RESUMO
PURPOSE: Electron radiation therapy dose distributions are affected by irregular body surface contours. This study investigates the feasibility of three-dimensional (3D) cameras to substitute for the treatment planning computerized tomography (CT) scan by capturing the body surfaces to be treated for accurate electron beam dosimetry. METHODS: Dosimetry was compared for six electron beam treatments to the nose, toe, eye, and scalp using full CT scan, CT scan with Hounsfield Unit (HU) overridden to water (mimic 3D camera cases), and flat-phantom techniques. Radiation dose was prescribed to a depth on the central axis per physician's order, and the monitor units (MUs) were calculated. The 3D camera spatial accuracy was evaluated by comparing the 3D surface of a head phantom captured by a 3D camera and that generated with the CT scan in the treatment planning system. A clinical case is presented, and MUs were calculated using the 3D camera body contour with HU overridden to water. RESULTS: Across six cases the average change in MUs between the full CT and the 3Dwater (CT scan with HU overridden to water) calculations was 1.3% with a standard deviation of 1.0%. The corresponding hotspots had a mean difference of 0.4% and a standard deviation of 1.9%. The 3D camera captured surface of a head phantom was found to have a 0.59 mm standard deviation from the surface derived from the CT scan. In-vivo dose measurements (213 ± 8 cGy) agreed with the 3D-camera planned dose of 209 ± 6 cGy, compared to 192 ± 6 cGy for the flat-phantom calculation (same MUs). CONCLUSIONS: Electron beam dosimetry is affected by irregular body surfaces. 3D cameras can capture irregular body contours which allow accurate dosimetry of electron beam treatment as an alternative to costly CT scans with no extra exposure to radiation. Tools and workflow for clinical implementation are provided.
Assuntos
Elétrons , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X , Humanos , Imagens de Fantasmas , Radiometria , Dosagem Radioterapêutica , Planejamento da Radioterapia Assistida por ComputadorRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Inter-fractional variation in urinary bladder volumes during the course of radiotherapy (RT) for prostate cancer causes deviations between planned and delivered doses. This study compared planned versus daily cone-beam CT (CBCT)-based spatial bladder dose distributions, for prostate cancer patients receiving local prostate treatment (local treatment) versus prostate including pelvic lymph node irradiation (pelvic treatment). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Twenty-seven patients (N = 15 local treatment; N = 12 pelvic treatment) were treated using daily image-guided RT (1.8 Gy@43-45 fx), adhering to a full bladder/empty rectum protocol. For each patient, 9-10 CBCTs were registered to the planning CT, using the clinically applied translations. The urinary bladder was manually segmented on each CBCT, 3 mm inner shells were generated, and semi and quadrant sectors were created using axial/coronal cuts. Planned and delivered DVH metrics were compared across patients and between the two groups of treatment (t-test, p < .05; Holm-Bonferroni correction). Associations between bladder volume variations and the dose-volume histograms (DVH) of the bladder and its sectors were evaluated (Spearman's rank correlation coefficient, rs). RESULTS: Bladder volumes varied considerably during RT (coefficient of variation: 16-58%). The population-averaged planned and delivered DVH metrics were not significantly different at any dose level. Larger treatment bladder volumes resulted in increased absolute volume of the posterior/inferior bladder sector receiving intermediate-high doses, in both groups. The superior bladder sector received less dose with larger bladder volumes for local treatments (rs ± SD: -0.47 ± 0.32), but larger doses for pelvic treatments (rs ± SD: 0.74 ± 0.24). CONCLUSIONS: Substantial bladder volume changes during the treatment course occurred even though patients were treated under a full bladder/daily image-guided protocol. Larger bladder volumes resulted in less bladder wall spared at the posterior-inferior sector, regardless the treatment received. Contrary, larger bladder volumes meant larger delivered doses to the superior bladder sector for pelvic RT but smaller doses for local treatments.
Assuntos
Pelve/patologia , Próstata/patologia , Neoplasias da Próstata/patologia , Planejamento da Radioterapia Assistida por Computador/métodos , Radioterapia Guiada por Imagem/métodos , Reto/patologia , Bexiga Urinária/patologia , Tomografia Computadorizada de Feixe Cônico/métodos , Humanos , Processamento de Imagem Assistida por Computador/métodos , Masculino , Órgãos em Risco/diagnóstico por imagem , Órgãos em Risco/patologia , Órgãos em Risco/efeitos da radiação , Pelve/diagnóstico por imagem , Pelve/efeitos da radiação , Próstata/diagnóstico por imagem , Próstata/efeitos da radiação , Neoplasias da Próstata/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias da Próstata/radioterapia , Dosagem Radioterapêutica , Radioterapia de Intensidade Modulada/métodos , Reto/diagnóstico por imagem , Reto/efeitos da radiação , Bexiga Urinária/diagnóstico por imagem , Bexiga Urinária/efeitos da radiaçãoAssuntos
Órgãos em Risco/efeitos da radiação , Proctite/epidemiologia , Neoplasias da Próstata/radioterapia , Lesões por Radiação/epidemiologia , Radioterapia de Intensidade Modulada/efeitos adversos , Reto/efeitos da radiação , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Fracionamento da Dose de Radiação , Relação Dose-Resposta à Radiação , Seguimentos , Humanos , Masculino , Órgãos em Risco/diagnóstico por imagem , Proctite/etiologia , Proctite/prevenção & controle , Neoplasias da Próstata/diagnóstico por imagem , Qualidade de Vida , Lesões por Radiação/etiologia , Lesões por Radiação/prevenção & controle , Planejamento da Radioterapia Assistida por Computador , Radioterapia de Intensidade Modulada/métodos , Reto/diagnóstico por imagem , Fatores de Tempo , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios XRESUMO
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The risk of genitourinary (GU) toxicity is dose-limiting in radiotherapy (RT) for prostate cancer. This study investigated whether motion-inclusive spatial dose/volume metrics explain the GU toxicity manifesting after high-precision RT for prostate cancer. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A matched case-control was performed within a cohort of 258 prostate cancer patients treated with daily cone-beam CT (CBCT)-guided RT (prescription doses of 77.4-81.0â¯Gy). Twenty-seven patients (10.5%) presented late RTOG GUâ¯≥â¯Grade 2 toxicity and those without symptoms of toxicity prior treatment (Nâ¯=â¯7) were selected as cases. Each case was matched with three controls based on pre-treatment GU symptoms, age, Gleason score, follow-up time, and hormone therapy. Thirteen CBCTs per patient were rigidly registered to the planning CT using the recorded treatment shifts, and the bladder was manually contoured on each CBCT. Planned and actually delivered dose/volume metrics (the latter averaged across the CBCTs) were extracted from the bladder and its subsectors, and compared between cases and controls (two-way ANOVA test). RESULTS: There were no significant differences between planned and delivered dose/volume metrics; also, there were no significant differences between cases and controls at any dose level, neither for planned nor delivered doses. The cases tended to have larger bladder volumes during treatment than controls (221⯱â¯71â¯cm3 vs 166⯱â¯73â¯cm3; pâ¯=â¯0.09). CONCLUSIONS: High-precision RT for prostate cancer eliminates differences between planned and delivered dose distributions. Neither planned nor delivered bladder dose/volume metrics were associated to the remaining low risk of developing GU toxicity after high-precision radiotherapy for prostate cancer.