Quality of Life and Real-time Patient Experience During Neoadjuvant Therapy: A Prospective Cohort Study.

OBJECTIVE: To use a customized smartphone application to prospectively measure QOL and the real-time patient experience during neoadjuvant therapy (NT). BACKGROUND: NT is increasingly used for patients with localized gastrointestinal (GI) cancers. There is little data assessing patient experience and quality of life (QOL) during NT for GI cancers. METHODS: Patients with GI cancers receiving NT were instructed on using a customized smartphone application through which the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G) questionnaire, a validated measure of health-related QOL, was administered at baseline, every 30 days, and at the completion of NT. Participants also tracked their moods and symptoms and used free-text journaling functionalities in the application. Mean overall and subsection health-related QOL scores were calculated during NT. RESULTS: Among 104 enrolled patients, the mean age was 60.5 ± 11.5 years and 55% were males. Common cancer diagnoses were colorectal (40%), pancreatic (37%), and esophageal (15%). Mean overall FACT-G scores did not change during NT ( P = 0.987). While functional well-being scores were consistently the lowest and social well-being scores the highest, FACT subscores similarly did not change during NT (all P > 0.01). The most common symptoms reported during NT were fatigue, insomnia, and anxiety (39.3%, 34.5%, and 28.3% of patient entries, respectively). Qualitative analysis of free-text journaling entries identified anxiety, fear, and frustration as the most common themes, but also the importance of social support systems and confidence in health care providers. CONCLUSIONS: While patient symptom burden remains high, results of this prospective cohort study suggest QOL is maintained during NT for localized GI cancers.

Surgeon Perspectives on the Management of Aborted Cancer Surgery: Results of a Society of Surgical Oncology Member Survey.

BACKGROUND: While surgery is generally necessary for most solid-organ cancers, curative-intent resection is occasionally aborted due to unanticipated unresectability or occult metastases. Following aborted cancer surgery (ACS), patients have unique and complex care needs and yet little is known about the optimal approach to their management. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to define the practice patterns and perspectives of an international cohort of cancer surgeons on the management of ACS. METHODS: A validated survey assessing surgeon perspectives on patient care needs and management following ACS was developed. The survey was distributed electronically to members of the Society of Surgical Oncology (SSO). RESULTS: Among 190 participating surgeons, mean age was 49 ± 11 years, 69% were male, 61% worked at an academic institution, and most had a clinical practice focused on liver/pancreas (30%), breast (23%), or melanoma/sarcoma cancers (20%). Participants estimated that ACS occurred in 7 ± 6% of their cancer operations, most often due to occult metastases (67%) or local unresectability (30%). Most surgeons felt (very) comfortable addressing their patients' surgical needs (92%) and cancer treatment-related questions (90%), but fewer expressed comfort addressing psychosocial needs (83%) or symptom-control needs (69%). While they perceived discussing next available therapies as the patients' most important priority after ACS, surgeons reported avoiding postoperative complications as their most important priority (p < 0.001). While 61% and 27% reported utilizing palliative care and psychosocial oncology, respectively, in these situations, 46% noted care coordination as a barrier to addressing patient care needs. CONCLUSIONS: Results from this SSO member survey suggest that ACS is relatively common and associated with unique patient care needs. Surgeons may feel less comfortable assessing psychosocial and symptom-control needs, highlighting the need for novel patient-centered approaches.

Advances in the clinical use of patient-reported outcomes in thoracic surgery.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are increasingly recognized as a clinical tool for measuring and improving patient-centric care. This review provides a summary on recent advances in the use of PROs in the field of thoracic surgery. RECENT FINDINGS: PROs have been used as primary endpoints in clinical trials and observational studies evaluating clinical care pathways and quantifying the benefits of minimally invasive surgical techniques for patients undergoing lung surgery. Qualitative and quantitative research has yielded fundamental insights into which PRO domains are meaningful and valued by patients after lung surgery. Patient experience and recovery after esophagectomy have been further characterized by using PROs. New disease-specific survey tools for patients have been developed to track long-term symptoms after esophageal reconstruction. Patient satisfaction has emerged as the key metric used to gauge the patient centeredness of hospital systems. SUMMARY: Advances have been made in the application of PROs in multiple areas of thoracic surgery, which include lung and esophageal surgery. The growing focus on the use of PROs in clinical pathways has led to a better understanding on how to optimize patient experience.

Segmentectomy for clinical stage I non-small cell lung cancer: National benchmarks for nodal staging and outcomes by operative approach.

BACKGROUND: Segmentectomy is increasingly used for parenchyma sparing anatomical resection for small stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This study characterizes the national outcomes for lymph node assessment and perioperative outcomes of segmentectomy for clinical stage I NSCLC by robotic-assisted surgery (RATS), video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS), and open thoracotomy approach. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted of patients who underwent segmentectomy for clinical stage I NSCLC captured in the national Society of Thoracic Surgeons General Thoracic Surgery Database between years 2012 and 2018. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was used to balance baseline characteristics. Lymph node (LN) staging and 30-day outcomes were compared by approach. RESULTS: A total of 3680 patients (VATS 61.9%, RATS 20%, open 18%) underwent segmentectomy. The IPTW adjusted rate of pathologic LN upstaging (pN1/pN2) was 6.2% (RATS 6.3%, VATS 5.6%, open 8.6%; P = .05). On multivariate analysis, there was no differences in pN1/N2 upstaging between RATS (odds ratio [OR], 0.81; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.44-1.49) or VATS (OR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.57-1.63) with open segmentectomy. The RATS and VATS approach was associated with fewer postoperative events (RATS 31.3%, VATS 28.8%, open 38.3%; P < .001) and shorter length of stay (RATS 4.3 days, VATS 4.4 days, open 5.2 days; P < .001) as compared with thoracotomy. RATS segmentectomy-specific complications included a higher rate of pneumothorax after chest tube removal and discharge with chest tube. Major complications were lower after RATS and VATS as compared with open segmentectomy (RATS 5.9%, VATS 4.5%, open 7.2%; P = .028). CONCLUSIONS: Segmentectomy by VATS and robotic approach resulted in similar high rates of lymph node upstaging as a global marker of the quality of lymph node dissection and were associated with lower overall morbidity and shorter length of stay as compared with open thoracotomy. These national outcomes may serve as benchmarks for future comparative studies.

Nomograms for predicting overall and recurrence-free survival after trimodality therapy for esophageal adenocarcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Locally advanced esophageal carcinoma is treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiation and esophagectomy. Patients may still experience recurrence and death despite undergoing potentially curative trimodality therapy. This study describes predictive nomograms for recurrence-free (RFS) and overall survival (OS) after the completion of trimodality therapy. METHODS: A total of 215 patients with esophageal adenocarcinoma underwent trimodality therapy from September 2010 to April 2018. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to create nomograms for OS and RFS. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were calculated for OS and RFS comparing high-risk and low-risk cohorts. RESULTS: On multivariate analysis, clinical N-stage, tumor differentiation, tumor regression grade, anastomotic leak, body mass index, age, and number of lymph nodes removed were predictive variables for overall survival. Clinical N-stage, tumor differentiation, tumor regression grade, anastomotic leak, age, and positive lymph nodes were significant predictors of RFS in a multivariate model. The nomogram for OS had good predictive ability (Harrell's Concordance index [C-index]: 0.71 [95% confidence interval {CI}: 0.66-0.76]). The nomogram for RFS also performed well (C-index: 0.70 [95% CI: 0.65-0.74]). CONCLUSION: Our nomograms can accurately predict OS and RFS after trimodality therapy and may provide guidance regarding adjuvant therapy and surveillance.

Racial disparities in provider recommendation for esophagectomy for esophageal carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Racial disparities currently exist for the utilization rate of esophagectomy for Black patients with operable esophageal carcinoma. METHODS: A total of 37 271 cases with the American Joint Committee on Cancer clinical stage I, II, and III esophageal carcinoma that were reported to the National Cancer Database were analyzed between 2004 and 2016. A multivariable-adjusted logistic regression model was used to evaluate differences in the odds ratio of esophagectomy not being recommended based on race. Kaplan-Meier curves and log-rank tests were used to evaluate differences in overall survival. Propensity score methodology with inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was used to balance baseline differences in patient demographics. RESULTS: After IPTW adjustment, we identified 30 552 White patients and 3529 Black patients with clinical stage I-III esophageal carcinoma. Black patients had three times greater odds of not being recommended for esophagectomy (odds ratio: 3.03, 95% confidence interval: 2.67-3.43, p < 0.0001) compared to White patients. Black patients demonstrated significantly worse 3- and 5-year overall survival rates compared to White patients (log-rank p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Black patients with clinical stage I-III esophageal cancer were significantly less likely to be recommended for esophagectomy even after adjusting for baseline demographic covariates compared to White patients.

A successful clinical pathway protocol for minimally invasive esophagectomy.

BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive esophagectomy is associated with significant morbidity, which can substantially influence the hospital length of stay for patients. Anastomotic leak is the most devastating complication. Minimizing major postoperative complications can facilitate adherence to a clinical pathway protocol and can decrease hospital length of stay. METHODS: This is a retrospective study of 130 patients who underwent an elective laparoscopic and thoracoscopic Ivor Lewis esophagectomy for esophageal carcinoma between August 2014 and June 2018. A total of 112 patients (86%) underwent neoadjuvant chemoradiation. All of the 130 patients underwent a laparoscopic gastric devascularization procedure a median of 15 days prior to the esophagectomy. The target discharge date was postoperative day number 8. RESULTS: Thirty patients (23.08%) had postoperative complications. Atrial fibrillation (20 patients) [15.38%] was the most frequent complication. Four patients (3.1%) developed an anastomotic leak. There was one postoperative death (0.77%) in the cohort of patients. The median length of stay was 8 days. The mean length of stay for patients without complications was 8 days ± 1.2 days and 12.4 days ± 7.1 days for patients with one or more complications (p = 0.002). CONCLUSION: The development of postoperative complications after minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy significantly increases hospital length of stay. Performing the operation with a specialized tandem surgical team and including preoperative ischemic preconditioning of the stomach minimizes overall and anastomotic complications and facilitates on time hospital discharge as defined by a perioperative clinical pathway protocol.

Defining the learning curve of robotic thoracic surgery: what does it take?

BACKGROUND: Controversy exists as to what constitutes a learning curve to achieve competency, and how the initial learning period of robotic thoracic surgery should be approached. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review of the literature published prior to December 2018 using PubMed/MEDLINE for studies of surgeons adopting the robotic approach for anatomic lung resection or thymectomy. Changes in operating room time and outcomes based on number of cases performed, type of procedure, and existing proficiency with video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) were examined. RESULTS: Twelve observational studies were analyzed, including nine studies on robotic lung resection and three studies on thymectomy. All studies showed a reduction in operative time with an increasing number of cases performed. A steep learning curve was described for thymectomy, with a decrease in operating room time in the first 15 cases and a plateau after 15-20 cases. For anatomic lung resection, the number of cases to achieve a plateau in operative time ranged between 15-20 cases and 40-60 cases. All but two studies had at least some VATS experience. Six studies reported on experience of over one hundred cases and showed continued gradual improvements in operating room time. CONCLUSION: The learning curve for robotic thoracic surgery appears to be rapid with most studies indicating the steepest improvement in operating time occurring in the initial 15-20 cases for thymectomy and 20-40 cases for anatomic lung resection. Existing data can guide a standardized robotic curriculum for rapid adaptation, and aid credentialing and quality monitoring for robotic thoracic surgery programs.

Long-Term Survival in Patients with Gastroesophageal Junction Cancer Treated with Preoperative Therapy: Do Thoracic and Abdominal Approaches Differ?

BACKGROUND: The optimal surgical approach for gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) cancer treated with preoperative therapy remains controversial. We compared the outcomes of patients who underwent either esophagectomy or gastrectomy and identified variables associated with overall survival (OS). METHODS: We reviewed records of patients with Siewert types II and III GEJ adenocarcinoma who were treated with preoperative therapy followed by resection from 1995 to 2013. OS was assessed using Kaplan-Meier curves and associated variables were analyzed using Cox proportional hazards models. RESULTS: Of 143 patients, 110 (76.9 %) had type II and 33 (23.1 %) had type III tumors. Most (86 %) patients had stage T3 or T4 disease, and more than half had N+ (62 %) disease. The majority (93 %) received neoadjuvant chemoradiation; 7 % received chemotherapy alone. Patients with type II tumors underwent either esophagectomy (75 %) or gastrectomy (25 %). Patients with type III tumors primarily underwent gastrectomy (88 %). Eighty-six (60 %) patients underwent extended (D1+/D2) abdominal lymphadenectomy. We saw no differences between esophagectomy and gastrectomy patients in R0 resection rate (94 vs. 95 %; p = 0.9), number of nodes removed (mean, 18.3 vs. 19.3; p = 0.6), or 60-day mortality rate (4 vs. 4 %; p = 1.0). The median follow-up period for survivors was 65 months. Esophagectomy and gastrectomy showed similar 5-year OS rates (49 vs. 53 %; p = 0.8). Surgical approach was not associated with OS [hazard ratio (HR) 1.30; 95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.68-2.45; p = 0.43]. The strongest predictor of OS was extended lymphadenectomy (HR 0.55; 95 % CI, 0.32-0.94; p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: R0 resection and OS rates were similar in patients undergoing esophagectomy or gastrectomy after neoadjuvant therapy; however, extended abdominal lymphadenectomy may improve OS rates.

Regional disparities affect treatment and survival of patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma--a Texas Cancer Registry analysis.

BACKGROUND: Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) is often diagnosed at advanced stage and few patients qualify for resection. Effects of barriers to access on outcomes are unknown. We hypothesized that income and rural residence account for delays in treatment and decreased survival. METHODS: Texas Cancer Registry was queried for ICC patients from 2000 to 2008. Median household income (MHI) and urban/rural status were analyzed. Regression analyses were performed for (1) time-to- treatment (TTT), and (2) overall survival (OS). RESULTS: Among 1,089 patients, 20.2% patients resided in rural areas and MHI ranged $24,497-$81,113/year. Primary treatment included surgery for 9.5%, radiation 5.4% and chemotherapy 21.0%. Median TTT was 29 (range 0-235) days. Patients from low-income areas were less likely to receive treatment (below median MHI, 29.7% vs. above median MHI, 37.5%%; P = 0.007). MHI was associated with TTT (per $10,000/year: hazard ratio (HR) = 1.05; 95% CI: 1.01-1.09). Adjusting for stage, MHI was associated with OS (per $10,000/year: HR = 0.97; 95%CI: 0.94-0.99). Rural residence was neither associated with TTT nor OS. CONCLUSION: Overall treatment rates for ICC patients are low. Regional income, not urbanization was associated treatment and survival independent of stage. Further research is needed to determine how regional prosperity relates to care access.

Management of Major Complications After Esophagectomy.

Esophagectomy remains a procedure with one of the highest complication rates. Given the advances in medical and surgical management of patients and increased patient survival, the number of complications reported has increased. There are different grading systems for complications which vary based on severity or organ system, with the Esophageal Complications Consensus Group unifying them. Management involves conservative intervention and dietary modification to endoscopic interventions and surgical reintervention. Treatment is etiology specific but rehabilitation and patient optimization play a significant role in managing these complications by preventing them. Management is a step-up approach depending on the severity of symptoms.

Sublobar Resection vs Lobectomy for Stage IA Non-Small Cell Lung Carcinoma-Takeaways From Modern Randomized Trials.

Sublobar resection for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer has been an emerging topic of great interest to thoracic surgeons. However, data regarding the efficacy and safety of sublobar resection vs lobectomy was lacking until now. Recently, 3 published randomized controlled trials (Cancer and Leukemia Group B [CALGB]140503/Alliance, Japan Clinical Oncology Group [JCOG]0802 and Das Deutsche Register Klinischer Studien [DRKS]00004897) confirmed the noninferiority of sublobar resection for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer in carefully selected populations. This review aims to summarize and compare these 3 landmark trials and inform surgeons of new best practices.

Perioperative Immunotherapy for Node-Negative Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer-Current Evidence and Future Directions.

Neoadjuvant immunotherapy has gone from an idea to an indication in locally advanced lung cancer. Several phase III trials have demonstrated the superiority of neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy compared with chemotherapy in this setting. Although such progress has revolutionized the treatment of locally advanced disease, the unmet needs of stage I and stage II patients without lymph node disease have largely been underrepresented in existing trials. Up-front resection with few patients going on to complete adjuvant therapy remains the norm for most stage I and II patients. Emerging evidence now supports the exploration of supplemental checkpoint blockade in well-selected early-stage, node-negative patients with large tumors and no actionable driver mutations. Although concerns surrounding safety and risk exist, patient selection could be substantially improved using novel biomarker approaches that leverage our understanding of the tumor immune microenvironment of lung cancer. This review provides a comprehensive overview of the opportunities and controversies of perioperative immunotherapy in node-negative lung cancer.

Rotational Latissimus Dorsi Flap for Lateral Repair of Thoracic Cerebrospinal Fluid-Pleural Fistula: Case Report.

BACKGROUND AND IMPORTANCE: Giant calcified thoracic discs are challenging surgical pathologies that tend to be more centrally located and calcified. This complicates the removal process and potentiates the formation of dural defects, resulting in persistent cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leaks and the formation of pleural fistulas. The typical intervention for this is CSF diversion through external ventricular drain or lumbar drain placement, followed by direct repair. However, if all these measures fail, subsequent salvage techniques have not been described previously. CLINICAL PRESENTATION: A 45-year-old man with past medical history of obesity (body mass index: 58), hypertension, and type 2 diabetes mellitus presented to the emergency department with thoracic myelopathy symptoms. MR demonstrated a giant calcified thoracic discs at T7-T8 with severe spinal cord compression. Intraoperatively, the disc was found fused to the dura and removal caused a large ventrolateral dural dehiscence. CSF diversion and direct repair were attempted unsuccessfully, so a salvage procedure with a rotational pedicled latissimus dorsi flap was performed. The patient's latissimus dorsi was exposed and resected from attachments, maintaining thoracodorsal blood supply, while removing thoracodorsal innervation. The flap was then rotated into the previous corpectomy site. The dural defect was repaired with a sealant patch, overlayed with a parietal pleural flap and the latissimus dorsi flap. By the patient's last follow-up, he had full functional independence at home. CONCLUSION: We present a surgical case highlighting the challenges of managing postoperative CSF-pleural fistula occurring after giant calcified thoracic disc removal and the successful use of a novel rotational latissimus dorsi flap to definitively repair the fistula after unsuccessful primary interventions.

National learning curves among robotic thoracic surgeons in the United States: Quantifying the impact of procedural experience on efficiency and productivity gains.

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to characterize the aggregate learning curves of US surgeons for robotic thoracic procedures and to quantify the impact on productivity. METHODS: National average console times relative to cumulative case number were extracted from the My Intuitive application (Version 1.7.0). Intuitive da Vinci robotic system data for 56,668 lung resections performed by 870 individual surgeons between 2021 and 2022 were reviewed. Console time and hourly productivity (work relative value units/hour) were analyzed using linear regression models. RESULTS: Average console times improved for all robotic procedures with cumulative case experience (P = .003). Segmentectomy and thymectomy had the steepest initial learning curves with a 33% and 34% reduction of the average console time for proficient (51-100 cases) relative to novice surgeons (1-10 cases), respectively. The hourly productivity increase for proficient surgeons ranged from 11.4 work relative value units/hour (+26%) for lobectomy to 17.0 work relative value units/hour (+50%) for segmentectomy. At the expert level (101+ cases), average console times continued to decrease significantly for esophagectomy (-18%) and lobectomy (-23%), but only minimally for wedge resections (-1%) (P = .003). The work relative value units/hour increase at the expert level reached 50% for lobectomy and 40% for esophagectomy. Surgeon experience level, dual console use, system model, and robotic stapler use were factors independently associated with console time for robotic lobectomy. CONCLUSIONS: The aggregate learning curve for robotic thoracic surgeons in the United States varies significantly by procedure type and demonstrate continued improvements in efficiency beyond 100 cases for lobectomy and esophagectomy. Improvements in efficiency with growing experiences translate to substantial productivity gains.

Pedicled osteomyocutaneous pectoralis major flap with osseous rib harvest for salvage mandibular reconstruction: Case and technique.

In the era of free flap reconstruction, mandibular defects are routinely reconstructed with osseous free flaps, and non-free flap bony reconstruction options are limited. A patient with T4N0 mandibular squamous cell carcinoma underwent resection with fibula free flap reconstruction of a parasymphyseal to angle defect. After free flap failure due to venous congestion, the flap was explanted. He declined additional free flap reconstruction and elected to proceed with pedicled osteomyocutaneous pectoralis major with rib. In this case presentation, we discuss the technical details of harvest of this flap using the 6th rib. The pedicled osteomyocutaneous pectoralis major flap with osseous rib harvest, which is infrequently described in the literature, remains a viable option for bony reconstruction, particularly in the salvage setting.

A comparison of right posterior sectorectomy with formal right hepatectomy: a dual-institution study.

OBJECTIVES: Right posterior sectorectomy (RPS) preserves liver volume but typically requires a longer parenchymal transection distance than does right hepatectomy (RH). This study was conducted to define the advantages of one approach over the other. METHODS: Databases at two institutions were retrospectively reviewed for all patients submitted to RPS or RH between January 2000 and August 2012. Primary outcomes were perioperative complications and 90-day mortality. RESULTS: Patients undergoing RPS (n = 100) and RH (n = 480), respectively, were similar in demographics, comorbidities, operative indications and Model for End-stage Liver Disease (MELD) mean scores (7.8 in the RPS group and 7.7 in the RH group; P = 0.49). A comparison of the RPS group with the RH group showed no significant differences in mean estimated blood loss (697 ml versus 713 ml; P = 0.900), rate of transfusions (19.2% versus 17.1%; P = 0.720), margin-positive resection (9.2% versus 11.6%; P = 0.70), complications (41.8% versus 42.0%; P = 1.000), bile leak (3.0% versus 4.0%; P = 1.000), or length of stay (7.5 days versus 8.3 days; P = 0.360). Postoperative hepatic insufficiency (defined as a postoperative bilirubin level of >7 mg/dl or significant ascites), occurred less frequently after RPS (1.0% versus 8.5%; P = 0.005). Operation type remained an independent determinant of postoperative hepatic insufficiency after controlling for preoperative risk factors (RH: hazard ratio = 9.628, 95% confidence interval 1.295-71.573; P = 0.027). A total of 28 (4.8%) patients died within 90 days; these included 25 (5.2%) patients in the RH group and three (3.0%) in the RPS group (P = 0.449). CONCLUSIONS: Despite similar blood loss and overall morbidity, RPS is associated with less hepatic insufficiency than RH. Right posterior sectorectomy is parenchyma-sparing and should be strongly considered when it is technically feasible and oncologically sound.

Case report: Pulmonary synovial sarcoma in a long-term survivor of childhood Hodgkin lymphoma.

Solid organ malignancies have been reported in survivors of Hodgkin lymphoma treated with chemoradiation; however, to the best of our knowledge no cases of pulmonary synovial sarcoma have been documented in the literature in this cohort. We herein provide a detailed description of synovial sarcoma occurring in the lung of a long-term survivor of childhood Hodgkin lymphoma. A 29-year-old female never smoker with past medical history of Hodgkin lymphoma diagnosed at the age of 7 years and treated with chemotherapy and radiation therapy was admitted for management of pneumothorax. Wedge lung resection of an ulcerated subpleural nodule revealed a malignant spindle cell tumor that based on light microscopic and immunohistochemical features was classified as monophasic synovial sarcoma. The diagnosis was further confirmed by identification of SS18 (SYT) rearrangement by fluorescence in situ hybridization and SS18-SSX1 gene fusion by RNA sequencing. The case documents a rare occurrence of synovial sarcoma in a long-term survivor of childhood Hodgkin lymphoma. While comprising a typical genetic profile for synovial sarcoma, the tumor had unusual histological features such as cystic and low-grade morphology. The case suggests that synovial sarcoma falls within an expanding spectrum of secondary malignancies following prior treatment of Hodgkin lymphoma.