Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
País/Região como assunto
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Assunto da revista
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Transgenic Res ; 24(2): 213-25, 2015 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25248506

RESUMO

During the development of a genetically modified (GM) crop product, extensive phenotypic and agronomic data are collected to characterize the plant in comparison to a conventional control with a similar genetic background. The data are evaluated for potential differences resulting from the genetic modification process or the GM trait, and the differences--if any--are subsequently considered in the context of contributing to the pest potential of the GM crop. Ultimately, these study results and those of other studies are used in an ecological risk assessment of the GM crop. In the studies reported here, seed germination, vegetative and reproductive growth, and pollen morphology of Roundup Ready 2 Yield(®) soybean, MON 89788, were compared to those of A3244, a conventional control soybean variety with the same genetic background. Any statistically significant differences were considered in the context of the genetic variation known to occur in soybean and were evaluated as indicators of an effect of the genetic modification process and assessed for impact on plant pest (weed) characteristics and adverse ecological impact (ecological risk). The results of these studies revealed no effects attributable to the genetic modification process or to the GM trait in the plant that would result in increased pest potential or adverse ecological impact of MON 89788 compared with A3244. These results and the associated risk assessments obtained from diverse geographic and environmental conditions in the United States and Argentina can be used by regulators in other countries to inform various assessments of ecological risk.


Assuntos
Ecologia , Glycine max/genética , Plantas Geneticamente Modificadas/efeitos dos fármacos , Meio Ambiente , Germinação/efeitos dos fármacos , Germinação/genética , Herbicidas/toxicidade , Plantas Geneticamente Modificadas/genética , Plantas Geneticamente Modificadas/crescimento & desenvolvimento , Medição de Risco , Sementes/efeitos dos fármacos , Sementes/crescimento & desenvolvimento , Glycine max/efeitos dos fármacos , Estados Unidos
2.
GM Crops Food ; 6(3): 167-82, 2015.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26177011

RESUMO

As part of an ecological risk assessment, Roundup Ready 2 Yield® soybean (MON 89788) was compared to a conventional control soybean variety, A3244, for disease and arthropod damage, plant response to abiotic stress and cold, effects on succeeding plant growth (allelopathic effects), plant response to a bacterial symbiont, and effects on the ability of seed to survive and volunteer in a subsequent growing season. Statistically significant differences between MON 89788 and A3244 were considered in the context of the genetic variation known to occur in soybean and were assessed for their potential impact on plant pest (weed) potential and adverse environmental impact. The results of these studies revealed no effects of the genetic modification that would result in increased pest potential or adverse environmental impact of MON 89788 compared with A3244. This paper illustrates how such characterization studies conducted in a range of environments where the crop is grown are used in an ecological risk assessment of the genetically modified (GM) crop. Furthermore, risk assessors and decision makers use this information when deciding whether to approve a GM crop for cultivation in-or grain import into-their country.


Assuntos
Ecossistema , Glycine max/genética , Glicina/análogos & derivados , Medição de Risco , Adaptação Fisiológica/efeitos dos fármacos , Alelopatia/efeitos dos fármacos , Animais , Artrópodes/fisiologia , Temperatura Baixa , Glicina/toxicidade , Fenótipo , Plantas Geneticamente Modificadas , Simbiose/efeitos dos fármacos , Glifosato
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA