Predictors of elaborated perineal or a combined abdominoperineal approach during repair for pelvic fracture urethral injury.

PURPOSE: A step-based anastomotic urethroplasty is a standard technique for repairing the posterior urethra in patients with pelvic fracture urethral injury (PFUI). We aim to identify pre-operative factors, including results of conventional radiological imaging, for prediction of elaborated perineal or a combined abdominoperineal procedure. METHODS: Retrospective observational study on 114 consecutive patients undergoing urethroplasty for PFUI between January 2020 and December 2022 was conducted. Surgical procedures were categorized according to the Webster classification into two groups: steps 1-2 (group 1) and steps 3-4 or a combined abdominoperineal repair (group 2). Pre-operative pattern results of RGU/VCUG were categorized regarding the relation between the proximal urethral stump with the pubic symphysis: posterior urethral stump below (pattern 1) or above (pattern 2) the lower margin of the pubic symphysis. Patient demographics were assessed. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were utilized. RESULTS: Overall, 102 patients were enrolled in the study for data analysis. On the multivariate logistic regression analysis, the presence of erectile dysfunction (OR 4.5; p = 0.014), prior combined treatment (endoscopic and urethroplasty) (OR 6.4; p = 0.018) and RGU/VCUG pattern 2 (OR 66; p < 0.001) significantly increased the likelihood of the need of step 3 or higher. CONCLUSIONS: The need of step 3 or higher during urethroplasty for PFUI can be predicted pre-operatively with conventional imaging (RGU/VCUG). Patients with proximal urethral stump above the lower margin of pubic symphysis were about 66 times more likely to need step 3 or higher during urethroplasty.

Novel single-stage preputial spiral graft for panurethral stricture: a step-by-step description of the technique.

PURPOSE: To report the 12-month results of a novel urethroplasty technique relying on a spiral preputial graft for panurethral stricture disease. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty consecutive patients were treated between May and October 2021 at our center. A spiral preputial mucocutaneous graft is a foreskin-based graft, developed from a 5-cm-wide preputial skin, which is harvested using a helicoidal shape and can reach up to 20 cm in length. Stricture characteristics were assessed through preoperative retrograde and voiding cystourethrogram and maximum uroflowmetry data (Qmax). Complications were collected up to 30 days after surgery and graded using the Clavien-Dindo (C-D) classification. The patients were followed up to 12 months. RESULTS: Preoperative median Qmax was 6.5 ml/s [interquartile range (IQR): 4.0-8.7]. After a median follow-up of 12 months (IQR 12-13), six patients experienced at least one complication. Of them, two patients had grade 2 C-D complications, while only one developed a grade 3a C-D complication. The median postoperative Qmax was 16 ml/s (IQR: 13-18). Only one patient had early urethral stricture recurrence treated with dilatation after catheter removal. At one-year follow-up, no other patients had urethral stricture recurrence with an overall median Qmax of 15.1 ml/s (IQR 13.5-16.4). CONCLUSIONS: Our novel single-stage spiral preputial graft urethroplasty for panurethral stricture treatment appears to be safe and could be used as a valid alternative to two-stage procedures or even to single-stage buccal mucosa graft augmentation.

Advances in urethroplasty.

There has been rapid evolution in management of urethral strictures in the last 3 decades. From the era of dilatation, we have moved to urethral reconstruction. Reinvention of buccal grafts changed the outcomes of urethroplasty. Barbaglis dorsal onlay popularised stricture management across the globe. Kulkarni described a single stage surgery for panurethral stricture. Advances have taken place, and we have moved from transecting to the non-transecting approaches. We describe the various advances in urethral reconstruction in the last decade.

Management of pelvic fracture urethral injuries in the developing world.

INTRODUCTION: Pelvic fracture causes urethral injury in about 10% of patients. The etiology of injury is different in developing and developed world. While high-velocity automobile accidents are common in developed countries, where patients are in the car and there is usually a side impact, in the developing world, significant number of injuries are caused by two-wheeler accidents, pedestrians, farming accidents, fall from height, fall from tractor, fall from tree, and other causes like earthquake. We share our experience which is the largest in the reported literature. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In our tertiary referral center, we get referrals from all across the globe. Since 1995 till 2018 we have performed 1307 surgeries for Pelvic fracture urethral injury. Our referrals are for complex urethroplasty. Our data from 1995-2018 was analyzed. Data after June 2018 was not included so as to have a minimum follow up of 6 months. RESULTS: 1296 patients were males and 11 were females. In the group of 1296 males, mean age was 32.4 years (range 1-79 years). The minimum follow-up was 6 months, and the median follow-up was 56.7 months (range 6.2-233.7). The overall success rate was 88.79% for primary cases while re-do urethroplasty patients had a success rate of 83.70%. The majority of our patients (more than 61.40%) needed inferior pubectomy: Of the total 1307 cases of urethroplasty for pelvic fracture urethral injury data was available for 1042 patients. Data were available for 1042 patients. The data from 2012 onwards were prospectively analyzed while the previous data were retrospectively analyzed. CONCLUSION: PFUI are common in the developing world. They tend to be more complex and have longer gaps as compared to developed world. This could be related to the anthropometric differences between races as well as nature of injury. They are best managed with delayed transperineal repair with excellent outcomes. Ancillary maneuvers are more frequently required. Re-do urethroplasty can achieve good results.

RE Re Do urethroplasty after multiple failed surgeries of pelvic fracture urethral injury.

INTRODUCTION: We quantify surgical success rate in the management of pelvic fracture urethral injury (PFUI) with repeat urethroplasty in the setting of two or more failed prior urethroplasties. MATERIALS AND MATERIALS: A retrospective analysis was completed of a single surgeon urethroplasty database from Jan 1, 2012 to June 31, 2018. Patients with a history of PFUI recurrent urethral stricture despite two or more failed prior urethroplasty procedures were included. RESULTS: We identified 87 patients that had two more more failed prior urethroplasties. These had 2 main categories. One requiring anastomotic urethroplasty and other requiring substitution urethroplasty. Total success rate was 74.75% for anastomotic group and 84.61% for substitution group with a median follow-up of 34 months (range 6-60). Overall success rate for re redo Urethroplasty was 82.70%. Bulbar urethral ischemic necrosis was identified in 14 of 64 patients (21.9%). In these cases urethral substitution measures were performed including 12 with preputial flap and tubularization, 1 sigmoid colon substitution, medial thigh flap. No significant difference was observed between the success or failure group with respect to age, BMI, stricture length, number of prior urethroplasty procedure or endoscopic procedures or comorbidities. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings demonstrate that high success rates can be achieved for repeat urethroplasty in recurrent PFUI urethral stricture after two or more failed prior urethroplasty procedures. Bulbar urethral ischemic necrosis is a common finding in this patient population. Patients should be managed at a tertiary high volume referral center.

Penile urethroplasty using Orandi's dorsal skin flap: a new technique.

OBJECTIVES: To describe, step by step, a new one-stage dorsal skin flap urethroplasty for penile stricture repair. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The surgery was accomplished through a midline incision on the ventral penile surface, the urethra was fully dissected from the corpora cavernosa and longitudinally opened along its dorsal surface. A penile skin island, based on the dartos fascia flap, was dissected and moved over the corpora cavernosa, and the urethra was moved and sutured over the penile skin flap. RESULTS: Out of the 12 cases, 10 were classified successful and there were two failures. The operating time was 60 min. There was no postoperative fistula or urethral diverticulum. CONCLUSION: Our modified Orandi's technique was easy and feasible, and avoided fistula and diverticulum formation after repair.

Management of post TURP strictures.

INTRODUCTION: Urethral stricture is a well-known complication after transurethral surgeries. The incidence of urethral stricture after transurethral resection of prostate (TURP) varies between 2.2 and 9.8%. Most of the cases present within 6 months of transurethral surgery. Presentation is likely with poor flow, urinary tract infection or acute retention. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective study was undertaken from January 2010-June 2017 for the management of post TURP stricture. A total of 170 patients with stricture urethra due to TURP were studied. RESULTS: The age of patients was 54-87 years (mean age 67.34). The mean preop Qmax was 6.1 ml (range 0-15). The length of stricture varied from very short in the proximal bulbar to pan urethral stricture. Out of 170, 94 were treated with dorsal approach, 71 with ventral approach and 5 with simultaneous distal dorsal, proximal ventral approach. Five patients underwent endoscopic procedure. Mean BMG length was 6.25 cm (4-8) and width was 1.5 cm (1.3-1.8). Overall success rate was 82.43%. CONCLUSION: Urethral stricture is a well-known complication after transurethral surgeries. Post TURP can cause stricture at any part urethra. BMG mucosa Urethroplasty is the safe, feasible and offer long-term success in these patient and should be strongly considered over CIC and VIU. Ventral approach is best suited for proximal bulbar strictures close to membranous urethra. This is a continence preserving surgery.

Repair of sphincter urethral strictures preserving urinary continence: surgical technique and outcomes.

INTRODUCTION: Repair of post-TURP sphincter urethral strictures represents challenging problem, due to the risk of urinary incontinence after the repair. We described a surgical technique we use to repair these strictures preserving urinary continence in patients with incompetent bladder neck. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An observational, retrospective, study was conducted to include patients with post-TURP urethral strictures in the area of distal sphincter. We included only patients with complete clinical data and follow-up who previously underwent TURP or HOLEP or TUIP, and subsequently developed proximal bulbar urethral strictures close to the membranous urethra and the related distal urethral sphincter. Patients were included, if they were fully continent after TURP or other procedures to treat BPH. The primary outcome of the study was treatment failure, defined as the need for any post-operative instrumentation. Secondary outcome was post-urethroplasty urinary continence. Patients showing stricture recurrence or post-operative incontinence were classified as failure. RESULTS: Overall, 69 patients were included in the study. Median patient's age was 67 years; median stricture length was 4 cm. Thirty-tree patients (47.8%) underwent previous urethrotomy. Median follow-up was 52 months. Out of 69 patients, 55 (79.7%) were classified as success and 14 (20.3%) as failure. Out of the whole cohort, thus, 11/69 (16%) have a risk of recurrent strictures and 3/69 (4.3%) have incontinence. CONCLUSIONS: The use of modified ventral onlay graft urethroplasty, using particular non-aggressive steps, is a suitable surgical technique for repair of sphincter urethral stricture in patients who underwent BPH transurethral surgery, using different procedures (TURP, HOLEP, TUIP).

A novel composite two-stage urethroplasty for complex penile strictures: A multicenter experience.

INTRODUCTION: Complex penile strictures are usually repaired using a two-stage urethroplasty. Buccal mucosal graft (BMG) placed in the first stage can have a significant contraction rate, which may require a subsequent revision surgery. We describe a composite two-stage penile urethroplasty using BMG for patients of complex penile strictures who have some salvageable urethral plate. METHODS: Within a multi-institutional cohort, 82 patients underwent a two-stage urethroplasty for complex stricture of the penile urethra. Of these 42 patients who underwent our composite two-stage penile urethroplasty using BMG implanted at the second-stage were included. Patients with genital lichen sclerosus or incomplete clinical records were excluded from this study. The primary outcome of the study was to evaluate stricture-free success rate. RESULTS: Of total 42, 4 patients were lost to follow-up. 42% of stricture etiology was failed hypospadias repair. Mean stricture length was 4.5 cm (range 3-8 cm). Seventeen (44.7%) patients had undergone the previous urethroplasty. At a median follow-up of 44 months, of 38 patients, 34 (89.5%) were successful, and 4 (10.5%) had a recurrence. No patient required revision surgery before the second-stage and required redo buccal graft harvesting for subsequent urethroplasty. CONCLUSIONS: The composite two-stage technique in repairing complex penile urethral strictures is a valid and reproducible surgical treatment for complex penile stricture and it may reduce the rate of contraction of the transplanted BMG.

How to do a penile urethroplasty using a novel self-retaining penile retractor.

Effective retraction and clear exposure of urethral tissue is essential in reconstructive penile surgery. The Joshi-Kulkarni retractor provides stable, bloodless operative exposure via non-traumatic tissue compression at the base of penis. The self-retaining design of this retractor also improves ergonomics thereby reducing surgeon fatigue. In this article, we describe how to do a penile urethroplasty by using the Joshi-Kulkarni penile retractor.

Management of Pelvic Fracture Urethral Injury: Is Supracrural Urethral Rerouting (Step 4) Becoming Anecdotical or Does It Remain in Force?

Webster described a step-based perineal approach for repairing the posterior urethra in patients with pelvic fracture urethral injury (PFUI). The higher the complexity of the step, the higher the morbidity for the patient and the lower the surgical outcomes. We evaluated the outcomes of anastomotic urethroplasty (especially Step 4 or higher) or substitution urethroplasty in patients with PFUI at our center. Between 2013 to 2021, we retrospectively collected data on patients with PFUI. Surgical procedures were categorized according to the Webster classification and rates of each step were reported. The success rate was defined as Qmax above 10 mL/s and no need for further treatment. In this period, 737 male patients with PFUI were surgically treated. Notably, 18.8%, 17.6%, 46%, 1.8%, and 5.6% of included patients received steps 1, 2, 3, and 4 and the abdominoperineal approach, respectively. In 68 (9.2%) patients, the substitution of urethroplasty with a pedicled preputial tube (PPT) was needed. The success rate was 69.2% in Step 4, 74.4% in the abdominoperineal approach, and 86.4% in PPT; however, recurrence-free survival was not significantly different between groups (p = 0.22). Step 4 perineal anastomotic urethroplasty represents a surgical option in the armamentarium of PFUI treatment. Indications should be carefully reviewed to improve patient selection and avoid surgical failure, stopping at the step which first gives a tension-free anastomosis.

Management of panurethral stricture disease in India.

PURPOSE: Panurethral stricture involving the penile and bulbar urethra is a common urological problem on the South Asian subcontinent. It represents a particularly difficult challenge to manage and there is a relative paucity of literature on the subject. In India lichen sclerosus is the most common etiology of panurethral stricture, followed by iatrogenic causes. We present our experience with panurethral stricture repair using 1-stage, 1-side dissection dorsal onlay repair with oral mucosa grafts. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the records of 117 consecutive men who underwent treatment for panurethral stricture from June 1998 to December 2010. Median patient age was 47.8 years, mean stricture length was 14 cm and median followup was 59 months. The stricture was approached through a perineal incision, limiting dissection to only 1 side of the urethra. The penis was invaginated to provide access to the entire length of anterior urethra in 1 stage. Two oral mucosal grafts were placed dorsally. RESULTS: The outcome was considered a success if the patient required no further instrumentation, including dilation or urethrotomy. The overall success rate was 83.7% with a success rate of 86.5% for primary urethroplasty and 61.5% in patients in whom urethroplasty had previously failed. Most recurrent strictures developed at the proximal end of the graft. CONCLUSIONS: Repair of panurethral stricture in 1 stage with 1-side dissection and dorsal onlay of oral mucosa graft is a minimally invasive technique that is simple, fast, safe, effective and reproducible by any surgeon.

Common Flaps in Genitourinary Reconstruction.

Urethroplasty has evolved over time. The twentieth century saw management of urethral strictures and hypospadias with flaps. Things changed in the late 1990s with reintroduction of grafts. Buccal mucosa grafts gained popularity. There are failed urethroplasties and obliterative strictures, mostly iatrogenic, after urologic endosurgery. Such strictures need vascularized augmentation or substitution with flaps. Reconstructive urologists should be well versed in management of all types of complex cases. This article discusses the commonly used flaps in genitourinary reconstruction. Penile flaps are the commonest. Overall, the winner is the dartos. All penile flaps are based on the excellent vascularity of dartos.

Long-term outcomes from a multi-institutional experience with prefabricated composite gracilis-buccal mucosal flap for reconstruction of devastated urethras.

PURPOSE: Patients with devastated bulbar urethras have limited surgical options to restore normal upright voiding. We investigated the long-term feasibility of using two independently vascularized urethral hemi-plates lined with buccal mucosal graft (BMG) to treat these patients. METHODS: A multi-institutional retrospective review was conducted for patients that underwent this staged repair. In stage-1, the affected urethra is dissected and removed or prepared for a dorsal inlay augmentation. Two BMG segments are harvested; one graft is quilted on corpora cavernosa and urethra, creating an augmented perineal urethrostomy, and the other is quilted on the exposed distal gracilis muscle. Stage-2 utilizes the gracilis-BMG composite to recreate ventral bulbar urethra. The primary outcome measure was stricture recurrence. Secondary outcome measures included patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). RESULTS: Five patients with mean age of 50 years (45-56) underwent staged repairs at two institutions between 7/2014 and 4/2016. All patients presented with suprapubic tubes and underwent at least one prior failed repair (1-9). Mean stricture length was 7.2 cm (5-9). Mean time between stage-1 and stage-2 repairs was 6.2 weeks (1-10). At a mean follow-up of 61 months (39-87), there were no recurrences. The mean uroflow was 20 cc/s (9-42) with a mean PVR of 59 cc (0-157). Four patients completed post-operative surveys; all reported at least a moderate improvement in their condition on Global Response Assessment (GRA), and a mean IPSS of 7.3 (0-26). CONCLUSIONS: Our bi-institutional case series demonstrates that this technique is a feasible option for devastated urethras with long-term durability.

Which Are the Commonest Sites and Characteristics of Post-Transurethral Prostate Surgery Strictures in a High-Volume Reconstructive Center?

Background: Urethral stricture is a well-known complication after transurethral prostate surgery (TPS) and it is usually considered an easy-to-treat condition. We aimed to examine characteristics of post-TPS urethral stricture cases that were referred for urethroplasty at our tertiary center. Methods: We identified 201 patients with TPS-induced stricture treated with urethroplasty at our institution from 2017 to 2021. First, stricture length and location were evaluated during preoperative assessment. Second, multiple sets of multivariable logistic regression (MLR) analyses were run to assess whether clinical variables were associated with the location of the stricture. Results: Median stricture length was 5 cm (4-7). One hundred forty-one (70.1%) patients received previous no-invasive treatments (dilatation and/or direct visual internal urethrotomy). Proximal bulbar urethra was the commonest site for stricture, whereas panurethral stricture (≥10 cm) was diagnosed in 41 (20.4%) patients. Lichen sclerosus was more common in patients with penile stricture location, compared with patients with other involved segments (26% vs 19%, p = 0.03), and it was the only predictor of penile and midbulbar urethra location at MLR. Surgical approaches were augmented urethroplasty in 94% of patients, especially for patients with previous treatment including urethroplasty (95.8% vs 82.5% for naive, p = 0.004). Dorsal onlay was the preferred approach for bulbar (53.4%) and penile urethra (90.7%), whereas ventral onlay (38.2%) and double face augmentation (20.6%) were the preferred approaches in membranous strictures. Conclusions: Most patients who were referred for TPS-induced stricture attempted previous noninvasive managements. Referred TPS-induced urethral strictures were long and frequently involving multiple segments of urethra. Augmentation urethroplasty was our preferred surgical approach because of the characteristics and complexity of these strictures. The presence of lichen may increase the risk of post-TPS stricture in a specific segment of urethra, namely the penile and midbulbar urethra.

Dorsal approach for double-face bulbar urethroplasty: ventral inlay plus dorsal onlay using Kulkarni one-side dissection.

BACKGROUND: Non-traumatic obliterative bulbar urethral stricture with residual urethral lumen below 3 Fr is a challenging surgical scenario for reconstructive surgeons, because either anastomotic or single augmentation urethroplasty is not an option. OBJECTIVES: To describe our double-face buccal mucosa graft (BMG) urethroplasty with dorsal onlay and ventral inlay relying on the vessels and nerve-sparing technique of Kulkarni's one-side dissection. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed a prospectively maintained database of patients with non-traumatic obliterative bulbar urethral strictures who underwent double-face bulbar urethroplasty with one-side dissection and dorsal onlay plus ventral inlay BMG. Patient demographics, clinical data, and follow-up were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 59 patients underwent double-face urethroplasty with dorsal approach. The median age was 37 years (IQR 27-49) and the median stricture length was 5 cm (IQR 3.75-6). No patients had immediate post-operative complications. The overall success rate was 88% with a median follow-up of 30.9 months (IQR 16.9-44.2). Two patients were treated with DVIU, and two patients with open urethral surgery. One patient developed erectile dysfunction after surgery. Age, etiology, stenosis length and previous treatment were not factors related to surgical failure. CONCLUSION: Our preliminary albeit encouraging results showed that this approach was feasible in all patients and with negligible perioperative complications. Success rate was 88%. We did not find any factors related to surgical failure. Our dorsal double-face augmented urethroplasty may be a valid alternative to the Palminteri's ventral double-face urethroplasty, especially in those patients with mid-distal bulbar or peno-bulbar urethral strictures.

Graft Plus Fasciocutaneous Penile Flap for Nearly or Completely Obliterated Long Bulbar and Penobulbar Strictures.

BACKGROUND: Graft plus flap urethroplasty is gaining momentum in patients with nearly or completely obliterated urethral strictures, in whom staged procedures or perineal urethrostomy is the only possible alternative. However, graft plus flap urethroplasty is mainly adopted for strictures involving the penile urethra. OBJECTIVE: To report our experience on graft plus flap urethroplasty for bulbar and penobulbar reconstruction. DESIGN SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Between January 2014 and June 2020, patients with nearly or completely obliterated long (>4 cm) bulbar or penobulbar strictures, who required graft plus flap urethroplasty, were considered for this study. SURGICAL PROCEDURE: The bulbar and the penile urethra were accessed through a perineal incision and penile invagination when required. Grafts were harvested from cheek, lingual, or preputial skin and quilted over the corpora to reconstruct the dorsal plate of the neourethra. The fasciocutaneous penile flap recreated the ventral plate of the neourethra. The corpus spongiosum was flapped over the neourethra to prevent the formation of diverticula. MEASUREMENTS: Any need for instrumentation after surgery was defined as the primary failure. Obstructive symptoms or maximum flow rate (Qmax) below 10 ml/s, with or without a need for instrumentation, was defined as a secondary failure. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: We identified 15 patients who met the inclusion criteria. The median stricture length was 7 cm (interquartile range [IQR] 5-8 cm). The inner cheek was the preferred site for graft harvesting (53.3%). No perioperative complication of Clavien-Dindo grade ≥III were recorded in the first 30 postoperative days. The median Qmax at catheter removal was 23 ml/min (IQR 21.5-26 ml/min). The median follow-up was 25 mo (IQR 10-30 mo). The primary success rate was 86.7% (13/15) and the secondary success rate was 73.3% (11/15). Post-traumatic strictures represent a contraindication for this technique. CONCLUSIONS: In referral centers, graft plus flap urethroplasty represents a feasible option for patients with nearly or completely obliterated long (>4 cm) strictures. Our study demonstrated that this option is also feasible for strictures involving mainly the bulbar urethra. PATIENT SUMMARY: Perineal urethrostomy should be considered as the last option in patients with a nearly or completely obliterated bulbar urethral stricture. Nowadays, graft plus fasciocutaneous penile flap augmentation enriched our armamentarium of bulbar urethra reconstruction.

A global approach to improving penile cancer care.

Rare tumours such as penile carcinoma have been largely neglected by the urology scientific community in favour of more common - and, therefore, more easily fundable - diseases. Nevertheless, penile cancer represents a rising burden for health-care systems around the world, because a lack of widespread expertise, ineffective centralization of care and absence of research funds have hampered our ability to improve the global care of these patients. Moreover, a dichotomy has arisen in the field of penile cancer, further impeding care: the countries that are mainly supporting research on this topic through the development of epidemiological studies and design of clinical trials are not the countries that have the highest prevalence of the disease. This situation means that randomized controlled trials in developed countries often do not meet the minimum accrual and are intended to close before reaching their end points, whereas trials are almost completely absent in those areas with the highest disease prevalence and probability of successful recruitment, such as Africa, South America and South Asia. The scientific and organizational inaction that arises owing to this mismatch translates into a burdensome cost for our patients. A global effort to gather experts and pull together scientific data from around the world may be the best way to boost clinical research, to change clinical practice and, ultimately, to improve care for patients and their families.

Magnetic resonance imaging procedure for pelvic fracture urethral injuries and recto urethral fistulas: A simplified protocol.

OBJECTIVE: The urethral gap in pelvic fracture urethral injury (PFUI) is traditionally assessed using voiding cystourethrogram (VCUG) and retrograde urethrogram (RGU). Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is performed in complex cases. We assessed the refined "Joshi" MRI protocol to evaluate complex urethral defects after PFUI. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A prospective study was conducted at our center from January 2018 to January 2020, involving patients aged >18 years with PFUI, suitable for MRI, and those who gave consent to perform standard RGU, VCUG, and MRI using standard and "Joshi" protocol. Forty men were included in the study. Distance between urethral/prostatic stumps was measured. Image quality was scored by four radiologists and four urologists. The surgical approach and type of PFUI repair were noted. We also established the need for inferior pubectomy by assessing the position of the posterior urethra (membranous) in relation to a horizontal line drawn from the lower edge of the pubic bone anteriorly to the rectum posteriorly in a sagittal image. RESULTS: The mean age was 30 years (SD, 5.25; range, 21-43), and the time from injury to imaging was 4 months (3-10 months); 40% of the men underwent crural separation, 57.5%, inferior pubectomy, and 2.5%, crural rerouting. There was a difference of 0.3 to 1.1 cm in the urethral gap measurements between MR images using the standard versus "Joshi" technique. MRI identified complex injuries such as rectourethral fistula, the need for inferior pubectomy, and the orientation of the posterior urethra. Urologists' and radiologists' satisfaction scores for the MR images were satisfactory to excellent. If the posterior urethra was over the defined mark, there was a 100% likelihood of inferior pubectomy (23/40 patients). CONCLUSION: MR image acquisition using the "Joshi" protocol provided high-quality anatomical information in PFUI cases to assist with surgical planning.