Covalent and Oriented Immobilization of Antibodies through Systematic Modification of Photoactivatable RNA Hybrid Aptamers.

We report a covalent and well-oriented strategy of immobilization of antibodies using photoactivatable Fc-binding RNA aptamers (FcBAs). We prepared several types of FcBAs that were further modified with photoaffinity probes (i.e., benzophenone or diazirine), and evaluated the binding capabilities and the photo-crosslinking efficiency of them via pull-down assays and fluorescence analyses, respectively. Initial moderate photo-crosslinking efficiency (Kd ∼ 110 nM) was substantially improved by multivalent association of FcBAs and structural modification of FcBAs. For a conceptual proof, covalent crosslinking of human IgG on FcBA-tethered solid chips was fabricated and investigated by scanometry, which eventually proved real applicability of the present scheme toward immunoassays.

Effectiveness of supplemental screw fixation for the prevention of anterior cage migration in oblique lateral interbody fusion at L5-S1.

BACKGROUND: The anterior cage at L5-S1 segment is more vulnerable to anterior migration because of the sacral slope, the greater disc angle (DA), the higher shear force, and the weaker pedicle screw fixation at S1. We hypothesized that a supplemental screw (SS) fixation is effective for the prevention of anterior cage migration in oblique lateral interbody fusion (OLIF) at L5-S1. METHODS: This study involved 61 consecutive patients who underwent OLIF at L5-S1 and had more than 1-year regular follow-up. In the first 35 cases, the anterior cage was fixed with pedicle screws only (non-SS group). In the remaining 26 cases, the anterior cage was fixed with a SS and pedicle screws (SS group). Radiological parameters including anterior disc height (ADH), posterior disc height (PDH), DA, cage migration, cage subsidence, and fusion rate at L5-S1 were compared between the two groups. RESULT: Of the total 61 patients, fifteen (24.6%) patients had an anterior cage migration of >2 mm and six (9.8%) patients had an anterior cage migration of >5 mm. Baseline demographic characteristics were similar between the two groups. The mean cage migration was 2.0 ± 3.1 mm in the non-SS group and 0.9 ± 0.9 mm in the SS group (P = 0.038). Thirteen (37.1%) patients had a cage migration of >2 mm in the non-SS group, while only two (7.7%) had a cage migration of >2 mm in the SS group (P = 0.002). There were no significant differences in the ADH, PDH, DA, cage subsidence, and fusion rate between the two groups (all P > 0.05). There was no SS-related complication in the SS group. CONCLUSIONS: SS fixation in front of the anterior L5-S1 cage is simple, safe, and effective for the prevention of anterior cage migration in OLIF at L5-S1.

Risk factors for nonunion in oblique lateral interbody fusion.

BACKGROUND: Compared with posterior interbody fusion techniques, oblique lateral interbody fusion (OLIF) offers a larger fusion bed with greater intervertebral space access, use of larger cages, more sufficient discectomy, and better end-plate preparation. However, the fusion rate of OLIF is similar to that of other interbody fusions. This study aimed to examine the factors associated with nonunion in OLIF. METHODS: This study examined 201 disc levels from 124 consecutive patients who underwent OLIF for lumbar degenerative diseases with 1-year regular follow-up. Demographic and surgical factors were reviewed from the medical records. Radiological factors measured were sagittal parameters, intervertebral disc angle (DA) before surgery and at the final follow-up, presence of vertebral end-plate lesions, and cage subsidence. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to identify the factors associated with nonunion. RESULTS: Among the 201 discs, 185 (92.0%) achieved union at 1-year followed up. Smoking, surgery at the L5-S1 level, not performing laminectomy, and a large intervertebral DA were factors associated with nonunion in OLIF (all P < 0.05). Multivariable logistic regression analysis showed two independent variables (surgery at L5-S1 level and not performing laminectomy) as risk factors for nonunion in OLIF. CONCLUSIONS: Not performing laminectomy and surgery at the L5-S1 level were risk factors for nonunion in OLIF. To reduce the nonunion rate, surgeons should consider additional stabilization strategies for the L5-S1 OLIF and perform laminectomy.

Prospective investigation of Oswestry Disability Index and short form 36 subscale scores related to sagittal and coronal parameters in patients with degenerative lumbar scoliosis.

PURPOSE: This study investigated relationships of Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and Short Form 36 (SF-36) total and subscale scores with global spinal parameters in patients with degenerative lumbar scoliosis (DLS). METHODS: This was a prospective single-center study of 126 consecutive patients with DLS. Disability was evaluated using the ODI and SF-36 total and subscale scores. Sagittal and coronal parameters were measured. Pearson's correlation analysis was performed to determine relationships between disability and radiographic parameters. RESULTS: The study population included 76 women and 15 men (mean age, 70.2 ± 8.4 years). Mean Cobb angle was 18.9° ± 8.0°. The ODI total score and SF-36 physical component score were only correlated with coronal parameters. ODI pain intensity, personal care, lifting, sitting, and sex life domains were only correlated with coronal parameters. The walking, standing, social life, and traveling domain scores were correlated with coronal and sagittal parameters. The SF-36 bodily pain and vitality domain scores were only correlated with coronal parameters. The SF-36 physical function domain score was correlated with both coronal and sagittal parameters. Among the clinical and radiographic parameters, the personal care score and the coronal vertical-axis had the strongest correlation (r = 0.425), although the r2 value was only 0.18. CONCLUSIONS: ODI total score and most of the subscale scores were significantly, but weakly correlated with coronal parameters. Sagittal parameters were only correlated with some of the ODI and SF-36 subscale scores. Analysis using ODI and SF-36 subscale scores may aid in understanding and treatment of disability in patients with DLS.

Vascular anatomy and surgical approach in oblique lateral interbody fusion at lumbosacral transitional vertebrae.

BACKGROUND: Oblique lateral interbody fusion (OLIF) at lumbosacral junction is typically performed on the central window between the bifurcations of iliac vessels. However, the central window of lumbosacral transitional vertebrae (LSTVs) is usually obstructed by the iliocaval venous structures. We aimed to describe the vascular anatomy and surgical approach in OLIF at LSTVs compared with those in OLIF at typical L5-S1 junction. METHODS: Sixty-eight consecutive patients who underwent OLIF at lumbosacral junction were included. Of these, 31 patients had LSTVs and 37 patients had typical L5-S1 junction. The position of the iliocaval junction and the configuration of the left common iliac vein were compared using the preoperative CT and MR images of the lumbar spine. The surgical approach and intraoperative vascular findings were analyzed. RESULTS: Almost 70% of LSTVs had the iliocaval junction at low or very low position. Mobilization of left common iliac vein for central window was potentially difficult in almost 74% of OLIF at LSTVs while it was not required or was potentially easy in almost 80% of OLIF at typical L5-S1. Vascular injury was identified in 2 (6.5%) patients with OLIF at LSTVs and in 3 (8.1%) patients with OLIF at typical L5-S1 junction (P = 0.904). CONCLUSIONS: In our series, OLIF at LSTVs was performed through lateral window in 93.5% of the cases. Preoperative evaluation of the iliocaval junction using CT/MR of lumbar spine was reliable and valid in the determination of OLIF approach at lumbosacral junction.

Accuracy of the lateral cage placement under intraoperative C-arm fluoroscopy in oblique lateral interbody fusion.

BACKGROUND: In oblique lateral interbody fusion (OLIF), the lateral cage enters into the disc space obliquely, and is then turned to the true lateral direction to achieve a lateral lumbar interbody fusion. The OLIF cage is sometimes placed asymmetrically although it seemed to be placed accurately on intraoperative C-arm images. The present study aimed to investigate the accuracy of cage placement and its effect on the radiological outcome in OLIF. METHODS: This study involved a retrospective radiological analysis of 127 lateral cages in 75 consecutive OLIF patients. The cage deviations from the midline and cage obliquity were evaluated using three sets of images: (1) intraoperative C-arm fluoroscopy, (2) postoperative standing radiographs, and (3) postoperative computed tomography (CT). RESULTS: The mean cage deviation from the midline was measured as 2.5 ± 2.7 mm on intraoperative C-arm images, but was found to be more deviated on postoperative radiographs and CT (5.4 ± 3.8 mm and 3.8 ± 3.7 mm; P = 0.000 and 0.005, respectively). The cage obliquity on the intraoperative lateral C-arm was minimal in 26 (20.5%) cases, mild in 69 (54.3%), and moderate in 32 (25.2%), but was found to be more obliquely on postoperative radiographs as minimal in 9 (7.1%), mild in 55 (43.3%), and moderate in 63 (49.6%) (P < 0.001). Anterior/posterior disc heights, disc lordotic angle, fusion rate, and cage subsidence rate were not different according to cage obliquity (all P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Cage deviation from the midline and obliquity is underestimated on intraoperative C-arm images in OLIF. Although minimal cage deviation and obliquity did not affect the radiological outcome, great care should be made for the orthogonal cage insertion.

Preoperative evaluation of left common iliac vein in oblique lateral interbody fusion at L5-S1.

PURPOSE: Oblique lateral interbody fusion (OLIF) L5-S1 is essentially to perform an anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) in the lateral position. Because the surgical procedures are performed "obliquely" over the left common iliac vein (LCIV), ensuring that the vein is protected which is particularly important. We aimed to evaluate the configuration of LCIV and its risk of mobilization during anterior approach at L5-S1 segment. METHODS: This study involved 65 consecutive patients who underwent anterior lumbar fusion (ALIF, n = 39; OLIF, n = 26) at the L5-S1 segment. Three independent examiners evaluated the configuration of the LCIV at the L5-S1 disc on axial magnetic resonance images of the lumbar spine. The LCIV was categorized into three types according to the difficulty of mobilization: type I (no requirement for mobilization; LCIV runs laterally for more than two-thirds of the length of the left side of the L5-S1 disc), type II (easy mobilization; LCIV obstructs the L5-S1 disc space, but the perivascular adipose tissue is present under the LCIV), and type III (potentially difficult mobilization; no perivascular adipose tissue under the LCIV). The patient records were reviewed for vascular complications. RESULTS: There were 21 men and 44 women in this study, with a mean age of 63.4 years (range 19-83 years). Type I LCIV configuration was found in 32 (49.2%) patients, type II in 18 (27.7%), and type III in 15 (23.1%). There were 7 (10.8%) patients with LCIV injury (type I, n = 0; type II, n = 2; type III, n = 5) (P = 0.003). Intraobserver reliability for the LCIV classification ranged from substantial to excellent, and interobserver reliability ranged from moderate to excellent. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative evaluation for anterior approach to the L5-S1 segment should take account of the LCIV position, as well as the difficulty of its mobilization. The type III LCIV configuration showed a high rate of vascular injury.

Factors affecting postural reduction in posterior surgery for thoracolumbar burst fracture.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of a prospectively collected patient database. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the significance and relevant factors of postural kyphosis reduction during posterior surgical treatment of thoracolumbar burst fracture. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Optimal reduction of kyphosis is a goal in the surgical treatment of thoracolumbar burst fracture. Several factors are known to limit the amount of posterior surgical reduction. However, few comprehensive assessments of intraoperative postural reduction have been reported. METHODS: Seventy-two consecutive patients who underwent posterior surgical treatment for thoracolumbar (T11-L2) burst fracture were included. Postural reduction was evaluated using C-arm fluoroscopic images and regarded as insufficient when the lateral Cobb angle was ≥20 degrees or AP Cobb angle ≥10 degrees. Clinical characteristics including sex, age, body mass index, time to operation, injury level, and neurological injury, as well as radiologic characteristics including fracture morphology, fracture deformity, canal stenosis, and ligament injuries were investigated to determine the relevant factors. RESULTS: The mean lateral Cobb angle was 22.2±11.0 degrees preoperatively, 16.4±7.7 degrees after postural reduction (P<0.001), and 13.4±6.9 degrees after instrumental reduction (P<0.001). Insufficient postural reduction was found in 25 (34.7%) patients, all of which were lateral. The relevant factors for insufficient reduction, as identified by multivariate analysis, were time to operation >72 hours (OR, 6.453; 95% CI, 1.283-32.553), burst-split type injury (OR, 4.689; 95% CI, 1.314-25.225), and anterior compression ratio >0.5 (OR, 2.284; 95% CI, 1.151-19.811). CONCLUSIONS: Postural reduction plays an important role in the reduction of kyphosis and compression deformity after thoracolumbar burst fracture. However, it was affected by delayed operation time, burst-split type injury, and severe anterior vertebral compression.

Highly stable colorimetric aptamer sensors for detection of ochratoxin A through optimizing the sequence with the covalent conjugation of hemin.

Optimization of hairpin DNA is introduced to detect ochratoxin A (OTA) by chemically conjugating its cofactor, hemin, toward the 5'-end. The newly designed OTA aptasensor showed enhanced stability and sensitivity, thereby lowering the detection limit to an ~1 nM level. Furthermore, an optimal spacer for hemin conjugation was investigated for stable responses toward very diluted OTA solutions.

A simple intraoperative method for assessment of pedicle screw trajectory using contrast medium injection.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective radiologic study. OBJECTIVE: To introduce a novel method for intraoperative verification of the pedicle screw pathway using contrast medium injection. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Various surgical techniques and equipments, such as, mechanical probing, intraoperative fluoroscopy, computer-assisted navigation system, and neurophysiological monitoring have been devised to assist accurate pedicle screw placement. However, pedicle screw misplacement remains of considerable concern, even to experienced spine surgeons. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty pedicle screws placed using the devised contrast medium technique in 39 consecutive patients were included. The authors used a contrast medium injection to verify pedicle screw tracts when pedicle wall violation was doubtful with conventional methods. Contrast medium (Iopamidol) was injected through the prepared screw path under fluoroscopic view. The screw path preparation was deemed successful when contrast medium was contained within the prepared screw tract. Pedicle screw placements were interpreted by postoperative computed tomography. RESULTS: Intraoperative verifications of pedicle screw paths using contrast medium technique showed that 6 of the 50 (12%) screw paths were disrupted, and these paths were redirected. Posteoperative computed tomography evaluations showed that 39 of the 50 (78%) screws were correctly placed. Of the 11 misplaced screws, 9 (18%) were interpreted as exhibiting cortical encroachment, and 2 (4%) as exhibiting mild frank penetration. CONCLUSIONS: The intraoperative injection of contrast medium provides a simple, fast, safe, and reliable means of verifying pedicle screw tract, when pedicle wall violation is doubtful.

Increased size of a gas-filled intradural cyst causing acute foot drop: a case report.

We describe the case of a 76-year-old man presenting with a gas-filled intradural cyst that increased in size over a 10-month period and caused acute bilateral foot drop. The gas-filled intradural cyst was resected from the adherent cauda equina, and histopathological examination identified cystic tissue with degenerated fibrocartilage. Leg pain disappeared immediately following surgery, and the bilateral foot drop resolved within 8 months.

Impact of spinal injury on mortality in patients with major trauma: A propensity-matched cohort study.

Major trauma is defined as a significant injury or injury that has the potential to be life-threatening and is quantitatively identified as an injury severity score (ISS) >15. Spinal injuries are common in patients with major trauma; however, because spinal injury is not independently included in the ISS calculation, the impact of spinal injury on mortality in patients with major trauma has not been fully elucidated. The purpose of this study is to identify the association between spinal injury and mortality in patients with major trauma. From January 1, 2016, to December 31, 2020, retrospective analysis was conducted on 2893 major trauma adult patients admitted to a level 1 trauma center. There were 781 patients in the spinal injury group and 2112 patients in the group without spinal injury. After matching the 2 groups 1:1, we compared injury mechanism, mortality, cause of death, intensive care unit length of stay (ICU LOS), and duration of ventilator use between spinal injury group and matched cohorts. Falls and traffic accidents were the most common injury mechanisms in the spinal injury group and the matched cohort, respectively. The mortality was significantly lower in the spinal injury group compared with the matched cohort (4.0% vs 7.9%, P = .001), and the ICU LOS was longer than the matched cohort (8.8 ± 17.4 days vs 7.2 ± 11.7 days, P = .028). In the spinal injury group, multiple organ failure (MOF) was the most common cause of death (41.9%), while that in the matched cohort was central nervous system (CNS) damage (61.3%). In patients with major trauma, spinal injury may act as a shock absorber for internal organs, which is thought to lower the mortality rate.

Cage Obliquity and Radiological Outcomes in Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective radiological study. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to examine whether cage obliquity affects radiological outcomes in oblique lateral interbody fusion (OLIF). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The OLIF cage enters the disk space in the oblique direction and is then turned to the true orthogonal orientation. However, orthogonal cage placement is often hindered by cage rotation limitations. Few studies have examined the degree of cage obliquity and its effects in OLIF. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study involved 171 levels in 118 consecutive patients who underwent OLIF between L2-L3 and L4-L5 with a minimum two-year follow-up. Cage obliquity was divided into three groups on postoperative axial computed tomography images; cage obliquity <10° (group 1), cage obliquity ≥10° and <20° (group 2), and cage obliquity ≥20° (group 3). The radiological outcomes included anterior/posterior disk height, intervertebral disk angle, foraminal height, fusion, and cage subsidence. Postoperative complications related to cage obliquity were examined. RESULTS: The mean cage obliquity of the 171 cages was 11.3±6.9°. Cage obliquity was greater at the L4-L5 level (13.4±6.4°) than at other levels (L2-L3 and L3-L4: 6.5±7.0° and 10.1±6.2°, respectively) ( P <0.05). There were no significant differences in radiological outcomes among the groups. There were two cases of postoperative contralateral neurological symptoms in group 3. CONCLUSIONS: Our study showed that the orthogonal cage rotation in OLIF achieved adequate lateral cage placement. Although accurate cage rotation can be limited at the lower lumbar segments, radiological outcomes were not affected by cage obliquity.

The validity of ankle-brachial index for the differential diagnosis of peripheral arterial disease and lumbar spinal stenosis in patients with atypical claudication.

PURPOSE: Claudication is a typical symptom of peripheral arterial disease (PAD) and lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS). Differential diagnosis of PAD and LSS is often difficult due to the subjective natures of symptoms and atypical signs. The authors aimed to determine the usefulness of ankle-brachial index (ABI) measurement for the differential diagnosis of PAD and LSS when the etiology of claudication is uncertain. METHODS: Forty-two consecutive patients who had been referred by spine surgeons to a lower extremity vascular surgeon for atypical claudication were retrospectively analyzed. Atypical claudication was defined as claudication not caused by PAD, as determined by clinical manifestations, or by LSS, as determined by MR imaging. A final diagnosis of PAD was established by CT angiography (CTA) and of LSS by excluding PAD. Diagnostic validity of ABI for PAD in atypical presentation was assessed. RESULTS: Sixty-two legs of 42 atypical claudication patients were analyzed. Mean patient age was 65.8 ± 8.2 years (38-85) and 29 (69.0%) had diabetes mellitus. Mean ABI was 0.73 ± 0.14 (0.53-0.94) in the PAD group and 0.92 ± 0.18 (0.52-1.10) in the LSS group (P < 0.001). Of the 33 legs with a low ABI (ABI < 0.9), 29 legs were diagnosed as true positives for PAD by CTA and 4 were false positives, and of the 29 legs with a high ABI, 5 were false negatives and 24 were true negatives. The sensitivity and specificity of ABI for the diagnosis of PAD in patients with atypical claudication were 85.3 and 85.7%, respectively, and its positive and negative predictive values were 87.9 and 82.8%. CONCLUSIONS: ABI is a recommended screening test for the differential diagnosis of lower leg claudication when clinical symptoms are atypical.

Factors Affecting Slip Reduction in Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion With Posterior Fixation for Degenerative Spondylolisthesis.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective case series. OBJECTIVES: Reduction of translational/angular slip is a favorable radiological result in spinal fusion for degenerative spondylolisthesis, although its clinical significance remains controversial. Few studies have investigated slip reduction and associated factors in oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF) for degenerative spondylolisthesis. METHODS: This study involved a retrospective analysis of 56 operated levels of 52 consecutive patients who underwent OLIF for degenerative spondylolisthesis and had more than 1-year of regular follow-up. Translational/angular slip, anterior/posterior disc height, and spinopelvic parameters were measured preoperatively, postoperatively at 6-weeks, and at the last follow-up. Demographic, radiological, and surgical parameters were analyzed to determine factors associated with the amount of slip reduction. RESULT: The mean follow-up duration was 30.4 ± 12.9 months (range, 12 to 61). The mean decrease in translational slip was 5.7 ± 2.1 mm (13.6 ± 5.5%) and the mean increase in angular slip was 7.9 ± 7.1° at the last follow-up (both P < 0.001). The amount of slip reduction was greater in female sex, age < 65 years, use of a 12° cage, cage position from the anterior disc margin of < 7 mm, and cases with posterior decompression (laminectomy with inferior facetectomy). CONCLUSIONS: OLIF showed satisfactory translational/angular slip reduction in degenerative spondylolisthesis. Surgical techniques for optimal reduction include the use of a large angle cage, anterior cage placement, and resection of the inferior facet.

A Modified Anterior Column Realignment With Partial Anterior Longitudinal Ligament Release in Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective radiological analysis. OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate the radiological outcome after a modified anterior column realignment (mACR) with partial anterior longitudinal ligament (ALL) release in oblique lateral interbody fusion (OLIF). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Anterior column realignment (ACR) remains a powerful sagittal correction technique in minimally invasive adult spinal deformity surgery and is often combined with posterior column osteotomy (PCO) to achieve more lordosis. OLIF is ideal for ACR because the anterior-to-psoas corridor typically involves the anterolateral half of the disk. METHODS: This study included 112 operated disk levels of 101 consecutive patients who underwent OLIF between L2-L3 and L4-L5 using a 12° lateral cage. The mACR was performed at 73 (65.2%) levels with 30% to 50% sectioning of the ALL. Each operated level was grouped according to the mACR and additional PCO as: (1) no mACR, OLIF only (n=39); (2) mACR with no PCO (n=18); (3) mACR with grade 1 PCO (n=27); (4) mACR with grade 2 PCO (n=22); or (5) mACR with grade 3 PCO (n=6). RESULTS: At the last follow-up, the mean disk lordotic angles were 10.9±2.9°, 12.6±3.0°, 13.3±3.9°, 16.7±3.2°, and 16.8±2.4° in the no mACR, mACR with no PCO, mACR with grade 1 PCO, mACR with grade 2 PCO, and mACR with grade 3 PCO groups, respectively ( P <0.001). The mean increases in disk lordotic angle were 5.8±4.1°, 12.1±6.1°, 13.5±8.7°, 15.8±6.7°, and 17.9±6.2° in each group, respectively ( P <0.001). CONCLUSIONS: ACR can be performed with partial ALL release under direct vision in OLIF without deep dissection into the ventral disk space. The mACR in OLIF is a simple, safe, and effective technique for anterior column lengthening. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.

Influence of Vascular Anatomy on the Radiologic Outcomes in Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion at L5-S1.

STUDY DESIGN: This was a retrospective study. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate whether the anatomy of the left common iliac vein (LCIV) affects the radiologic outcomes in oblique lateral interbody fusion (OLIF) at L5-S1. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Upward mobilization and retraction of the LCIV is an essential technique in OLIF at L5-S1. However, mobilization of the LCIV is sometimes difficult and may affect the surgical outcomes in OLIF at L5-S1. METHODS: This study involved 52 consecutive patients who underwent OLIF at L5-S1 and had >1-year regular follow-up. The configuration of LCIV on preoperative axial magnetic resonance images of the lumbar spine was categorized into 3 types according to the difficulty of mobilization: type I (no requirement for mobilization), type II (potentially easy mobilization), and type III (potentially difficult mobilization). Radiologic parameters included anterior/posterior disk heights (ADH/PDH), disk angle (DA), cage migration, cage subsidence, cage position, and fusion rate at L5-S1. Intraoperative/perioperative events associated with OLIF at L5-S1 were reviewed. Radiologic outcomes among the LCIV types were compared. RESULTS: There were 19 men and 33 women with a mean age of 62.8±9.7 years. The mean follow-up duration was 24.8±15.5 months. The LCIV anatomy was type I in 25 (48.1%) patients, type II in 14 (26.9%), and type III in 13 (25.0%). The mean ADH increased from 7.0±4.7 to 16.9±4.1 mm at the last follow-up (P<0.001), and the mean PDH increased from 2.7±1.7 to 4.9±1.6 mm (P<0.001). The mean DA increased from 5.4±5.4 to 16.9±6.5 degrees (P<0.001). There were no significant differences in ADH, PDH, and DA at the last follow-up among the LCIV types. Two (3.8%) major and 2 (3.8%) minor LCIV injuries were identified, all of which had a type III LCIV. CONCLUSIONS: OLIF at L5-S1 showed favorable radiologic outcomes regardless of the LCIV anatomy. However, type III LCIV patients had a high rate of intraoperative vascular injury.

The Impact of Vertebral End Plate Lesions on the Radiological Outcome in Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective case-control study. OBJECTIVES: Vertebral end plate (EP) lesions include Modic changes, Schmorl's nodes, EP erosion, EP sclerosis, and so on. While previous studies have mostly focused on the association between vertebral EP lesions and low back pain, few studies evaluated the influence of vertebral EP lesions on the radiological outcomes in lumbar interbody fusion. METHODS: This study included a total of 125 operated disc levels from 86 consecutive patients who underwent a 1- or 2-level oblique lateral interbody fusion (OLIF) and had more than 1-year regular follow-up. The presence of vertebral EP lesions, changes in disc heights/angle, cage subsidence, and fusion grade were examined. The associations between vertebral EP lesions and radiological parameters were analyzed. RESULT: The presence of Modic changes, Schmorl's node, EP cartilage erosion, and EP sclerosis were found in 72 (57.6%), 26 (20.8%), 31 (24.8%), and 44 (35.2%) disc levels, respectively. The mean anterior disc height increased from 6.9 ± 3.8 mm to 13.1 ± 2.7 mm (P < .001) and the mean segmental angle increased from 2.9° ± 5.8° to 9.2° ± 4.8° (P < .001) at the last follow-up. The overall fusion rate was 98.4% (123/125) and cage subsidence rate was 7.2% (9/125). All radiological parameters and cage subsidence rate were not different regardless of vertebral EP lesions. CONCLUSIONS: Vertebral EP lesions did not affect the overall radiological outcome in 1- or 2-level OLIF. These results come from the stable contact between lateral cage and peripheral rim of vertebral EP.

Comparison of surgical outcomes between oblique lateral interbody fusion (OLIF) and anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF).

OBJECTIVE: Although oblique lateral interbody fusion (OLIF) utilizes the similar approach in anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF), OLIF is essentially a lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF). Therefore, OLIF may have advantages in LLIF that the lateral cage can achieve greater restoration of the disc height and angle. We aimed to compared the surgical outcomes between OLIF and ALIF. METHODS: This study involved 47 consecutive patients who underwent a single-level OLIF and 45 consecutive patients who underwent a single-level ALIF at L2-L5 levels. Radiological measurements included the changes of anterior/posterior disc height, coronal/sagittal disc angle, foramen cross-sectional area (CSA), cage position from the anterior margin of the lower vertebra, fusion rate, and cage subsidence using the serial radiographs and computed tomography preoperatively and at the postoperative 1-year follow-up. Clinical outcomes were assessed by visual analog scale (VAS) for back/leg pain, Oswestry disability index (ODI), and the occurrence of perioperative complications. RESULTS: The baseline radiological and clinical parameters were similar between the OLIF and ALIF groups (all P > 0.05). At postoperative 1 year, the mean anterior disc height was higher in the OLIF group than the ALIF group (11.4 ±â€¯1.9 mm vs. 9.6 ±â€¯2.6 mm, P = 0.021). The mean sagittal disc angle was also greater in the OLIF group than the ALIF group (10.9 ±â€¯4.4° vs. 8.9 ±â€¯5.8°, P < 0.001). The mean cage position was 5.8 ±â€¯2.1 mm in the OLIF group and 8.7 ±â€¯2.3 mm in the ALIF group (P <  0.001). There was no difference in the postoperative changes of coronal disc angles, foramen CSA, fusion rate, cage subsidence, VAS for back/leg pain, ODI, and the occurrence of perioperative complications between the OLIF and ALIF groups (all P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: OLIF showed a greater increase in disc height and segmental lordosis than ALIF with comparable complications. OLIF is a meaningful progress from ALIF.