Neonatal magnesium sulphate for neuroprotection: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

AIM: To review the evidence of the effects of neonatal magnesium sulphate for neuroprotection in perinatal asphyxia and hypoxic-ischaemic encephalopathy (HIE). METHOD: This was a systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) (with meta-analysis) and non-RCTs assessing magnesium sulphate for treating perinatal asphyxia and HIE at 35 weeks or more gestation (primary outcomes: neonatal death and death or long-term major neurodevelopmental disability). RESULTS: Twenty-five RCTs (2099 infants) and four non-RCTs (871 infants) were included, 23 in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). In RCTs, reductions in neonatal death with magnesium sulphate versus placebo or no treatment (risk ratio [RR] = 0.68; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.53-0.86; 13 RCTs), and magnesium sulphate with melatonin versus melatonin alone (RR = 0.74; 95% CI = 0.58-0.95; one RCT) were observed. No difference in neonatal death was seen for magnesium sulphate with therapeutic hypothermia versus therapeutic hypothermia alone (RR = 0.66, 95% CI = 0.34-1.26; three RCTs), or magnesium sulphate versus phenobarbital (RR = 3.00; 95% CI = 0.86-10.46; one RCT). No reduction in death or long-term neurodevelopmental disability (RR = 0.52; 95% CI = 0.14-1.89; one RCT) but reductions in several short-term adverse outcomes were observed with magnesium sulphate. Evidence was low- to very-low certainty because of risk of bias and imprecision. INTERPRETATION: Given the uncertainty of the current evidence, further robust neonatal magnesium sulphate research is justified. This may include high-quality studies to determine stand-alone effects in LMICs and effects with and after therapeutic hypothermia in high-income countries.

Reducing intravenous antibiotics in neonates born ≥35 weeks' gestation: A quality improvement study.

AIM: To assess the impact of the Early Onset Sepsis (EOS) calculator, implemented as a quality improvement study, to reduce the rate of unnecessary antibiotics in neonates born ≥35 weeks' gestation. METHODS: An audit of routinely collected hospital data from January 2008 to March 2014 (retrospective) and from January 2018 to September 2019 (prospective) determined baseline incidence of EOS intravenous antibiotic use in neonates born ≥35 weeks' gestation in a tertiary level perinatal centre. Plan-do-study-act (PDSA) cycles were applied to implement the EOS calculator. Statistical process control methodology and time series analysis assessments were used to assess the potential impact of the PDSA cycles on the rate of intravenous antibiotics, blood culture collection, EOS, length of stay and health care costs (not adjusted for potential confounders). RESULTS: In the study population, from January 2008 to March 2014, the baseline incidence of intravenous antibiotic use was 10.49% (2970/28290), whilst only 0.067% (19/28290) neonates had culture proven EOS. From January 2018 to October 2019, prior to implementation of the EOS calculator, 13.3% (1119/8411) neonates were treated with intravenous antibiotic and the use decreased to 8.3% (61/734) post-implementation. The rate of blood culture collection decreased from 14.4% (1211/8411) to 11.9% (87/734). There were no cases of missed EOS. Length of stay decreased from 2.68 to 2.39 days, with an estimated cost saving of $366 per patient per admission. CONCLUSION: Implementing the EOS calculator in a tertiary hospital setting reduced invasive investigations for EOS and intravenous antibiotic use among neonates ≥35 weeks' gestation. This can result in reduced length of neonatal hospital stays, and associated health care cost savings and may reduce separation of mother and baby.

International guidelines regarding the role of IVIG in the management of Rh- and ABO-mediated haemolytic disease of the newborn.

Haemolytic disease of the newborn (HDN) can be associated with significant morbidity. Prompt treatment with intensive phototherapy (PT) and exchange transfusions (ETs) can dramatically improve outcomes. ET is invasive and associated with risks. Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) may be an alternative therapy to prevent use of ET. An international panel of experts was convened to develop evidence-based recommendations regarding the effectiveness and safety of IVIG to reduce the need for ETs, improve neurocognitive outcomes, reduce bilirubin level, reduce the frequency of red blood cell (RBC) transfusions and severity of anaemia, and/or reduce duration of hospitalization for neonates with Rh or ABO-mediated HDN. We used a systematic approach to search and review the literature and then develop recommendations from published data. These recommendations conclude that IVIG should not be routinely used to treat Rh or ABO antibody-mediated HDN. In situations where hyperbilirubinaemia is severe (and ET is imminent), or when ET is not readily available, the role of IVIG is unclear. High-quality studies are urgently needed to assess the optimal use of IVIG in patients with HDN.

Effects of COVID-19 pandemic restrictions on an Australian neonatal and paediatric retrieval service.

AIM: The COVID-19 pandemic and associated travel and social distancing restrictions have reduced paediatric intensive care unit admissions for respiratory illnesses. The effects on retrieval (transport) services remain unquantified. Our study examined the utility of statistical process control in assessing the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the number of neonatal and paediatric transfers in an Australian retrieval service. METHODS: Data collected prospectively from the SA Ambulance Service MedSTAR Emergency Retrieval database in South Australia were analysed from January 2015 to June 2021. Statistical process control methodology, a combination of a time series analysis and assessment for common and special cause variation, was used to assess the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on retrieval workload (primary outcome of interest). RESULTS: A total of 5659 neonatal and paediatric transfers occurred during the study period and were included. A significant decrease in paediatric transfers occurred after the initial lockdown measures in March 2020 were announced in South Australia (special cause variation). However, a similar reduction was not observed for neonatal transfers (common cause variation). CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrates that statistical process control may be effectively used to understand the effects of external events and processes on usual activity patterns in the retrieval setting. We found a reduction in retrieval numbers for paediatric transfers but no effect on neonatal transfer numbers. The decline in paediatric transfers was primarily attributed to reduced respiratory cases.

Early versus delayed introduction of human milk fortification in enterally fed preterm infants: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

AIM: To assess effects of early versus delayed introduction of human milk fortification in preterm infants. METHODS: We searched Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, Embase, PubMed and CINAHL for randomised controlled trials evaluating start time for human milk fortification in preterm infants (March 2020). Two authors assessed trial eligibility and risk of bias, extracted data and assessed evidence certainty. RESULTS: We identified 1307 publications and included three trials (378 infants). Meta-analysis comparing fortification commencing at an enteral feed volume of ≤40 mL/kg/day versus ≥75 mL/kg/day, showed little to no difference in rates of necrotising enterocolitis (3 trials), sepsis (3 trials), feeding intolerance (2 trials) (low-quality evidence) and infant growth (1 trial, very low-quality evidence). CONCLUSIONS: Whether early introduction of fortification, at an enteral feed volume of ≤40 mL versus delayed at ≥75 mL/kg/day improves growth or influences adverse feeding outcomes is very uncertain.

Antenatal magnesium sulphate for preventing cerebral palsy: An economic evaluation of the impact of a quality improvement program.

Previous work demonstrated that implementing a quality improvement (QI) program improves the uptake of guideline-recommended antenatal magnesium sulphate, a critical intervention known to reduce cerebral palsy risk. Here we estimate potential cost savings attributable to the improved uptake. By expanding coverage from 63 to 83% of eligible women, we estimated that five children potentially would not have received a diagnosis of cerebral palsy, a potential cost saving of $AU4.8 million in lifetime healthcare costs. Our findings strengthen the case for embedding QI approaches in perinatal care to reduce the incidence of cerebral palsy.

Improving the admission temperatures of preterm infants in the neonatal unit.

Use of plan-do-study-act cycles to increase the proportion of preterm infants born at <32 weeks' gestation admitted to a neonatal unit with a body temperature of 36.5-37.4°C.

Avoidance of bottles during the establishment of breastfeeds in preterm infants.

BACKGROUND: Preterm infants often start milk feeds by gavage tube. As they mature, sucking feeds are gradually introduced. Women with preterm infants may not always be in hospital to breastfeed their baby and need an alternative approach to feeding. Most commonly, milk (expressed breast milk or formula) is given by bottle. Whether using bottles during establishment of breastfeeds is detrimental to breastfeeding success is a topic of ongoing debate. OBJECTIVES: To identify the effects of avoidance of bottle feeds during establishment of breastfeeding on the likelihood of successful breastfeeding, and to assess the safety of alternatives to bottle feeds. SEARCH METHODS: A new search strategy was developed for this update. Searches were conducted without date or language limits in September 2021 in: MEDLINE, CENTRAL, and CINAHL.  We also searched the ISRCTN trial registry and the reference lists of retrieved articles for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs.  SELECTION CRITERIA: We included RCTs and quasi-RCTs comparing avoidance of bottles with use of bottles for preterm infants where their mothers planned to breastfeed. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently assessed trial quality and extracted data. When appropriate, we contacted study authors for additional information. We used the GRADE approach to assess the certainty of evidence. Outcomes included full breastfeeding and any breastfeeding on discharge home and at three and six months after discharge, as well as length of hospital stay and episodes of infant infection. We synthesised data using risk ratios (RR), risk differences (RD) and mean differences (MD), with 95% confidence intervals (CI). We used the GRADE approach to assess the certainty of the evidence. MAIN RESULTS: We included seven trials with 1152 preterm infants in this updated review. There are three studies awaiting classification. Five included studies used a cup feeding strategy, one used a tube feeding strategy and one used a novel teat when supplements to breastfeeds were needed. We included the novel teat study in this review as the teat was designed to closely mimic the sucking action of breastfeeding. The trials were of small to moderate size, and two had high risk of attrition bias. Adherence with cup feeding was poor in one of the studies, indicating dissatisfaction with this method by staff or parents (or both); the remaining four cup feeding studies provided no such reports of dissatisfaction or low adherence. Avoiding bottles may increase the extent of full breastfeeding on discharge home (RR 1.47, 95% CI 1.19 to 1.80; 6 studies, 1074 infants; low-certainty evidence), and probably increases any breastfeeding (full and partial combined) on discharge (RR 1.11, 95% CI 1.06 to 1.16; studies, 1138 infants; moderate-certainty evidence). Avoiding bottles probably increases the occurrence of full breastfeeding three months after discharge (RR 1.56, 95% CI 1.37 to 1.78; 4 studies, 986 infants; moderate-certainty evidence), and may also increase full breastfeeding six months after discharge (RR 1.64, 95% CI 1.14 to 2.36; 3 studies, 887 infants; low-certainty evidence). Avoiding bottles may increase the occurrence of any breastfeeding (full and partial combined) three months after discharge (RR 1.31, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.71; 5 studies, 1063 infants; low-certainty evidence), and six months after discharge (RR 1.25, 95% CI 1.10 to 1.41; 3 studies, 886 infants; low-certainty evidence). The effects on breastfeeding outcomes were evident at all time points for the tube alone strategy and for all except any breastfeeding three months after discharge for cup feeding, but were not present for the novel teat. There were no other benefits or harms including for length of hospital stay (MD 2.25 days, 95% CI -3.36 to 7.86; 4 studies, 1004 infants; low-certainty evidence) or episodes of infection per infant (RR 0.70, 95% CI 0.35 to 1.42; 3 studies, 500 infants; low-certainty evidence). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Avoiding the use of bottles when preterm infants need supplementary feeds probably increases the extent of any breastfeeding at discharge, and may improve any and full breastfeeding (exclusive) up to six months postdischarge. Most of the evidence demonstrating benefit was for cup feeding. Only one study used a tube feeding strategy. We are uncertain whether a tube alone approach to supplementing breastfeeds improves breastfeeding outcomes; further studies of high certainty are needed to determine this.

Does selective evaluation of gastric aspirates in preterm infants influence time to full enteral feeding?

The use of routine gastric aspiration in the assessment of feeding intolerance is widespread in neonatal practice. Our article seeks to answer the clinical question, 'In premature infants receiving feeds via nasogastric or orogastric tube [P], does routine evaluation of gastric aspirates [I] compared with selective evaluation of gastric aspirates [C] reduce the time taken to establish full feeds without complications [O]?' Articles were identified through MEDLINE and reference lists from the sources found were reviewed for additional publications. Three papers were critically appraised and National Health and Medical Research Centre grades of level of evidence have been assigned to each. We found limited evidence to either support or reject the practice of routine gastric aspiration in preterm infants. There were no increases in the rates of significant complications in studies underpowered for this outcome. The decision to perform routine or selective gastric aspiration should be determined by individual centres. A large scale randomised controlled trial would be of significant benefit in determining the value of routine gastric aspiration in preterm infants.

Top 10 research priorities for human milk banking and use of donor human milk: A partnership between parents and clinicians.

AIM: This study sought to establish research priorities in human milk banking and use of pasteurised donor human milk. It aimed to (i) collaborate with national stakeholders, including parents of preterm infants, human milk donors and health-care professionals, to identify evidence uncertainties and (ii) agree by consensus on a consolidated prioritised list of research questions. METHODS: A consensus approach modelled on the James Lind Alliance was used. A steering group was formed, and key stakeholder organisations identified. Evidence uncertainties were gathered through an online survey and literature search. An iterative process was used to consolidate and rank questions. A final workshop was held to identify the top 10 research priorities. RESULTS: A total of 391 evidence uncertainties were gathered from 202 respondents (38% parents of preterm infants/milk donors, 50% health-care professionals, 12% who identified as both a parent of preterm and health professional) and a further 15 were identified from literature. The steering group consolidated these to 39 evidence uncertainties, which were ranked via another survey. The top 24 questions were workshopped by 13 participants (four parents and nine clinicians) to determine the top 10 research priorities. These included the risks and benefits of using donor milk, optimum techniques for processing and the effects of these on the properties of milk, the nutrient profile of the milk and clinical criteria for prioritising receipt of milk. CONCLUSION: The top 10 research priorities in human milk banking and use of donor milk were identified and can be used to guide researchers.

In preterm infants, does fluid restriction, as opposed to liberal fluid prescription, reduce the risk of important morbidities and mortality?

AIM: To answer the clinical question: 'In preterm infants, does fluid restriction, as opposed to liberal fluid prescription, reduce the risk of important morbidities (namely, intraventricular haemorrhage, necrotising enterocolitis, bronchopulmonary dysplasia and patent ductus arteriosus) and mortality?' METHODS: Literature searches were conducted of Medline, Embase and Cochrane Library. Results were limited to human clinical trials on infants and those published in English. The reference lists of relevant articles were screened for further articles. Studies that examined measures which inform diagnostic criteria of morbidities of interest (such as echocardiographic changes) but did not go further to confirm or exclude presence of said morbidities in study populations were excluded. RESULTS: A total of 110 articles were found and screened by title and abstract. The final analysis included five randomised controlled trials and five case control studies. Among the randomised controlled trials, there is some suggestion (though not unanimous) that liberal fluid regimens are associated with an increased risk of patent ductus arteriosus, necrotising enterocolitis and mortality. Case control studies focused on patent ductus arteriosus and bronchopulmonary dysplasia or chronic lung disease, with all but one study suggesting an increased risk of these complications with liberal fluid regimens. CONCLUSION: Further investigation is needed to clarify the optimal fluid regimen for preterm infants to ensure adequate hydration and nutrition without contributing to serious complications.

What clinical practice strategies have been shown to decrease incidence rates of intraventricular haemorrhage in preterm infants?

AIM: To answer the clinical question 'In infants about to be delivered and admitted to neonatal units, what clinical practice strategies, compared to standard care, have been shown to decrease incidence rates of intraventricular haemorrhage (IVH)?' METHODS: MEDLINE via Ovid (1943 to 5 January 2018), Embase via Ovid (1974 to 5 January 2018) and the Cochrane Library (5 January 2018) were searched for relevant articles. RESULTS: A total of 478 articles, after the removal of duplicates, were found and screened by title and abstract. Forty full-text articles were subsequently reviewed, and 19 were included as relevant to the structured clinical question. An additional article was included based on expert advice. CONCLUSION: There are various levels of research evidence for clinical practice strategies to decrease the incidence rates of IVH. Higher-quality evidence suggests that antenatal corticosteroids decrease the rates of IVH, and multiple evidence-based intervention bundles implemented in the neonatal unit are associated with decreased rates of IVH.

Are there interventions that improve breastfeeding and the use of breast milk in late preterm infants?

To answer the clinical question 'Among late preterm infants are there any interventions that improve the rates of breastfeeding and the use of breast milk compared with current practice?'. MEDLINE via Ovid, Embase via Ovid, the Maternity and Infant Care Database and the Cochrane Library were searched for relevant articles. Articles were excluded if they did not discuss specific interventions to improve breastfeeding, for example, if they only commented on factors such as age, race and education. Articles were also excluded if they were not specific to the late preterm infant population. A total of 516 articles were found and screened by title and abstract independently by two reviewers. The full text of 17 articles was independently reviewed. The reference lists of these full-text articles were screened, and 14 abstracts were subsequently reviewed. The final analysis included three studies. There is limited high-quality research evidence for interventions to improve breastfeeding in late preterm infants. In the absence of robust academic research, clinical practice should be guided by clinical expertise and involve a multidisciplinary team, including qualified lactation consultants. While it seems reasonable for hospitals to support interventions that improve breastfeeding in term infants, managing late preterm infants as healthy term infants without additional specialist support may result in high breastfeeding failure rates among late preterm infants.

Does early compared to late fortification of human milk for preterm infants improve clinical outcomes?

AIM: This evidence-based review aims to answer the following structured clinical question: In preterm infants <37 weeks' gestation (patient), does early fortification of breast milk (intervention) compared to late fortification (control) improve growth outcomes at the time of discharge or affect length of hospital stay (outcome)? METHODS: MEDLINE, Embase, Maternity and Infant Care Database and Evidence-Based Medicine Reviews were searched for articles published from 2000 onwards that were relevant to the structured clinical question. The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, National Health and Medical Research Council, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, National Institute of Health and Turning Research into Practice databases were also searched, and reference lists of relevant articles were reviewed. RESULTS: A total of 167 articles, after removal of duplicates, were found and screened by title and abstract. Five full-text articles were ultimately included in the review. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this review suggest that early fortification is safe and well tolerated. However, earlier fortification has not been shown to have a significant impact on growth outcomes at time of discharge or length of stay. More research is required to determine if early fortification of breast milk may have benefits regarding longer-term growth and neurodevelopmental outcomes.

What evidence-based strategies have been shown to improve breastfeeding rates in preterm infants?

Breast milk is the preferred form of nutrition for all infants and has been shown to reduce morbidity and improve health outcomes in preterm infants. However, mothers of preterm infants face many challenges initiating and sustaining breastfeeding within the neonatal unit. This scoping review examines evidence-based practices which aim to improve breastfeeding rates in preterm infants at the time of hospital discharge. A literature review identified 17 articles which are included in this review. Supporting evidence was found for the implementation of kangaroo mother care and/or skin-to-skin care, peer counsellors, provision of oropharyngeal colostrum in early infancy and use of donor human milk banks. However, overall it is apparent that high quality research including systematic review and data synthesis in the form of meta-analysis is required in this area to reach sound conclusions regarding recommendations of different interventions. This scoping review provides an important foundation for further research into this area.

International, multicentre, observational study of fluid bolus therapy in neonates.

AIM: To assess the prevalence, types and indications for fluid bolus therapy in neonates with haemodynamic compromise. METHODS: This was a pragmatic, international, multicentre observational study in neonatal units across Australasia, Europe and North America with a predefined study period of 10-15 study days per participating neonatal unit between December 2015 and March 2017. Infants ≤28 days of age who received a fluid bolus for the management of haemodynamic compromise (≥10 mL/kg given at ≤6 h) were included. RESULTS: A total of 163 neonates received a bolus over 8479 eligible patient days in 41 neonatal units. Prevalence of fluid bolus therapy varied between centres from 0 to 28.6% of admitted neonates per day, with a pooled prevalence rate of 1.5% (95% confidence interval 1.1-1.9%). The most common fluid used was 0.9% sodium chloride (129/163; 79%), and the volume of fluid administered was most commonly 10 mL/kg (115/163; 71%) over a median of 30 min (interquartile range 20-60). The most frequent indications were hypotension (n = 56; 34%), poor perfusion (n = 20; 12%) and metabolic acidosis (n = 20; 12%). Minimal or no clinical improvement was reported by clinicians in 66 of 163 cases (40%). CONCLUSIONS: Wide international variations in types, indications and effects of fluid bolus administration in haemodynamically compromised neonates suggest uncertainty in the risk-benefit profile. This is likely to reflect the lack of robust evidence to support the efficacy of different fluid types, doses and appropriate indications. Together, these highlight a need for further clinically relevant studies.

Do feeding practices during transfusion influence the risk of developing necrotising enterocolitis in preterm infants?

Our evidence-based review set out to answer the clinical question 'In a preterm infant (patient) with anaemia of prematurity, do feeding practices (intervention) during blood transfusion reduce the risk of developing transfusion-associated necrotising enterocolitis (outcome)'? We found limited evidence that withholding feeding during red blood cell transfusion in preterm infants may reduce the risk of development of transfusion-associated necrotising enterocolitis. As clinical equipoise seemingly exists, it seems reasonable for individual units to make their own decisions regarding whether to withhold or continue enteral feeds during red blood cell transfusion until further evidence is available. The UK-based Withholding Enteral Feeds Around Transfusion (WHEAT) trial, a nation-wide multi-centre 'opt-out' randomised controlled study, hopefully will definitively answer our clinical question. Further research in other areas of neonatal care, using this innovative study design, is needed and it is exciting to see such a study underway.

A systematic review of transfusion-associated graft-versus-host disease.

Transfusion-associated graft-versus-host disease (TA-GVHD) is a rare complication of blood transfusion. The clinicolaboratory features of TA-GVHD and the relative contributions of recipient and component factors remain poorly understood. We conducted a systematic review of TA-GVHD reports. The HLA relationship between donor and recipient was classified as D = 0 when no donor antigens were foreign to the recipient vs D ≥ 1 when ≥1 donor antigen disparity occurred. We identified 348 unique cases. Criteria for component irradiation were met in 48.9% of cases (34.5% immune-compromised, 14.4% related-donor), although nonirradiated components were transfused in the vast majority of these (97.6%). Components were typically whole blood and red cells. When reported, component storage duration was ≤10 days in 94%, and 23 (6.6%) were leukoreduced (10 bedside, 2 prestorage, and 11 unknown). Among 84 cases with HLA data available, the category of D = 0 was present in 60 patients (71%) at either HLA class I or II loci and was more common among recipients without traditional indications for component irradiation. These data challenge the historic emphasis on host immune defects in the pathogenesis of TA-GVHD. The dominant mechanism of TA-GVHD in both immunocompetent and compromised hosts is exposure to viable donor lymphocytes not recognized as foreign by, but able to respond against, the recipient.