RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess the economic efficiency of the acute medical unit (AMU) hospitalist care model, utilising patient outcomes (length of hospital stay, emergency department (ED)-length of hospital stay, in-hospital mortality) from a previous investigation. DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study was conducted using benefit-cost analysis from a societal perspective. Data relating to clinical factors, outcomes and medical costs were obtained from the electronic medical record database at our institution. Literature-based costing was applied to determine direct non-medical costs and indirect costs that could not be obtained directly. SETTING: A tertiary care hospital in the Republic of Korea. PARTICIPANTS: We evaluated 6391 medical inpatients admitted through the ED from 1 June 2016 to 31 May 2017. INTERVENTIONS: The study compared multiple types of costs and benefits among inpatients from the ED between a non-hospitalist group and an AMU hospitalist group. Results This investigation found a significant reduction in medical costs and total costs in the AMU hospitalist group compared to the non-hospitalist group (30% reduction, 95% CI: 27.6-32.1%, P=0.000; 29.3% reduction, 95% CI: 27.0-31.5%, P=0.000; respectively). Furthermore, significant reductions in direct and indirect costs were found in the AMU hospitalist group compared to the non-hospitalist group (28.6% reduction, 95% CI: 26.6-30.5%, P=0.000; 23.3% reduction, 95% CI: 20.9-25.5%, P=0.000; respectively). The net-benefit and benefit-cost ratio (BCR) of the AMU hospitalist care group were US $6846 and 1.33 per patient admission, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The AMU hospitalist care model was associated with remarkable reductions in multiple costs. The results of the sensitivity analysis indicated that the net-benefit estimates of AMU hospitalist care were similar to the baseline estimates. Thus, the overall net-benefit of AMU hospitalist care was found to be largely positive.
Assuntos
Análise Custo-Benefício , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Médicos Hospitalares , Tempo de Internação , Humanos , Médicos Hospitalares/economia , Estudos Retrospectivos , República da Coreia , Masculino , Feminino , Tempo de Internação/economia , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/economia , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Centros de Atenção Terciária/economia , Custos Hospitalares/estatística & dados numéricos , AdultoRESUMO
Plant intracellular nucleotide-binding leucine-rich repeat receptors (NLRs) analyzed to date oligomerize and form resistosomes upon activation to initiate immune responses. Some NLRs are encoded in tightly linked co-regulated head-to-head genes whose products function together as pairs. We uncover the oligomerization requirements for different Arabidopsis paired CHS3-CSA1 alleles. These pairs form resting-state heterodimers that oligomerize into complexes distinct from NLRs analyzed previously. Oligomerization requires both conserved and allele-specific features of the respective CHS3 and CSA1 Toll-like interleukin-1 receptor (TIR) domains. The receptor kinases BAK1 and BIRs inhibit CHS3-CSA1 pair oligomerization to maintain the CHS3-CSA1 heterodimer in an inactive state. Our study reveals that paired NLRs hetero-oligomerize and likely form a distinctive "dimer of heterodimers" and that structural heterogeneity is expected even among alleles of closely related paired NLRs.
Assuntos
Proteínas de Arabidopsis , Arabidopsis , Quitina Sintase , Proteínas NLR , Doenças das Plantas , Imunidade Vegetal , Receptores Imunológicos , Alelos , Arabidopsis/genética , Arabidopsis/imunologia , Proteínas de Arabidopsis/química , Proteínas de Arabidopsis/genética , Proteínas de Arabidopsis/metabolismo , Quitina Sintase/química , Quitina Sintase/genética , Quitina Sintase/metabolismo , Mutação , Proteínas NLR/química , Proteínas NLR/genética , Proteínas NLR/metabolismo , Doenças das Plantas/genética , Doenças das Plantas/imunologia , Imunidade Vegetal/genética , Receptores Imunológicos/química , Receptores Imunológicos/genética , Receptores Imunológicos/metabolismo , Multimerização ProteicaRESUMO
Objective: This study aimed to assess the actual burden of antibiotic use among end-of-life (EOL) patients in South Korea and to compare trends between cancer and non-cancer decedents. Design: Population-based mortality follow-back study. Setting: Data from the Korean National Health Insurance Database, covering the period from January1, 2006, to December 31, 2018, provided for research by the National Health Insurance Service (NHIS), were used. Participants: All decedents from 2006 to 2018 were included and categorized as cancer decedents or non-cancer decedents. Methods: Annual antibiotic consumption rates and prescription rates were calculated, and Poisson regression was used to estimate their trends. Results: Overall antibiotic consumption rates decreased slightly among decedents in their final month with a less pronounced annual decrease rate among cancer decedents compared to non-cancer decedents (0.4% vs 2.3% per year, P <.001). Over the study period, although narrow spectrum antibiotics were used less, utilization and prescription of broad-spectrum antibiotics steadily increased, and prescription rates were higher in cancer decedents compared to non-cancer controls. Specifically, carbapenem prescription rates increased from 5.6% to 18.5%, (RR 1.087, 95% CI 1.085-1.088, P <.001) in cancer decedents and from 2.9% to 13.2% (RR 1.115, 95% CI 1.113-1.116, P <.001) in non-cancer decedents. Conclusions: Our findings show that patients at the EOL, especially those with cancer, are increasingly and highly exposed to broad-spectrum antibiotics. Measures of antibiotic stewardship are required among this population.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Measurement of sodium intake in hospitalized patients is critical for their care. In this study, artificial intelligence (AI)-based imaging was performed to determine sodium intake in these patients. OBJECTIVE: The applicability of a diet management system was evaluated using AI-based imaging to assess the sodium content of diets prescribed for hospitalized patients. METHODS: Based on the information on the already investigated nutrients and quantity of food, consumed sodium was analyzed through photographs obtained before and after a meal. We used a hybrid model that first leveraged the capabilities of the You Only Look Once, version 4 (YOLOv4) architecture for the detection of food and dish areas in images. Following this initial detection, 2 distinct approaches were adopted for further classification: a custom ResNet-101 model and a hyperspectral imaging-based technique. These methodologies focused on accurate classification and estimation of the food quantity and sodium amount, respectively. The 24-hour urine sodium (UNa) value was measured as a reference for evaluating the sodium intake. RESULTS: Results were analyzed using complete data from 25 participants out of the total 54 enrolled individuals. The median sodium intake calculated by the AI algorithm (AI-Na) was determined to be 2022.7 mg per day/person (adjusted by administered fluids). A significant correlation was observed between AI-Na and 24-hour UNa, while there was a notable disparity between them. A regression analysis, considering patient characteristics (eg, gender, age, renal function, the use of diuretics, and administered fluids) yielded a formula accounting for the interaction between AI-Na and 24-hour UNa. Consequently, it was concluded that AI-Na holds clinical significance in estimating salt intake for hospitalized patients using images without the need for 24-hour UNa measurements. The degree of correlation between AI-Na and 24-hour UNa was found to vary depending on the use of diuretics. CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights the potential of AI-based imaging for determining sodium intake in hospitalized patients.
RESUMO
Background: Transitional medication safety is crucial, as miscommunication about medication changes can lead to significant risks. Unclear or incomplete documentation during care transitions can result in outdated or incorrect medication lists at discharge, potentially causing medication errors, adverse drug events, and inadequate patient education. These issues are exacerbated by extended hospital stays and multiple care events, making accurate medication recall challenging at discharge. Objective: Thus, we aimed to investigate how real-time documentation of in-hospital medication changes prevents undocumented medication changes at discharge and improves physician-pharmacist communication. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study in a tertiary hospital. Two pharmacists reviewed medical records of patients admitted to the acute medical unit from April to June 2020. In-hospital medication discrepancies were determined by comparing preadmission and hospitalization medication lists and it was verified whether the physician's intent of medication changes was clarified by documentation. By a documentation rate of medication changes of 100% and <100%, respectively, fully documented (FD) and partially documented (PD) groups were defined. Any undocumented medication changes at discharge were considered a "documentation error at discharge". Pharmacists' survey was conducted to assess the impact of appropriate documentation on the pharmacists. Results: After reviewing 400 medication records, patients were categorized into FD (61.3%) and PD (38.8%) groups. Documentation errors at discharge were significantly higher in the PD than in the FD group. Factors associated with documentation errors at discharge included belonging to the PD group, discharge from a non-hospitalist-managed ward, and having three or more intentional discrepancies. Pharmacists showed favorable attitudes towards physician's documentation. Conclusion: Appropriate documentation of in-hospital medication changes, facilitated by free-text communication, significantly decreased documentation errors at discharge. This analysis underlines the importance of communication between pharmacists and hospitalists in improving patient safety during transitions of care.
During transitions of care, communication failures among healthcare professionals can lead to medication errors. Therefore, effective sharing of information is essential, especially when intentional changes in prescription orders are made. Documenting medication changes facilitates real-time communication, potentially improving medication reconciliation and reducing discrepancies. However, inadequate documentation of medication changes is common in clinical practice. This retrospective cohort study underlines the importance of real-time documentation of in-hospital medication changes. There was a significant reduction in documentation errors at discharge in fully documented group, where real-time documentation of medication changes was more prevalent. Pharmacists showed favorable attitudes toward the physician's real-time documenting of medication changes because it provided valuable information on understanding the physician's intent and improving communication and also saved time for pharmacists. This study concludes that physicians' documentation on medication changes may reduce documentation errors at discharge, meaning that proper documentation of medication changes could enhance patient safety through effective communication.