Characterisation of the safety profile of evobrutinib in over 1000 patients from phase II clinical trials in multiple sclerosis, rheumatoid arthritis and systemic lupus erythematosus: an integrated safety analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Analyse the integrated safety profile of evobrutinib, a Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitor (BTKi), using pooled data from multiple sclerosis (MS), rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) trials. METHODS: Phase II, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial data were analysed (N=1083; MS: n=213, 48 weeks (W); RA: n=390, 12W; SLE: n=480, 52W). The analysis included all patients who received ≥1 dose of evobrutinib (25 mg or 75 mg once daily, or 50 mg or 75 mgtwice daily) or placebo. Descriptive statistics and exposure-adjusted incidence rates (EAIR) were used to report treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). RESULTS: Data from 1083 patients were pooled: evobrutinib, n=861; placebo, n=271 (sum >1083 due to MS trial design: n=49 received both placebo (W0-24) and evobrutinib 25 mg (W25-48)); median follow-up time (pt-years): evobrutinib, 0.501; placebo, 0.463. Across indications, the proportion of patients with TEAEs and the EAIR were similar for evobrutinib and placebo (66.2% (247.6 events/100 pt-years) vs 62.4% (261.4 events/100 pt-years)). By indication, the EAIR (events/100 pt-years) of TEAEs for evobrutinib versus placebo were: MS: 119.7 vs 148.3; RA: 331.8 vs 306.8; SLE: 343.0 vs 302.1. Two fatal events occurred (in SLE). The serious infections EAIR was 2.7 and 2.1 events/100 pt-years for evobrutinib and placebo. For previously reported BTKi-class effects, the EAIR of transient elevated alanine aminotransferase/aspartate aminotransferase TEAEs (events/100 pt-years) with evobrutinib versus placebo was 4.8 vs 2.8/3.5 vs 0.7, respectively. IgG levels were similar in evobrutinib/placebo-treated patients. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first BTKi-integrated safety analysis that includes patients with MS. Overall, evobrutinib treatment (all doses) was generally well tolerated across indications. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBERS: NCT02975349, NCT03233230, NCT02975336.

Safety and clinical activity of atacicept in the long-term extension of the phase 2b ADDRESS II study in systemic lupus erythematosus.

OBJECTIVES: Atacicept reduced SLE disease activity in the phase 2b ADDRESS II study, particularly in patients with high disease activity (HDA; SLEDAI-2K ≥10) at screening. We assessed long-term safety and efficacy of atacicept in the long-term extension (LTE) of ADDRESS II. METHODS: In the 24-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled ADDRESS II study, patients received weekly atacicept (75 or 150 mg) or placebo. Atacicept was continued at the same dose in atacicept-treated patients in the LTE; placebo-treated patients switched to atacicept 150 mg. Long-term safety was the primary endpoint. Secondary endpoints included SLE responder index (SRI)-4 and SRI-6 response rates and flares. RESULTS: In total, 253 patients entered the ADDRESS II LTE; 88 received atacicept 150 mg, 82 atacicept 75 mg and 83 placebo/atacicept 150 mg. Median active treatment duration in the LTE was 83.8 weeks. Frequencies of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were similar across groups (90.4-93.2%), and 12.5%, 14.6% and 21.7% of patients in the atacicept 150 mg, atacicept 75 mg and placebo/atacicept 150 mg groups reported serious TEAEs during the treatment period. The proportions of patients with TEAEs leading to discontinuation were 5.7%, 4.9% and 10.8%, respectively. SRI-4 and SRI-6 response rates were maintained with atacicept in the modified intent-to-treat and HDA populations and those on continuous 150 mg had a reduced risk of first severe flare and longer time to first severe flare vs those who initially received placebo. CONCLUSION: Long-term treatment with atacicept 150 mg in SLE patients had an acceptable safety profile, with durable efficacy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, http://clinicaltrials.gov, NCT02070978.

Attainment of treat-to-target endpoints in SLE patients with high disease activity in the atacicept phase 2b ADDRESS II study.

OBJECTIVE: Low disease activity (LDA) and remission are emerging treat-to-target (T2T) endpoints in SLE. However, the rates at which these endpoints are met in patients with high disease activity (HDA) are unknown. Atacicept, which targets B lymphocyte stimulator and a proliferation-inducing ligand, improved disease outcomes in SLE patients with HDA (SLEDAI-2K ≥10) at baseline in the phase 2b ADDRESS II study. This is a post hoc analysis of T2T endpoints in these patients. METHODS: Patients received weekly atacicept (75 or 150 mg s.c.) or placebo for 24 weeks (1:1:1 randomization). Attainment of three T2T endpoints, LDA (SLEDAI-2K ≤ 2), Lupus Low Disease Activity State (LLDAS) and remission (clinical SLEDAI-2K = 0, prednisone-equivalent ≤5mg/day and Physician's Global Assessment <0.5), was assessed and compared with SLE Responder Index (SRI)-4 and SRI-6 response. RESULTS: Of 306 randomized patients, 158 (51.6%) had baseline HDA. At week 24, 37 (23.4%) HDA patients attained LDA, 25 (15.8%) LLDAS and 17 (10.8%) remission. Each of these endpoints was more stringent than SRI-4 (n = 87; 55.1%) and SRI-6 (n = 67; 42.4%). Compared with placebo (n = 52), at week 24, patients treated with atacicept 150 mg (n = 51) were more likely to attain LDA [odds ratio (OR) 3.82 (95% CI: 1.44, 10.15), P = 0.007], LLDAS [OR 5.03 (95% CI: 1.32, 19.06), P = 0.018] or remission [OR 3.98 (95% CI: 0.78, 20.15), P = 0.095]. CONCLUSION: At week 24, LDA, LLDAS and remission were more stringent than SRI-4 and SRI-6 response, were attainable in the HDA population and discriminated between treatment with atacicept 150 mg and placebo. These results suggest that T2T endpoints are robust outcome measures in SLE clinical trials and support further evaluation of atacicept in SLE. TRAIL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, http://clinicaltrials.gov, NCT01972568.

Brief report: citrullination within the atherosclerotic plaque: a potential target for the anti-citrullinated protein antibody response in rheumatoid arthritis.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether citrullinated proteins within the atherosclerotic plaque can be targeted by anti-citrullinated protein antibodies (ACPAs), forming stimulatory immune complexes that propagate the progression of atherosclerosis. METHODS: Protein lysates prepared from atherosclerotic segments of human aorta were assessed for the presence of citrulline-modified proteins, and specifically citrullinated fibrinogen (Cit-fibrinogen), by immunoprecipitation and/or immunoblotting followed by mass spectrometry. Immunohistochemical analysis of coronary artery plaque was performed to determine the presence of citrullinated proteins and peptidylarginine deiminase type 4 (PAD-4). Serum levels of anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide (anti-CCP), anti-citrullinated vimentin (anti-Cit-vimentin), and anti-Cit-fibrinogen antibodies were measured in 134 women with seropositive rheumatoid arthritis; these subjects had previously been characterized for the presence of subclinical atherosclerosis, by electron beam computed tomography scanning. RESULTS: Western blot analysis of atherosclerotic plaque lysates demonstrated several citrullinated proteins, and the presence of Cit-fibrinogen was confirmed by immunoprecipitation and mass spectrometry. Immunohistochemical analysis showed colocalization of citrullinated proteins and PAD-4 within the coronary artery plaque. In age-adjusted regression models, antibodies targeting Cit-fibrinogen and Cit-vimentin, but not CCP-2, were associated with an increased aortic plaque burden. CONCLUSION: Citrullinated proteins are prevalent within atherosclerotic plaques, and certain ACPAs are associated with the atherosclerotic burden. These observations suggest that targeting of citrullinated epitopes, specifically Cit-fibrinogen, within atherosclerotic plaques could provide a mechanism for the accelerated atherosclerosis observed in patients with RA.

A plain language summary of what clinical studies can tell us about the safety of evobrutinib - a potential treatment for multiple sclerosis.

WHAT IS THIS SUMMARY ABOUT?: This summary explains the findings from a recent investigation that combined the results of over 1000 people from three clinical studies to understand the safety of evobrutinib. Evobrutinib is an oral medication (taken by mouth), being researched as a potential treatment for multiple sclerosis (MS). This medication was also investigated in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Over 1000 people have taken evobrutinib as part of three separate phase 2 clinical studies. These studies looked at how much of the drug should be taken, how safe the drug is, and how well it might work for treating a certain medical condition. WHAT WERE THE RESULTS?: Evobrutinib was well-tolerated by participants in all three studies. The number of side effects reported by participants taking the medication was very similar to those reported by participants taking the placebo (a 'dummy' treatment without a real drug). The most common side effects in clinical studies were urinary tract infections, headache, swelling of the nose and throat, diarrhoea and blood markers of potential liver damage (these returned to normal once the treatment was stopped). WHAT DO THE RESULTS MEAN?: The safety data from all three clinical studies are encouraging and can be used to inform further research into using evobrutinib in MS. Clinical Trial Registration: NCT02975349 (multiple sclerosis), NCT03233230 (rheumatoid arthritis), NCT02975336 (systemic lupus erythematosus) (ClinicalTrials.gov).

Efficacy and Safety of the Bruton's Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Evobrutinib in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: Results of a Phase II, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Dose-Ranging Trial.

OBJECTIVE: Evobrutinib is a highly selective, orally administered Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitor. The objective of this phase II, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of evobrutinib in patients with active autoantibody-positive systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). METHODS: Patients were diagnosed with SLE by either the Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics criteria or at least four American College of Rheumatology criteria 6 months or more prior to screening, had an SLE Disease Activity Index-2000 score of 6 or more, were autoantibody-positive and on standard-of-care therapy. Randomization was 1:1:1:1 to oral evobrutinib 25 mg once daily (QD), 75 mg QD, 50 mg twice daily, or placebo. Primary efficacy endpoints were SLE responder index (SRI)-4 response at week 52 and SRI-6 response at week 52 in the high disease activity subpopulation. Safety endpoints included treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). RESULTS: A total of 469 patients were randomized and received at least one dose of evobrutinib or placebo at the time of primary analysis. Mean (SD) age at baseline was 40.7 (±12.3) years; 94.9% of patients were female. Neither primary efficacy endpoint was met. All doses of evobrutinib were well tolerated, and there was no clear dose effect on the incidence of reported TEAEs, or serious TEAEs, including severe infections. CONCLUSION: This phase II, dose-ranging trial in SLE failed to show a treatment effect of evobrutinib versus placebo at any dose. Evobrutinib was generally well tolerated, with no dose effect observed for TEAEs. These results suggest that BTK inhibition does not appear to be an effective therapeutic intervention for patients with SLE.

Enpatoran in COVID-19 pneumonia: Safety and efficacy results from a phase II randomized trial.

Enpatoran is a selective inhibitor of toll-like receptors 7 and 8 (TLR7/8) that potentially targets pro-inflammatory pathways induced by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). A phase II study conducted in Brazil, the Philippines, and the USA during the early pandemic phase assessed the safety and efficacy of enpatoran in patients hospitalized with COVID-19 pneumonia (NCT04448756). A total of 149 patients, who scored 4 on the World Health Organization's (WHO) 9-point ordinal severity scale, were randomized 1:1:1 and received enpatoran 50 mg (n = 54) or 100 mg (n = 46), or placebo (n = 49) twice daily (b.i.d.) for 14 days plus standard of care. The primary objectives were safety and time to recovery (WHO 9-point scale ≤3). Clinical deterioration (WHO 9-point scale ≥ 5) was a key secondary objective. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were comparable across groups (56.5%-63.0%). Treatment-related TEAEs were numerically higher with enpatoran 50 mg (14.8%) than 100 mg (10.9%) or placebo (8.2%). Serious TEAEs were numerically lower with enpatoran (50 mg 9.3%, 100 mg 2.2%) than placebo (18.4%). The primary efficacy objective was not met; median time to recovery was 3.4-3.9 days across groups, with placebo-treated patients recovering on average faster than anticipated. Clinical deterioration event-free rates up to Day 7 were 90.6%, 95.6%, and 81.6% with enpatoran 50 mg, 100 mg, and placebo, respectively. Enpatoran was well tolerated by patients acutely ill and hospitalized with COVID-19 pneumonia. Positive signals in some secondary end points suggested potential beneficial effects, supporting further evaluation of enpatoran in patients with hyperinflammation due to infection or autoimmunity.

Association of systemic lupus erythematosus with C8orf13-BLK and ITGAM-ITGAX.

BACKGROUND: Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a clinically heterogeneous disease in which the risk of disease is influenced by complex genetic and environmental contributions. Alleles of HLA-DRB1, IRF5, and STAT4 are established susceptibility genes; there is strong evidence for the existence of additional risk loci. METHODS: We genotyped more than 500,000 single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in DNA samples from 1311 case subjects with SLE and 1783 control subjects; all subjects were North Americans of European descent. Genotypes from 1557 additional control subjects were obtained from public data repositories. We measured the association between the SNPs and SLE after applying strict quality-control filters to reduce technical artifacts and to correct for the presence of population stratification. Replication of the top loci was performed in 793 case subjects and 857 control subjects from Sweden. RESULTS: Genetic variation in the region upstream from the transcription initiation site of the gene encoding B lymphoid tyrosine kinase (BLK) and C8orf13 (chromosome 8p23.1) was associated with disease risk in both the U.S. and Swedish case-control series (rs13277113; odds ratio, 1.39; P=1x10(-10)) and also with altered levels of messenger RNA in B-cell lines. In addition, variants on chromosome 16p11.22, near the genes encoding integrin alpha M (ITGAM, or CD11b) and integrin alpha X (ITGAX), were associated with SLE in the combined sample (rs11574637; odds ratio, 1.33; P=3x10(-11)). CONCLUSIONS: We identified and then confirmed through replication two new genetic loci for SLE: a promoter-region allele associated with reduced expression of BLK and increased expression of C8orf13 and variants in the ITGAM-ITGAX region.

Association analysis of PON2 genetic variants with serum paraoxonase activity and systemic lupus erythematosus.

BACKGROUND: Low serum paraoxonase (PON) activity is associated with the risk of coronary artery disease, diabetes and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Our prior studies have shown that the PON1/rs662 (p.Gln192Arg), PON1/rs854560 (p.Leu55Met), PON3/rs17884563 and PON3/rs740264 SNPs (single nucleotide polymorphisms) significantly affect serum PON activity. Since PON1, PON2 and PON3 share high degree of structural and functional properties, in this study, we examined the role of PON2 genetic variation on serum PON activity, risk of SLE and SLE-related clinical manifestations in a Caucasian case-control sample. METHODS: PON2 SNPs were selected from HapMap and SeattleSNPs databases by including at least one tagSNP from each bin defined in these resources. A total of nineteen PON2 SNPs were successfully genotyped in 411 SLE cases and 511 healthy controls using pyrosequencing, restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) or TaqMan allelic discrimination methods. RESULTS: Our pair-wise linkage disequilibrium (LD) analysis, using an r² cutoff of 0.7, identified 14 PON2 tagSNPs that captured all 19 PON2 variants in our sample, 12 of which were not in high LD with known PON1 and PON3 SNP modifiers of PON activity. Stepwise regression analysis of PON activity, including the known modifiers, identified five PON2 SNPs [rs6954345 (p.Ser311Cys), rs13306702, rs987539, rs11982486, and rs4729189; P = 0.005 to 2.1 × 10⁻6] that were significantly associated with PON activity. We found no association of PON2 SNPs with SLE risk but modest associations were observed with lupus nephritis (rs11981433, rs17876205, rs17876183) and immunologic disorder (rs11981433) in SLE patients (P = 0.013 to 0.042). CONCLUSIONS: Our data indicate that PON2 genetic variants significantly affect variation in serum PON activity and have modest effects on risk of lupus nephritis and SLE-related immunologic disorder.

Erythrocyte C3d and C4d for monitoring disease activity in systemic lupus erythematosus.

OBJECTIVE: Disease activity in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is typically monitored by measuring serum C3 and C4. However, these proteins have limited utility as lupus biomarkers, because they are substrates rather than products of complement activation. The aim of this study was to evaluate the utility of measuring the erythrocyte-bound complement activation products, erythrocyte-bound C3d (E-C3d) and E-C4d, compared with that of serum C3 and C4 for monitoring disease activity in patients with SLE. METHODS: The levels of E-C3d and E-C4d were measured by flow cytometry in 157 patients with SLE, 290 patients with other diseases, and 256 healthy individuals. The patients with SLE were followed up longitudinally. Disease activity was measured at each visit, using the validated Systemic Lupus Activity Measure (SLAM) and the Safety of Estrogens in Lupus Erythematosus: National Assessment (SELENA) version of the Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index (SLEDAI). RESULTS: At baseline, patients with SLE had higher median levels of E-C3d and E-C4d (P < 0.0001) in addition to higher within-patient and between-patient variability in both E-C3d and E-C4d when compared with the 2 non-SLE groups. In a longitudinal analysis of patients with SLE, E-C3d, E-C4d, serum C3, and anti-double-stranded DNA (anti-dsDNA) antibodies were each significantly associated with the SLAM and SELENA-SLEDAI. In a multivariable analysis, E-C4d remained significantly associated with these SLE activity measures after adjusting for serum C3, C4, and anti-dsDNA antibodies; however, E-C3d was associated with the SLAM but not with the SELENA-SLEDAI. CONCLUSION: Determining the levels of the erythrocyte-bound complement activation products, especially E-C4d, is an informative measure of SLE disease activity as compared with assessing serum C4 levels and should be considered for monitoring disease activity in patients with SLE.

Specificity of the STAT4 genetic association for severe disease manifestations of systemic lupus erythematosus.

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a genetically complex disease with heterogeneous clinical manifestations. A polymorphism in the STAT4 gene has recently been established as a risk factor for SLE, but the relationship with specific SLE subphenotypes has not been studied. We studied 137 SNPs in the STAT4 region genotyped in 4 independent SLE case series (total n = 1398) and 2560 healthy controls, along with clinical data for the cases. Using conditional testing, we confirmed the most significant STAT4 haplotype for SLE risk. We then studied a SNP marking this haplotype for association with specific SLE subphenotypes, including autoantibody production, nephritis, arthritis, mucocutaneous manifestations, and age at diagnosis. To prevent possible type-I errors from population stratification, we reanalyzed the data using a subset of subjects determined to be most homogeneous based on principal components analysis of genome-wide data. We confirmed that four SNPs in very high LD (r(2) = 0.94 to 0.99) were most strongly associated with SLE, and there was no compelling evidence for additional SLE risk loci in the STAT4 region. SNP rs7574865 marking this haplotype had a minor allele frequency (MAF) = 31.1% in SLE cases compared with 22.5% in controls (OR = 1.56, p = 10(-16)). This SNP was more strongly associated with SLE characterized by double-stranded DNA autoantibodies (MAF = 35.1%, OR = 1.86, p<10(-19)), nephritis (MAF = 34.3%, OR = 1.80, p<10(-11)), and age at diagnosis<30 years (MAF = 33.8%, OR = 1.77, p<10(-13)). An association with severe nephritis was even more striking (MAF = 39.2%, OR = 2.35, p<10(-4) in the homogeneous subset of subjects). In contrast, STAT4 was less strongly associated with oral ulcers, a manifestation associated with milder disease. We conclude that this common polymorphism of STAT4 contributes to the phenotypic heterogeneity of SLE, predisposing specifically to more severe disease.

The ALPHA Project: Establishing consensus and prioritisation of global community recommendations to address major challenges in lupus diagnosis, care, treatment and research.

The Addressing Lupus Pillars for Health Advancement (ALPHA) Project is a global consensus effort to identify, prioritise and address top barriers in lupus impacting diagnosis, care, treatment and research. To conduct this process, the ALPHA Project convened a multistakeholder Global Advisory Committee (GAC) of lupus experts and collected input from global audiences, including patients. In phase I, the ALPHA Project used expert interviews and a global survey of lupus experts to identify and categorise barriers into three overarching pillars: drug development, clinical care and access to care. In phase II, reported here, the GAC developed recommended actionable solutions to address these previously identified barriers through an in-person stakeholder meeting, followed by a two-round scoring process. Recommendations were assessed for feasibility, impact and timeline for implementation (FIT), where potential FIT component values were between 1 and 3 and total scores were between 3 and 9. Higher scores represented higher achievability based on the composite of the three criteria. Simplifying and standardising outcomes measures, including steroid sparing as an outcome (drug development) and defining the lupus spectrum (clinical care) ranked as the highest two priority solutions during the GAC meeting and received high FIT scores (7.67 and 7.44, respectively). Leveraging social media (access to care) received the highest FIT score across all pillars (7.86). Cross-cutting themes of many solutions include leveraging digital technology and applying specific considerations for special populations, including paediatrics. Implementing the recommendations to address key barriers to drug development, clinical care and access to care is essential to improving the quality of life of adults and children with lupus. Multistakeholder collaboration and guidance across existing efforts globally is warranted.

Association between depression and coronary artery calcification in women with systemic lupus erythematosus.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the associations between depression, cardiovascular risk factors and coronary artery calcification (CAC) in women with SLE and controls. METHODS: CAC was measured using electron-beam CT (EBCT). Traditional, inflammatory and lupus-related risk factors as well as depressive symptoms (Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale-CES-D) were measured at a single study visit in 161 women with SLE and 161 age- and race frequency-matched female healthy controls. RESULTS: Women with SLE reported more depressive symptoms than controls, with 27% of SLE and 15% of controls having CES-D scores suggestive of clinical depression. SLE women were more likely to have CAC, as well as more severe CAC compared with controls. Among the SLE women, depression was associated with greater than 2-fold odds of having any CAC [odds ratio (OR) 2.48; 95% CI 1.05, 5.87; P = 0.04], independent of traditional risk factors (age, hypertension and triglycerides) and inflammatory markers. However, when BMI was included among the covariates, the association between depression and CAC was attenuated, indicating the potential mediating role of BMI. Depression was not a risk factor for CAC in controls. CONCLUSIONS: In women with SLE, depression was associated with CAC. This association was mediated by BMI. Depression and adiposity may add to the inflammatory burden of SLE, thus contributing to cardiovascular disease risk.

Platelet C4d is associated with acute ischemic stroke and stroke severity.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Platelets bearing complement C4d were recently reported to be 99% specific for a diagnosis of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and associated with neuropsychiatric lupus. We compared the prevalence of platelet C4d and investigated the clinical associations of platelet C4d in patients with acute ischemic stroke. METHODS: We recruited 80 patients hospitalized for acute ischemic stroke. Stroke severity was measured by the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIH-SS). Infarct volume was determined by MRI. Platelet C4d was measured by flow cytometry. RESULTS: Mean age was 57.9 years (range: 24.6 to 86.8 years), 58% were male, and 91% were white. Eight patients (10%) with acute ischemic stroke were platelet C4d-positive, which was significantly higher in prevalence compared to healthy controls (0%, P<0.0001) and non-SLE patients with immune/inflammatory disease (2%, P=0.004). The median NIH-SS score and infarct volume for acute stroke patients were 6 (interquartile range [IQR]: 2 to 13) and 3.4 cc (IQR: 1.1 to 16.6), respectively. Platelet C4d-positive patients were more likely to have a severe stroke compared to those with negative platelet C4d (NIH-SS median: 17.5 versus 5, P=0.003). Positive platelet C4d was independently associated with stroke severity (P=0.03) after controlling for age, anticardiolipin antibody (aCL) status, and total anterior circulation of stroke involvement, and also with infarct volume (P=0.005) after controlling for age, aCL status, and old stroke by MRI. CONCLUSIONS: Platelet C4d is associated with severe acute ischemic stroke. Platelet C4d may be a biomarker as well as pathogenic clue that links cerebrovascular inflammation and thrombosis.

C-reactive protein and coronary artery calcium in asymptomatic women with systemic lupus erythematosus or rheumatoid arthritis.

Patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and those with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) have increased risk for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. The aims of this study were to compare the presence of coronary artery calcium (CAC) in age- and race-matched women with SLE, those with RA, and healthy controls without diabetes mellitus or history of myocardial infarction, angina pectoris, or stroke and to investigate its relation with traditional risk factors, inflammation, and endothelial activation. Study subjects completed cardiovascular risk factor assessment and electron-beam computed tomography that measured CAC. The 2 patient groups had similar prevalence and extent of CAC as well as significantly increased odds of having any CAC (odds ratio 1.87, 95% confidence interval 1.09 to 3.21) and more extensive CAC (odds ratio 4.04, 95% confidence interval 1.42 to 11.56 for CAC score >100) compared with healthy controls. After controlling for differences in cardiovascular risk factors, including insulin resistance and hypertension, the results remained statistically significant. After adjustment for differences in levels of C-reactive protein and/or soluble intercellular adhesion molecule-1, however, women with chronic inflammatory diseases no longer had significantly increased odds of having any CAC or more extensive CAC compared with controls. In conclusion, asymptomatic and nondiabetic women with chronic inflammatory diseases had significantly increased odds of having CAC and more extensive CAC compared with age- and race-matched healthy controls. The increased odds for CAC may in part result from higher levels of inflammation and endothelial activation in these patients.

An evaluation of health-related quality of life in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus using PROMIS and Neuro-QoL.

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a multi-organ chronic autoimmune disease that can negatively affect patients' health-related quality of life (HRQOL). This study evaluated HRQOL of SLE patients using questionnaires from the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) and Quality of Life in Neurological Disorders (Neuro-QoL). Individuals with SLE completed an online survey consisting of the PROMIS-29 health profile, PROMIS Psychosocial Illness Impact-Negative, and Neuro-QoL Applied Cognition. PROMIS and Neuro-QoL scores have a mean of 50 in the US general population. Patients self-rated SLE disease severity as negligible, mild, moderate, or severe. Of the 333 participants (mean age 45 years; 92% female; 26% Black; mean SLE disease duration 12 years, 56% with SLE disease severity as moderate or severe), mean HRQOL scores were worse than those of the general population by ≥0.5 SD with the greatest deficits observed in the domains of fatigue, applied cognition, psychosocial illness impact-negative, pain interference, and physical function. Greater SLE disease severity was associated with worse mean HRQOL scores (all p < 0.05). Pain severity was also associated with worse HRQOL scores on all domains (p < 0.05) except for satisfaction with social role. Test-retest reliability exceeded 0.70 for all PROMIS and Neuro-QoL scores. PROMIS-29 and Neuro-QoL are valid tools to assess HRQOL in patients with SLE. These patients reported substantial deficits that correlated with their SLE disease severity, with pain being an important independent contributor. These deficits should be monitored in SLE patients during their routine clinical care and evaluated when investigating new therapies.

Cell-bound complement activation products (CB-CAPs) as a source of lupus biomarkers.

Measurement of serum C3 and C4 has been used for several decades to monitor disease activity in patients with SLE. Despite the limited utility and recognized weaknesses of these assays, they have remained the gold standard during an era of unprecedented discovery in the complement field. The current urgent need for lupus biomarkers warrants efforts to mine the complement system for assays superior to serum C3 and C4. Recent studies of soluble and cell-bound complement activation products hold promise for achieving this goal.

Identification of a New Susceptibility Locus for Systemic Lupus Erythematosus on Chromosome 12 in Individuals of European Ancestry.

OBJECTIVE: Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) in individuals of European ancestry identified a number of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) susceptibility loci using earlier versions of high-density genotyping platforms. Followup studies on suggestive GWAS regions using larger samples and more markers identified additional SLE loci in subjects of European descent. This multistage study was undertaken to identify novel SLE loci. METHODS: In stage 1, we conducted a new GWAS of SLE in a North American case-control sample of subjects of European ancestry (n = 1,166) genotyped on Affymetrix Genome-Wide Human SNP Array 6.0. In stage 2, we further investigated top new suggestive GWAS hits by in silico evaluation and meta-analysis using an additional data set of subjects of European descent (>2,500 individuals), followed by replication of top meta-analysis findings in another data set of subjects of European descent (>10,000 individuals) in stage 3. RESULTS: As expected, our GWAS revealed the most significant associations at the major histocompatibility complex locus (6p21), which easily surpassed the genome-wide significance threshold (P < 5 × 10(-8)). Several other SLE signals/loci previously implicated in Caucasians and/or Asians were also confirmed in the stage 1 discovery sample, and the strongest signals were observed at 2q32/STAT4 (P = 3.6 × 10(-7)) and at 8p23/BLK (P = 8.1 × 10(-6)). Stage 2 meta-analyses identified a new genome-wide significant SLE locus at 12q12 (meta P = 3.1 × 10(-8)), which was replicated in stage 3. CONCLUSION: Our multistage study identified and replicated a new SLE locus that warrants further followup in additional studies. Publicly available databases suggest that this newly identified SLE signal falls within a functionally relevant genomic region and near biologically important genes.

Glucocorticoid Use in Patients With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: Association Between Dose and Health Care Utilization and Costs.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the determinants of health care utilization and costs with use of glucocorticoid (GC) drugs among adult systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients. METHODS: This cross-sectional study analyzed established SLE patients identified by International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification diagnosis codes from a large US insurance claims database in 2007-2011. Five patient groups were defined by their oral GC use during a 1-year period: non-GC users, <60 days of GC use, and ≥60 days of GC use in low dosage (≤7.5 mg/day), medium dosage (>7.5 to ≤15 mg/day), or higher dosage (>15 mg/day). Annual health care utilization and costs were compared across these groups. Incremental costs of GC groups, calculated as the difference in total health care costs compared with those of the non-GC group, were estimated from multivariable regressions adjusting for demographic/clinical characteristics and stratified by concomitant immunosuppressant use. RESULTS: A total of 50,230 SLE patients were identified (52% non-GC users, 20% <60 days of GC use, and 10% low dose, 10% medium dose, and 8% higher dose of ≥60 days of GC use). GC users had higher health care utilization and costs. Incremental costs were significant (all P < 0.01) for medium-dose ($5,319 and $6,913) and higher-dose ($12,517 and $15,019) GC groups, regardless of concomitant immunosuppressant use. The incremental costs for the low-dose GC group with concomitant immunosuppressants ($1,285; P = 0.04) were smaller than the incremental costs for the low-dose GC group without concomitant immunosuppressants ($2,514; P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: GC use, especially at higher doses, was associated with higher health care utilization and costs. Findings in users with concomitant immunosuppressants suggest that therapies with a GC-sparing effect may be associated with lower economic burden in SLE treatment.