When to Use Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance in Patients with Heart Failure.

Use of cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) to aid in diagnosis, management, and prognosis of ischemic and nonischemic cardiomyopathy has advanced tremendously in the past several decades. These advances have expanded our understanding of both ischemic and nonischemic cardiomyopathies while also allowing for new avenues of diagnosis and treatment. This review summarizes key concepts of CMR technology and CMR use in the diagnosis and prognosis in ischemic, infiltrative, inflammatory, and other nonischemic cardiomyopathies and discusses the use of CMR in the patient presenting with ventricular arrhythmia with unclear diagnosis and advances in CMR in the management cardiomyopathy.

Development and validation of a predictive score for anterograde crossing of infrapopliteal chronic total occlusions: (The Infrapop-CTO Score).

BACKGROUND: Patients with critical limb ischemia often have infrapopliteal (IP) chronic total occlusions (CTOs). While revascularization is indicated to prevent major amputation, anterograde crossing of these lesions can be challenging, with high failure rates. OBJECTIVE: To develop and validate a scoring system that can adequately predict successful anterograde crossing of infrapopliteal CTOs. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 213 IP CTOs (147 successfully crossed with the anterograde approach vs. 66 where anterograde crossing failed) were included in the analysis. Backwards stepwise selection (p for retention <.05) was used to create a multivariable logistic regression model for the prediction of successful anterograde crossing using variables that were found to have a p < .1 in univariate analysis. The model was internally validated with bootstrapping and demonstrated excellent discriminatory ability (C-statistic 0.78 and Hosmer-Lemeshow p value = .61). A point score based on the beta-coefficient of the model variables was created, with one point assigned for presence of a noncentral (blunt) stump, one point for severe calcification at the entry site, and two points each for non-restenotic lesions or lesion length > 200 mm. The score was shown to have an excellent discriminatory ability for successful crossing, with low scores (0-2) associated with low failure rates (10%) and high scores associated with high failure rates (79%). CONCLUSIONS: The Infrapop-CTO score can stratify the procedural complexity of IP CTOs based on the likelihood of successful anterograde crossing. This score may help to direct optimal approaches toward infrapopliteal revascularization of patients with critical limb ischemia.

Laser atherectomy and drug-coated balloons for the treatment of femoropopliteal in-stent restenosis: 2-Year outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Femoropopliteal (FP) artery is one of the most anatomically challenging areas for sustained stent patency. The incidence of FP in-stent restenosis (ISR) is estimated at 50% at 24 months. Prior studies have shown that lesion debulking with laser atherectomy (LA) combined with drug coated balloon (DCB) have superior outcomes compared to LA + balloon angioplasty (BA) ISR, but there have not been studies evaluating 2-year outcomes. METHODS: This was a dual-center retrospective cohort study that compared patients with FP-ISR treated with LA + DCB versus LA + BA. Cox regression analysis was used to examine 2-year outcomes of target lesion revascularization (TLR) and the composite outcome of TLR or restenosis. Multivariable analysis was performed for clinical and statistically significant (in the univariate analysis) variables. RESULTS: One hundred and seventeen consecutive patients with Tosaka II (n = 32) and III (n = 85) ISR were analyzed. Sixty-six patients were treated with LA + DCB and 51 with LA + BA. The LA + DCB group had more lesions with moderate to severe calcification (58% vs. 13%; p < .0001). The LA + DCB group was more likely to be treated with the use of embolic protection devices (64% vs. 23%, p < .001) and cutting balloons (61% vs. 6%, p < .001). Bail-out stenting rates were lower in the LA + DCB group (32% vs. 57%, p = .008). LA + DCB was superior (HR: 0.57; 95% CI: 0.34-0.9, p = .027) for the composite outcome of 2-year TLR or restenosis. The 12-month KM estimates for freedom from TLR or restenosis were 66% in the LA + DCB group versus 46% in the LA + BA group. The 24-month KM estimates were 45% in the LA + DCB group versus 24% in the LA + BA group. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of DCB + LA was associated with decreased rates of bail-out stenting and improved 2-year TLR or restenosis rates. Randomized clinical trials examining the DCB + LA combination for FP-ISR are needed.

Two-Year Outcomes of Orbital Atherectomy Combined With Drug-Coated Balloon Angioplasty for Treatment of Heavily Calcified Femoropopliteal Lesions.

Purpose: To examine whether the combination of orbital atherectomy (OA) and drug-coated balloons (DCB) can lead to superior procedural and 2-year outcomes compared with DCB only in heavily calcified femoropopliteal (FP) lesions. Materials and Methods: A retrospective chart review was conducted to identify patients treated with DCB only or OA+DCB for de novo FP lesions at a single center over a 4-year period (2014-2017). In the observation period, 113 patients met the inclusion criteria: 63 treated with DCB only (mean age 69.0±8.6 years; 62 men) vs 50 treated with OA+DCB (mean age 70.3±7.1 years; 48 men). The OA+DCB group had higher calcification rates (78% with severe calcification vs 37% in the DCB only group). Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to adjust for baseline differences between the 2 groups. Cox regression analysis was used to compare the follow-up outcomes between lesions treated with OA+DCB vs DCB only. Results: No difference in procedural complications or success was found. After PSM adjustment, the OA+DCB group was associated with lower bailout stenting rates (39.4% vs 66.7% in the DCB only group; p=0.026). The 2 groups had similar long-term outcomes, although the OA+DCB arm had a trend toward reduced TLR rates that did not reach statistical significance. The Kaplan-Meier estimates for 2-year freedom from TLR were 76.1% for the OA+DCB group vs 55.5% for the DCB only group (p=0.109). Conclusion: OA+DCB is a safe and effective combination for the treatment of calcified FP lesions. The combined therapy decreased the bailout stenting rates in the adjusted analysis. Larger cohorts and randomized trials are needed to examine OA efficacy in FP lesions.

Statin therapy for reduction of cardiovascular and limb-related events in critical limb ischemia: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

High-intensity statins are recommended for patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD). Critical limb ischemia (CLI) is the most advanced presentation of PAD. The benefit of statins in the CLI population is unclear based on the existent studies. Our objective was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis regarding the efficacy of statin therapy in patients with CLI. PRISMA guidelines were followed. PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane CENTRAL databases were reviewed up to April 30, 2019. The primary outcomes included amputation rates and all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes included primary patency rates, amputation-free survival and major adverse cardiac or cerebrovascular events (MACCE). Risk of bias was assessed with the Robins-I tool for observational studies. A random-effects model meta-analysis was performed. Heterogeneity was assessed with I2. Funnel plots and Egger's test were used to assess publication bias. Nineteen studies including 26,985 patients with CLI were included in this systematic review. Among patients with known data on statin status, 12,292 (49.6%) were on statins versus 12,513 (50.4%) not on statins. Patients treated with statins were 25% less likely to undergo amputation (HR 0.75; 95% CI: 0.59-0.95; I2 = 79%) and 38% less likely to have a fatal event (HR 0.62; 95% CI: 0.52-0.75; I2 = 41.2%). Statin therapy was also associated with increased overall patency rates and lower incidence of MACCE. There was substantial heterogeneity in the analysis for amputation and amputation-free survival (I2 > 70%). In conclusion, statins are associated with decreased risk for amputation, mortality, and MACCE, as well as increased overall patency rates among patients with CLI. Future studies should assess whether other lipid-lowering medications in addition to high-intensity statins can further improve outcomes among patients with CLI. (PROSPERO registration number: CRD42019134160).

Acute and Midterm Outcomes of Antegrade vs Retrograde Crossing Strategies for Endovascular Treatment of Iliac Artery Chronic Total Occlusions.

PURPOSE: To examine whether an antegrade or retrograde crossing strategy for treatment of iliac artery chronic total occlusions (CTOs) is associated with differences in procedural or midterm outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A dual-center retrospective cohort study was conducted in 168 patients (mean age 66.4±10.6 years; 116 men) treated for CTOs in 110 common iliac arteries (CIA), 52 external iliac arteries (EIA), and 26 combined CIA/EIAs. Logistic regression models were developed to determine the association between crossing strategy and procedural complications, 1- and 3-year target lesion revascularization (TLR), and major adverse limb events (MALE). Results are presented as the odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI). RESULTS: An initial antegrade strategy was more common for EIA CTOs (p<0.005), and an initial retrograde strategy was more often used in CIA (p<0.005) and combined CIA/EIA (p<0.005) CTOs. Crossover to an alternate approach was required in 27.6% of initial antegrade attempts and 9.6% of initial retrograde attempts. EIA CTOs were the most likely lesions to be treated successfully with the initial attempt (either strategy). In all, 123 (65.4%) lesions were successfully crossed with a final retrograde approach and 65 with a final antegrade approach. Overall target lesion success was high for both groups (95.1% vs 93.2%, p=0.456). Lesions treated with a final retrograde approach were shorter (75.3±34.9 vs 87.6±31.3 mm, p=0.005) and were more likely to be treated with a reentry device (34.2% vs 9.2%, p<0.001) and with balloon-expandable stents (39.2% vs 17.7%, p=0.005). The final antegrade approach was associated with a lower risk of target lesion complications (OR 0.07, 95% CI 0.01 to 0.81, p=0.034). The two crossing approaches were associated with similar estimates of 1- and 3-year TLR and MALE. CONCLUSION: A final antegrade approach was associated with lower rates for complications but the 2 approaches were similar in terms of lesion success, TLR, and MALE. The EIA CTOs were more likely to be treated with an antegrade approach and more likely to be crossed successfully with the initial approach irrespective of the crossing direction.

Laser Atherectomy Combined With Drug-Coated Balloon Angioplasty Is Associated With Improved 1-Year Outcomes for Treatment of Femoropopliteal In-Stent Restenosis.

PURPOSE: To examine whether laser atherectomy combined with drug-coated balloons (laser + DCB) can improve the outcomes of femoropopliteal (FP) in-stent restenosis (ISR). METHODS: A dual-center retrospective study was conducted of 112 consecutive patients (mean age 70.3±10.6 years; 86 men) with Tosaka class II (n=29; diffuse stenosis) or III (n=83; occlusion) FP-ISR lesions. Sixty-two patients (mean age 68.5±10 years; 51 men) underwent laser + DCB while the other 50 patients (mean age 72.5±10.8 years; 35 men) had laser atherectomy plus balloon angioplasty (laser + BA). Critical limb ischemia was the indication in 33% of the interventions. The average lesion length was 247 mm. A Cox regression hazard model was developed to examine the association between laser + DCB vs laser + BA; the results are presented as the hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI). One-year target lesion revascularization (TLR) and reocclusion were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: Overall procedure success was 98% and was similar between groups. Bailout stenting was less often required in the laser + DCB group (31.7% vs 58%, p=0.006). The combination of laser + DCB was associated with improved 12-month estimates for freedom from TLR (72.5% vs 50.5%, p=0.043) and freedom from reocclusion (86.7% vs 56.9%, p=0.003). Among patients with Tosaka III FP-ISR, combination therapy with laser + DCB was also associated with increased freedom from reocclusion (87.1% vs 57.1%, p=0. 028). On multivariable analysis, treatment with laser + DCB was associated with a significantly reduced risk of reocclusion (HR 0.08, 95% CI 0.17 to 0.38; p=0.002). CONCLUSION: When used for treatment of complex FP-ISR lesions, DCB angioplasty combined with laser atherectomy is associated with significantly reduced 1-year TLR and reocclusion rates.

Atrial Tachycardia-Induced Cardiomyopathy in Late Pregnancy: It Is Not Always Peripartum Cardiomyopathy.

Tachycardia-mediated cardiomyopathy is an established cause of left ventricular dysfunction. The development of cardiomyopathy depends on type, rate, and duration of tachyarrhythmia. Early recognition and treatment are critical in preventing left ventricular dysfunction and heart failure. Normal physiologic changes in pregnancy can complicate the early recognition and treatment of pathologic tachyarrhythmia.

Short-Term Outcomes After Retrograde Versus Antegrade Crossing Approaches for Femoropopliteal Occlusive Disease.

OBJECTIVE: To compare short- and mid-term outcomes of patients with femoropopliteal (FP) occlusive disease treated with a retrograde vs antegrade crossing strategy. BACKGROUND: Few studies have directly compared procedural details and outcomes after retrograde vs antegrade crossing of FP lesions. METHODS: Patients undergoing retrograde approaches to FP lesions were identified from the multicenter Excellence in Peripheral Artery Disease (XLPAD) registry between 2007 and 2015. These patients were matched 1:1 to patients treated with antegrade crossing strategies based on age, gender, comorbidities, indication for procedure, and lesion characteristics. Technical success, major adverse limb events (MALEs), and overall device cost were compared between retrograde and antegrade-only crossing. RESULTS: A total of 116 patients (58 antegrade and 58 retrograde) were included. The retrograde group had higher prevalence of coronary artery disease and presence of chronic total occlusions. The retrograde approach was associated with significantly longer procedural time (186 ± 70 minutes vs 124.4 ± 60 minutes; P<.001), but similar technical success (91.4% vs 96.6%; P=.24). There was no significant difference in perioperative morbidity. Patients treated with a retrograde approach had a lower total amputation rate (8.6% vs 22.4%; P=.04) and no difference in overall mortality (8.6% vs 5.2%; P=.47). Mean procedural costs were similar in the antegrade and retrograde groups. CONCLUSION: In patients with similar disease characteristics, a retrograde approach to FP occlusive disease was associated with longer procedural time, but improved limb salvage, without significant difference in procedural cost.

Comparison of and Frequency of Mortality, Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation, Ventricular Arrhythmias, and Heart Transplantation in Patients With Familial Versus Nonfamilial Idiopathic Dilated Cardiomyopathy.

We postulated that familial idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy (F-IDC) is associated with a worse prognosis than nonfamilial IDC (nonF-IDC). Patients with F-IDC had either a strong family history and/or proved genetic mutations. We studied long-term prognosis (mean follow-up: 6.1 ± 4.1 years) of 162 patients with IDC (age: 55.5 ± 17.9 years, men: 57.8%, 50% F-IDC) with an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator or cardiac resynchronization therapy. The primary end point was a composite of death, left ventricular (LV) assist device implant, or heart transplantation. The secondary end point was a ventricular arrhythmia event. There was no significant difference in the prevalence of diabetes, hypertension, New York Heart Association class, medical therapy, and years of follow-up between the F-IDC and nonF-IDC groups. Patients with F-IDC were younger than patients with nonF-IDC (49.1 ± 17.0 years vs 61.6 ± 16.5 years, p <0.001). Mean LV ejection fraction was significantly lower in F-IDC group than in the nonF-IDC group (26 ± 12% vs 31 ± 12%, p = 0.022). The primary end point was achieved in 54 patients in F-IDC group (66.7%) versus 19 in the nonF-IDC group (23.5%) (p <0.001). The Kaplan-Meier survival estimates for the composite end point and for ventricular arrhythmia were significantly lower in the F-IDC versus nonF-IDC (log-rank p ≤0.001 and 0.04, respectively). F-IDC was the only multivariable predictor of the primary composite end point (hazard ratio 3.419 [95% confidence interval 1.845 to 6.334], p <0.001). The likelihood of LV remodeling manifested by LV ejection fraction improvement (≥10%) was significantly lower in F-IDC than nonF-IDC (27.1% vs 44.8%, p = 0.042). In conclusion, F-IDC is a predictor of mortality, need for LV assist device, or heart transplantation. F-IDC is associated with significantly lower event-free survival for primary end point and ventricular arrhythmia than nonF-IDC. F-IDC has significantly lower likelihood of LV reverse remodeling than nonF-IDC.

Ventricular Assist Devices and Chronic Kidney Replacement Therapy: Technology and Outcomes.

Heart failure and kidney failure are very common conditions, precipitating and exacerbating each other. Left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) represent a relatively new technology for treatment of advanced heart failure. Kidney dysfunction, if present, makes candidate selection for LVADs challenging and contributes to multiple complications while the patients are on an LVAD support. Although kidney function generally improves after LVAD implantation, some patients develop acute and then chronic kidney disease sometimes requiring kidney replacement therapies (KRTs). Overall, chronic KRT in LVAD recipients is feasible and well tolerated, but routine technique of blood pressure monitoring should be adjusted to the continuous blood flow. Both hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis can be used. Unique challenges for chronic KRT posed by the presence of LVAD are discussed in this review.

Laser Atherectomy for Infrapopliteal Lesions in Patients With Critical Limb Ischemia.

BACKGROUND: Infrapopliteal (IP) lesions are common in patients with critical limb ischemia (CLI). Optimal revascularization strategies including the use of adjunctive atherectomy have the potential to improve the outcomes for these patients. OBJECTIVE: To compare laser atherectomy (LA) vs. balloon angioplasty alone for the treatment of IP lesions in patients with CLI. METHODS: This was a two-center retrospective study of patients with CLI who underwent endovascular interventions for IP lesions. One and 2-year target lesion revascularization (TLR) was the primary outcome. One and 2-year limb loss and major adverse limb events (MALE) were secondary outcomes. Propensity score matching was performed. A Cox regression analysis was used to compare 1- and 2-year outcomes of the two groups. Logistic regression analysis was used to compare the two groups in terms of bail-out stenting and procedural complications. RESULTS: A total of 313 patients with CLI were included; 76 were treated with LA. There was a high degree of lesion complexity in both groups. Consistent with the application of LA in the most complex lesions, lesions in the LA group were significantly longer (165.7 mm vs. 94.1 mm; p < 0.001) and were more frequently TASC C/D (82% vs. 45%; p < 0.001). In-stent restenosis (ISR) lesions were also more common among the LA group (14% vs. 0.4%; p < 0.001). Thrombotic lesions were present in 11% of the LA group vs. 4% in the no LA group (p = 0.04). CTOs were also more common in the LA group (58% vs. 43%; p = 0.024). After propensity matching, there was no difference in the 1 or 2-year TLR rates between the two groups. Similarly, there were no differences between the two groups in terms of 1 or 2-year limb loss or 2-year major adverse limb events. CONCLUSIONS: LA is safe and effective for IP lesions in patients with CLI. There was a higher baseline angiographic complexity in patients treated with LA, suggesting that operators tend to use LA for the treatment of more complicated lesions. There was no difference among the two groups in 1- or 2-year outcomes of TLR of major amputation.

Outcomes of Drug-Coated Balloon Angioplasty vs. Conventional Balloon Angioplasty for Endovascular Treatment of Common Femoral Artery Atherosclerotic Disease.

BACKGROUND: Atherosclerotic disease of the common femoral artery (CFA), commonly associated with multilevel disease affecting the femoropopliteal segment, can cause claudication or contribute to critical limb ischemia. Although endovascular therapy for the management of peripheral arterial disease (PAD) has been increasingly utilized, its role in CFA lesions remains controversial. The aim of this study was to investigate the safety and efficacy of drug (DCB) vs non drug coated balloon angioplasty (BA) at the CFA segment. METHODS: In this two-center study, we identified 154 patients treated either with DCB (n = 47) or BA (n = 107) for CFA lesions. Hazard ratios (HR) and the respective 95% confidence interval (CI) were synthesized to examine the association between the two groups in terms of target lesion revascularization (TLR), limb loss, and major adverse limb event (MALE) at 12 and 24 months of follow up. RESULTS: This real-world population included a high percentage of patients with critical limb ischemia (43%) and moderate to severe lesion calcification (75%). Adjunctive atherectomy was performed in 97.9% of DCB cases (N = 46/47) and 44.7% of BA cases (N = 51/114). The overall procedural success rate was 95% without any differences between the two groups. Post-angioplasty dissections were observed in 15 cases [DCB: 8.5% (N = 4/47) vs BA: 9.7% (N = 11/113); p = .81], while distal embolization occurred in one patient in the DCB group and one in the BA group (p = .52). Provisional stenting was more commonly necessary in BA vs. DCB cases (12.3% vs 2.13%, p = .044). Physiologic assessment during follow up demonstrated a better mean 2-year ABI for the DCB group (mean: 0.9; SD: 0.2) vs BA group (mean: 0.6; SD: 0.4), although statistical significance was not reached (p = .06). No difference between the two groups was detected in terms of freedom from TLR (DCB: 75.5% vs BA: 86.8%; HR: 1.31; 95% CI: 0.46-3.67; p = .61), freedom from limb loss (DCB: 83.8% vs BA: 83.6%; HR: 1.04; 95% CI: 0.36-2.99; p = .94) or freedom from MALE (DCB: 83.5% vs BA: 78%; HR: 0.73; 95% CI: 0.26-1.99; p = .53) at 24 m of follow up. However, at the end of follow up more deaths were observed in patients treated with BA than DCB (DCB: 14.9% vs BA: 31.7%; p = .03). Patients who required provisional stenting were at higher risk for limb loss 2 years after the initial procedure (multivariate: HR: 4.54; 95% CI: 1.09-18.85; p = .04). CONCLUSIONS: Both DCB and non-DCB strategies are effective modalities for revascularization of patients with CFA lesions. Larger prospective studies are necessary to determine the relative benefit, if any, of drug-eluting technologies for the treatment of common femoral artery disease.

Turbo-Power™ Laser Atherectomy Combined with Drug-coated Balloon Angioplasty is Associated with Improved One-Year Outcomes for the Treatment of Tosaka II and III Femoropopliteal In-stent Restenosis.

BACKGROUND: Femoropopliteal (FP) artery in-stent restenosis (ISR) is associated with high rates of re-intervention and occlusion. The combined use of laser atherectomy (LA) with balloon angioplasty (BA) is superior to conventional balloon angioplasty (BA). Drug-coated balloons (DCBs) when combined with LA have provided additional efficacy for the treatment of FP-ISR. The aim of this study was to investigate the combination of DCB + LA with the recently approved Turbo-Power™ (Spectranetics Inc., Colorado Springs, CO, USA) LA device. METHODS: This was a dual-center retrospective study enrolling 78 consecutive patients with Tosaka type II (n = 18) or III (n = 60) FP-ISR. The lesions were treated with either Turbo-Power™ LA followed by DCB (n = 27) or with other LA devices followed by plain BA (LA + BA; n = 51) from 2015 to 2017. A Cox regression analysis was performed to examine the association between the two groups in terms of target lesion revascularization (TLR) and occlusion rates over a follow up period of 12 months. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were estimated and compared with the log-rank test. RESULTS: The overall procedural success was 90%. Eight periprocedural complications occurred without any difference between the two groups (Turbo-Power™â€¯+ DCB: 7.4% vs LA + BA: 11.8%, p = .7). The 12-month KM estimates for freedom from TLR were 90.9% in the Turbo-Power™â€¯+ DCB group vs 55.7% in the LA + BA group (p = .005). Among Toasaka III lesions, the 12 m-KM survival estimates for freedom from TLR were 88.9% in the Turbo-Power™â€¯+ DCB group vs 54.2% in the LA + BA group (p = .009). The 12 m-KM estimates for freedom from re-occlusion were 89.0% in the Turbo-Power™â€¯+ DCB group vs 58.9% in the LA + BA group (p = .070). CONCLUSIONS: Turbo-Power™ laser atherectomy combined with DCB exerted synergistic mechanism of actions and improved 12-month TLR rates for the treatment of complex FP-ISR lesions.

Temporal Trends and Site Variation in High-Risk Coronary Intervention and the Use of Mechanical Circulatory Support: Insights From the Veterans Affairs Clinical Assessment Reporting and Tracking (CART) Program.

Background Patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) are older with greater medical comorbidities and anatomical complexity than ever before, resulting in an increased frequency of nonemergent high-risk PCI (HR-PCI). We thus sought to evaluate the temporal trends in performance of HR-PCI and utilization of mechanical circulatory support in the largest integrated healthcare system in the United States. Methods and Results A cohort of high-risk adult patients that underwent nonemergent PCI in the Veterans Affairs Healthcare System between January 2008 and June 2018 were identified by objective clinical, hemodynamic, and anatomic criteria. Temporal trends in the performance of HR-PCI, utilization of mechanical circulatory support, and site-level variation were assessed. Of 111 548 patients assessed during the study period, 554 met 3 high-risk criteria whereas 4414 met at least 2 criteria for HR-PCI. There was a significant linear increase in the proportion of interventions that met 3 (P<0.001) or at least 2 (P<0.001) high-risk criteria over time, with rates approaching 1.9% and 11.2% in the last full calendar year analyzed. A minority of patients who met all high-risk criteria received PCI with mechanical support (15.7%) without a significant increase over time (P=0.193). However, there was significant site-level variation in the probability of performing HR-PCI (4.0-fold higher likelihood) and utilizing mechanical circulatory support (1.9-fold higher likelihood) between high and low utilization sites. Conclusions The proportion of cases categorized as HR-PCI has increased over time, with significant site-level variation in performance. The majority of HR-PCI cases did not utilize mechanical support, highlighting a discrepancy between current recommendations and clinical practice in an integrated healthcare system.

Contemporary use of intra-aortic balloon pumps during percutaneous coronary intervention: insights from the Veterans Affairs Clinical Assessment, Reporting, and Tracking program.

BACKGROUND: Intra-aortic balloon pumps (IABP) support nonemergent and emergent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Recent studies have not showed a routine benefit to this practice. We sought to evaluate the temporal trends in balloon pump utilization and site-level variation within a large integrated healthcare system. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We identified all patients that underwent PCI in the Veterans Affairs Healthcare System between 1 January 2008 and 31 December 2015. Procedural information was ascertained from the medical record and stratified by the concomitant use of an IABP. Site-specific variation was determined with mixed logistic regression models and reported as a median odds ratio. RESULTS: There were 88 851 interventions performed on 71 529 patients across 71 hospitals with 1289 (1.5%) of these utilizing an IABP. Patients that underwent an intervention with this device had more medical comorbidities, as reflected by an increase in the median National Cardiovascular Data Registry CathPCI mortality score (34 vs. 15, P<0.001). The overall utilization of balloon pumps was constant throughout the study period (P=0.446). However, there was a significant decline (P=0.027) in its use during emergent cases with a significant increase (P=0.009) during nonemergent cases. Furthermore, there was site variation in use independent of patient or procedural characteristics (median odds ratio: 1.82, 95% confidence interval: 1.58-2.16). CONCLUSION: In the largest integrated healthcare system in the USA, there was a significant decline in IABP use among emergent cases and a significant increase during nonemergent cases. Residual site variation suggests an opportunity to standardize a procedural approach consistent with currently available data.

Comparative Effectiveness Study of Drug-Eluting and Bare-Metal Peripheral Artery Stents in Endovascular Femoropopliteal Artery Revascularization.

OBJECTIVES: Paclitaxel drug-eluting stents (DESs) have been shown to improve primary patency of femoropopliteal lesions compared to plain balloon angioplasty with provisional bare-metal stents (BMSs) in randomized controlled studies. However, data are lacking on patency outcomes of real-world DES use relative to BMS use. This study compared clinically driven target-lesion revascularization (TLR), target-vessel revascularization (TVR), and target-limb revascularization outcomes at 1 year between DES and BMS treatments in a real-world setting. METHODS: The study identified 174 DES (Zilver PTX; Cook Medical) and 784 BMS femoropopliteal interventions from the available 969 Excellence in Peripheral Artery Disease (XLPAD) registry patients between October 2013 and December 2016. We analyzed both unmatched (174 DES and 784 BMS) and propensity score (PS)-matched datasets (174 for each). RESULTS: This study found that patients who underwent DES femoropopliteal endovascular revascularization had significantly lower TLR rates in both unmatched (hazard ratio [HR], 0.57; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.35-0.91; P=.02) and matched data (HR, 0.50 95% CI, 0.27-0.91; P=.02). The DES group had a 43% lower TVR risk than the BMS group in the PS matched cohort (HR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.33-0.98; P=.04). Mortality rate in the DES group (5%) was significantly higher than the BMS group in both unmatched (2%; P=.04) and matched groups (1%; P=.046) at 1 year. CONCLUSIONS: Patients treated with DES had higher lesion and vessel patency than BMS after adjusting for confounding, which included complexity of lesion characteristics and operators' clinical decision-making regarding selection of treatment modalities, in femoropopliteal endovascular interventions in a real-world registry.