RESUMO
Objective: To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of different imaging modalities in patients with partial biliary obstruction with no obvious aetiology on initial imaging. Methods: This is a prospective single-centre cohort study carried out at Pak Emirates Military Hospital, Rawalpindi from June 2019 to June 2021 with non-probability consecutive sampling. Patients with ages 16 to 75 years, presenting with partial biliary obstruction and undetermined aetiology on initial imaging (TUS and MRCP) were enrolled. EUS was performed for each of these patients and the case was regarded as "true positive" or "true negative" if the findings of imaging modality correlated to those of ERCP. ROC curve, sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV and AUC (with 95% confidence interval) were drawn for all the diagnostic tools using SPSS V. 21. Results: A total of 65 patients were enrolled over a period of two years with male to female ratio of 1.4:1. Forty-four patients had an intermediate risk of choledocholithiasis upon preliminary evaluation whereas, 48(74%) of the participants had CBD calculi or sludge confirmed upon subsequent ERCP. Trans-abdominal ultrasound showed the lowest sensitivity (29.2%), specificity (85%), NPV 12% and PPV 93% for diagnosing CBD calculi. This was followed by MRCP with a sensitivity of 37.5%, specificity of 100%, NPV of 36.2% and PPV of 100%. EUS showed the maximum diagnostic accuracy with AUC of 1.0 and a 100% sensitivity and specificity when compared with ERCP as gold standard. Conclusion: EUS is superior to MRCP in terms of diagnostic accuracy as minimally invasive diagnostic tool and EUS superiority is particularly relevant in patients with intermediate risk of choledocholithiasis.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Solitary rectal ulcer syndrome (SRUS) is a very rare benign defecation disorder characterized by distinct clinical features and histological findings. Conventional measures are often shown to be ineffective for the treatment of ulcers. Argon plasma coagulation (APC) has recently been shown to be an effective treatment method for SRUS that is refractory to conventional therapy. OBJECTIVES: Determine the efficacy of APC treatment for patients suffering from SRUS. DESIGN: Prospective, single center. SETTINGS: Gastroenterology department at a military hospital in Pakistan. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This prospective study included patients with symptoms of rectal bleeding diagnosed with SRUS. Patients were recruited on the basis of clinical, sigmoidoscopic, and histological findings from September 2022 to March 2023. All patients had received conventional treatment initially and were assessed for persistence of symptoms. APC was performed only for those patients who were refractory to standard treatment. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Effectiveness of APC for resistant SRUS. SAMPLE SIZE: 99 patients. RESULTS: The 99 patients diagnosed with SRUS had a median (minimum-maximum) age of patients was 20 (9-41) years. All the patients had undergone conventional treatment, which included the use of laxatives, drinking plenty of water and practicing biofeedback. After this standard treatment, 19 patients (19.19%) recovered fully. However, the remaining 80 patients did not show improvement and underwent APC sessions, out of which 61 patients (76.3%) achieved complete healing of ulcers, while the remaining 19 (23.8%) had no improvement at all. None of the patients reported post session complications. CONCLUSION: APC is an effective therapy with very promising results for rectal ulcer hemorrhage. It also helps with ulcer healing and alleviates clinical symptoms. However, further controlled investigations are required to consolidate the use of APC in SRUS patients. LIMITATIONS: Single centered.