Intrafraction motion monitoring to determine PTV margins in early stage breast cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant partial breast SABR.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: To quantify intra-fraction tumor motion using imageguidance and implanted fiducial markers to determine if a 5 mm planning-target-volume (PTV) margin is sufficient for early stage breast cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A HydroMark© (Mammotome) fiducial was implanted at the time of biopsy adjacent to the tumor. Sixty-one patients with 62 tumours were treated prone using a 5 mm PTV margin. Motion was quantified using two methods (separate patient groups): 1) difference in 3D fiducial position pre- and post-treatment cone-beam CTs (CBCTs) in 18 patients receiving 21 Gy/1fraction (fx); 2) acquiring 2D triggered-kVimages to quantify 3D intra-fraction motion using a 2D-to-3D estimation method for 44 tumours receiving 21 Gy/1fx (n = 22) or 30 Gy/3fx (n = 22). For 2), motion was quantified by calculating the magnitude of intra-fraction positional deviation from the pretreatment CBCT. PTV margins were derived using van Herkian analysis. RESULTS: The average ± standard deviation magnitude of motion across patients was 1.3 ± 1.15 mm Left/Right (L/R), 1.0 ± 0.9 mm Inferiorly/Superiorly (I/S), and 1.8 ± 1.5 mm Anteriorly/Posteriorly (A/P). 85/105 (81%) treatment fractions had dominant anterior motion. 6/62patients (9.7%) had mean intra-fraction motion during any fraction > 5 mm in any direction, with 4 in the anterior direction. Estimated PTV margins for single and three-fx patients in the L/R, I/S, and A/P directions were 6.0x4.1x5.9 mm and 4.5x2.9x4.3 mm, respectively. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that a 5 mm PTV margin is sufficient for the I/S and A/P directions if a lateral kV image is acquired immediately before treatment. For the L/R direction, either further immobilization or a larger margin is required.

Radical radiotherapy for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer-what's up with arm positioning?

Radical thoracic radiotherapy is ideally delivered in the arms-up (AU) position; however, patient comfort may only allow for arms-down (AD) positioning to be feasible. Objectives of this study were (I) to evaluate the dosimetric impact of changing arm position during treatment and (II) to compare plan quality for optimization in AU vs. AD positions. In this retrospective planning study, stage III lung cancer patients (n=10) who received 60 Gy in 30 fractions using volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) were identified. To simulate AD treatment, a PET/CT (acquired AD) was registered to the planning CT (acquired AU) for arm delineation. The clinically delivered plan (AU) was recalculated with a density override to 1 g/cm3 for one or both arm contours (AD). Plans were also re-optimized for the AD position. Dose-volume parameters were compared for each scenario. Moving from AU to AD without re-optimization resulted in a mean 3.7% reduction in PTV D95; in all cases, this caused 95% of the PTV to receive ≤57 Gy. The mean arms D2cc were 23.1 and 4.0 Gy for the ipsilateral and contralateral, respectively. Dosimetric consequences of ipsilateral arm only were similar to both AD, whereas contralateral arm only had less than 1% effect on PTV D95. Re-optimizing to account for both AD recovered PTV D95 coverage with acceptable doses to all organs at risk. Arm D2cc were also decreased to 5.5 and 2.3 Gy for ipsilateral and contralateral, respectively. There was a significant difference in heart V25 and mean heart dose (P<0.001), but the magnitude was small at 4.1% for V25 and 1.7 Gy for mean heart dose and the plans still met institutional dose constraints. This planning study suggests that it is feasible to plan radiotherapy for locally advanced lung cancer patients in the AD position using VMAT, when necessary, with only a modest dosimetric impact.

The use of intensity-modulated radiation therapy photon beams for improving the dose uniformity of electron beams shaped with MLC.

Electrons are ideal for treating shallow tumors and sparing adjacent normal tissue. Conventionally, electron beams are collimated by cut-outs that are time-consuming to make and difficult to adapt to tumor shape throughout the course of treatment. We propose that electron cut-outs can be replaced using photon multileaf collimator (MLC). Two major problems of this approach are that the scattering of electrons causes penumbra widening because of a large air gap, and available commercial treatment planning systems (TPSs) do not support MLC-collimated electron beams. In this study, these difficulties were overcome by (1) modeling electron beams collimated by photon MLC for a commercial TPS, and (2) developing a technique to reduce electron beam penumbra by adding low-energy intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) photons (4 MV). We used blocks to simulate MLC shielding in the TPS. Inverse planning was used to optimize boost photon beams. This technique was applied to a parotid and a central nervous system (CNS) clinical case. Combined photon and electron plans were compared with conventional plans and verified using ion chamber, film, and a 2D diode array. Our studies showed that the beam penumbra for mixed beams with 90 cm source to surface distance (SSD) is comparable with electron applicators and cut-outs at 100 cm SSD. Our mixed-beam technique yielded more uniform dose to the planning target volume and lower doses to various organs at risk for both parotid and CNS clinical cases. The plans were verified with measurements, with more than 95% points passing the gamma criteria of 5% in dose difference and 5 mm for distance to agreement. In conclusion, the study has demonstrated the feasibility and potential advantage of using photon MLC to collimate electron beams with boost photon IMRT fields.

Brachytherapy with permanent gold grain seeds for squamous cell carcinoma of the lip.

PURPOSE: To describe the use of radioactive gold grain implantation for squamous cell carcinoma of the lip. METHODS: Retrospective review of 51 patients treated with permanent gold ((198)Au) grain implant brachytherapy. The seed arrangement delivered a dose of 5500 cGy at 0.5 cm from a single plane. Primary endpoints were local recurrence and cosmetic outcome. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 27 months. Median age was 69 years. The majority (90%) were T1 lesions. None of the patients had evidence of regional lymph node or distant metastasis. Twelve patients had recurrent disease with prior surgery and five patients had previous head and neck radiation. Local control was achieved in 49 patients. Good cosmesis was achieved in 48 patients. Two-year actuarial estimates for local failure-free survival, disease-free survival and overall survival were 97.9%, 94.1% and 87.9%, respectively; no deaths were attributable to lip cancer. CONCLUSIONS: Gold grain interstitial low-dose rate brachytherapy provides excellent local control and cosmesis in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the lip. This technique provides an excellent option for patients that are elder or live remotely. It is particularly useful for lesions that are small, in previously radiated areas, or treated with prior surgery.