RESUMO
Nurses and clinicians require knowledge and training of their facilities' code blue response cart to manage emergency scenarios. However, the nurses who access the carts change frequently through turnover and role changes. An augmented reality training solution was built for mobile devices, but encountered distribution and access challenges. This study evaluated the conversion of the mobile application to a desktop-based version deployed via a learning management system. Eight hundred fifty clinicians were assigned the interactive learning product, which collected anonymous usage data and an optional feedback survey within the module. Of 850 assigned users, 468 completed the module, and 338 completed the feedback survey. Respondents indicated a positive difference of 25.3% in retrospective pre/post confidence and an appreciation for the features of the product. Performance measured by decreasing total item search time appeared to level off after three plays. The format transition was successful, allowing the same widespread distribution as the mobile versions of [X]. Feedback gathered will drive improvements in the module.
RESUMO
PURPOSE: The literature assessing the process of note-writing based on gathered information is scant. This scoping review investigates methods of providing feedback on learners' note-writing abilities. METHOD: Scopus and Web of Science were searched for studies that investigated feedback on student notes or reviewed notes written on an information or data-gathering activity in health care and other fields in August 2022. Of 426 articles screened, 23 met the inclusion criteria. Data were extracted on the article title, publication year, study location, study aim, study design, number of participants, participant demographics, level of education, type of note written, field of study, form of feedback given, source of the feedback, and student or participant rating of feedback method from the included articles. Then possible themes were identified and a final consensus-based thematic analysis was performed. RESULTS: Themes identified in the 23 included articles were as follows: (1) learners found faculty and peer feedback beneficial; (2) direct written comments and evaluation tools, such as rubrics or checklists, were the most common feedback methods; (3) reports on notes in real clinical settings were limited (simulated clinical scenarios in preclinical curriculum were the most studied); (4) feedback providers and recipients benefit from having prior training on providing and receiving feedback; (5) sequential or iterative feedback was beneficial for learners but can be time intensive for faculty and confounded by maturation effects; and (6) use of technology and validated assessment tools facilitate the feedback process through ease of communication and improved organization. CONCLUSIONS: The various factors influencing impact and perception of feedback include the source, structure, setting, use of technology, and amount of feedback provided. As the utility of note-writing in health care expands, studies are needed to clarify the value of note feedback in learning and the role of innovative technologies in facilitating note feedback.