Current Perspective and Strategy on Management of Spontaneous Jugular Venous Ectasia: A Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND: Spontaneous jugular venous ectasia (SJVE) is characterized by dilation of the internal jugular vein (IJV) and external jugular vein. It is generally considered a benign anomaly. There is no accepted categorization for this disorder. METHODS: We conducted a case series study and a systematic review of available articles on SJVE to understand the main characteristics, clinicopathologic classifications, and therapeutic approaches. RESULTS: From January 2001 to December 2021, 14 patients in our hospital were analyzed. A total of 110 original articles (295 cases/311 lesions) were included in the systematic review. We proposed a classification and categorized SJVE into 4 main types (type I-IV) plus one (type V) in which the specific ectasia was located around the jugular bulb at the IJV. CONCLUSIONS: Conservative treatment is preferred for patients with type I (without thrombus) SJVE and asymptomatic patients who can be treated without anticoagulants. The therapeutic efficiency of surgery was high, and the best surgical modalities were chosen according to the type of SJVE.

Comparisons of outcomes of open surgery versus endovascular intervention for thrombotic popliteal artery aneurysm with acute lower limb ischemia: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Thrombotic popliteal artery aneurysm (PAA) with acute lower limb ischemia (ALI) is a serious disease leading to amputation. The choice of emergency procedures is not clearly defined, and the difference in therapeutic efficiency between open surgery and endovascular intervention is still unclear. METHOD: We conducted a comprehensive search through PubMed, Wiley Online Library and ScienceDirect. According to the predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria, eligible articles were screened out, and all relevant data were extracted for further analysis. Our study was designed and developed based on Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Guideline. We critically assessed all included articles by Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) Critical Appraisal Checklists and the Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies (MINORS). RESULT: A total of 29 articles (1338 patients/1387 limbs) were included in the study. After a 1-year follow-up, the primary patency rate of the open surgery group was significantly lower than that of the endovascular intervention group (72.65 vs. 81.46%, P = 0.004), but without significant difference in the secondary patency rate (86.19 vs. 86.86%, P = 0.825). The limb salvage rate of the open surgery group was also significantly lower (83.07 vs. 98.25%, P < 0.001). After the 2-year follow-up, the primary patency rate of the open surgery group was still significantly lower (48.57 vs. 59.90%, P = 0.021). CONCLUSION: The outcome of endovascular intervention was better than that of open surgery especially in the 1-year limb salvage rate and primary patency rate at the 1-year and 2-year follow-ups.