Cost-Effective Cas9-Mediated Targeted Sequencing of Spinocerebellar Ataxia Repeat Expansions.

Hereditary repeat diseases are caused by an abnormal expansion of short tandem repeats in the genome. Among them, spinocerebellar ataxia (SCA) is a heterogeneous disease, and currently, 16 responsible repeats are known. Genetic diagnosis is obtained by analyzing the number of repeats through separate testing of each repeat. Although simultaneous detection of candidate repeats using current massively parallel sequencing technologies has been developed to avoid complicated multiple experiments, these methods are generally expensive. This study developed a cost-effective SCA repeat panel [Flongle SCA repeat panel sequencing (FLO-SCAp)] using Cas9-mediated targeted long-read sequencing and the smallest long-read sequencing apparatus, Flongle. This panel enabled the detection of repeat copy number changes, internal repeat sequences, and DNA methylation in seven patients with different repeat expansion diseases. The median (interquartile range) values of coverage and on-target rate were 39.5 (12 to 72) and 11.6% (7.5% to 16.5%), respectively. This approach was validated by comparing repeat copy number changes measured by FLO-SCAp and short-read whole-genome sequencing. A high correlation was observed between FLO-SCAp and short-read whole-genome sequencing when the repeat length was ≤250 bp (r = 0.98; P < 0.001). Thus, FLO-SCAp represents the most cost-effective method for conducting multiplex testing of repeats and can serve as the first-line diagnostic tool for SCA.

The Utility of Automated ASPECTS in Acute Ischemic Stroke for Intravenous Recombinant Tissue Plasminogen Activator (IV-rtPA) Therapy.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to investigate the accuracy and clinical significance of an artificial intelligence (AI)-based automated Alberta Stroke Program Early Computed Tomography (ASPECT) scoring software of head CT for the indication of intravenous recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rt-PA) therapy. METHODS: This study included two populations of acute ischemic stroke: one comprised patients who had undergone head CT within 48 h of presentation (Population #1, n = 448), while the other included patients within 4.5 h from onset (Population #2, n = 132). The primary endpoint was the concordance rate of ASPECTS of the neurologists and AI software against the benchmark score. The secondary endpoints were to validate the accuracy of the neurologist and AI software in assessing the ability to rule out extensive infarction (ASPECTS of 0-5) in population #2. RESULTS: The reading accuracy of AI software was comparable to that of the board-certified vascular neurologists. The detection rate of cardiogenic cerebral embolism was better than that of atherothrombotic cerebral infarction. By excluding extensive infarction, AI-software showed a higher specificity and equivalent sensitivity compared to those of experts. CONCLUSIONS: The AI software for ASPECTS showed convincing agreement with expert evaluation and would be supportive in determining the indications of intravenous rt-PA therapy.