State of the Evidence Traffic Lights 2019: Systematic Review of Interventions for Preventing and Treating Children with Cerebral Palsy.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Cerebral palsy is the most common physical disability of childhood, but the rate is falling, and severity is lessening. We conducted a systematic overview of best available evidence (2012-2019), appraising evidence using GRADE and the Evidence Alert Traffic Light System and then aggregated the new findings with our previous 2013 findings. This article summarizes the best available evidence interventions for preventing and managing cerebral palsy in 2019. RECENT FINDINGS: Effective prevention strategies include antenatal corticosteroids, magnesium sulfate, caffeine, and neonatal hypothermia. Effective allied health interventions include acceptance and commitment therapy, action observations, bimanual training, casting, constraint-induced movement therapy, environmental enrichment, fitness training, goal-directed training, hippotherapy, home programs, literacy interventions, mobility training, oral sensorimotor, oral sensorimotor plus electrical stimulation, pressure care, stepping stones triple P, strength training, task-specific training, treadmill training, partial body weight support treadmill training, and weight-bearing. Effective medical and surgical interventions include anti-convulsants, bisphosphonates, botulinum toxin, botulinum toxin plus occupational therapy, botulinum toxin plus casting, diazepam, dentistry, hip surveillance, intrathecal baclofen, scoliosis correction, selective dorsal rhizotomy, and umbilical cord blood cell therapy. We have provided guidance about what works and what does not to inform decision-making, and highlighted areas for more research.

Motor Learning Feeding Interventions for Infants at Risk of Cerebral Palsy: A Systematic Review.

Feeding difficulties and dysphagia are common in cerebral palsy (CP) and can lead to deficiencies of development and aspiration pneumonia; a leading cause of death in CP. Motor learning interventions have shown positive results in other clinical areas and may be beneficial for this population. This systematic review appraises research that addresses the question: are motor learning-based interventions more effective than compensatory strategies alone in treating dysphagia in infants with, or at risk of, CP?. Systematic searches were conducted in nine electronic databases. All levels of evidence, with at least one infant between 37 weeks post-menstrual age and 12 months corrected age who were at risk of, or diagnosed with CP, implemented interventions which aimed to improve oropharyngeal function for feeding, and aligned with at least two motor learning principles, were included. Studies were appraised by two independent reviewers using the Cho & Bero Instrument and GRADE. One historical case-control study and four case series met inclusion criteria. All involved a combination of motor learning interventions and compensatory strategies, which do not traditionally align with motor learning principles. All studies reported improvements in oral feeding outcomes, however, only three reported statistical analysis. The best available evidence collectively demonstrated a very weak positive effect for motor learning-based interventions for feeding difficulties in infants with, or at risk of, CP.

Baby Intensive Early Active Treatment (babiEAT): A Pilot Randomised Controlled Trial of Feeding Therapy for Infants with Cerebral Palsy and Oropharyngeal Dysphagia.

Cerebral palsy (CP), results in impairment of muscle function including the face, mouth, and throat, leading to oropharyngeal dysphagia (OPD), which affects 85% of children with CP. OPD increases risk of deficiencies in growth, neurological development, and aspiration pneumonia, a leading cause of death in CP. This pilot randomised controlled trial aimed to (i) assess feasibility and acceptability of a novel neuroplasticity and motor-learning feeding intervention program, Baby Intensive Early Active Treatment (babiEAT), and standard care, and (ii) explore preliminary efficacy of babiEAT on health and caregiver feeding-related quality of life (QoL). A total of 14 infants with both CP and OPD were randomly allocated to 12 weeks of babiEAT or standard care. Results indicate that babiEAT and standard care are equally feasible, and acceptable. Parents in the babiEAT group thought recommendations were significantly more effective than standard care parents, were more likely to recommend the program to a friend and reported higher QoL. babiEAT infants showed significantly greater efficiency in fluid intake, fewer compensatory strategies with cup drinking, consumption of more advanced food textures, and shorter mealtimes without impacting intake, aspiration risk, or weight. This small pilot study shows promise for babiEAT in infants with CP and OPD. Further research is needed to determine strength of its effects.