Effect of prophylactic paracetamol administration at time of vaccination on febrile reactions and antibody responses in children: two open-label, randomised controlled trials.

BACKGROUND: Although fever is part of the normal inflammatory process after immunisation, prophylactic antipyretic drugs are sometimes recommended to allay concerns of high fever and febrile convulsion. We assessed the effect of prophylactic administration of paracetamol at vaccination on infant febrile reaction rates and vaccine responses. METHODS: In two consecutive (primary and booster) randomised, controlled, open-label vaccination studies, 459 healthy infants were enrolled from ten centres in the Czech Republic. Infants were randomly assigned with a computer-generated randomisation list to receive three prophylactic paracetamol doses every 6-8 h in the first 24 h (n=226) or no prophylactic paracetamol (n=233) after each vaccination with a ten-valent pneumococcal non-typeable Haemophilus influenzae protein D-conjugate vaccine (PHiD-CV) co-administered with the hexavalent diphtheria-tetanus-3-component acellular pertussis-hepatitis B-inactivated poliovirus types 1, 2, and 3-H influenzae type b (DTPa-HBV-IPV/Hib) and oral human rotavirus vaccines. The primary objective in both studies was the reduction in febrile reactions of 38.0 degrees C or greater in the total vaccinated cohort. The second objective was assessment of immunogenicity in the according-to-protocol cohort. These studies are registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, numbers NCT00370318 and NCT00496015. FINDINGS: Fever greater than 39.5 degrees C was uncommon in both groups (after primary: one of 226 participants [<1%] in prophylactic paracetamol group vs three of 233 [1%] in no prophylactic paracetamol group; after booster: three of 178 [2%] vs two of 172 [1%]). The percentage of children with temperature of 38 degrees C or greater after at least one dose was significantly lower in the prophylactic paracetamol group (94/226 [42%] after primary vaccination and 64/178 [36%] after booster vaccination) than in the no prophylactic paracetamol group (154/233 [66%] after primary vaccination and 100/172 [58%] after booster vaccination). Antibody geometric mean concentrations (GMCs) were significantly lower in the prophylactic paracetamol group than in the no prophylactic paracetamol group after primary vaccination for all ten pneumococcal vaccine serotypes, protein D, antipolyribosyl-ribitol phosphate, antidiphtheria, antitetanus, and antipertactin. After boosting, lower antibody GMCs persisted in the prophylactic paracetamol group for antitetanus, protein D, and all pneumococcal serotypes apart from 19F. INTERPRETATION: Although febrile reactions significantly decreased, prophylactic administration of antipyretic drugs at the time of vaccination should not be routinely recommended since antibody responses to several vaccine antigens were reduced. FUNDING: GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals (Belgium).

Challenge of conducting a placebo-controlled randomized efficacy study for influenza vaccine in a season with low attack rate and a mismatched vaccine B strain: a concrete example.

BACKGROUND: Our aim was to determine the efficacy of a trivalent inactivated split virus influenza vaccine (TIV) against culture-confirmed influenza A and/or B in adults 18 to 64 years of age during the 2005/2006 season in the Czech Republic. METHODS: 6203 subjects were randomized to receive TIV (N = 4137) or placebo (N = 2066). The sample size was based on an assumed attack rate of 4% which provided 90% power to reject the hypothesis that vaccine efficacy (VE) was > or = 45%. Cases of influenza like illness (defined as fever (oral temperature > or =37.8 degrees C) plus cough and/or sore throat) were identified both by active (biweekly phone contact) and passive (self reporting) surveillance and nasal and throat swabs were collected from subjects for viral culture. RESULTS: TIV was well tolerated and induced a good immune response. The 2005/2006 influenza season was exceptionally mild in the study area, as it was throughout Europe, and only 46 culture-confirmed cases were found in the study cohort (10 influenza A and 36 influenza B). Furthermore among the B isolates, 35 were identified as B/Hong Kong 330/2001-like (B/Victoria/2/87 lineage) which is antigenically unrelated to the vaccine B strain (B/Yamagata/16/88 lineage). The attack rate in the vaccine group (0.7%) was not statistically significantly different from the attack rate in the placebo group (0.9%). CONCLUSION: Due to the atypical nature of the influenza season during this study we were unable to assess TIV efficacy. This experience illustrates the challenge of conducting a prospective influenza vaccine efficacy trial during a single season when influenza attack rates and drift in circulating strains or B virus lineage match can be difficult to estimate in advance. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical trial registery: NCT00197223.

Pneumococcal capsular polysaccharides conjugated to protein D for prevention of acute otitis media caused by both Streptococcus pneumoniae and non-typable Haemophilus influenzae: a randomised double-blind efficacy study.

BACKGROUND: Acute otitis media is one of the most commonly-diagnosed childhood infections. This study assessed the efficacy of a novel vaccine that contained polysaccharides from 11 different Streptococcus pneumoniae serotypes each conjugated to Haemophilus influenzae-derived protein D in prevention of acute otitis media. METHODS: 4968 infants were randomly assigned to receive either pneumococcal protein D conjugate or hepatitis A vaccine at the ages of 3, 4, 5, and 12-15 months and were followed-up until the end of the second year of life. Middle-ear fluid was obtained for bacteriological culture and serotyping in children who presented with abnormal tympanic membrane or presence of middle-ear effusion, plus two predefined clinical symptoms. The primary endpoint was protective efficacy against the first episode of acute otitis media caused by vaccine pneumococcal serotypes. Analysis was per protocol. FINDINGS: From 2 weeks after the third dose to 24-27 months of age, 333 clinical episodes of acute otitis media were recorded in the protein D conjugate group (n=2455) and 499 in the control group (n=2452), giving a significant (33.6% [95% CI 20.8-44.3]) reduction in the overall incidence of acute otitis media. Vaccine efficacy was shown for episodes of acute otitis media caused by pneumococcal vaccine serotypes (52.6% [35.0-65.5] for the first episode and 57.6% [41.4-69.3] for any episode). Efficacy was also shown against episodes of acute otitis media caused by non-typable H influenzae (35.3% [1.8-57.4]). The vaccine reduced frequency of infection from vaccine-related cross-reactive pneumococcal serotypes by 65.5%, but did not significantly change the number of episodes caused by other non-vaccine serotypes. INTERPRETATION: These results confirm that using the H influenzae-derived protein D as a carrier protein for pneumococcal polysaccharides not only allowed protection against pneumococcal otitis, but also against acute otitis media due to non-typable H influenzae. Whether this approach would also allow improved protection against lower respiratory tract infections warrants further investigation.

Impact of the 10-valent pneumococcal non-typeable Haemophilus influenzae Protein D conjugate vaccine (PHiD-CV) on bacterial nasopharyngeal carriage.

Pneumococcal conjugate vaccines (PCV) may reduce nasopharyngeal carriage (NPC) of Streptococcus pneumoniae vaccine strains (VT), but serotype replacement with non-vaccine strains (NVT) has been reported. Bacterial NPC after PHiD-CV vaccination was assessed in the second year of life. Open descriptive study of NPC reported for 414 subjects vaccinated at 3-5 and 12-15 months of age with PHiD-CV with or without prophylactic paracetamol (PP) compared to 336 age-matched PCV-naïve controls. Carriage was assessed prior to and 1, 3, 7 and 12 months after PHiD-CV booster or MenACWY-TT control vaccination at 12-15 months of age. At each visit, carriage of VT was reduced by 22-35% in PHiD-CV recipients. Vaccine efficacy across all visits was 21.7% [95% CI 2.6; 37.0] (26.8% carriage in the PHiD-CV group versus 34.2% in controls). Carriage rates of NVT tended to be higher in PHiD-CV recipients. Pre-booster, these findings were more pronounced when PP had not been administered. No substantial effect of PHiD-CV vaccination was observed on NPC of other bacterial pathogens including non-typeable Haemophilus influenzae. Primary and booster vaccination with PHiD-CV reduced NPC of VT in the second year of life and tended to slightly increase that of NVT in line with previous experience with the 7-valent PCV.

Effect of vaccination with pneumococcal capsular polysaccharides conjugated to Haemophilus influenzae-derived protein D on nasopharyngeal carriage of Streptococcus pneumoniae and H. influenzae in children under 2 years of age.

Following primary and booster vaccination with an 11-valent pneumococcall protein D conjugate vaccine there was a 42.8% (95% CI: -16.7 to 71.9, ns) reduction in the carriage of Streptococcus pneumoniae vaccine serotypes and a 42.6% (95% CI: 1.3-66.6) reduction in the carriage of Haemophilus influenzae identified by standard microbiological techniques. When PCR and immunoblot assays were used to further improve specificity of non-typeable H. influenzae strain identification, carriage of H. influenzae was still reduced with 38.6% (95% CI: -6.3 to 64.6, ns). Reduction of acute otitis media (AOM) episodes preceded the impact on carriage. These data provide further support of the functional role of the protein D immunity.

Safety of the 11-valent pneumococcal vaccine conjugated to non-typeable Haemophilus influenzae-derived protein D in the first 2 years of life and immunogenicity of the co-administered hexavalent diphtheria, tetanus, acellular pertussis, hepatitis B, inactivated polio virus, Haemophilus influenzae type b and control hepatitis A vaccines.

This randomized (1:1), double-blind, multicenter study, included 4,968 healthy infants to receive either the 11-valent pneumococcal protein D (PD)-conjugate study vaccine or the hepatitis A vaccine (HAV) (control) at 3, 4, 5, and 12-15 months of age. The three-dose primary course of both vaccines was co-administered with combined hexavalent DTPa-HBV-IPV/Hib vaccine. The pneumococcal PD-conjugate study vaccine did not impact the immune response of co-administered hexavalent vaccine and the control HAV vaccine induced seropositivity (antibodies >or=15 mIU/mL) in all infants. The incidence of solicited symptoms was higher with the 11-valent pneumococcal PD-conjugate study vaccine, yet similar to that induced by concomitant DTPa-HBV-IPV/Hib vaccine. Overall, the reactogenicity and safety profile of the 11-valent pneumococcal PD-conjugate vaccine when co-administered with the hexavalent DTPa-HBV-IPV/Hib vaccine, as well as the immunogenicity of the co-administered hexavalent vaccine, were consistent with previous reports for the licensed DTPa-HBV-IPV/Hib and pneumococcal conjugate vaccines.