Clinical features of dermatomyositis associated with anti-MDA5 antibodies by age.

OBJECTIVES: Anti-melanoma differentiation-associated gene 5 (MDA5) autoantibody-positive and age at onset ≥60 years are poor prognosis factors in polymyositis (PM) and dermatomyositis (DM) associated with interstitial lung disease (ILD) among Japanese patients. However, the influence of age on the clinical features of anti-MDA5 autoantibody-positive patients with DM remains unclear. METHODS: We retrospectively examined 40 patients with DM and anti-MDA5 autoantibodies according to age. We compared patients aged <60 and ≥60 years with respect to clinical features including laboratory test findings, high-resolution lung computed tomography data, treatment content, and complications such as infections and prognosis. We also examined clinical features between surviving and deceased patients in the older patient group. RESULTS: Of 40 enrolled patients, 13 were classified as old and 27 as young. Older patients had significantly fewer clinical symptoms including arthralgia/arthritis (p < .01), skin ulceration (p = .02), and higher mortality than younger patients (p = .02) complicated with rapidly progressive ILD (RP-ILD), combination immunosuppressive therapy, and strictly controlled infections. CONCLUSION: Clinical features and mortality of anti-MDA5 autoantibody-positive DM patients were influenced by age. Patients aged ≥60 years had a worse prognosis, and combination immunosuppressive therapy was often ineffective for RP-ILD in older patients.

Clinical features of patients with anti-melanoma differentiation-associated gene-5 antibody-positive dermatomyositis complicated by spontaneous pneumomediastinum.

BACKGROUND: Dermatomyositis (DM) with autoantibody against melanoma differentiation-associated gene-5 (MDA5) is characterized by elevated risk of rapidly progressive interstitial lung disease (RP-ILD) with a potentially fatal course. Pneumomediastinum (PNM) is a common pulmonary manifestation which accompanies ILD. However, the clinical features of the patients with anti-MDA5 antibody-positive DM who develop PNM remain unclear. METHODS: We retrospectively examined 31 patients with DM having anti-MDA5 antibody and compared the clinical features between patients with PNM (PMN(+)) (n = 11) and those without (PNM(-) (n = 20). In addition, we evaluated the treatment-related prognoses in PNM(+) group. RESULTS: CT score (total ground-glass opacity (GGO) score, P = 0.02; total fibrosis score, P = 0.02) before treatment, and mortality (P = 0.04) were significantly higher in PNM(+) group. The cumulative survival rate as assessed by Kaplan-Meier method was significantly lower for the PNM(+) group (P = 0.02). Among 11 PMN(+) patients, 9 patients (9/11, 81.8%) underwent intensive immunosuppression therapy for RP-ILD, and 5 patients (5/11, 45.5%) did not respond to it and died from the respiratory failure. At the time of diagnosis of PNM, nonsurvivors had worse liver function (ALT, P = 0.03; LDH, P = 0.01), worse respiratory status (A-aDO2, P = 0.01), and worse CT score (total GGO score, P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: A subgroup of patients with DM having anti-MDA5 antibody complicated by PNM as well as RP-ILD did respond to intensive immunosuppression therapy. Initial aggressive immunosuppressive therapy should be considered for these patients.Key Points• This study clearly demonstrate the presence of PNM was associated with elevated risk of death due to respiratory failure from RP-ILD among patients with DM having circulating anti-MDA5-antibody.•This study demonstrate evaluation of CT image may be helpful to find patients with better response to the intense immunosuppression therapy for the patients with DM having circulating anti-MDA5-antibody and PNM.

The Onset of Eosinophilic Pneumonia Preceding Anti-synthetase Syndrome.

A 66-year-old man had been treated with prednisolone for eosinophilic pneumonia for 8 years. His slowly progressing cough and dyspnea were accompanied by elevated levels of fibrotic serological markers and an increased reticular shadow on chest computed tomography images. The patient had recently tested positive for anti-EJ antibodies, a type of anti-aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase antibody; therefore, we diagnosed him with an exacerbation of interstitial pneumonia due to anti-synthetase syndrome (ASS). He was treated with tacrolimus and an increased prednisolone dosage. We herein present the first reported case of eosinophilic pneumonia preceding anti-EJ antibody-positive ASS.

Differential clinical features of patients with clinically amyopathic dermatomyositis who have circulating anti-MDA5 autoantibodies with or without myositis-associated autoantibodies.

BACKGROUND: Anti-melanoma differentiation-associated gene 5 (MDA5) autoantibodies have been identified as myositis-specific autoantibodies that are often associated with clinically amyopathic dermatomyositis (CADM) and a poor prognosis due to rapidly progressive interstitial lung disease (RP-ILD) in East Asian patients. Besides anti-MDA5 autoantibodies, patients with CADM may have myositis-associated autoantibodies (MAAs), which characterize other connective tissue diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis and Sjögren's syndrome. However, the clinical significance of the coexistence of anti-MDA5 autoantibodies and MAAs in patients with CADM remains unclear. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 24 patients with CADM who had anti-MDA5 autoantibodies. Their clinical phenotypes including laboratory test results, high-resolution lung computed tomography data, response to therapy, and prognosis were compared between those who were positive and negative for MAAs, such as antinuclear antibody (ANA), anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide (CCP), anti-SSA, and anti-SSB antibodies. RESULTS: Among 24 patients, 9 (37.5%) additionally had at least one of the MAAs examined in this study: 1 patient was positive for ANA, 5 for anti-CCP, 5 for either anti-SSA or anti-SSB, 1 for anti-cardiolipin, and 1 for anti-Scl-70. Although all anti-MDA5-positive patients with CADM had ILD, the MAA-positive patients showed a lower risk of developing RP-ILD (p = 0.03), a more favorable response to combination therapy of corticosteroids and immunosuppressive agents, and a lower mortality rate than patients with no MAAs (p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that anti-MDA5-positive patients with CADM who also have MAAs have a better prognosis than those without MAAs; thus, anti-MDA5 autoantibodies by themselves may not be strong predictors of worse clinical outcomes in patients with CADM. Coexistent MAAs could be biomarkers for a favorable prognosis in anti-MDA5-positive patients with CADM.