Hybrid-based iliofemoral endarterectomy for severe and complete iliofemoral occlusive disease.

OBJECTIVE: Primary endovascular approaches are now the dominant modality for the treatment of iliac occlusive disease. However, stenting of the external iliac artery is plagued with high in-stent restenosis rates. This hybrid approach with fluoroscopic, retrograde iliofemoral endarterectomy combined with stenting was previously demonstrated to be both a safe and effective alternative to bypass and primary stenting alone for TransAtlantic Inter-Society Consensus (TASC) II C and D lesions. In this study, early outcomes and hemodynamic improvements of this hybrid approach are evaluated with an expanded patient population. METHODS: This was a single-institution, retrospective review of all hybrid-based retrograde iliofemoral endarterectomies from the common femoral artery extending to the proximal external iliac artery from January 1, 2010, to November 15, 2017. Data were collected from the electronic medical record and analyzed using standard quantitative statistical techniques. All preprocedure and postprocedure imaging was independently reviewed by two vascular surgeons. Variables included patient demographics, degree of ischemia, and stent characteristics. The primary outcomes were mortality and freedom from amputation, with secondary outcomes including changes in the ankle-brachial index and toe pressure. RESULTS: The procedure was performed on 63 limbs in 51 total patients. In 33 limbs, the indication was critical limb ischemia (tissue loss/gangrene = 17, rest pain = 16) and 30 for lifestyle-limiting claudication. The cohort consisted of 84% TASC D and 16% TASC C. External iliac stenting was required in 68% (modal diameter, 10 mm) and ipsilateral common iliac stenting was completed in 75% (modal diameter, 9 mm). The ankle-brachial index significantly improved from 0.42 ± 0.25 to 0.73 ± 0.27 (P < .001) as did toe pressure from 29 ± 27 mm Hg to 59 ± 34 mm Hg (P < .001). Thirteen limbs ultimately required an infrainguinal procedure. One patient experienced an intraoperative iliac perforation that resolved with stenting. One death occurred within 90 days. Ninety-five percent of patients remained free from amputation. CONCLUSIONS: Extensive hybrid-based, retrograde iliofemoral endarterectomy with stenting is a safe and efficacious approach to severe iliac arterial occlusive disease, with excellent early outcomes. This series promulgates the hypothesis that extensive endarterectomy with selective iliac stenting yields superior results to external iliac stenting alone. Given the superb hemodynamic improvements in a larger patient population, this hybrid-based, extensive iliofemoral endarterectomy should be recommended as a minimally invasive, first-line treatment for severe iliac occlusive disease.

Hybrid external iliac selective endarterectomy surgical technique and outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: Long or multisegmental external iliac-to-femoral arterial lesions treated by angioplasty and stenting have achieved disappointing results. Conventional, open approaches are often complicated by significant morbidity, and endovascular stenting alone typically requires additional outflow procedures. We hypothesized that a hybrid approach, combining endovascular techniques with remote selective external iliac endarterectomy, produces superior outcomes in terms of patency compared with stenting alone, with minimal associated morbidity. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of all patients having undergone hybrid-based retrograde iliofemoral endarterectomy from 2010 to 2014 at St. Joseph Mercy in Ann Arbor, Michigan. Patient demographics, presenting complaints, operative details, and complications were analyzed. Postoperative patency was assessed by comparison of ankle-brachial index values and qualitative patient improvement. Data were analyzed by way of paired Student t-test with significance defined as P < .05. RESULTS: A total of 40 limbs were intervened upon on 33 patients. In 20 limbs, the procedure was performed for critical limb ischemia (rest pain, n = 9; tissue loss/gangrene, n = 11). By TransAtlantic Inter-Society Consensus II criteria, 83% of iliac lesions were class D. A more even distribution was noted in TransAtlantic Inter-Society Consensus II classification for femoral and popliteal disease. Seventeen percent of patients had one-vessel infrageniculate runoff. In 21 limbs (54%), external iliac artery (EIA) stenting was performed at the time of procedure, 18 (46%) had common iliac artery (CIA) stenting, and 7 (18%) had a bridging stent from the CIA to EIA. The modal EIA stent diameter was 10 mm (range, 8-10 mm), modal CIA stent diameter 8 mm (range, 7-9 mm). The preintervention ankle-brachial index was 0.45 ± 0.24 (n = 33 limbs) and significantly improved to 0.75 ± 0.27 (n = 29 limbs; P < .001). In addition, preintervention toe pressure of 34 ± 28 (n = 28 limbs) improved to 58 ± 26 (n = 23 limbs; P < .001). No intraoperative complications occurred, which necessitated abdominal or retroperitoneal exposure. Average follow-up after the intervention was 13 ± 14.6 months. One limb (3%) required an additional outflow bypass. The incidence of ipsilateral hypogastric occlusion increased from 35% to 55% postoperatively; however, no patients reported pelvic or buttock ischemia. One patient who had the procedure done bilaterally presented 655 days after the procedure with bilateral iliac artery thrombosis and underwent aortobifemoral bypass. No other patient needed subsequent primary assisted patency or additional infrainguinal revascularization. CONCLUSIONS: Hybrid-based external iliac and femoral endarterectomy provides a minimally invasive approach to EIA occlusive disease comparable with aortofemoral bypass. Dramatic inflow improvement was observed in our series, and the need for additional outflow revascularization was minimal. The procedure was deemed technically feasible and safe, with a low number of adverse sequela and excellent primary patency achieved more than 1 year after the intervention.

Chlorhexidine with isopropyl alcohol versus iodine povacrylex with isopropyl alcohol and alcohol- versus nonalcohol-based skin preparations: the incidence of and readmissions for surgical site infections after colorectal operations.

BACKGROUND: Surgical site infections are a major cause of morbidity and mortality after colorectal operations. Preparation of the surgical site with antiseptic solutions is an essential part of wound infection prevention. To date, there is no universal consensus regarding which preparation is most efficacious. OBJECTIVE: This study compared 2.0% chlorhexidine with 70.0% isopropyl alcohol versus 0.7% iodine povacrylex with 74.0% isopropyl alcohol and alcohol-based versus nonalcohol-based skin preparations with regard to efficacy in preventing postoperative wound infections. DESIGN: This is a retrospective study from 2 prospectively collected statewide databases combined. A propensity score model was used to adjust for differences between the groups in patient demographics, characteristics, comorbidities, and laboratory values. SETTINGS: The multicenter data set used in this analysis represents a variety of academic and community hospitals within the state of Michigan from January 2010 through June 2012. PATIENTS: Patients over the age of 18 years who underwent clean-contaminated colorectal operations were included. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The incidence of superficial surgical site infections, any surgical site infection, any wound complication, and readmission within 30 days for surgical site infection were measured. RESULTS: When 2.0% chlorhexidine with 70.0% isopropyl alcohol (n = 425) and 0.7% iodine povacrylex with 74.0% isopropyl alcohol (n = 115) were compared, a total of 540 colorectal cases met inclusion criteria. When alcohol-based (n = 610) and nonalcohol-based (n = 177) skin preparations were compared, a total of 787 colorectal cases met inclusion criteria. There was no significant difference in the propensity-adjusted odds for having any of the 4 outcomes of interest when comparing 2.0% chlorhexidine with 70.0% isopropyl alcohol to 0.7% iodine povacrylex with 74.0% isopropyl alcohol and when comparing alcohol-based with nonalcohol-based skin preparations. LIMITATIONS: This was a nonrandomized study performed retrospectively based on data collected within the state of Michigan. CONCLUSIONS: The use of 2.0% chlorhexidine with 70.0% isopropyl alcohol versus 0.7% iodine povacrylex with 74.0% isopropyl alcohol or alcohol-based versus nonalcohol-based skin preparations does not significantly influence the incidence of surgical site infections or readmission within 30 days for surgical site infection after clean-contaminated colorectal operations.