to 6 consecutive weeks. The first safety and tolerability study evaluated cetirizine BID (study 1, N=512), while the second study examined cetirizine three times daily (TID) (study 2, N=516). Each study assessed best corrected visual acuity, slit-lamp biomicroscopy, IOP, dilated ophthalmoscopy, treatment-emergent adverse events, vital signs, urine pregnancy test, and physical examination (general health, head, eyes, ears, nose, and throat). The PK study also measured hematology, blood chemistry, and urinalysis, while the two Phase III studies additionally assessed corneal endothelial cell counts (ECC) and ECC density in a subset of subjects (via specular microscopy), and drug administration tolerability. RESULTS: Bilateral administration of cetirizine ophthalmic solution 0.24% resulted in low systemic exposure in the PK study and was associated with a low incidence of mild adverse events. There were no drug-related severe or serious adverse events. The tolerability scores between the active and vehicle groups were comparable, demonstrating high comfort in the administration of cetirizine ophthalmic solution 0.24%. CONCLUSION: Cetirizine ophthalmic solution 0.24% dosed BID or TID demonstrated an acceptable safety profile and was well-tolerated when administered to subjects aged ≥2 years.

Correction to: In Vivo Pharmacokinetics of Bromfenac Ophthalmic Solution 0.075%, Bromfenac Ophthalmic Solution 0.07%, and Nepafenac/Amfenac Ophthalmic Suspension 0.3% in Rabbits.

In the original publication, units were incorrectly published in the results section as micrograms (µg/mL).

Pharmacokinetics of CIPRODEX otic in pediatric and adolescent patients.

OBJECTIVE: Describe the pharmacokinetics of ciprofloxacin and dexamethasone after administration of CIPRODEX Otic Suspension (CIP/DEX) into the middle ears of children. DESIGN: Open-label, single-dose, pharmacokinetic studies, administering four drops of CIP/DEX instilled into each middle ear through the tympanostomy tubes immediately following tube placement. Blood was collected for 6h and analyzed for ciprofloxacin and dexamethasone concentrations using a validated liquid chromatography and tandem mass spectrometry (LC/MS/MS) method. SETTING: The study was conducted through a referral pediatric otolaryngology practice with actual surgical procedures performed in an ambulatory care center. PATIENTS: Twenty-five randomly selected patients, 1-14 years of age (mean age, 5 years), receiving tympanostomy tubes. RESULTS: Peak ciprofloxacin plasma levels were observed at about 1h, with a mean C(max) of 1.33+/-0.96 ng/mL (range <0.5-3.45 ng/mL) and an estimated half-life of 3.0+/-1.2h. Peak dexamethasone plasma levels were observed within 2h with a mean C(max) of 0.90+/-1.04 ng/mL (range <0.05-5.10 ng/mL) and an estimated half-life of 3.9+/-2.9h. CONCLUSION: These results demonstrated low systemic exposure of ciprofloxacin and dexamethasone following topical otic administration in pediatric patients.

Phase III trials examining the efficacy of cetirizine ophthalmic solution 0.24% compared to vehicle for the treatment of allergic conjunctivitis in the conjunctival allergen challenge model.

PURPOSE: The purpose of these Phase III studies was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of cetirizine ophthalmic solution 0.24% compared with vehicle in the treatment of allergen-induced conjunctivitis using the Ora conjunctival allergen challenge (CAC)® model. METHODS: The single-center (Study 1) and multi-center (Study 2), double-masked, randomized, vehicle-controlled, parallel group, CAC studies were conducted over ~5 weeks and four study visits. The study design only differed in entry criteria: Study 2 required more severe allergic conjunctivitis symptoms. Subjects were screened for an allergen response at Visits 1 and 2 and then randomized at Visit 3. Approximately 100 subjects were randomized in each study. The primary efficacy endpoints were ocular itching and conjunctival redness 15 minutes and 8 hours post-treatment, post-CAC. RESULTS: Cetirizine treatment administered 15 minutes or 8 hours prior to CAC resulted in significantly lower ocular itching at all time points post-CAC (P<0.0001) compared to vehicle in both studies. Conjunctival redness measured by the investigator was significantly lower after cetirizine treatment compared to vehicle at 7 minutes post-CAC at both 15 minutes and 8 hours post-treatment in both studies (P<0.05). All secondary endpoints were in favor and confirmatory of cetirizine efficacy with significant improvement in chemosis, eyelid swelling, tearing, ciliary redness, and episcleral redness, as well as nasal symptoms (rhinorrhea, nasal pruritus, ear or palatal pruritus, and nasal congestion) post-CAC. The most robust treatment differences were observed in Study 2 where more severe symptoms were required for study entry (P<0.05). No safety concerns for cetirizine ophthalmic solution 0.24% were identified. CONCLUSION: Cetirizine ophthalmic solution 0.24% was shown to be efficacious in the treatment of ocular and nasal signs and symptoms associated with allergic conjunctivitis and demonstrated a favorable safety profile. Clinical efficacy was demonstrated with a 15-minute onset of action and añ8-hour duration of action.

In Vivo Pharmacokinetics of Bromfenac Ophthalmic Solution 0.075%, Bromfenac Ophthalmic Solution 0.07%, and Nepafenac/Amfenac Ophthalmic Suspension 0.3% in Rabbits.

INTRODUCTION: Little is known of the ocular distribution characteristics of currently branded non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) in the United States. This study was designed to predict the ocular bioavailability characteristics in humans using Dutch Belted rabbits as a surrogate. Commercially available, topically-applied NSAIDs containing bromfenac or nepafenac/amfenac were evaluated. METHODS: 126 healthy adult Dutch Belted rabbits were randomly assigned to three treatment cohorts (BromSite® twice daily [BID] in the right eye, BromSite® once daily [QD] in the right eye, Prolensa® QD in the right eye and Ilevro™ QD in the left eye) and 7 post-dosing time points (0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 24 h after final instillation). The study eyes received 40 µL of the assigned drug for a consecutive 9 days. Samples of aqueous humor, iris-ciliary body, choroid, sclera, and retina were harvested from the study eyes at the assigned time point after the last dose on the 9th day. NSAID content in ocular tissues was analyzed using high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), and area under the curve (AUC0.5-24h), maximum concentration (Cmax), and time to maximum concentration (Tmax) were determined. RESULTS: Peak NSAID concentrations were reached within 1-3 h in the anterior segment and within 1-3 h in the posterior segment after last dose. Throughout the ocular tissues, both AUC and Cmax for BromSite® (BID and QD) were consistently higher than respective NSAID concentrations of Prolensa® QD and Ilevro® QD. When comparing BromSite® BID to QD, the BID regimen produced generally higher but statistically similar bromfenac concentrations throughout the ocular tissues except in the aqueous humor and iris-ciliary body, where the AUC BID was statistically significantly higher with BromSite® BID. CONCLUSION: As a surrogate to human ocular bioavailability, BromSite® demonstrated significantly greater NSAID compared to Prolensa® QD and Ilevro® QD. The DuraSite® component of BromSite® appears to enhance ocular penetration throughout both anterior and posterior tissues. FUNDING: Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd.

Goniotomy with a single-use dual blade: Short-term results.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the intraocular pressure (IOP)-lowering efficacy and safety of a single-use dual blade (Kahook) in patients with mild to end-stage glaucoma. SETTING: International multicenter ophthalmic care centers. DESIGN: Prospective interventional case series. METHODS: Consecutive patients with glaucoma who had phacoemulsification plus goniotomy with the single-use dual blade were enrolled in this study. Each center collected deidentified clinical data, including preoperative and postoperative IOP, medication use, adverse events, and whether additional surgery was required during a 6-month follow-up. RESULTS: Of the 71 eyes included in this study, 70% had primary open-angle glaucoma. Other diagnoses included angle-closure, pigmentary, pseudoexfoliative, and normal-tension glaucoma. Sixty-five percent of eyes were classified as having mild to moderate glaucoma and 35%, severe glaucoma. The mean baseline IOP decreased from 17.4 mm Hg ± 5.2 (SD) to 12.8 ± 2.6 mm Hg 6 months postoperatively and the hypotensive medication use decreased from 1.6 ± 1.3 to 0.9 ± 1.0, respectively (P < .001 and P = .005, respectively). The most common observation was blood reflux during surgery (39.4%). CONCLUSION: Single-use dual blade goniotomy plus phacoemulsification resulted in a significant and sustained reduction in IOP and a decrease in glaucoma medications after 6 months of follow-up.

Intraocular pressure-lowering efficacy of brinzolamide when added to travoprost/timolol fixed combination as adjunctive therapy.

PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy of brinzolamide versus placebo when added to travoprost/timolol fixed combination (TTFC) in uncontrolled patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a prospective, double-masked, randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel comparison of ocular hypertensive or primary open-angle glaucoma patients. Patients treated with a prostaglandin-based mono or adjunctive therapy were changed to TTFC qam (every day dosing) for 4 weeks. Patients with an intraocular pressure (IOP) of 19 to 32 mm Hg at 08:00 hours underwent additional measurements at 12:00 and 16:00 hours. Patients were then randomized to either placebo or brinzolamide given twice daily in addition to TTFC. At week 12, patients had their IOP measurements repeated. RESULTS: The per protocol dataset consisting of 78 placebo and 75 brinzolamide-treated patients decreased mean diurnal IOP (mm Hg) as well as IOP at all 3 individual time points (P≤0.005). Brinzolamide reduced the mean diurnal IOP from 20.3±2.0 to 17.5±2.6, whereas placebo reduced IOP from 20.9±2.7 to 19.4±3.8. The mean diurnal IOP was reduced from baseline and for the 08:00 and 16:00 hours time points in the brinzolamide group compared with placebo (P≤0.014). There were 30 adverse events with placebo and 24 with brinzolamide (intent-to-treat). There was no statistical difference for the side-effect profile observed between the treatment groups (P=0.47). CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that brinzolamide may be safely added to TTFC therapy to provide further significant reduction in IOP patients with ocular hypertensive or primary open-angle glaucoma.

Aqueous humor penetration of topical bimatoprost 0.01% and bimatoprost 0.03% in rabbits.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare the aqueous humor concentrations of bimatoprost acid after topical instillation in rabbits of bimatoprost ophthalmic solution 0.01% and bimatoprost ophthalmic solution 0.03%, two commercially available intraocular pressure-lowering medications. METHODS: Male Dutch Belted rabbits were divided into two teratment groups (four rabbits/eight eyes per group): bimatoprost 0.01% and bimatoprost 0.03%. Thirty microliters (µL) of study medication was to pically instilled into both eyes of each animal. Thirty minutes and 90 minutes after instillation, aqueous humor samples were collected. These samples were analyzed by reverse-phase high-performance liquid chromatography for bimatoprost acid concentration. RESULTS: Following a single topical ocular instillation, the bimatoprost 0.01% formulation had a lower mean aqueous humor concentration of bimatoprost acid than the bimatoprost 0.03% formulation at both 30 minutes (11.5 ± 2.1 ng/mL versus 37.8 ± 28.8 ng/mL; P = 0.17) and 90 minutes (20.8 ± 5.7 ng/mL versus 45.8 ± 14.3 ng/mL; P = 0.03) after topical instillation. CONCLUSIONS: Topical ocular instillation of bimatoprost 0.01% produced significantly lower bimatoprost acid concentration in the aqueous humor of rabbits than bimatoprost 0.03%, despite the 4-fold increase of benzalkonium chloride contained in bimatoprost 0.01%.

Diurnal IOP-lowering efficacy and safety of travoprost 0.004% compared with tafluprost 0.0015% in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension.

PURPOSE: To compare the diurnal intraocular pressure (IOP)-lowering efficacy and safety of travoprost 0.004% and tafluprost 0.0015% administered to patients with primary open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension. METHODS: This was a randomized, double-masked, active-controlled, crossover design trial, in which patients were randomized to either travoprost or tafluprost monotherapy administered once daily in the evening for six weeks and then crossed over to the alternative treatment for another six weeks. Diurnal IOP was measured (8 am to 8 pm, every two hours) and a solicited symptom survey was administered at the end of both six-week periods, as was conjunctival hyperemia and visual acuity assessment, slit-lamp biomicroscopy, and adverse event solicitation. RESULTS: Fifty-one patients were randomized and 48 patients completed the study. The 12-hour mean diurnal IOP was significantly lower with travoprost therapy than with tafluprost therapy (P = 0.01), and a significantly lower IOP was also reported for travoprost at five of the seven individual time points (P < 0.05). Neither therapy produced a significant increase from baseline in any of the individual patient-reported symptom scores, except for hyperemia (P ≤ 0.01), which was increased with both treatments. Investigator-observed hyperemia was also increased from baseline with both therapies (P < 0.01), although the increase with travoprost therapy was significantly smaller than with tafluprost (P < 0.01). No additional safety concerns were noted from slit-lamp biomicroscopy or visual acuity results, and no difference was noted in patient-reported tolerability of the two medications. CONCLUSION: Travoprost 0.004% monotherapy produced lower diurnal IOP than tafluprost 0.0015% in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension and exhibited a similar safety profile.

Safety and efficacy of changing to the travoprost/timolol maleate fixed combination (DuoTrav) from prior mono- or adjunctive therapy.

PURPOSE: To assess the safety and efficacy of changing to the travoprost/timolol fixed combination (TTFC) from other mono- or adjunctive therapies. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A prospective, open-label, observational cohort of primary open-angle glaucoma and ocular hypertensive patients whose intraocular pressure (IOP) was uncontrolled on prior therapy or was not on target. Patients were changed from prior mono- or adjunctive treatment at Day 0 to TTFC dosed every evening and underwent active treatment efficacy and safety evaluations at Week 12. RESULTS: In 474/522 (91%) patients who completed this trial an IOP (mm Hg) of 21.9 +/- 2.0 on prior treatment was reduced by TTFC at Month 3: from all prior treatments 5.6 +/- 2.6; from monotherapy 5.9 +/- 2.3; from adjunctive treatments 4.5 +/- 2.9; and from several of the most frequent individual treatments: timolol 5.7 +/- 2.2; latanoprost 6.3 +/- 2.6; and latanoprost/timolol fixed combination 4.4 +/- 1.9. Ocular hyperemia was the most frequent adverse effect (n = 21, 4%). Both patients and physicians preferred TTFC compared to all prior and common individual treatments. The solicited symptom survey showed, following a modified Bonferroni correction (alpha/5), a reduced incidence with TTFC of ocular pain (P = 0.01) while the prior medicine had a lower incidence of burning on instillation (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Changing patients from prior mono- or adjunctive therapy to TTFC can provide on average a further reduction in IOP while demonstrating a favorable safety profile and a high patient preference.

Prevalence of ocular surface complaints in patients with glaucoma using topical intraocular pressure-lowering medications.

PURPOSE: To determine the prevalence of ocular surface disease (OSD) in patients with glaucoma using topical intraocular pressure (IOP)-lowering therapy. METHODS: This prospective observational study enrolled patients with primary open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension who were on a topical IOP-lowering medication regimen. Enrolled patients completed the ocular surface disease index (OSDI) and OSDI scores (0-100, with 0 representing no symptoms) were calculated for each patient. Medical history, demographics, and concomitant medication information were also collected. RESULTS: Overall, 630 patients from 10 sites participated. Of these, 305 patients (48.4%) had an OSDI score indicating either mild (n = 134, 21.3%), moderate (n = 84, 13.3%), or severe (n = 87, 13.8%) OSD symptoms. OSDI scores were significantly different between patients with and without a prior diagnosis of dry eye syndrome (25.2 +/- 15.4 vs 15.4 +/- 15.8, respectively; P = 0.0036) and between patients who did and did not use artificial tears at the time of study participation (23.0 +/- 15.6 vs 15.3 +/- 15.8, respectively; P = 0.0046). Mean OSDI scores varied significantly with the number of topical IOP-lowering medications used, with higher (more severe) OSDI scores in patients using multiple IOP-lowering medications. Specifically, patients on a single medication had a mean OSDI score of 12.9 +/- 13.1, which was significantly lower than those of patients on 2 (16.7 +/- 17.0; P = 0.007) or 3 medications (19.4 +/- 18.1; P = 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: OSD is prevalent among medically treated patients with glaucoma. The severity of OSD symptoms is positively correlated to the number of IOP-lowering medications used.