Diagnostic value of diffusion-weighted brain magnetic resonance imaging in patients with sporadic Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the diagnostic yield and performance of DWI in patients with sporadic CJD (sCJD). METHODS: A systematic literature search of the MEDLINE and EMBASE databases was performed, since their inception up to July 28, 2020. Pooled diagnostic yield of diffusion-weighted imaging was calculated using DerSimonian-Laird random-effects model. Pooled diagnostic performance of DWI (sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve) in diagnosing sCJD among patients with rapidly progressive dementia was calculated using a bivariate random-effects model. Subgroup analysis and meta-regression were performed. RESULTS: Fifteen original articles with a total of 1144 patients with sCJD were included. The pooled diagnostic yield was 91% (95% confidence interval [CI], 86 to 94%); summary sensitivity, 91% (95% CI, 84 to 95%); and specificity, 97% (95% CI, 94 to 99%). The area under the hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.99 (95% CI, 0.97-0.99). Simultaneous involvement of the neocortex and striatum was the most common finding, and the neocortex was the most common site to be involved on DWI followed by striatum, thalamus, and cerebellum. Subgroup analysis and meta-regression demonstrated significant heterogeneity among the studies associated with the reference standards used for diagnosis of sCJD. CONCLUSIONS: DWI showed excellent diagnostic value in diagnosis of sporadic Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease among patients with rapidly progressive dementia. Simultaneous involvement of the neocortex and striatum was the most common finding, and the neocortex was the most common site to be involved on diffusion-weighted imaging followed by striatum, thalamus, and cerebellum. KEY POINTS: • The pooled diagnostic yield of diffusion-weighted imaging in sporadic Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease was 91%. • The diagnostic performance of diffusion-weighted imaging for predicting sporadic Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease among patients with rapidly progressive dementia was excellent, with pooled sensitivity, 91%, and specificity, 97%. • Simultaneous involvement in the neocortex and striatum was most commonly seen on diffusion-weighted imaging (60%), followed by the neocortex without striatum (30%), thalamus (21%), cerebellum (8%), and striatum without neocortex (7%).

Diagnostic yield of diffusion-weighted brain MR imaging in patients with cognitive impairment: Large cohort study with 3,298 patients.

OBJECTIVE: There is a paucity of large cohort-based evidence regarding the need and added value of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in patients attending outpatient clinic for cognitive impairment. We aimed to evaluate the diagnostic yield of DWI in patients attending outpatient clinic for cognitive impairment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective, observational, single-institution study included 3,298 consecutive patients (mean age ± SD, 71 years ± 10; 1,976 women) attending outpatient clinic for cognitive impairment with clinical dementia rating ≥ 0.5 who underwent brain MRI with DWI from January 2010 to February 2020. Diagnostic yield was defined as the proportion of patients in whom DWI supported the diagnosis that underlies cognitive impairment among all patients. Subgroup analyses were performed by age group and sex, and the Chi-square test was performed to compare the diagnostic yields between groups. RESULTS: The overall diagnostic yield of DWI in patients with cognitive impairment was 3.2% (106/3,298; 95% CI, 2.6-3.9%). The diagnostic yield was 2.5% (83/3,298) for acute or subacute infarct, which included recent small subcortical infarct for which the diagnostic yield was 1.6% (54/3,298). The diagnostic yield was 0.33% (11/3,298) for Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease (CJD), 0.15% (5/3,298) for transient global amnesia (TGA), 0.12% (4/3,298) for encephalitis and 0.09% (3/3,298) for lymphoma. There was a trend towards a higher diagnostic yield in the older age group with age ≥ 70 years old (3.6% vs 2.6%, P = .12). There was an incremental increase in the diagnostic yield from the age group 60-69 years (2.6%; 20/773) to 90-99 years (8.0%; 2/25). CONCLUSION: Despite its low overall diagnostic yield, DWI supported the diagnosis of acute or subacute infarct, CJD, TGA, encephalitis and lymphoma that underlie cognitive impairment, and there was a trend towards a higher diagnostic yield in the older age group.

Diagnostic Yield of Diffusion-Weighted Brain Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients with Transient Global Amnesia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the diagnostic yield of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in patients with transient global amnesia (TGA) and identify significant parameters affecting diagnostic yield. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A systematic literature search of the MEDLINE and EMBASE databases was conducted to identify studies that assessed the diagnostic yield of DWI in patients with TGA. The pooled diagnostic yield of DWI in patients with TGA was calculated using the DerSimonian-Laird random-effects model. Subgroup analyses were also performed of slice thickness, magnetic field strength, and interval between symptom onset and DWI. RESULTS: Twenty-two original articles (1732 patients) were included. The pooled incidence of right, left, and bilateral hippocampal lesions was 37% (95% confidence interval [CI], 30-44%), 42% (95% CI, 39-46%), and 25% (95% CI, 20-30%) of all lesions, respectively. The pooled diagnostic yield of DWI in patients with TGA was 39% (95% CI, 27-52%). The Higgins I² statistic showed significant heterogeneity (I² = 95%). DWI with a slice thickness ≤ 3 mm showed a higher diagnostic yield than DWI with a slice thickness > 3 mm (pooled diagnostic yield: 63% [95% CI, 53-72%] vs. 26% [95% CI, 16-40%], p < 0.01). DWI performed at an interval between 24 and 96 hours after symptom onset showed a higher diagnostic yield (68% [95% CI, 57-78%], p < 0.01) than DWI performed within 24 hours (16% [95% CI, 7-34%]) or later than 96 hours (15% [95% CI, 8-26%]). There was no difference in the diagnostic yield between DWI performed using 3T vs. 1.5T (pooled diagnostic yield, 31% [95% CI, 25-38%] vs. 24% [95% CI, 14-37%], p = 0.31). CONCLUSION: The pooled diagnostic yield of DWI in TGA patients was 39%. DWI obtained with a slice thickness ≤ 3 mm or an interval between symptom onset and DWI of > 24 to 96 hours could increase the diagnostic yield.