The Value of Textbook Outcome in Benchmarking Pancreatoduodenectomy for Nonfunctioning Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors.

BACKGROUND: Textbook outcome (TO) is a composite variable that can define the quality of pancreatic surgery. The aim of this study is to evaluate TO after pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) for nonfunctioning pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (NF-PanNETs). PATIENTS AND METHODS: All patients who underwent PD for NF-PanNETs (2007-2016) in different centers were included in this retrospective study. TO was defined as the absence of severe postoperative complications and mortality, length of hospital stay ≤ 19 days, R0 resection, and at least 12 lymph nodes harvested. RESULTS: Overall, 477 patients were included. The TO rate was 32%. Tumor size [odds ratio (OR) 1.696; p = 0.013], a minimally invasive approach (OR 12.896; p = 0.001), and surgical volume (OR 2.062; p = 0.023) were independent predictors of TO. The annual frequency of PDs increased over time as well as the overall rate of TO. At a median follow-up of 44 months, patients who achieved TO had similar disease-free (p = 0.487) and overall survival (p = 0.433) rates compared with patients who did not achieve TO. TO rate in patients with NF-PanNET > 2 cm was 35% versus 27% in patients with NF-PanNET ≤ 2 cm (p = 0.044). Considering only NF-PanNETs > 2 cm, patients with TO and those without TO had comparable 5-year overall survival rates (p = 0.766) CONCLUSIONS: TO is achieved in one-third of patients after PD for NF-PanNETs and is not associated with a benefit in terms of long-term survival.

Trend Analysis and Prediction of Hepatobiliary Pancreatic Cancer Incidence and Mortality in Korea.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to analyze the current trends and predict the epidemiologic features of hepatobiliary and pancreatic (HBP) cancers according to the Korea Central Cancer Registry to provide insights into health policy. METHODS: Incidence data from 1999 to 2017 and mortality data from 2002 to 2018 were obtained from the Korea National Cancer Incidence Database and Statistics Korea, respectively. The future incidence rate from 2018 to 2040 and mortality rate from 2019 to 2040 of each HBP cancer were predicted using an age-period-cohort model. All analyses, including incidence and mortality, were stratified by sex. RESULTS: From 1999 to 2017, the age-standardized incidence rate (ASIR) of HBP cancers per 100,000 population had changed (liver, 25.8 to 13.5; gallbladder [GB], 2.9 to 2.6; bile ducts, 5.1 to 5.9; ampulla of Vater [AoV], 0.9 to 0.9; and pancreatic, 5.6 to 7.3). The age-standardized mortality rate (ASMR) per 100,000 population from 2002 to 2018 of each cancer had declined, excluding pancreatic cancer (5.5 to 5.6). The predicted ASIR of pancreatic cancer per 100,000 population from 2018 to 2040 increased (7.5 to 8.2), but that of other cancers decreased. Furthermore, the predicted ASMR per 100,000 population from 2019 to 2040 decreased in all types of cancers: liver (6.5 to 3.2), GB (1.4 to 0.9), bile ducts (4.3 to 2.9), AoV (0.3 to 0.2), and pancreas (5.4 to 4.7). However, in terms of sex, the predicted ASMR of pancreatic cancer per 100,000 population in females increased (3.8 to 4.9). CONCLUSION: The annual incidence and mortality cases of HBP cancers are generally predicted to increase. Especially, pancreatic cancer has an increasing incidence and will be the leading cause of cancer-related death among HBP cancers.

Prognostic impact of tumor vascularity on CT in resectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.

BACKGROUND: We investigated the vascularity of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) on computed tomography (CT) images and its association with ICC recurrence after surgery and prognosis after recurrence. METHODS: In this retrospective study, the data of patients who underwent resection with curative intent for ICC between March 2001 and July 2017 were reviewed. Clinicopathologic factors including tumor vascularity (hypovascular, rim-enhancement, and hypervascular) on CT that could affect recurrence-free survival (RFS) were assessed. The association between the vascularity of recurrent ICC and survival after recurrence was also analyzed. RESULTS: Overall, 147 patients were enrolled and followed up for a median of 36.1 months of which, 101 (68.7%) experienced ICC recurrence. Hypervascularity of ICC showed better RFS than other vascularities [rim-enhanced image hazard ratio (HR), 3.893; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.700-8.915, p = 0.001; hypovascular image HR, 6.241; 95% CI, 2.670-14.586, p < 0.001]. The hypervascular recurrent ICC was also significantly associated with better survival after recurrence (log-rank test, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Hypervascular ICC was associated with a longer RFS and better prognosis after recurrence. The vascularity of ICC on CT may be a noninvasive, accessible, and useful prognostic index, and should be considered while planning treatment.

Randomized controlled study comparing the analgesic effects of intravenous patient-controlled analgesia and patient-controlled epidural analgesia after open major surgery for pancreatobiliary cancer.

BACKGROUND: This randomized clinical trial was performed to compare pain scales between intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (IV-PCA) and patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) in patients undergoing open surgical resection of major pancreatobiliary malignancies. METHODS: One hundred ten patients were randomly assigned to the PCEA or IV-PCA group. We compared the numeric rating scale pain score during ambulation on postoperative day (PD) 2 and at rest (at 06:00, 12:00, and 18:00) from PD 1 to 7, the serum level of troponin I on PD 1, and the incidence of postoperative complications between the two groups. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in the pain scores during ambulation on PD 2, at rest up to PD 7, serum troponin I level, and postoperative complication rates. The incidences of nausea (20.4% vs. 6.3%; p = 0.039) and drowsiness (20.4% vs. 0%; p = 0.001) were higher in the IV-PCA group and the rate of dysuria (0% vs. 14.6%; p = 0.004) was higher in the PCEA group. CONCLUSION: PCEA showed no superiority over IV-PCA in terms of postoperative pain relief or morbidity after major open surgery for pancreatobiliary malignancies. The method of analgesia should be considered based the characteristics of the patient, surgeon, anesthesiologist, and institute.

Effects of Pancreatic Enzyme Replacement Therapy on Body Weight and Nutritional Assessments After Pancreatoduodenectomy in a Randomized Trial.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: We studied the effects of pancreatic enzyme replacement therapy (PERT) on body weight, nutritional status, and quality of life (QoL) in patients with pancreatic exocrine insufficiency after pancreatoduodenectomy. METHODS: We performed a randomized, double-blind trial of 304 patients who underwent pancreatoduodenectomy at 7 tertiary referral hospitals in South Korea. Patients with fecal levels of elastase of 200 µg/g or less, before and after surgery, were assigned randomly to groups that received PERT (a single capsule of 40,000 IU pancreatin, Norzyme (40,000 IU, Pankreatan; Nordmark Arzneimittel GmbH & Co, Uetersen, Germany), 3 times each day during meals for 3 months; n = 151) or placebo (n = 153). Protocol completion was defined as taking more than two thirds of the total dose without taking other digestive enzymes; the protocol was completed by 71 patients in the PERT group and 93 patients in the placebo group. Patients underwent a physical examination, oral glucose tolerance tests, and blood tests at baseline and at month 3 of the study period. The primary end point was change in body weight. Secondary end points were changes in bowel habits, nutritional parameters, and QoL. RESULTS: In the per-protocol analysis, 3 months after the study began, patients in the PERT group gained a mean of 1.09 kg in weight and patients in the placebo group lost a mean of 2.28 kg (difference between groups, 3.37 kg; P < .001). However, no difference in body weight was observed between groups in the intent-to-treat analysis. Three months after the study began, the mean serum levels of prealbumin increased by 10.9 mg/dL in the PERT group and increased by 7.8 mg/dL in the placebo group (P = .002). Poor compliance to PERT was a significant risk factor for weight loss (P < .001). There was no significant difference in QoL scores between groups. CONCLUSIONS: In the intent-to-treat analysis of data from a randomized trial, we found no significant effect of PERT on mean body weights of patients with pancreatic exocrine insufficiency after pancreatoduodenectomy. However, with active education and monitoring, PERT could increase body weight and nutritional parameters. ClinicalTrials.gov no: NCT02127021.

Propensity score-matched analysis of internal stent vs external stent for pancreatojejunostomy during pancreaticoduodenectomy: Japanese-Korean cooperative project.

BACKGROUND: Several studies comparing internal and external stents have been conducted with the aim of reducing pancreatic fistula after PD. There is still no consensus, however, on the appropriate use of pancreatic stents for prevention of pancreatic fistula. This multicenter large cohort study aims to evaluate whether internal or external pancreatic stents are more effective in reduction of clinically relevant pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). METHODS: We reviewed 3149 patients (internal stent n = 1,311, external stent n = 1838) who underwent PD at 20 institutions in Japan and Korea between 2007 and 2013. Propensity score matched analysis was used to minimize bias from nonrandomized treatment assignment. The primary endpoint was the incidence of clinically relevant pancreatic fistula. This study was registered on the UMIN Clinical Trials Registry (UMIN000032402). RESULTS: After propensity score matched analysis, clinically relevant pancreatic fistula occurred in more patients in the external stents group (280 patients, 28.7%) than in patients in the internal stents group (126 patients, 12.9%) (OR 2.713 [95% CI, 2.139-3.455]; P < 0.001). In subset analysis of a high-risk group with soft pancreas and no dilatation of the pancreatic duct, clinically relevant pancreatic fistula occurred in 90 patients (18.8%) in internal stents group and 183 patients (35.4%) in external stents group. External stents were significantly associated with increased risk for clinically relevant pancreatic fistula (OR 2.366 [95% CI, 1.753-3.209]; P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Propensity score matched analysis showed that, regarding clinically relevant pancreatic fistula after PD, internal stents are safer than external stents for pancreaticojejunostomy.

Clinicopathologic analysis of intraductal papillary neoplasm of bile duct: Korean multicenter cohort study.

BACKGROUND: IPNB is very rare disease and most previous studies on IPNB were case series with a small number due to low incidence. The aim of this study is to validate previously known clinicopathologic features of intraductal papillary neoplasm of bile duct (IPNB) based on the first largest multicenter cohort. METHODS: Among 587 patients previously diagnosed with IPNB and similar diseases from each center in Korea, 387 were included in this study after central pathologic review. We also reviewed all preoperative image data. RESULTS: Of 387 patients, 176 (45.5%) had invasive carcinoma and 21 (6.0%) lymph node metastasis. The 5-year overall survival was 80.9% for all patients, 88.8% for IPNB with mucosal dysplasia, and 70.5% for IPNB with invasive carcinoma. According to the "Jang & Kim's modified anatomical classification," 265 (68.5%) were intrahepatic, 103 (26.6%) extrahepatic, and 16 (4.1%) diffuse type. Multivariate analysis revealed that tumor invasiveness was a unique predictor for survival analysis. (p = 0.047 [hazard ratio = 2.116, 95% confidence interval 1.010-4.433]). CONCLUSIONS: This is the first Korean multicenter study on IPNB through central pathologic and radiologic review process. Although IPNB showed good long-term prognosis, relatively aggressive features were also found in invasive carcinoma and extrahepatic/diffuse type.

Core Set of Patient-reported Outcomes in Pancreatic Cancer (COPRAC): An International Delphi Study Among Patients and Health Care Providers.

OBJECTIVE: To establish an international core set of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) selected by both patients and healthcare providers (HCPs) from the United States (US), Europe, and Asia. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: PROs are increasingly recognized in pancreatic cancer studies. There is no consensus on which of the many available PROs are most important. METHODS: A multicenter Delphi study among patients with pancreatic cancer (curative- and palliative-setting) and HCPs in 6 pancreatic centers in the US (Baltimore, Boston), Europe (Amsterdam, Verona), and Asia (Mumbai, Seoul) was performed. In round 1, participants rated the importance of 56 PROs on a 1 to 9 Likert scale. PROs rated as very important (scores 7-9) by the majority (≥80%) of curative- and/or palliative-patients as well as HCPs were included in the core set. PROs not fulfilling these criteria were presented again in round 2, together with feedback on individual and group ratings. Remaining PROs were ranked based on the importance ratings. RESULTS: In total 731 patients and HCPs were invited, 501 completed round 1, and 420 completed both rounds. This included 204 patients in curative-setting, 74 patients in palliative-setting, and 142 HCPs. After 2 rounds, 8 PROs were included in the core set: general quality of life, general health, physical ability, ability to work/do usual activities, fear of recurrence, satisfaction with services/care organization, abdominal complaints, and relationship with partner/family. CONCLUSIONS: This international Delphi study among patients and HCPs established a core set of PROs in pancreatic cancer, which should facilitate the design of future pancreatic cancer trials and outcomes research.

Progression of Pancreatic Branch Duct Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasm Associates With Cyst Size.

BACKGROUNDS & AIMS: Most guidelines for management of patients with intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMN) vary in proposed surveillance intervals and durations-these are usually determined based on expert opinions rather than substantial evidence. The progression of and optimal surveillance intervals for branch-duct IPMNs (BD-IPMN) has not been widely studied. We evaluated the progression of BD-IPMN under surveillance at a single center, and determined optimal follow-up intervals and duration. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of 1369 patients with BD-IPMN seen at Seoul National University Hospital in Korea from January 2001 through December 2016. We included only patients whose imaging studies showed classical features of BD-IPMN, and collected data from each patient over time periods of at least 3 years. We reviewed radiologic and pathologic findings, and performed linear and binary logistic regressions to estimate cyst growth. RESULTS: The median annual growth rate of the cyst was 0.8 mm over a median follow-up time of 61 months. During surveillance, 46 patients (3.4%) underwent surgery because of disease progression after a median follow-up time (in this group) of 62 months. Worrisome features were observed in 209 patients (15.3%) during surveillance, including cyst size of 3 cm or more (n = 109, 8.0%), cyst wall thickening (n = 51, 3.7%), main pancreatic duct dilatation (n = 77, 5.6%), and mural nodule (n = 43, 3.1%). Along with annual rate of cyst growth, incidences of main pancreatic duct dilatation and mural nodules associated with the sizes of cysts at detection (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: In a retrospective analysis of patients with BD-IPMN followed for more than 5 years, we found most cysts to be indolent, but some rapidly grew and progressed. Surveillance protocols should therefore be individualized based on initial cyst size and rate of growth.

Lymph node ratio as valuable predictor in pancreatic cancer treated with R0 resection and adjuvant treatment.

BACKGROUND: Lymph-node (LN) metastasis is an important prognostic factor in resected pancreatic cancer. In this study, the prognostic value of American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) 8th edition N stage, lymph-node ratio (LNR), and log odds of positive lymph nodes (LODDS) in resected pancreatic cancer was investigated. METHODS: Between January 2005 and December 2017, there were 351 patients with pancreatic cancer treated with R0 resection and adjuvant therapy at Seoul National University Hospital. Relationships between the three LN parameters and overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were evaluated using a log-rank test and Cox proportional hazard regression model. Each multivariate-adjusted LN parameter was internally validated by bootstrap-corrected Harrell's C-index. RESULTS: The mean duration from surgery to adjuvant therapy was 47.6 ± 17.4 days. In total, the median OS and RFS was 31.7 (95% CI, 27.2-37.2) and 15.4 (95% CI, 13.5-17.7) months. The three LN classification systems were significantly correlated with OS and RFS in log-rank tests and multivariate-adjusted models (all p < 0.05). When internally validated, LNR showed the highest discrimination ability in predicting OS and RFS (each C-index = 0.65). LNR also showed the highest C-index in subgroup analysis, classified by adjuvant therapy modality. LNR and the AJCC 8th edition LN classification system were significantly associated with loco-regional recurrence (p = 0.026 and p = 0.027, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: LNR, which showed the best prognostic performance and significant relationship with loco-regional recurrence, can help further stratify the patients and establish an active treatment plan.

Comparison of long-term clinical outcomes of external and internal pancreatic stents in pancreaticoduodenectomy: randomized controlled study.

BACKGROUND: To determine the most appropriate pancreatic drainage method, by investigating differences in 12-month clinical outcomes in patients implanted with external and internal pancreatic stents as an extension to a previous study on short-term outcome. METHODS: This prospective randomized controlled trial enrolled 213 patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy with duct to mucosa pancreaticojejunostomy between August 2010 and January 2014 (NCT01023594). Of the 185 patients followed-up for 12 months, 97 underwent external and 88 underwent internal stenting. Their long-term clinical outcomes were compared. RESULTS: Overall late complication rates were similar in the external and internal stent groups (P = 0.621). The percentage of patients with >50% atrophy of the remnant pancreatic volume after 12 months was similar in both groups (P = 0.580). Factors associated with pancreatic exocrine or endocrine function, including stool elastase level (P = 0.571) and rate of new-onset diabetes (P = 0.179), were also comparable. There were no significant between-group differences in quality of life, as evaluated by the EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ PAN26 questionnaires. CONCLUSION: External and internal stents showed comparable long-term, as well as short-term clinical outcomes, including late complication rates, preservation of pancreatic duct diameters, pancreatic volume changes with functional derangements, and quality of life after surgery.

Oncological Benefits of Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation With Gemcitabine Versus Upfront Surgery in Patients With Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Cancer: A Prospective, Randomized, Open-label, Multicenter Phase 2/3 Trial.

OBJECTIVE: This study was performed to determine whether neoadjuvant treatment increases survival in patients with BRPC. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Despite many promising retrospective data on the effect of neoadjuvant treatment for borderline resectable pancreatic cancer (BRPC), no high-level evidence exists to support the role of such treatment. METHODS: This phase 2/3 multicenter randomized controlled trial was designed to enroll 110 patients with BRPC who were randomly assigned to gemcitabine-based neoadjuvant chemoradiation treatment (54 Gray external beam radiation) followed by surgery or upfront surgery followed by chemoradiation treatment from four large-volume centers in Korea. The primary endpoint was the 2-year survival rate (2-YSR). Interim analysis was planned at the time of 50% case enrollment. RESULTS: After excluding the patients who withdrew consent (n = 8) from the 58 enrolled patients, 27 patients were allocated to neoadjuvant treatment and 23 to upfront surgery groups. The overall 2-YSR was 34.0% with a median survival of 16 months. In the intention-to-treat analysis, the 2-YSR and median survival were significantly better in the neoadjuvant chemoradiation than the upfront surgery group [40.7%, 21 months vs 26.1%, 12 months, hazard ratio 1.495 (95% confidence interval 0.66-3.36), P = 0.028]. R0 resection rate was also significantly higher in the neoadjuvant chemoradiation group than upfront surgery (n = 14, 51.8% vs n = 6, 26.1%, P = 0.004). The safety monitoring committee decided on early termination of the study on the basis of the statistical significance of neoadjuvant treatment efficacy. CONCLUSION: This is the first prospective randomized controlled trial on the oncological benefits of neoadjuvant treatment in BRPC. Compared to upfront surgery, neoadjuvant chemoradiation provides oncological benefits in patients with BRPC.

Clinical significance of defining borderline resectable pancreatic cancer.

Since the introduction of the concept of borderline resectable pancreatic cancer (BRPC), various definitions of this disease entity have been suggested. However, there are several obstacles in defining this disease category. The current diagnostic criteria of BRPC mainly focuses on its expanded 'technical resectability'; however, they are difficult to interpret because of their ambiguity using potential subjective or arbitrary terminology, In addition, limitations in current imaging technology and a lack of evidence in radiological-pathological-clinical correlation make it difficult to refine the criteria. On the other hand, neoadjuvant treatment is usually applied to increase the R0 resection rate of BRPC focusing on the 'oncological curability'. However, evidence is needed concerning the effect of neoadjuvant treatment by quality-controlled prospective randomized clinical trials based on a standardized radiologic and pathologic reporting system. In conclusion, there are two aspects in the current concept of BRPC, which are technical resectability and oncological curability. Although the recent evolution of surgical techniques is expanding the scope of technical resectability, it should not be overlooked that the disease entity must be defined based on the evidence of oncological curability.

International consensus on definition and criteria of borderline resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma 2017.

This statement was developed to promote international consensus on the definition of borderline resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (BR-PDAC) which was adopted by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) in 2006, but which has changed yearly and become more complicated. Based on a symposium held during the 20th meeting of the International Association of Pancreatology (IAP) in Sendai, Japan, in 2016, the presenters sought consensus on issues related to BR-PDAC. We defined patients with BR-PDAC according to the three distinct dimensions: anatomical (A), biological (B), and conditional (C). Anatomic factors include tumor contact with the superior mesenteric artery and/or celiac artery of less than 180° without showing stenosis or deformity, tumor contact with the common hepatic artery without showing tumor contact with the proper hepatic artery and/or celiac artery, and tumor contact with the superior mesenteric vein and/or portal vein including bilateral narrowing or occlusion without extending beyond the inferior border of the duodenum. Biological factors include potentially resectable disease based on anatomic criteria but with clinical findings suspicious for (but unproven) distant metastases or regional lymph nodes metastases diagnosed by biopsy or positron emission tomography-computed tomography. This also includes a serum carbohydrate antigen (CA) 19-9 level more than 500 units/ml. Conditional factors include the patients with potentially resectable disease based on anatomic and biologic criteria and with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 2 or more. The definition of BR-PDAC requires one or more positive dimensions (e.g. A, B, C, AB, AC, BC or ABC). The present definition acknowledges that resectability is not just about the anatomic relationship between the tumor and vessels, but that biological and conditional dimensions are also important. The aim in presenting this consensus definition is also to highlight issues which remain controversial and require further research.

The impact of perioperative CA19-9 change on the survival and recurrence patterns after adjuvant chemoradiotherapy in resectable extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.

BACKGROUNDS: Perioperative CA19-9 value in pancreato-biliary cancers has been recognized as a prognostic factor. Herein, we investigated survival differences and recurrence patterns after adjuvant chemoradiotherapy by perioperative CA19-9 change in surgically resected extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. METHODS: Patients were divided into those with preoperative normal CA19-9 (Group 1, n = 52), those with high preoperative and normalized postoperative CA19-9 (Group 2, n = 80), and those with both high pre- and postoperative CA19-9 (Group 3, n = 21). RESULTS: Depending on the group defined above, the 5-year overall survival (OS) (59.6%, 38.7%, and 9.5%, P < 0.001) and disease-free survival (55.8%, 31.2%, and 9.5%, P < 0.001) between the three groups differed. On multivariable analysis in patients other than group 1, poor prognosticators for OS were high postoperative CA19-9 (HR 2.26, P = 0.008) and N1 disease (HR 2.33, P = 0.001). Group 3, compared with group 2, showed higher distant metastasis rate, shorter disease-free interval, and higher CA19-9 at the time of recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: Survival and recurrence patterns after adjuvant chemoradiotherapy are significantly affected by perioperative CA19-9 change. This may have important implications in patient selection for adjuvant chemoradiotherapy and clinical trial design.

Preoperative MDCT Assessment of Resectability in Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Cancer: Effect of Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation Therapy.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the diagnostic performance of MDCT in assessing tumor resectability in patients with borderline resectable pancreatic cancers after receiving neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy (CRT) in comparison with those undergoing upfront surgery. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Thirty-seven patients with borderline resectable pancreatic cancers were randomly allocated to the neoadjuvant CRT group (arm 1; n = 18) or up-front surgery group (arm 2; n = 19). Three radiologists rated the likelihood of local resectability on a 5-point scale at preoperative MDCT in two separate sessions (session 1: post-CRT of arm 1, baseline of arm 2; session 2: using new imaging criteria reflecting the changes during CRT of arm 1). The AUC of each reviewer, as well as sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy based on consensus interpretation, were compared between arms and sessions. RESULTS: For local resectability (n = 30), AUC values at session 1 were 0.664, 0.669, and 0.588 for reviewers 1, 2, and 3, respectively, and were not significantly different between arms 1 (n = 15; 0.759, 0.713, and 0.593) and 2 (n = 15; 0.852, 0.685, and 0.722) (p > 0.05). In arm 1, MDCT sensitivity, specificity, accuracy were 22%, 100%, and 53%, respectively, at session 1 versus 78%, 67%, and 73%, respectively, at session 2 (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: In patients with borderline resectable pancreatic cancers, neoadjuvant CRT did not significantly decrease the performance of MDCT for the prediction of local resectability. However, by considering post-CRT changes, such as nonprogression in tumor-vascular contact, MDCT may provide better sensitivity for locally resectable disease.

Role of Adjuvant Chemoradiotherapy for Duodenal Cancer: An Updated Analysis of Long-Term Follow-Up from Single Institution.

BACKGROUND: There are only limited data on the failure patterns after surgical resection for duodenal cancer, and the role of adjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) also remains controversial. In this study, the treatment outcomes of surgery alone were compared to those of surgery plus adjuvant CRT for duodenal cancer. METHODS: Between January 1991 and February 2013, a total of 47 patients with duodenal cancer had pancreaticoduodenectomy, and their age ranged from 31 to 80 (median 62). Twenty-five patients (53%) underwent surgery alone, while 22 (47%) underwent surgery plus adjuvant CRT. Postoperative radiotherapy with concomitant 5-fluorouracil was given to tumor bed and regional lymph nodes up to 40-55.4 Gy. Median duration of follow-up was 31 months (range 6-286) for all patients and 90 months (range 14-286) for survivors. RESULTS: CRT (+) group included more patients with advanced nodal stage and overall stage group (p = 0.003 and 0.002, respectively). The 5-year overall survival rates were not different between CRT (-) and CRT (+) groups (50.1 vs. 46.7%, p = 0.794). CRT (+) group achieved a superior 5-year loco-regional relapse-free survival rate compared with CRT (-) group, but the difference did not reach a statistical significance (80.1 vs. 68.4%, p = 0.267). On multivariate analysis, however, the addition of CRT was the only favorable prognosticator predicting loco-regional relapse-free survival (p = 0.046). Two patients experienced grade 3 neutropenia during CRT. CONCLUSIONS: Adjuvant CRT after pancreaticoduodenectomy was correlated with an improved loco-regional control in duodenal cancer. Considering the high loco-regional recurrence in surgery alone group, CRT may be considered as adjuvant treatment.

Comparison of the Clinicopathologic Characteristics of Intraductal Papillary Neoplasm of the Bile Duct according to Morphological and Anatomical Classifications.

BACKGROUND: Intraductal papillary neoplasm of the bile duct (IPNB) is a recently defined entity and its clinical characteristics and classifications have yet to be established. We aimed to clarify the clinical features of IPNB and determine the optimal morphological classification criteria. METHODS: From 2003 to 2016, 112 patients with IPNB who underwent surgery were included in the analysis. After pathologic reexamination by a specialized biliary-pancreas pathologist, previously suggested morphological and anatomical classifications were compared using the clinicopathologic characteristics of IPNB. RESULTS: In terms of histologic subtypes, most patients had the intestinal type (n = 53; 48.6%) or pancreatobiliary type (n = 33; 30.3%). The simple "modified anatomical classification" showed that extrahepatic IPNB comprised more of the intestinal type and tended to be removed by bile duct resection or pancreatoduodenectomy. Intrahepatic IPNB had an equally high proportion of intestinal and pancreatobiliary types and tended to be removed by hepatobiliary resection. Morphologic classifications and histologic subtypes had no effect on survival, whereas a positive resection margin (75.9% vs. 25.7%; P = 0.004) and lymph node metastasis (75.3% vs. 30.0%; P = 0.091) were associated with a poor five-year overall survival rate. In the multivariate analysis, a positive resection margin and perineural invasion were important risk factors for survival. CONCLUSION: IPNB showed better long-term outcomes after optimal surgical resection. The "modified anatomical classification" is simple and intuitive and can help to select a treatment strategy and establish the proper scope of the operation.

Surgical Strategy for T2 Gallbladder Cancer: Nationwide Multicenter Survey in Korea.

BACKGROUND: Although all guidelines suggest that T2 gallbladder (GB) cancer should be treated by extended cholecystectomy (ECx), high-level scientific evidence is lacking because there has been no randomized controlled trial on GB cancer. METHODS: A nationwide multicenter study between 2000 and 2009 from 14 university hospitals enrolled a total of 410 patients with T2 GB cancer. The clinicopathologic findings and long-term follow-up results were analyzed after consensus meeting of Korean Pancreas Surgery Club. RESULTS: The 5-year cumulative survival rate (5YSR) for the patients who underwent curative resection was 61.2%. ECx group showed significantly better 5YSR than simple cholecystectomy (SCx) group (65.4% vs. 54.0%, P = 0.016). For N0 patients, there was no significant difference in 5YSR between SCx and ECx groups (68.7% vs. 73.6%, P = 0.173). Systemic recurrence was more common than locoregional recurrence (78.5% vs. 21.5%). Elevation of cancer antigen 19-9 level preoperatively and lymph node (LN) metastasis were significantly poor prognostic factors in a multivariate analysis. CONCLUSION: ECx including wedge resection of GB bed should be recommended for T2 GB cancer. Because systemic recurrence was more common and recurrence occurred more frequently in patients with LN metastasis, postoperative adjuvant therapy should be considered especially for the patients with LN metastasis.