Efficacy of Adductor Canal Block With Liposomal Bupivacaine: A Randomized Prospective Clinical Trial.

This study compared the postoperative analgesic efficacy of liposomal bupivacaine as a single-administration adductor canal block (ACB) vs periarticular injection (PAI) for pain control after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). From May 2016 to June 2017, a total of 70 unilateral TKA patients were randomized into 2 groups: PAI (extended-release bupivacaine 266 mg [20-mL vial] with 20 mL of 0.5% bupivacaine hydrochloride and normal saline to a total volume of 120 mL) and ACB (subsartorial saphenous nerve using extended-release bupivacaine 266 mg [20-mL vial]). All patents underwent spinal anesthesia with comprehensive preemptive and postoperative multi-modal pain protocol. All opioids administered were converted to morphine equivalents. Pain was recorded at 4 to 12 hours on the day of surgery, and on postoperative days 1, 2, and 3. Patients and investigators other than the surgeon and anesthesiologist were blinded to the study. The difference in pain scores between the PAI and ACB groups was not statistically significant during the first 12 hours (day 0) after surgery or on postoperative day 1 (5.31 vs 4.26, P=.091). However, on postoperative day 3, the mean pain score increased in the ACB group and decreased in the PAI group (4.8 vs 1.83, P=.037). There was no statistically significant difference between the 2 groups regarding the accumulative daily converted morphine equivalent consumption or total consumption. Although the PAI group demonstrated longer lasting pain relief than the ACB group for the duration of the study, other outcomes were similar between the 2 groups. [Orthopedics. 2020; 43(1):e47-e53.].

Use of a Modified Rep Model in Primary Joint Arthroplasty: Lessons Learned.

Orthopedic implant device sales representatives ("reps") can provide intraoperative guidance based on their product knowledge, as part of their many responsibilities. However, for experienced high-volume arthroplasty surgeons, a representative may not be required in the room for most primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) procedures. The goal of this study was to describe the authors' experience with a modified rep model for primary TKA. Between January and December 2017, a total of 100 unilateral primary TKAs were performed with a modified rep model and compared with 100 primary TKAs that were performed before this protocol. The authors adopted 2 additional initiatives to institute this protocol safely: (1) improved education of operating room staff and allocation of responsibilities; and (2) reengineering of the existing surgical trays. No perioperative complications, including readmission, periprosthetic fracture, or infection, occurred in either group. In addition, no difference was found in mean length of stay between the modified rep and conventional cohorts (2.2 and 2.4 days, respectively; P=.49). Mean operating room time was less with the modified rep cohort (102.1 vs 117.8 minutes; P<.001), as was total instrument turnover time in the operating room (13.9 vs 29.7 minutes; P<.0001) and in central sterilization (59.4 vs 126.8 minutes; P<.001). No errors occurred with implant accuracy or trays, and there was no need to change the type of implant with the modified rep model, compared with 6% of trays requiring additional sterilization with the conventional model. The negotiated implant cost with the modified rep model was approximately $2000 less than that for the conventional group. This study found that the modified rep model for primary TKA is safe and has the potential for substantial cost savings. [Orthopedics. 2020;43(6):e538-e542.].

Using Emergency Department Data to Inform Specialty Strategy: Analyzing the Distribution of 13,777 Consecutive Immediate Orthopaedic Consults in an Urban Community Emergency Department.

Although an estimated 20% of emergency department (ED) visits are musculoskeletal in nature, it is unclear which of these require urgent orthopaedic consultation and which orthopaedic subspecialties are best suited for these consults. When an ED's internal staff does not have necessary orthopaedic coverage, transfer to other facilities is required. However, transfers pose major inconveniences and financial burdens to patients and can lead to long ED wait times, hospital financial loss from walk outs, decreased patient safety, and decreased staff morale. Therefore, it is beneficial for a hospital to have the appropriate staff readily available for consults. Data can be used to assess the orthopaedic needs of an ED. We evaluated the nature of urgent ED consults requesting the timely presence of an orthopaedic provider. Methods: Between the years 2008 and 2017, the Orthopaedics Department of this Health System saw 13,777 patients from the ED requesting immediate consult from an orthopaedic provider. We retrospectively analyzed the distribution of anatomic areas and nature of these injuries for these visits. Results: Hand, foot, and ankle consults comprised 75% of the volume. Knee, hip, and spine accounted for 15% of consults. Most injuries were fractures. Infections and sprains were also common. Discussion: By determining and understanding this distribution, orthopaedic departments can improve their organization to better respond to urgent ED consults, allowing for the proper delivery of orthopaedic point-of-care service to patients, increased revenue for the hospital, proper availability of core competencies, and increased value to the healthcare delivery system as a whole. We also believe that the trends observed in our data are largely generalizable to EDs serving urban communities similar to ours. Thus, these results can help inform a synergistic strategy for the system comprising EDs, urgent care clinics, and orthopaedic surgeons servicing them.

The electronic medical office: optimizing solutions.

Optimizing the care for patients in the orthopaedic clinical setting involves a wide range of issues. Surgical techniques, preoperative and postoperative care, long-term outcomes follow-up, continuing education, and patient communication are a few of the important areas that surgeons deal with on a regular basis. Successful management of this information has an impact on clinical outcomes, direct patient care, financial decisions, and management of the surgeon's time. The development of a comprehensive electronic medical office is a powerful and probably necessary tool to successfully manage such information and achieve the goals of an effective and safe orthopaedic practice.

Routine Preoperative Venous Doppler Screening Is Not Effective in Preventing Thromboembolic Events After Total Joint Arthroplasty.

Despite advances in thromboprophylaxis, the relationship between preexisting deep venous thromboses (DVTs) and postoperative thromboembolic complications is not fully established. The aim of this study was to assess the utility of selective and nonselective preoperative lower extremity venous Doppler screening protocols as tools in reducing the incidence of thromboembolic events (DVT/pulmonary embolism [PE]) after total joint arthroplasty. In the 2-year period from August 2013 to August 2015, a total of 455 consecutive elective primary total joint arthroplasties were identified from the authors' database. During the first year, a selective preoperative Doppler ultrasound screening protocol (only patients with a history of DVT/PE) was used for 182 patients, 31 of whom had preoperative ultrasound scans. The following year, a nonselective screening protocol was used for 273 consecutive patients, all of whom had preoperative Doppler ultrasound scans. All patients were followed for a minimum of 3 months postoperatively for postoperative Doppler ultrasound scans, emergency department visits, and readmissions related to DVT/PE. Preoperatively, there was no difference between the selective and nonselective cohorts regarding preoperative DVTs (3 and 1, respectively; P=.307); all patients were known to have prior DVT. Postoperative thromboembolic events were found in 4 (2.6%) of the patients in the selective cohort and 2 (0.7%) of the patients in the nonselective cohort (P=.196). Use of a nonselective preoperative Doppler ultrasound screening protocol did not improve the identification of preoperative DVTs or reduce postoperative thromboembolic complications. [Orthopedics. 2018; 41(2):e202-e206.].