Sexual health in Belgian cervical cancer survivors: an exploratory qualitative study.

PURPOSE: To assess experiences of sexuality and of receiving sexual healthcare in cervical cancer (CC) survivors. METHODS: A qualitative phenomenological study using semistructured one-on-one interviews was conducted with 15 Belgian CC survivors recruited in 5 hospitals from August 2021 to February 2022. The interviews were audiotaped and transcribed verbatim. Data were analyzed using inductive thematic analysis. COREQ and SRQR reporting guidelines were applied. RESULTS: Most participants experienced an altered sexuality after CC treatment with often long-term loss/lack of sex drive, little/no spontaneity, limitation of positions to avoid dyspareunia, less intense orgasms, or no sexual activity at all. In some cases, emotional intimacy became more prominent. Physical (vaginal bleeding, vaginal dryness, dyspareunia, menopausal symptoms) and psychological consequences (guilt, changed self-image) were at the root of the altered sexuality. Treatment-induced menopause reduced sex drive. In premenopausal patients, treatment and/or treatment-induced menopause resulted in the sudden elimination of family planning. Most participants highlighted the need to discuss their altered sexual experience with their partner to grow together toward a new interpretation of sexuality. To facilitate this discussion, most of the participants emphasized the need for greater partner involvement by healthcare providers (HPs). The oncology nurse or sexologist was the preferred HP with whom to discuss sexual health. The preferred timing for information about the sexual consequences of treatment was at treatment completion or during early follow-up. CONCLUSION: Both treatment-induced physical and psychological experiences were prominent and altered sexuality. Overall, there was a need for HPs to adopt proactive patient-tailored approaches to discuss sexual health.

Characteristics and effectiveness of mentoring programmes for specialized and advanced practice nurses: A systematic review.

AIMS: (1) To identify, evaluate and summarize evidence about the objectives and characteristics of mentoring programmes for specialized nurses (SNs) or nurse navigators (NNs) and advanced practice nurses (APNs) and (2) to identify the effectiveness of these programmes. DESIGN: A systematic review based on PRISMA guidelines. DATA SOURCES: From November 2022 until 7 December 2022, four databases were searched: PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL and The Cochrane Library. REVIEW METHODS: Study selection was performed independently by two researchers. Disagreements were discussed until consensus was reached. Data extraction was undertaken for included studies. Data synthesis was conducted using narrative analysis. Quality appraisal was performed using the Critical Appraisal Skill Programme (CASP) and Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT). RESULTS: Twelve articles were included, all of which focused on mentoring programmes for APNs. Different forms of mentorship (e.g. (in)formal mentorship, work shadowing, workshops) were reported. Studies reported positive outcomes on job retention (n = 5), job satisfaction (n = 6), skills improvement (n = 7), satisfaction with the programme (n = 7) and confidence improvement (n = 4) among participants of mentoring programmes. CONCLUSION: There is a lack of uniformity and consistency in various elements of mentoring programmes. Further research is needed to develop mentoring programmes for both APNs and SNs/NNs in a systematic and theoretically underpinned manner. It is necessary to establish a thorough evaluation methodology, preferably using a mixed methods design that includes both a qualitative process evaluation and a comprehensive outcome evaluation using validated questionnaires, taking into account the NN/APN, the interprofessional team and organizational level. IMPACT: The synthesis of evidence may be useful to organizations developing and implementing mentoring programmes for both SN/NN and APN. The development of a mentoring programme for nursing experts should be considered a complex intervention that requires theoretical frameworks and contextual considerations. NO PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: Not applicable, as no patients or public were involved.

Perspectives on seamless collaboration between primary and secondary care for oral anticancer treatments.

Patients who take oral anticancer drugs (OACD) alternate between the hospital and the community setting. Little is known about how general practitioners (GPs) and community pharmacists (CPs) from primary care (PC) can be involved in providing seamless care. In an exploratory qualitative study, semi-structured interviews with healthcare professionals from primary and secondary care (SC) and (N = 26) were performed to investigate perceptions of seamless collaboration for patients on OACD. Seamless collaboration initiated by SC was restricted to informing GPs about treatment-initiation and delegating limited tasks to them in treatment monitoring. CPs are currently not informed by SC about the treatment. PC expressed willingness for seamless collaboration. However, collaboration is currently impeded due to an expressed lack of trust and desire for control by SC. Moreover, SC expressed unfamiliarity with the organization of PC. Findings suggest that healthcare professionals from SC and PC need to get to know each other and to discuss expectations in the seamless care for patients on OACD. A possible strategy is to elaborate a shared care model based on a partnership between PC and SC, in which the specific expertise of each partner contributes to patient-centered care and the qualitative and safe use of OACD.

Evaluation of interprofessional care processes for patients treated with oral anticancer drugs.

Information on interprofessional team composition and functioning in the care for patients on oral anticancer drugs (OACDs), and how healthcare professionals (HCPs) evaluate in-hospital care processes is scarce. We aimed to investigate interprofessional care processes for OACD-patients in a partially mixed-methods study. A combination of (a) the CareProces Self-Evaluation Tool (CPSET), completed by HCP-team members by health profession who were either currently involved in care processes (oncologists and nurses) or potentially involved in future care (pharmacists, psychologists, social workers), and by hospital managers (N = 87) and (b) semi-structured interviews in a subsample of oncologists, nursing staff, and pharmacists (N = 26) were used. Care process coordination was evaluated poorly, mainly by nurses, pharmacists, and psychologists. Nurses and pharmacists believed that they were not engaged in the organization of OACD care, lacked role clarity, and perceived no meaningful interprofessional practice. HCPs had different perceptions toward timing and planning of patient education and follow-up. Monitoring of care processes occurred only occasionally and was unstructured resulting in apoor complication-management and variance within care processes. Care processes for OACD-patients showed opportunities for optimization of interprofessional practice in timing, planning, and monitoring. Rethinking care processes through co-design is needed.

Collaborative network to take responsibility for oral anticancer therapy (CONTACT): Study-protocol investigating the impact of a care pathway.

AIM: To evaluate the effectiveness, feasibility, meaningfulness and appropriateness of the development and implementation of a transmural care pathway in four hospitals in Flanders to improve self-management support in healthcare professionals and self-management in patients treated with oral anticancer drugs. DESIGN: A multicentre, prospective, interventional before-after study. METHOD: The development and implementation of the care pathway is based on the 7-phase method by Vanhaecht et al. (2012). Before and after, the care process will be evaluated from the perspective of patients, healthcare professionals in the hospital and from primary care and the available evidence. In both study-parts, a mixed methods approach will be used including observations, semi-structured interviews, focus groups and validated questionnaires for outcome assessments. The primary outcome is self-management in patients and self-efficacy and perception towards self-management in healthcare professionals. This study was funded in October 2015 and has been approved by the Ethics Committee in June 2016. DISCUSSION: Due to the growing number of patients taking oral anticancer drugs, there is need for a rigorous study that aims to optimize self-management in patients and self-management support provided by an interdisciplinary team of healthcare professionals (including oncology nurses and clinical nurse specialists). The care pathway should therefore consist of effective self-management supporting interventions and should clearly define the role of all stakeholders. IMPACT: This study attempts to obtain standardization, uniformity and continuity of self-management support provided by healthcare professionals to patients on oral anticancer drugs with the aim to achieve an adequate level of self-management. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov NCT02861209.

Role development, implementation and evaluation of nurse practitioners in a Belgian university hospital: a mixed methods study protocol.

INTRODUCTION: Due to the increased prevalence of chronic conditions, multimorbidity and an increased complexity of care, the burden on healthcare teams is high resulting in unmet needs of patients and their family and a high workload on healthcare professionals. To respond to these challenges, care models integrating nurse practitioners were introduced. Despite the proven benefits, implementation in Belgium is at an early stage. The aim of this study is to develop, implement and evaluate nurse practitioner roles in a Belgian university hospital. Insights into development and implementation processes can inform healthcare managers and policymakers for future (nationwide) implementation. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: For the development, implementation and (process-)evaluation of nurse practitioner roles in three departments in a Belgian university hospital, a participatory action research approach involving interdisciplinary teams of healthcare professionals, healthcare managers and researchers will be used. To investigate the effectiveness at patient (eg, quality of care), healthcare providers (eg, team effectiveness) and organisational level (eg, utility) a longitudinal (matched controlled) pre-post mixed methods study will be set up. Quantitative data (surveys, data from electronic patient files, administrative files) will be analysed using SPSS V.28.0. Qualitative data will be collected throughout the whole process and will consist of the meetings, (focus group) interviews and field notes. All qualitative data will be analysed thematically both across-case and within-case. This study is designed and will be reported based on the Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials 2013 statement. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval for all parts of this study was obtained from the Ethics Committee of the participating university hospital (February-August 2021). All participants throughout the study parts will receive written and verbal information and will be asked written consent. All data will be stored on a secured server. Only the primary researchers will have access to the data set. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT05520203.

How patient-centered is education and counseling of patients treated with oral anticancer drugs? A multicenter cross-sectional study.

OBJECTIVE: In this multicenter cross-sectional study, the quality of patient-centered education and counseling for patients treated with oral anticancer drugs was examined. METHODS: The CONTACT-Patient-Centered Care Questionnaire was administered to 266 patients, recruited in 11 Flemish hospitals. The questionnaire consists of 80 items, each evaluating the degree of performance of a key element in patient-centered education and counseling. RESULTS: In total, 15 key elements were seriously underperformed (degree of performance < 50%). Elements regarding adherence monitoring, specific topics in patient education, and involvement of the community pharmacist and home care nurse received a very low score. Only six key elements were systematically performed (degree of performance ≥ 90%), among which the elements on communication style and involvement of the general practitioner. CONCLUSION: This study uncovered three major gaps in patient-centered education and counseling of patients on oral anticancer drugs: unmet patient information needs due to shortcomings in patient education, inadequate adherence monitoring, and lacking collaboration with community pharmacists and home care nurses. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: This study highlights the need for interdisciplinary and patient-centered education and counseling of patients using OACD, including all key stakeholders: physicians, nurses, hospital pharmacists, general practitioners, community pharmacist and home care nurses.

Dynamics and processes influencing role integration of advanced practice nurses and nurse navigators in oncology teams.

PURPOSE: Exploring the persisting presence of underlying processes, dynamics, experienced barriers and facilitators of Advanced Practice Nurses (APN) in oncology and Oncology Nurse Navigators (ONN) during their role integration in an interprofessional team over a research period of seven years. METHODS: A qualitative study based on the principles of Grounded Theory, in which individual semi-structured interviews and focus groups were conducted with 51 ONN and APN from 11 university and local hospitals in Belgium between 2011-2018. Data were analyzed to develop a framework that consists of different themes. RESULTS: ONN and APN experienced a lonely journey during role integration. They were searching for partners, medical knowledge and acknowledgement from the interprofessional team. ONN and APN had a watchful attitude and tried to make themselves visible to ensure they were involved in the team and to preserve their role and responsibilities. An unclear role description to the interprofessional team, and a lack of coaching and guidance were influencing factors in the experience of ONN and APN. CONCLUSION: ONN and APN in oncology feel difficulties to integrate their role in existing interprofessional teams. A lack of role clarity, the interprofessional team environment and a desire for coaching and guidance are influencing factors to implement APN roles. Coaching and mentorship of novice ONN/APN and their interprofessional team and healthcare managers are needed to address these issues. These findings could form the basis for a mentorship program for ONN/APN and their interprofessional team to enhance role integration.

Associated factors of nurse-sensitive patient outcomes: A multicentred cross-sectional study in psychiatric inpatient hospitals.

WHAT IS ALREADY KNOWN?: The nurse-patient relationship in mental health care is an important focus of mental health nursing theories and research. There is limited evidence about which factors influence nurse-sensitive patient outcomes of the nurse-patient relationship. This hinders the development, planning, delivering, and quality assurance of the nurse-patient relationship in nursing practice and nursing education. WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS TO EXISTING KNOWLEDGE?: To our best knowledge, this is the first study to examine associations between nurse-sensitive patient outcomes of the nurse-patient relationship and a range of patient characteristics and relationship-contextual factors. In this study, we found that gender, age, hospital characteristics, nurse availability when needed, nurse contact, and nurse stimulation were associated with the scores on the nurse-sensitive patient outcome scale. WHAT ARE THE IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE?: Having insight into the factors associated with nurse-sensitive patient outcomes of the nurse-patient relationship can help nurses, nursing students, nursing management and also patients to enhance the nurse-patient relationship, trying to influence outcomes of nursing care. ABSTRACT: Introduction The lack of evidence on patient characteristics and relational-contextual factors influencing nurse-sensitive patient outcomes of a nurse-patient relationship is a possible threat to the quality and education of the nurse-patient relationship. Aim To measure nurse-sensitive patient outcomes of the nurse-patient relationship and to explore the associations between nurse-sensitive patient outcomes and a range of patient characteristics and relational-contextual factors. Method In a multicenter cross-sectional study, 340 inpatients from 30 units in five psychiatric hospitals completed the Mental Health Nurse-Sensitive Patient Outcome Scale. Descriptive, univariate and Linear Mixed Model analyses were conducted. Results Overall, patient-reported outcomes were moderate to good. Female participants, nurse availability when needed, more nurse contact and nurse stimulation were associated with higher outcomes. Age differences were observed for some of the outcomes. Outcomes also varied across hospitals but were not related to the number of times patients were hospitalized or to their current length of stay in the hospital. Discussion The results may help nurses to become more sensitive and responsive to factors associated with nurse-sensitive patient outcomes of the nurse-patient relationship. Implications The nurse-sensitive results can support nurses in designing future nurse-patient relationships.

Patients' experiences with the application of medical adhesives to the skin: a qualitative systematic review protocol.

INTRODUCTION: Medical adhesives are adhesives used in medical devices to establish and maintain contact with the body over a period of time (usually by application to the skin) and are widely used in most care settings. Application of medical adhesives to the skin can lead to skin stripping, mild or severe allergic reactions and skin irritation that may manifest as redness, itching or rash. Adhesive-related skin injury can lead to infection, delayed wound healing and an increased risk of scarring. These injuries can cause severe discomfort and pain, and can affect the patient's quality of life. A systematic review summarising patient's experiences on this topic will contribute to informing adhesive producers and policy makers, and guiding further development and improvement of available technologies. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This systematic review protocol is based on the principles of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols guideline. A systematic search will be conducted in CINAHL, EMBASE, MEDLINE and PsycINFO. In addition, manual searches will be performed, reviewing the reference lists of relevant reviews and articles included for quality assessment. Qualitative studies using various methods will be considered for inclusion. Screening of title, abstract and full text will be done by two reviewers. The methodological quality of studies under consideration will be critically assessed by two reviewers using the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Tool for Qualitative Research. Data extraction will be performed independently by two reviewers using a predefined data extraction form. Meta-aggregation will be used to summarise the evidence. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: No ethical approval or consent is required because no participants will be recruited. This systematic review protocol is published in an open access journal to increase transparency of the research methods used. Results will be disseminated at national and international conferences.

A self-directed co-creation process for developing a care pathway for patients on oral anticancer therapy: A qualitative process evaluation.

PURPOSE: To provide in-depth insight in stakeholders' experiences with the self-directed co-creation of a care pathway for patients treated with oral anticancer drugs, and to identify influencing factors for the success of the co-creation process that are persistent throughout the prior pilot phase and the scale-up phase. METHODS: This qualitative process evaluation was performed in 11 Belgian oncology departments participating in a scale-up project. Semi-structured interviews with local coordinators (n = 13) and members of the project teams (n = 19), responsible for the co-creation of the care pathway, were conducted. Data were thematically analyzed. RESULTS: Despite the external support (including group-level coaching and the use of well-defined supportive tools) to promote self-directedness, the co-creation process was perceived burdensome. Three influencing factors were persistent throughout the pilot and scale-up phase: a) shared leadership among the coordinator, physician and hospital management, b) an intrinsically motivated team driven by additional extrinsic factors, and c) a balance between external support and self-directedness. CONCLUSION: This study shows that the self-directed co-creation of a care pathway is feasible on the condition that important prerequisites are met, including shared leadership and team motivation. More concrete tools, such as a model care pathway, seem needed to increase feasibility of the self-directed co-creation of the care pathway. Yet, these tools should allow tailoring to the specific hospital context. The findings of this study can be useful for further scale-up to other oncology centers, but can also be extrapolated to other healthcare settings.

Patient-reported outcomes of the nurse-patient relationship in psychiatric inpatient hospitals: A multicentred descriptive cross-sectional study.

WHAT IS KNOWN ON THE SUBJECT?: Psychiatric and/or mental health nurses are struggling to measure the outcomes of the nurse-patient relationship. Collecting nurse-sensitive patient outcomes is a strategy to provide outcomes of a nurse-patient relationship from patients' perspectives. Because there was no validated scale, the Mental Health Nurse-Sensitive Patient Outcome-Scale (six-point Likert-scale) was recently developed and psychometrically evaluated. WHAT THE PAPER ADDS TO EXISTING KNOWLEDGE?: This is the first study using the Mental Health Nurse-Sensitive Patient Outcome-scale to measure nurse-sensitive patient outcomes of the nurse-patient relationship in psychiatric hospitals. Moderate to good average scores for the MH-NURSE-POS total (4.42) and domains scores (≥4.09). are observed. Especially outcomes related to 'motivation' to follow and stay committed to the treatment received high average scores (≥4.60). Our results are consistent with the patient-reported effect(s) of relation-based nursing in qualitative research. The scores generate evidence to support the outcomes of the nurse-patient relationship and implicates that further investment in (re)defining and elaborating nurse-patient relationships in mental healthcare is meaningful and justified. More comparative patient-reported data can determine how nurse-sensitive patient outcomes are affected by the patient, nurse, and context. WHAT ARE THE IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE?: Demonstrating patient-reported outcomes of the nurse-patient relationship can be important to enhance the therapeutic alliance between nurses and patients, organize responsive nursing care, and create nursing visibility in mental healthcare. Further nursing staff training on interpersonal competencies, such as self-awareness and cultural sensitivity, can be pivotal to achieving the patient-reported outcomes for inpatients with mental health problems. ABSTRACT: INTRODUCTION: Identifying patient-reported outcomes of the nurse-patient relationship is a priority in inpatient mental healthcare to guide clinical decision-making and quality improvement initiatives. Moreover, demonstrating nurse-sensitive patient outcomes can be a strategy to avoid further erosion of the specialism of psychiatric and/or mental health nursing. AIM/QUESTION: To measure nurse-sensitive patient outcomes of the nurse-patient relationship. METHOD: In a multicentred cross-sectional study, 296 inpatients admitted to five psychiatric hospitals completed the recently developed and validated Mental Health Nurse-Sensitive Patient Outcome-Scale (MH-NURSE-POS). The MH-NURSE-POS consists of 21 items (six-point Likert-scale) in four domains: 'growth', 'expression', 'control', and 'motivation'. RESULTS: Participants displayed moderate to good average scores for the MH-NURSE-POS total (4.42) and domain scores (≥4.09). Especially outcomes related to 'motivation' to follow and stay committed to the treatment received high average scores (≥4.60). DISCUSSION: The results demonstrate that patients perceive the nurse-patient relationship and the care given by psychiatric and/or mental health nurses as contributing to their treatment. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICES: Patient-reported outcomes can guide nurses and managers to provide and organize nursing care and to build a nurse-patient relationship that has a positive impact on these outcomes. Additionally, outcomes can create nursing visibility as a profession in- and outside mental healthcare.

A qualitative evaluation of the process of creating and implementing an interprofessional care pathway for patients treated with oral anticancer drugs.

PURPOSE: To investigate factors affecting the co-creation and implementation of care pathways for patients treated with oral anticancer drugs. METHODS: An explorative qualitative process evaluation was performed at four Belgian hospitals, co-creating and implementing a care pathway for patients on oral anticancer drugs. Semistructured interviews and focus groups were performed by a) local coordinators leading an interprofessional project team during the co-creation and implementation stage, b) external implementation coaches, and c) teams of healthcare professionals with a role in the care pathway. In total, 47 stakeholders were interviewed. Interviews were audio-taped, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed thematically. RESULTS: We found four factors affecting co-creation and implementation of care pathways for patients on oral anticancer drugs. Developing an adequate supporting context using motivated interprofessional project teams of clinical and management staff led by competent coordinators is one important facilitator. Leadership of local coordinators and oncologists is crucial for progressing the co-creation. Other factors included the complexity of the oral anticancer drug intervention, the interprofessional character of the care pathway, and involving primary care. External coaching during co-creation proved an important facilitator. CONCLUSIONS: Prior investigation of willingness and motivation to change in clinical and management staff, competent coordinators, and leadership of oncologists are needed. In addition, external support determines the success of co-creating and implementing care pathways for patients on oral anticancer drugs.

Patient-centered care coordination, education and counseling of patients treated with oral anticancer drugs: An importance-performance analysis.

PURPOSE: To analyse the importance and performance of key elements in patient-centered care coordination, education and counseling of patients treated with oral anticancer drugs. METHOD: In four Belgian non-academic hospitals, the importance and performance of a set of 82 key elements was cross-sectionally evaluated by primary and secondary healthcare professionals and by patients. These key elements were divided in 6 themes: coordination of care, style and content of patient contacts, medication counseling at treatment initiation, follow-up of treatment, psychosocial support, and involvement of family and friends. Participants were asked to indicate for each key element if it was implemented in the current care process for patients on oral anticancer drugs ('yes', 'no', 'I don't know') and if they considered it important that the component was implemented or would be in the future ('yes' or 'no'). Three levels of performance were defined, based on the number of participants who had answered 'yes' or 'no': 'systematically performed' (≥90% of participants), 'not systematically performed' (≥75% and <90%) and 'not performed' (<75%). Importance-rates were based on the number of 'yes' or 'no'. RESULTS: In total, 85 participants evaluated the key elements. More than half of key elements, 13/82 (15.9%) and 35/82 (42.6%) respectively, were considered as 'not' or 'not systematically performed'. The majority of these elements concerned coordination of care, medication counseling at treatment initiation and follow-up of treatment. Especially key elements on involving primary care and on discussing adherence had low performance rates. Nearly all key elements were assigned an importance score of ≥90%. CONCLUSIONS: Performance of key elements of patient-centered care coordination, education and counseling of patients treated with oral anticancer drugs proved moderate. Our findings suggest that strategies are needed to prioritize and operationalize key elements to coordinate transmural care and to provide effective education and counseling.

Key elements for the education and counselling of patients treated with oral anticancer drugs.

PURPOSE: The process of education and counselling of patients treated with oral anticancer drugs, aimed to achieve adequate self-management, involves different stakeholders (i.e. physicians, oncology nurses, pharmacists) from primary and secondary care. However, currently no guiding principles exist on how to organize and perform education and counselling for these patients. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to develop and build consensus on key elements for the education and counselling in patients on oral anticancer drugs. METHODS: A multi-method approach combining a literature search, semi-structured interviews with patients and healthcare professionals, and input from experts were used to develop an initial list of key elements. Subsequently, consensus was built in a two-round Delphi-study, involving patients and healthcare professionals from primary and secondary care. Key elements were retained if at least 80% of respondents in all groups considered the element as important or if in at least one group 90% consensus was reached. RESULTS: The initial list contained 110 key elements, divided in 7 themes: coordination of care, patient contacts: style and content, medication counselling at the start of the treatment and during follow-up, psychosocial support, and involvement of family and friends. After the first Delphi round, 80% consensus was reached for 23 elements; 6 new key elements were added. After the second round, 80% consensus was reached for 51 out of 116 elements; 31 elements were added following the 90%-rule, yielding a list of 82 elements. CONCLUSION: The final list of 82 key elements, obtained in this study, could be used to develop clinical pathways that guide adequate education and counselling of patients on oral anticancer drugs. Due to the open description, the implementation of these elements can be adapted to the specific context and composition of the oncology team.