A sensitive LC-MS/MS methotrexate assay capable of assessing adherence to methotrexate therapy in rheumatoid arthritis.

OBJECTIVES: To develop a sensitive liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method capable of measuring serum methotrexate in patients with rheumatoid arthritis to assess adherence to drug treatment. METHODS: Isotopically labelled internal standard and deionised water were added to sample prior to solid phase extraction using a Waters Oasis Max ion-exchange 96-well plate. Following extraction, samples were analysed by LC-MS/MS on a TQS-micro mass spectrometer. RESULTS: Mean recovery was 107 % for four different concentrations of methotrexate spiked into seven patient samples, whilst post extraction spiking gave a mean recovery of 100 %. Between-batch and within-batch CVs were ≤6 % at three different concentrations of methotrexate in fresh frozen plasma. Mean bias was <5 % for between-batch and within batch analysis at three different weighed in concentrations of methotrexate certified reference material. The lower limit of quantification of the assay was 0.1 nmol/L with linearity up to approximately 100 nmol/L. Dilution linearity studies were used to validate the dilution of patient samples prior to analysis. There was no significant interference in the method from lipaemia, haemolysis or icterus. CONCLUSIONS: A sensitive LC-MS/MS assay for methotrexate has been developed and validated. The method has been used to measure methotrexate adherence in patient samples from clinical trials and could be used in future research to assess the ability of the assay as a biofeedback intervention to improve adherence to methotrexate therapy.

Development and validation of a novel 7α-hydroxy-4-cholesten-3-one (C4) liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry method and its utility to assess pre-analytical stability.

OBJECTIVES: 7α-Hydroxy-4-cholesten-3-one (C4) is the common intermediary of both primary bile acids. C4 is recommended by the British Society of Gastroenterology for the investigation of bile acid diarrhoea (BAD) in patients with chronic diarrhoea. This project aimed to develop and validate an assay to quantitate C4 in serum and assess the stability of C4 in unseparated blood. METHODS: Accuracy was underpinned by calibrating to quantitative nuclear magnetic resonance analysis. C4 was analysed in a 96-well plate format with a deuterated C4 internal standard and liquid-liquid extraction. Validation followed the 2018 Food and Drug Administration guidelines. To assess C4 stability, healthy volunteers (n=12) donated 8 fasted samples each. Samples were incubated at 20 °C for up to 72 h and retrieved, centrifuged, aliquoted and frozen for storage at different time points prior to C4 analysis. RESULTS: The C4 method demonstrated excellent analytical performance and passed all validation criteria. The method was found to be accurate, precise, free from matrix effects and interference. After 72 h of delayed sample separation, C4 concentration gradually declined by up to 14 % from baseline. However, the change was not significant for up to 12 h. CONCLUSIONS: We present a robust method of analysing serum C4, offering a convenient alternative to 75SeHCAT for BAD investigation. C4 was found to decline in unseparated blood over time; however, after 12 h the mean change was <5 % from baseline. Our results suggest C4 is suitable for collection from both primary and secondary care prior to gastroenterology referral.

Report from the HarmoSter study: different LC-MS/MS androstenedione, DHEAS and testosterone methods compare well; however, unifying calibration is a double-edged sword.

OBJECTIVES: Current liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) applications for circulating androgen measurements are technically diverse. Previously, variable results have been reported for testosterone. Data are scarce for androstenedione and absent for dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate (DHEAS). We assessed the agreement of androstenedione, DHEAS and testosterone LC-MS/MS measurements among nine European centers and explored benefits of calibration system unification. METHODS: Androgens were measured twice by laboratory-specific procedures in 78 patient samples and in EQA materials. Results were obtained by in-house and external calibration. Intra- and inter-laboratory performances were valued. RESULTS: Intra-laboratory CVs ranged between 4.2-13.2 % for androstenedione, 1.6-10.8 % for DHEAS, and 4.3-8.7 % and 2.6-7.1 % for female and male testosterone, respectively. Bias and trueness in EQA materials were within ±20 %. Median inter-laboratory CV with in-house vs. external calibration were 12.0 vs. 9.6 % for androstenedione (p<0.001), 7.2 vs. 4.9 % for DHEAS (p<0.001), 6.4 vs. 7.6 % for female testosterone (p<0.001) and 6.8 and 7.4 % for male testosterone (p=0.111). Median bias vs. all laboratory median with in-house and external calibration were -13.3 to 20.5 % and -4.9 to 18.7 % for androstenedione, -10.9 to 4.8 % and -3.4 to 3.5 % for DHEAS, -2.7 to 6.5 % and -11.3 to 6.6 % for testosterone in females, and -7.0 to 8.5 % and -7.5 to 11.8 % for testosterone in males, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Methods showed high intra-laboratory precision but variable bias and trueness. Inter-laboratory agreement was remarkably good. Calibration system unification improved agreement in androstenedione and DHEAS, but not in testosterone measurements. Multiple components, such as commutability of calibrators and EQA materials and internal standard choices, likely contribute to inter-laboratory variability.

Discriminatory Value of Steroid Hormones on Polycystic Ovary Syndrome and Clustering of Hyperandrogenism and Metabolic Factors.

OBJECTIVE: We determined (1) if 11-oxygenated androgens better identify polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) diagnosis in women with obesity compared to total or free testosterone (T) and free androgen index; (2) how biochemical hyperandrogenism and metabolic factors cluster in a cohort of women with infertility and obesity. METHODS: Women with obesity and PCOS comprised the study group (N = 132). Ovulatory women with obesity and idiopathic, tubal or male factor infertility were the control group (N = 83). Steroid hormones were measured by means of liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry. Receiver operating characteristic curves and principal component analysis were used. RESULTS: Women with obesity and PCOS had higher 11-ketotestosterone (11 KT) (1.22 nmol/L [0.84; 1.65] vs 1.05 [0.78; 1.35], P = .04) compared to controls, but not 11ß-hydroxyandrostenedione 4.30 [2.87; 5.92] vs 4.06 [3.22; 5.73], P = .44). 11-ketotestosterone (area under the curve: 0.59) did not better discriminate PCOS in women with obesity compared to: total T (0.84), free T (0.91), and free androgen index (0.85). We identified 4 principal components (PCs) in the PCOS group (72.1% explained variance): (1) insulin resistance status; (2) blood pressure; (3) obesity; (4) androgen status and 4 PCs in the control group (68.7% explained variance) with variables representing metabolism being dispersed in component 2, 3, and 4. CONCLUSIONS: Eleven-oxygenated androgens do not aid in the diagnosis of PCOS in women with obesity. Insulin resistance is the strongest PC in the PCOS group. There is no major dominant characteristic that defines obese non-PCOS women.

Report from the HarmoSter study: impact of calibration on comparability of LC-MS/MS measurement of circulating cortisol, 17OH-progesterone and aldosterone.

OBJECTIVES: Liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) is recommended for measuring circulating steroids. However, assays display technical heterogeneity. So far, reproducibility of corticosteroid LC-MS/MS measurements has received scant attention. The aim of the study was to compare LC-MS/MS measurements of cortisol, 17OH-progesterone and aldosterone from nine European centers and assess performance according to external quality assessment (EQA) materials and calibration. METHODS: Seventy-eight patient samples, EQA materials and two commercial calibration sets were measured twice by laboratory-specific procedures. Results were obtained by in-house (CAL1) and external calibrations (CAL2 and CAL3). We evaluated intra and inter-laboratory imprecision, correlation and agreement in patient samples, and trueness, bias and commutability in EQA materials. RESULTS: Using CAL1, intra-laboratory CVs ranged between 2.8-7.4%, 4.4-18.0% and 5.2-22.2%, for cortisol, 17OH-progesterone and aldosterone, respectively. Trueness and bias in EQA materials were mostly acceptable, however, inappropriate commutability and target value assignment were highlighted in some cases. CAL2 showed suboptimal accuracy. Median inter-laboratory CVs for cortisol, 17OH-progesterone and aldosterone were 4.9, 11.8 and 13.8% with CAL1 and 3.6, 10.3 and 8.6% with CAL3 (all p<0.001), respectively. Using CAL1, median bias vs. all laboratory-medians ranged from -6.6 to 6.9%, -17.2 to 7.8% and -12.0 to 16.8% for cortisol, 17OH-progesterone and aldosterone, respectively. Regression lines significantly deviated from the best fit for most laboratories. Using CAL3 improved cortisol and 17OH-progesterone between-method bias and correlation. CONCLUSIONS: Intra-laboratory imprecision and performance with EQA materials were variable. Inter-laboratory performance was mostly within specifications. Although residual variability persists, adopting common traceable calibrators and RMP-determined EQA materials is beneficial for standardization of LC-MS/MS steroid measurements.

Modifying dietary patterns in cardiothoracic transplant patients to reduce cardiovascular risk: The AMEND-IT Trial.

BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is common after cardiothoracic transplantation and causes substantial morbidity. AIMS: To assess feasibility and potential effectiveness of dietary interventions to reduce CVD risk. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In a pilot intervention, we recruited patients from a tertiary hospital and randomly allocated them to a Mediterranean or low-fat diet for 12 months. Feasibility was measured by patient participation, retention, and adherence. Changes in weight, body mass index (BMI), heart rate, blood pressure, glucose markers, and blood lipids were assessed using longitudinal generalized estimating equation regression models with 95% confidence intervals. RESULTS: Of 56 heart and 60 lung transplant recipients, 52 (45%) consented, 41 were randomized, and 39 (95%) completed the study with good adherence to randomized diets. After 12 months, changes in many risk factors were seen in the Mediterranean and low-fat-diet groups, respectively, including mean BMI (-0.5 vs. 0.0 kg/m2 ), systolic/diastolic blood pressure +0.5/+0.1 vs -4.4/-3.5 mmHg; fasting glucose -0.26 vs -0.27 mmol/L; total cholesterol -0.56 vs -0.40 mmol/L. Changes in BMI and systolic/diastolic blood pressure in 49 eligible patients who did not take part were +0.7 kg/m2 and +2.5/+1.8 mmHg. DISCUSSION: Dietary interventions in cardiothoracic transplant patients are feasible and potentially beneficial. CONCLUSION: A definitive nutritional intervention study in these high-risk patients is warranted.

Development of a total serum testosterone, androstenedione, 17-hydroxyprogesterone, 11ß-hydroxyandrostenedione and 11-ketotestosterone LC-MS/MS assay and its application to evaluate pre-analytical sample stability.

Background Classically, serum testosterone (T) and androstenedione (A4) have been the mainstay for the biochemical assessment of hyperandrogenism. However, recent evidence suggests 11ß-hydroxyandrostenedione (11OHA4) and 11-ketotestosterone (11KT) may also be important. Here, we describe the development of a liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) assay for quantitation of total serum T, A4, 17-hydroxyprogesterone (17OHP), 11OHA4 and 11KT. In addition, we applied the method to assess pre-analytical stability. Methods An isotopically labelled internal standard was added to samples prior to supported liquid extraction (SLE). Extracts were analysed using LC-MS/MS to detect T/A4/17OHP/11OHA4 and 11KT along with their corresponding internal standards. Samples (n = 7) were collected from healthy volunteers (n = 14) and left incubated at 20 °C for up to 72 h. Tubes were retrieved at select time points, centrifuged, separated and frozen prior to analysis. Results The total run time was 4 min. For all analytes, intra- and inter-assay imprecision did not exceed 7.9% and 5.3%, respectively; matrix effects were negligible and mean recoveries ranged from 95.3 to 111.6%. The limits of quantitation (LOQs) were 0.25 nmol/L for T, A4 and 11OHA4, 0.50 nmol/L for 17OHP, and 0.24 nmol/L for 11KT. No significant change was observed in pre-centrifugation A4 or female T concentrations over 72 h. Significant increases (p < 0.01) in concentrations of 11KT, 17OHP, 11OHA4 and male T were observed after 2, 8, 12 and 24 h, respectively. Conclusions We developed a robust LC-MS/MS assay for the quantitation of total serum T/A4/17OHP/11OHA4 and 11KT. Applying the method to determine pre-analytical stability suggests samples requiring 11KT need separating from the cells within 2 h.

The contribution of serum cortisone and glucocorticoid metabolites to detrimental bone health in patients receiving hydrocortisone therapy.

BACKGROUND: Glucocorticoid therapy is the most common cause of iatrogenic osteoporosis. Less is known regarding the effect of glucocorticoids when used as replacement therapy on bone remodelling in patients with adrenal insufficiency. Enhanced intracellular conversion of inactive cortisone to active cortisol, by 11 beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 1(11ß-HSD1) and other enzymes leading to alterations in glucocorticoid metabolism, may contribute to a deleterious effect on bone health in this patient group. METHODS: Study design: An open crossover prospective study randomizing ten hypopituitary men, with severe ACTH deficiency, to three commonly used hydrocortisone dose regimens. MEASUREMENTS: Following 6 weeks of each regimen, patients underwent 24-h serum cortisol/cortisone sampling, measurement of bone turnover markers, and a 24-h urine collection for measurement of urinary steroid metabolites by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS). Serum cortisone and cortisol were analysed by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS). RESULTS: Dose-related and circadian variations in serum cortisone were seen to parallel those for cortisol, indicating conversion of ingested hydrocortisone to cortisone. The median area under the curve (AUC) of serum cortisone was significantly higher in patients on dose A (20 mg/10 mg) [670.5 (IQR 621-809.2)] compared to those on dose C (10 mg/5 mg) [562.8 (IQR 520.1-619.6), p = 0.01]. A negative correlation was observed between serum cortisone and bone formation markers, OC [1-49] (r = - 0.42, p = 0.03), and PINP (r = - 0.49, p = 0.01). There was a negative correlation between the AUC of night-time serum cortisone levels with the bone formation marker, OC [1-49] (r = - 0.41, p = 0.03) but there were no significant correlations between day-time serum cortisone or cortisol with bone turnover markers. There was a negative correlation between total urinary cortisol metabolites and the bone formation markers, PINP (r = - 0.39, p = 0.04), and OC [1-49] (r = - 0.35, p = 0.06). CONCLUSION: Serum cortisol and cortisone and total urinary corticosteroid metabolites are negatively associated with bone turnover markers in patients receiving replacement doses of hydrocortisone, with nocturnal glucocorticoid exposure having a potentially greater influence on bone turnover. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Irish Medicines Board Clinical Trial Number - CT900/459/1 and EudraCT Number - 2007-005018-37 . Registration date: 07-09-2007.

Oestradiol measurement during fulvestrant treatment for breast cancer.

Biochemical evaluation of menopausal status is used to inform treatment decisions, including clinical trial eligibility in women with oestrogen receptor positive breast cancer. However, fulvestrant may interfere with oestradiol immunoassays and confound accurate assessment in this context. We conducted a service evaluation of two immunoassays and an LC-MS/MS assay to determine the extent of the interference. Serum oestradiol levels were analysed by two immunoassays (Siemens Centaur XP and Abbott Architect) and liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC/MS/MS). Immunoassay gave higher serum oestradiol results than LC-MS/MS at low concentrations, with improved analytical sensitivity demonstrated by LC-MS/MS. Cross-reactivity of fulvestrant was observed for each immunoassay. We have shown that two commonly used immunoassays do not demonstrate the required sensitivity or specificity for the measurement of oestradiol in a breast cancer population. For patients receiving fulvestrant, spurious results may be generated that could impact treatment decisions. LC-MS/MS is recommended in this setting.

Official International Association for Therapeutic Drug Monitoring and Clinical Toxicology Guideline: Development and Validation of Dried Blood Spot-Based Methods for Therapeutic Drug Monitoring.

Dried blood spot (DBS) analysis has been introduced more and more into clinical practice to facilitate Therapeutic Drug Monitoring (TDM). To assure the quality of bioanalytical methods, the design, development and validation needs to fit the intended use. Current validation requirements, described in guidelines for traditional matrices (blood, plasma, serum), do not cover all necessary aspects of method development, analytical- and clinical validation of DBS assays for TDM. Therefore, this guideline provides parameters required for the validation of quantitative determination of small molecule drugs in DBS using chromatographic methods, and to provide advice on how these can be assessed. In addition, guidance is given on the application of validated methods in a routine context. First, considerations for the method development stage are described covering sample collection procedure, type of filter paper and punch size, sample volume, drying and storage, internal standard incorporation, type of blood used, sample preparation and prevalidation. Second, common parameters regarding analytical validation are described in context of DBS analysis with the addition of DBS-specific parameters, such as volume-, volcano- and hematocrit effects. Third, clinical validation studies are described, including number of clinical samples and patients, comparison of DBS with venous blood, statistical methods and interpretation, spot quality, sampling procedure, duplicates, outliers, automated analysis methods and quality control programs. Lastly, cross-validation is discussed, covering changes made to existing sampling- and analysis methods. This guideline of the International Association of Therapeutic Drug Monitoring and Clinical Toxicology on the development, validation and evaluation of DBS-based methods for the purpose of TDM aims to contribute to high-quality micro sampling methods used in clinical practice.

The free androgen index is inaccurate in women when the SHBG concentration is low.

OBJECTIVE/CONTEXT: The free androgen index (FAI) is known to give erroneous results in men, but it is still a commonly used test for the investigation of hyperandrogenism in women. This study aimed to compare the results of the FAI with the gold standard equilibrium dialysis method for free testosterone in women. DESIGN/PATIENTS: Free serum testosterone T (ED-T) and total serum T (T) were measured by equilibrium dialysis and LC-MS/MS in patients with polycystic ovarian syndrome (n = 130), normal female controls (n = 53) and normal males (n = 120). Calculated free T (cFT) and free androgen index (FAI) were also measured in these patients. In addition, cFT was retrospectively calculated in 4223 female patients with a normal T (<1.6 nmol/L) routinely investigated for hyperandrogenism. RESULTS: The cFT showed good agreement with measured ED-T, and the ratio cFT/ED-T was stable across all SHBG concentrations. In contrast, the FAI/ED-T ratio and the FAI/cFT ratio increased when the concentration of SHBG fell below 30 nmol/L. CONCLUSIONS: The FAI is not a reliable indicator of free T when the SHBG concentration is low and would give misleading information in a large number of women being investigated for hyperandrogenism.

Use of salivary cortisol and cortisone in the high- and low-dose synacthen test.

CONTEXT: Salivary cortisone reflects serum cortisol levels, is more sensitive than salivary cortisol at lower values of serum cortisol and is noninvasive. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the relationship between serum cortisol and salivary cortisol and cortisone following low- and high-dose synacthen. DESIGN AND SETTING: Prospective pharmacodynamic studies in clinical research facilities. PARTICIPANTS AND INTERVENTION: Thirty-five dexamethasone-suppressed, healthy adult males underwent an intravenous synacthen test: N = 23 low-dose (1 mcg), N = 12 high-dose (250 mcg). Paired serum and salivary samples were taken at 15 sampling points over 120 minutes. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Serum cortisol and salivary cortisol and cortisone were analysed for correlations and by a mixed-effects model. RESULTS: At baseline, the correlation between serum cortisol and salivary cortisol was weak with many samples undetectable (r = .45, NS), but there was a strong correlation with salivary cortisone (r = .94, P < .001). Up to 50 minutes following synacthen, the correlation coefficient between serum cortisol and salivary cortisol and cortisone was <0.8, but both had a stronger correlation at 60 minutes (salivary cortisol r = .89, P < .001, salivary cortisone r = .85, P < .001). The relationship was examined excluding samples in the dynamic phase (baseline to 60 minutes). Salivary cortisol and cortisone showed a close relationship to serum cortisol. Salivary cortisone showed the stronger correlation: salivary cortisol r = .82, P < .001, salivary cortisone r = .96, P < .001. CONCLUSION: Following synacthen, both salivary cortisol and cortisone reflect serum cortisol levels, but there is a lag in their rise up to 60 minutes. The results support further research for possible future use of a 60-minute salivary cortisone measurement during the synacthen test.

Elevated luteinizing hormone despite normal testosterone levels in older men-natural history, risk factors and clinical features.

OBJECTIVE: Elevated luteinizing hormone (LH) with normal testosterone (T) suggests compensated dysregulation of the gonadal axis. We describe the natural history, risk factors and clinical parameters associated with the development of high LH (HLH, LH >9.4 U/L) in ageing men with normal T (T ≥ 10.5 nmol/L). DESIGN, PATIENTS AND MEASUREMENTS: We conducted a 4.3-year prospective observational study of 3369 community-dwelling European men aged 40-79 years. Participants were classified as follows: incident (i) HLH (n = 101, 5.2%); persistent (p) HLH (n = 128, 6.6%); reverted (r) HLH (n = 46, 2.4%); or persistent normal LH (pNLH, n = 1667, 85.8%). Potential predictors and changes in clinical features associated with iHLH and rHLH were analysed using regression models. RESULTS: Age >70 years (OR = 4.12 [2.07-8.20]), diabetes (OR = 2.86 [1.42-5.77]), chronic pain (OR = 2.53 [1.34-4.77]), predegree education (OR = 1.79 [1.01-3.20]) and low physical activity (PASE ≤ 78, OR = 2.37 [1.24-4.50]) predicted development of HLH. Younger age (40-49 years, OR = 8.14 [1.35-49.13]) and nonsmoking (OR = 5.39 [1.48-19.65]) predicted recovery from HLH. Men with iHLH developed erectile dysfunction, poor health, cardiovascular disease (CVD) and cancer more frequently than pNLH men. In pHLH men, comorbidities, including CVD, developed more frequently, and cognitive and physical function deteriorated more, than in pNLH men. Men with HLH developed primary hypogonadism more frequently (OR = 15.97 [5.85-43.60]) than NLH men. Men with rHLH experienced a small rise in BMI. CONCLUSIONS: Elevation of LH with normal T is predicted by multiple factors, reverts frequently and is not associated with unequivocal evidence of androgen deficiency. High LH is a biomarker for deteriorating health in aged men who tend to develop primary hypogonadism.

Ethnic differences in male reproductive hormones and relationships with adiposity and insulin resistance in older men.

OBJECTIVES: To assess ethnic differences in male reproductive hormone levels and to determine whether any differences are explained by adiposity, insulin resistance (IR) or comorbidities in older men. DESIGN: Multi-ethnic cross-sectional observational study. PARTICIPANTS: Community dwelling middle-aged and elderly men residing in the UK aged 40-84 years of South Asian (SA; n = 180), White European (WE; n = 328) or African Caribbean (AC; n = 166) origin. OBSERVATIONS: Measured testosterone (T), calculated free T (cFT), sex hormone-binding globulin and LH in SA, WE and AC men along with an assessment of body composition, IR, lifestyle factors and medical conditions. RESULTS: Age-adjusted mean T and cFT levels were lower in SA men when compared to WE and AC men (mean (SEM) T: SA: 14·0 ± 0·4; WE: 17·1 ± 0·3; AC: 17·2 ± 0·5 nmol/l, P < 0·001; cFT: SA: 283 ± 7; WE: 313 ± 5; AC: 314 ± 8 pmol/l, P < 0·006). Compared to WE and AC men, SA men had higher levels of body fat, IR, comorbidities and diabetes. After adjusting for body fat, IR and other confounders, T levels in SA men remained lower than in WE men (P = 0·04) but ethnic differences in cFT became nonsignificant. LH levels were higher in SA than WE men in age-adjusted and fully adjusted models. CONCLUSIONS: T and cFT are lower in SA men than in WE and AC men. Whether ethnic-specific reference ranges for T and cFT might be appropriate in clinical practice requires further investigation. Ethnic differences in cFT, but not T, appear to be, more readily, explained by ethnic differences in adiposity, thus providing insights into potential pathophysiological mechanisms.

Androsterone glucuronide to dehydroepiandrosterone sulphate ratio is discriminatory for obese Caucasian women with polycystic ovary syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Androsterone glucuronide (ADTG) concentrations have been suggested as a marker of the effects of androgens at the target tissue level. As the mechanism for hyperandrogenemia in obese and nonobese polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) may differ, this study compared the different androgen parameters in non-obese compared to obese women with PCOS, and in normal subjects. METHODS: Eleven non-obese and 14 obese women with PCOS were recruited and compared to 11 control women without PCOS. Total testosterone, dehydroepiandrosterone sulphate (DHEAS), ADTG, and androstenedione were analysed using gold standard tandem mass spectrometry, and the free androgen index (FAI) was calculated. RESULTS: Total testosterone, ADTG and androstendione levels did not differ between non-obese (body mass index (BMI) ≤25 kg/m2) and obese PCOS (BMI >25 kg/m2) but all were significantly higher than for controls (p < 0.01). The ADTG to DHEAS ratio was significantly elevated 39 ± 6 (p < 0.01) in obese PCOS in comparison to non-obese PCOS and controls (28 ± 5 and 29 ± 4, respectively). The free androgen index (FAI) and insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) were significantly higher in obese PCOS compared to non-obese PCOS and controls (p < 0.01). DHEAS was significantly higher in the non-obese versus obese PCOS (p < 0.01). All androgen parameters were significantly lower and sex hormone binding globulin (SHBG) significantly higher in normal subjects compared to those with obese and non-obese PCOS. CONCLUSIONS: The ADTG:DHEAS ratio was significantly elevated in obese PCOS compared to non-obese PCOS and controls suggesting that this may be a novel biomarker discriminatory for obese PCOS subjects, perhaps being driven by higher hepatic 5α reductase activity increasing ADTG formation in these women.

Candidate Reference Measurement Procedure for the Quantification of Total Serum Cortisol with LC-MS/MS.

BACKGROUND: Accurate measurement of serum cortisol is required to diagnose and treat adrenal disorders. Although certified reference materials (CRMs) are available to standardize cortisol measurements, External Quality Assessment (EQA) schemes still demonstrate a wide dispersion of results. We present a serum cortisol candidate reference measurement procedure that, through analysis of a Joint Committee for Traceability in Laboratory Medicine-listed panel of higher-order CRMs, provides metrologically traceable results. METHOD: Isotope-labeled internal standard was added to samples before supported liquid extraction. Extracts were analyzed with LC-MS/MS in positive electrospray ionization mode. Multiple reaction monitoring was used to detect cortisol and its corresponding internal standard transitions. We measured samples in triplicate over 3 days and calculated the mean result. RESULTS: Mean intra- and interassay imprecision were 1.3% and 1.5%, respectively, for concentrations of 154, 510, and 769 nmol/L. Ionization efficiency studies and structural analog analysis proved the method to be robust against interferences. Through analysis of 34 CRMs (83-764 nmol/L), expanded measurement uncertainty was calculated to be 5% (95% CI). The mean bias between the measured and target CRM concentrations was statistically insignificant at -0.08%. CONCLUSIONS: The accuracy and low measurement uncertainty of this method qualify it as a CRM procedure. Metrological traceability has been achieved through the analysis of higher-order CRMs. This method could be used to underpin serum cortisol EQA schemes to provide samples with a traceable target value, enabling participating laboratories to determine the accuracy and measurement uncertainty of their assays.

Serum Cortisol: An Up-To-Date Assessment of Routine Assay Performance.

BACKGROUND: Accurate serum cortisol quantification is required for the correct diagnosis and management of adrenal pathologies. Presently, most laboratories use immunoassay to measure serum cortisol with proficiency schemes demonstrating a wide dispersion of results. Here, we investigate the effects of sex, matrix, and antibody specificity on serum cortisol quantification in 6 routine assays. METHODS: Surplus serum was obtained before disposal and the following cohorts were created: males, nonpregnant females, pregnant patients, and patients prescribed either metyrapone or prednisolone. Samples were anonymized and distributed to collaborating laboratories for cortisol analysis by 6 routine assays. Cortisol was also measured in all samples using an LC-MS/MS candidate reference measurement procedure (cRMP); cortisol-binding globulin (CBG) was measured in the nonpregnant and pregnant female cohorts. RESULTS: Considerable inter- and intraassay variation was observed across the male and nonpregnant female cohorts relative to the cRMP. Four immunoassays underrecovered cortisol in the pregnancy cohort, and CBG was found to be significantly higher in this cohort than in the nonpregnant females. In the metyrapone and prednisolone cohorts, all immunoassays overestimated cortisol. The first generation Roche E170 and Siemens Centaur XP were particularly prone to overestimation. In all cohorts the routine LC-MS/MS assay aligned extremely well with the cRMP. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the clinical importance of serum cortisol, the performance of routine immunoassays remains highly variable. Accurate quantification is compromised by both matrix effects and antibody specificity. Underpinning this study with a cRMP has highlighted the deficiencies in standardization across routine cortisol immunoassays.

The use of mass spectrometry to improve the diagnosis and the management of the HPA axis.

Liquid chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) is becoming a standard analytical tool in the clinical laboratory for the measurement of small molecules, including steroid hormones. Endocrinologists are coming to acknowledge the superior quality of measurement that is achievable by LC-MS/MS through the enhanced analytical specificity and high sensitivity that this technique offers over conventional immunoassay (IA) methodologies. Additionally, LC-MS/MS overcomes many of the problems encountered in immunoassays, such as anti-reagent antibody interferences and cross-reactivity with structurally related compounds. The potential benefits of applying LC-MS/MS for the assessment of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis are beginning to be realised. This review critically evaluates recent developments in the application of LC-MS/MS for measurement of glucocorticoids and mineralocorticoids towards the diagnosis and management of HPA axis disorders and aims to address the current unmet need in this expanding field of endocrinology for which future studies into the potential applications of LC-MS/MS should be directed.

Serum cortisol assay performance following the 1 mg overnight dexamethasone suppression test.

BACKGROUND: The 1 mg overnight dexamethasone suppression test (ONDST) is recommended for the differential diagnosis of Cushing's syndrome and the investigation of adrenal incidentalomas. Despite documented variation in serum cortisol immunoassay performance, little has been published regarding its effect on the ONDST. AIMS: Assess the performance of three immunoassay platforms (Roche Elecsys II, Abbott Alinity & Siemens Centaur) when compared to a liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) method. METHODS: Samples (n = 77) sent to the laboratory as part of an ONDST were retrieved prior to disposal, anonymized, and analysed on all platforms. Samples with factors impacting immunoassay analysis quality were excluded. Results were statistically compared to an LC-MS/MS method that previously demonstrated excellent comparability to a candidate reference method. RESULTS: The Roche gen II showed a mean bias of -2.4 nmol/L and a Passing-Bablok fit of y = -0.9 + 0.97x. This was not affected by sex. The Abbott showed a mean bias -18.8 nmol/L, and a fit of y = -11.3 + 0.88x. This bias was -20.7 nmol/L in females versus -17.2 nmol/L in males. The Siemens had a mean bias of 2.3 nmol/L and a fit of y = 1.4 + 1.07x. This bias was 5.7 nmol/L in males versus -1.0 nmol/L in females. CONCLUSIONS: Clinicians should be aware of the method-dependent variation that exists within serum cortisol analysis during the ONDSTs. Roche and Siemens aligned more closely with LC-MS/MS while the Abbot may cause a reduction in ONDST sensitivity. This data supports assay-specific cut-offs for the ONDST.