Everolimus in metastatic renal cell carcinoma after failure of initial anti-VEGF therapy: final results of a noninterventional study.

BACKGROUND: Data are limited regarding routine use of everolimus after initial vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-targeted therapy. The aim of this prospective, noninterventional, observational study was to assess efficacy and safety of everolimus after initial VEGF-targeted treatment in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) in routine clinical settings. METHODS: Everolimus was administered per routine clinical practice. Patients with mRCC of any histology from 116 active sites in Germany were included. The main objective was to determine everolimus efficacy in time to progression (TTP). Progression-free survival (PFS), treatment duration, tumor response, adherence to everolimus regimen, treatment after everolimus, and safety were also assessed. RESULTS: In the total population (N = 334), median follow-up was 5.2 months (range, 0-32 months). Median treatment duration (safety population, n = 318) was 6.5 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 5-8 months). Median TTP and median PFS were similar in populations investigated. In patients who received everolimus as second-line treatment (n = 211), median (95% CI) TTP was 7.1 months (5-9 months) and median PFS was 6.9 months (5-9 months). Commonly reported adverse events (safety population, n = 318) were dyspnea (17%), anemia (15%), and fatigue (12%). Limitations of the noninterventional design should be considered. CONCLUSIONS: This study reflects routine clinical use of everolimus in a large sample of patients with mRCC. Favorable efficacy and safety were seen for everolimus after previous therapy with one VEGF-targeted agent. Results of this study confirm everolimus as one of the standard options in second-line therapy for patients with mRCC. Novartis study code, CRAD001LD27: VFA registry for noninterventional studies ( http://www.vfa.de/de/forschung/nisdb/).

Bevacizumab in first-line treatment of elderly patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: German community-based observational cohort study results.

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the efficacy of first-line bevacizumab-based chemotherapy for untreated metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) based on age. METHODS: Eligibility criteria focused on M1 disease without prior palliative chemotherapy. Choice of chemotherapy regimen was at the physician's discretion. Predefined efficacy endpoints were response rate, progression-free and overall survival (PFS, OS). Patients were analysed by age (<70 vs. ≥70 years, <75 vs. ≥75 years). RESULTS: Of 1777 patients, 27% and 12% were ≥70 and ≥75 years, respectively. PFS was shorter in elderly patients (<70 vs. ≥70 years: 10.5 vs. 9.5 months, p = 0.074; <75 vs. ≥75 years: 10.5 vs. 8.9 months, p = 0.00019), as was OS (<70 vs. ≥70 years: 25.8 vs. 22.7 months, p < 0.0008; <75 vs. ≥75 years: 25.8 vs. 20.8 months; p < 0.0001). In the groups <70 and <75 years, PFS was longer in those receiving oxaliplatin-/irinotecan-containing regimens vs. those receiving 5-FU/capecitabine (<70 years: 10.6 vs. 9.0 months; p = 0.0065; <75 years: 10.6 vs. 9.2 months; p = 0.028); no difference in PFS was observed between oxaliplatin-/irinotecan-containing regimens vs. 5-FU/capecitabine regimens in both elderly age-group comparisons (≥70 years: 9.7 vs. 9.2 months; ≥75 years: 8.3 and 9.0 months). CONCLUSION: First-line bevacizumab-based chemotherapies were effective in German mCRC patients ≥75 years of age, but PFS and OS were significantly shorter in this age group vs. younger patients.

Everolimus in metastatic renal cell carcinoma after failure of initial vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (VEGFr-TKI) therapy: results of an interim analysis of a non-interventional study.

BACKGROUND: Everolimus is approved for treatment of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-refractory patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). Clinical trials rarely mirror treatment reality. Thus, a broader evaluation of everolimus is valuable for routine use. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A German multicenter non-interventional study documented mRCC patients starting everolimus after failure of initial VEGF-targeted therapy. Primary endpoint was effectiveness, defined as time to progression (TTP) according to investigator assessment (time from first dose to progression). RESULTS: Of 382 documented patients, 196 were included in this interim analysis. In the efficacy population (n = 165), median TTP was 7.0 months (95% confidence interval (CI) 5.1-9.0). Among patients with < or ≥ 6 months of previous VEGF-targeted therapy, median TTP was 6.6 months (95% CI 3.8-not estimable) and 7.4 months (95% CI 4.6-9.6), respectively. Most common adverse events were anemia (13%) and dyspnea (14%). Physicians assessed high tolerance and documented high adherence to everolimus therapy (approximately 97%). CONCLUSION: In routine clinical practice, everolimus is effective, as measured by median TTP (longer than median progression-free survival in RECORD-1 trial), and well tolerated. Our results support everolimus use in anti-VEGF-refractory patients with mRCC.

Positive effects of zoledronate on skeletal-related events in patients with renal cell cancer and bone metastases.

INTRODUCTION: Approximately 30% of patients with renal cell cancer (RCC) develop bone metastasis causing skeletal-related events (SRE): pathologic fracture, spinal cord compression, surgery to bone and radiotherapy. Zoledronic acid demonstrated significant clinical benefit in RCC patients in a retrospective analysis. Primary objective of this prospective study was the proportion of patients experiencing ≥ 1 SRE during 12 months of zoledronic acid treatment and to verify the retrospective data. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty patients with histologically confirmed RCC and evidence of ≥ 1 cancer-related bone lesion and ≤ 3 prior bisphosphonate applications were enrolled in 19 German centers between 2004 and 2007. The patients received 4 mg zoledronic acid every 3 weeks for 12 months followed by a follow up period for overall survival of 12 months. Bone lesions were diagnosed by bone scan or MRI-quickscan. Greater and equal to 1 lesion had to be confirmed by x-ray, CT or MRI scan. Additional bone scans were performed after completion of study treatment and if clinically indicated. In case of suspicion or evidence of a SRE it had to be confirmed radiologically. RESULTS: In total, 49 of the 50 enrolled patients were treated. Only 11 of them (22.4%) experienced any SRE until month 12. Patients with > 6 lesions and higher baseline MSKCC (Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center) score had a higher risk for SREs. Zoledronic acid was generally well tolerated and its known safety profile was affirmed. CONCLUSIONS: This prospective study confirms the results of prior data about the efficacy of zoledronic acid in patients with metastatic (m)RCC, supporting its beneficial use in these patients.

Baseline and On-Treatment Markers Determining Prognosis of First-Line Chemotherapy in Combination with Bevacizumab in Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.

BACKGROUND: In metastatic colorectal cancer, no upfront or on-treatment markers are available to determine the prognosis or efficacy for chemotherapy in combination with bevacizumab. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The current analysis was performed to evaluate the prognostic value of disease and patient characteristics (age, number of metastatic sites, stage of primary tumor, performance status, carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA)) and on-treatment changes of CEA (response after 8-12 weeks of treatment and specific patterns of CEA kinetics) in patients from an observational cohort study of chemotherapy with bevacizumab. RESULTS: Baseline factors were available from 1,438 patients. Patients with baseline CEA levels > 20 ng/ml, more than 1 metastatic site, and age > 75 years showed significantly lower progression-free (PFS) and overall survival in multivariate analysis. A CEA response of > 30% during treatment was associated with increased PFS. In addition, the pattern of CEA kinetics predicts survival and response to treatment. CONCLUSION: In summary, baseline CEA, number of metastatic sites, and age are strong independent prognostic factors for survival. By monitoring CEA, clear patterns with distinct prognostic value can be determined. CEA kinetics and/or response after 8-12 weeks might be a useful and simple tool to stratify the post-induction treatment approach based on individual prognosis in the future.

First-line treatment of pancreatic cancer patients with the combination of 5-fluorouracil/folinic acid plus gemcitabine: a multicenter phase II trial by the CONKO-study group.

PURPOSE: This open-label, multi-center phase II study investigated the efficacy and safety of the combination of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)/folinic acid (FA) plus gemcitabine (GFF) in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. The study is based on our completed dose finding phase I trial. METHODS: A total of 90 patients (pts) were recruited between 02/2000 and 04/2002 to receive 5-FU 750 mg/m(2) (24 h, i.v.), FA 500 mg/m(2) (2 h, i.v.) and gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m(2) (30 min, i.v.) on days 1, 8, 15, and 22. Treatment was repeated on day 43 until disease progression. The primary objective was the 1-year survival rate. The trial was conducted in compliance with the Declaration of Helsinki. RESULTS: The 1-year survival rate was 25% [95% CI: 16-34], median overall survival was 6.8 months [95% CI: 5.13-8.45], 9 patients showed partial responses (PR) so that the overall response rate was 10.3%. Overall control rate (PR + stable disease for at least 6 months) was 56%. Median time to progression was 4.6 months [95% CI: 3.68-5.52]. In 402 GFF cycles, we observed adverse events grade 3 in up to 10% of patients and grade 4 below 5% of patients. CONCLUSIONS: The GFF combination appears to be effective and well tolerated. This intravenous regimen represents an intensified therapy with low frequency of toxicities and seems to be convenient for patients who are unable to get oral anti-neoplastic medication. After these encouraging results, the German CONKO-002 trial investigated the GFF regimen versus single-agent gemcitabine.

Rapid and sustained influence of intravenous zoledronic Acid on course of pain and analgesics consumption in patients with cancer with bone metastases: a multicenter open-label study over 1 year.

BACKGROUND: Bone metastases might lead to severe bone pain, pathologic fractures, and hypercalcemia. Osteolytic destruction is caused by the activation of osteoclasts by release of tumor-derived stimulating factors. Bisphosphonates are known to inhibit osteoclast function and, therefore, to alleviate the adverse effects of tumor-induced bone resorption. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We investigated the effects of zoledronic acid on bone pain and use of analgesic medication in 604 patients with cancer with bone metastases in an openlabel multicenter study over 1 year. Patients were treated with a maximum of 12 infusions (4 mg) every 3 or 4 weeks. RESULTS: During treatment, the mean visual analog score value for pain (mm) decreased by 13.9 +/- 32.3 from 37.1 +/- 28.2 to 23.3 +/- 24.2 (P < .0001, t test, intent-to-treat population, n = 410) and the mean analgesic score decreased by 0.56 +/- 1.42 from 1.84 +/- 1.53 to 1.28 +/- 1.63 (P < .0001, t test). A statistically significant reduction in visual analog score pain could be observed within 1 week after initiation of treatment. Application of zoledronic acid was safe and well tolerated. CONCLUSION: Treatment with zoledronic acid in patients with cancer with bone metastases in a broad range of tumor types provides substantial benefit in terms of pain relief.

Prospective, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter, randomized phase III study with orally administered budesonide for prevention of irinotecan (CPT-11)-induced diarrhea in patients with advanced colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Unpredictable and severe diarrhea (NCI grade > or =3) remains a life-threatening adverse event in patients treated with irinotecan (CPT-11). The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of orally administered budesonide for prevention of CPT-11-induced delayed diarrhea in patients with advanced colorectal cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 56 patients with advanced colorectal cancer receiving CPT-11 therapy (125 mg/m2 once weekly) were enrolled in this multicenter trial. Patients were randomly treated with 3 mg budesonide orally 3 times daily versus placebo. Detailed assessment of diarrhea by monitoring stool frequency, stool consistency and loperamide rescue medication was made by keeping a diary. RESULTS: Diarrhea, defined as number of stools >4 occurring on a single day during the study period, could be prevented in 58.3% of the budesonide-treated patients compared to 38.5% of the patients under placebo. Patients in the budesonide group had less episodes (0.7 vs. 2.2 episodes) and a considerably shorter total duration of diarrhea (1.8 vs. 4.2 days) episodes than patients in the placebo group. Loperamide use was more frequent in the placebo than in the budesonide arm (55.6 vs. 41.7%). Also, exposure to rescue medication of loperamide was higher for placebo (36.2 capsules) than for budesonide (24.9 capsules). A superior prevention of diarrhea was observed for budesonide compared to placebo in the first cycle (14 vs. 10; p = 0.257), with more failures observed in the placebo group (16 vs. 10). CONCLUSION: This double-blind randomized trial failed to show that budesonide has a significant benefit in preventing CPT-11-induced diarrhea. While a trend exists, further trials are warranted.