RESUMO
SARS-CoV-2 Delta and Omicron are globally relevant variants of concern. Although individuals infected with Delta are at risk of developing severe lung disease, infection with Omicron often causes milder symptoms, especially in vaccinated individuals1,2. The question arises of whether widespread Omicron infections could lead to future cross-variant protection, accelerating the end of the pandemic. Here we show that without vaccination, infection with Omicron induces a limited humoral immune response in mice and humans. Sera from mice overexpressing the human ACE2 receptor and infected with Omicron neutralize only Omicron, but not other variants of concern, whereas broader cross-variant neutralization was observed after WA1 and Delta infections. Unlike WA1 and Delta, Omicron replicates to low levels in the lungs and brains of infected animals, leading to mild disease with reduced expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines and diminished activation of lung-resident T cells. Sera from individuals who were unvaccinated and infected with Omicron show the same limited neutralization of only Omicron itself. By contrast, Omicron breakthrough infections induce overall higher neutralization titres against all variants of concern. Our results demonstrate that Omicron infection enhances pre-existing immunity elicited by vaccines but, on its own, may not confer broad protection against non-Omicron variants in unvaccinated individuals.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , Proteção Cruzada , SARS-CoV-2 , Vacinação , Animais , Anticorpos Neutralizantes/imunologia , Anticorpos Antivirais/imunologia , COVID-19/imunologia , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , COVID-19/virologia , Vacinas contra COVID-19/administração & dosagem , Proteção Cruzada/imunologia , Citocinas , Humanos , Camundongos , SARS-CoV-2/classificação , SARS-CoV-2/imunologia , Vacinação/estatística & dados numéricosRESUMO
The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) Omicron variant contains extensive sequence changes relative to the earlier-arising B.1, B.1.1, and Delta SARS-CoV-2 variants that have unknown effects on viral infectivity and response to existing vaccines. Using SARS-CoV-2 virus-like particles (VLPs), we examined mutations in all four structural proteins and found that Omicron and Delta showed 4.6-fold higher luciferase delivery overall relative to the ancestral B.1 lineage, a property conferred mostly by enhancements in the S and N proteins, while mutations in M and E were mostly detrimental to assembly. Thirty-eight antisera samples from individuals vaccinated with Pfizer/BioNTech, Moderna, or Johnson & Johnson vaccines and convalescent sera from unvaccinated COVID-19 survivors had 15-fold lower efficacy to prevent cell transduction by VLPs containing the Omicron mutations relative to the ancestral B.1 spike protein. A third dose of Pfizer vaccine elicited substantially higher neutralization titers against Omicron, resulting in detectable neutralizing antibodies in eight out of eight subjects compared to one out of eight preboosting. Furthermore, the monoclonal antibody therapeutics casirivimab and imdevimab had robust neutralization activity against B.1 and Delta VLPs but no detectable neutralization of Omicron VLPs, while newly authorized bebtelovimab maintained robust neutralization across variants. Our results suggest that Omicron has similar assembly efficiency and cell entry compared to Delta and that its rapid spread is due mostly to reduced neutralization in sera from previously vaccinated subjects. In addition, most currently available monoclonal antibodies will not be useful in treating Omicron-infected patients with the exception of bebtelovimab.
Assuntos
Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados , Anticorpos Neutralizantes , Anticorpos Antivirais , COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Glicoproteína da Espícula de Coronavírus , Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados/uso terapêutico , Anticorpos Neutralizantes/imunologia , Anticorpos Neutralizantes/uso terapêutico , Anticorpos Antivirais/uso terapêutico , COVID-19/terapia , COVID-19/virologia , Humanos , Mutação , SARS-CoV-2/genética , SARS-CoV-2/patogenicidade , Glicoproteína da Espícula de Coronavírus/genéticaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The epidemiology of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) continues to develop with emerging variants, expanding population-level immunity, and advances in clinical care. We describe changes in the clinical epidemiology of COVID-19 hospitalizations and risk factors for critical outcomes over time. METHODS: We included adults aged ≥18 years from 10 states hospitalized with COVID-19 June 2021-March 2023. We evaluated changes in demographics, clinical characteristics, and critical outcomes (intensive care unit admission and/or death) and evaluated critical outcomes risk factors (risk ratios [RRs]), stratified by COVID-19 vaccination status. RESULTS: A total of 60 488 COVID-19-associated hospitalizations were included in the analysis. Among those hospitalized, median age increased from 60 to 75 years, proportion vaccinated increased from 18.2% to 70.1%, and critical outcomes declined from 24.8% to 19.4% (all P < .001) between the Delta (June-December, 2021) and post-BA.4/BA.5 (September 2022-March 2023) periods. Hospitalization events with critical outcomes had a higher proportion of ≥4 categories of medical condition categories assessed (32.8%) compared to all hospitalizations (23.0%). Critical outcome risk factors were similar for unvaccinated and vaccinated populations; presence of ≥4 medical condition categories was most strongly associated with risk of critical outcomes regardless of vaccine status (unvaccinated: adjusted RR, 2.27 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 2.14-2.41]; vaccinated: adjusted RR, 1.73 [95% CI, 1.56-1.92]) across periods. CONCLUSIONS: The proportion of adults hospitalized with COVID-19 who experienced critical outcomes decreased with time, and median patient age increased with time. Multimorbidity was most strongly associated with critical outcomes.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , Adulto , Humanos , Adolescente , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , COVID-19/epidemiologia , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Vacinas contra COVID-19 , Hospitalização , Imunidade Coletiva , Fatores de RiscoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Following historically low influenza activity during the 2020-2021 season, the United States saw an increase in influenza circulating during the 2021-2022 season. Most viruses belonged to the influenza A(H3N2) 3C.2a1b 2a.2 subclade. METHODS: We conducted a test-negative case-control analysis among adults ≥18 years of age at 3 sites within the VISION Network. Encounters included emergency department/urgent care (ED/UC) visits or hospitalizations with ≥1 acute respiratory illness (ARI) discharge diagnosis codes and molecular testing for influenza. Vaccine effectiveness (VE) was calculated by comparing the odds of influenza vaccination ≥14 days before the encounter date between influenza-positive cases (type A) and influenza-negative and severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)-negative controls, applying inverse probability-to-be-vaccinated weights, and adjusting for confounders. RESULTS: In total, 86 732 ED/UC ARI-associated encounters (7696 [9%] cases) and 16 805 hospitalized ARI-associated encounters (649 [4%] cases) were included. VE against influenza-associated ED/UC encounters was 25% (95% confidence interval (CI), 20%-29%) and 25% (95% CI, 11%-37%) against influenza-associated hospitalizations. VE against ED/UC encounters was lower in adults ≥65 years of age (7%; 95% CI, -5% to 17%) or with immunocompromising conditions (4%; 95% CI, -45% to 36%). CONCLUSIONS: During an influenza A(H3N2)-predominant influenza season, modest VE was observed. These findings highlight the need for improved vaccines, particularly for A(H3N2) viruses that are historically associated with lower VE.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , Vírus da Influenza A Subtipo H1N1 , Vacinas contra Influenza , Influenza Humana , Adulto , Humanos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Pré-Escolar , Influenza Humana/epidemiologia , Influenza Humana/prevenção & controle , Vírus da Influenza A Subtipo H3N2 , Estações do Ano , Eficácia de Vacinas , COVID-19/epidemiologia , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , SARS-CoV-2 , Vacinação , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Assistência Ambulatorial , Hospitais , Estudos de Casos e ControlesRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Understanding the changing epidemiology of adults hospitalized with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) informs research priorities and public health policies. METHODS: Among adults (≥18 years) hospitalized with laboratory-confirmed, acute COVID-19 between 11 March 2021, and 31 August 2022 at 21 hospitals in 18 states, those hospitalized during the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) Omicron-predominant period (BA.1, BA.2, BA.4/BA.5) were compared to those from earlier Alpha- and Delta-predominant periods. Demographic characteristics, biomarkers within 24 hours of admission, and outcomes, including oxygen support and death, were assessed. RESULTS: Among 9825 patients, median (interquartile range [IQR]) age was 60 years (47-72), 47% were women, and 21% non-Hispanic Black. From the Alpha-predominant period (Mar-Jul 2021; N = 1312) to the Omicron BA.4/BA.5 sublineage-predominant period (Jun-Aug 2022; N = 1307): the percentage of patients who had ≥4 categories of underlying medical conditions increased from 11% to 21%; those vaccinated with at least a primary COVID-19 vaccine series increased from 7% to 67%; those ≥75 years old increased from 11% to 33%; those who did not receive any supplemental oxygen increased from 18% to 42%. Median (IQR) highest C-reactive protein and D-dimer concentration decreased from 42.0 mg/L (9.9-122.0) to 11.5 mg/L (2.7-42.8) and 3.1 mcg/mL (0.8-640.0) to 1.0 mcg/mL (0.5-2.2), respectively. In-hospital death peaked at 12% in the Delta-predominant period and declined to 4% during the BA.4/BA.5-predominant period. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to adults hospitalized during early COVID-19 variant periods, those hospitalized during Omicron-variant COVID-19 were older, had multiple co-morbidities, were more likely to be vaccinated, and less likely to experience severe respiratory disease, systemic inflammation, coagulopathy, and death.
Assuntos
Vacinas contra COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Humanos , Adulto , Feminino , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Masculino , COVID-19/epidemiologia , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , SARS-CoV-2 , Mortalidade Hospitalar , OxigênioRESUMO
BACKGROUND: To treat Neisseria gonorrhoeae infection, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommends a single oral dose of cefixime as an alternative to injectable ceftriaxone. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to describe the effectiveness of cefixime in treating N. gonorrhoeae infection at 3 different anatomic sites.We searched PubMed and Embase database to abstract treatment success rates and cefixime dosage/frequency for studies that reported the anatomical site of infection. We included reports published between January 1, 1980, and December 7, 2021. Twenty studies published between 1989 and 2015 were included in our meta-analysis. We calculated pooled treatment success percentages and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) using random-effects models. RESULTS: Of patients who received a 400-mg single dose of cefixime, 824 of 846 (97%; 95% CI, 96%-98%) patients with urogenital infection, 107 of 112 (97%; 95% CI, 84%-100%) patients with rectal infection, and 202 of 242 (89%; 95% CI, 76%-96%) patients with pharyngeal infection were cured. Of patients who received an 800-mg single dose of cefixime, 295 of 301 (98%; 95% CI, 96%-99%) patients with urogenital infection and 21 of 26 (81%; 95% CI, 61%-92%) patients with pharyngeal infection were cured. CONCLUSIONS: Our meta-analysis found that cefixime is highly effective at treating urogenital infections and less effective at treating pharyngeal infections. We recommend more investigation into the effectiveness of cefixime in treating rectal infections and studying multidose therapy for the cefixime treatment of pharyngeal infection.
Assuntos
Gonorreia , Humanos , Cefixima/farmacologia , Gonorreia/tratamento farmacológico , Antibacterianos/farmacologia , Ceftriaxona/uso terapêutico , Resultado do Tratamento , Neisseria gonorrhoeae , Testes de Sensibilidade MicrobianaRESUMO
Influenza seasons typically begin in October and peak between December and February (1); however, the 2022-23 influenza season in Tennessee began in late September and was characterized by high pediatric hospitalization rates during November. This report describes a field investigation conducted in Tennessee during November 2022, following reports of increasing influenza hospitalizations. Data from surveillance networks, patient surveys, and whole genome sequencing of influenza virus specimens were analyzed to assess influenza activity and secondary illness risk. Influenza activity increased earlier than usual among all age groups, and rates of influenza-associated hospitalization among children were high in November, reaching 12.6 per 100,000 in children aged <5 years, comparable to peak levels typically seen in high-severity seasons. Circulating influenza viruses were genetically similar to vaccine components. Among persons who received testing for influenza at outpatient clinics, children were twice as likely to receive a positive influenza test result as were adults. Among household contacts exposed to someone with influenza, children were more than twice as likely to become ill compared with adults. As the influenza season continues, it is important for all persons, especially those at higher risk for severe disease, to protect themselves from influenza. To prevent influenza and severe influenza complications, all persons aged ≥6 months should get vaccinated, avoid contact with ill persons, and take influenza antivirals if recommended and prescribed.
Assuntos
Vacinas contra Influenza , Influenza Humana , Adulto , Criança , Humanos , Lactente , Influenza Humana/prevenção & controle , Estações do Ano , Tennessee/epidemiologia , Vírus da Influenza B/genética , VacinaçãoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Access to primary care was hindered by the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. OBJECTIVE: Evaluate changes in health screening rates before and during the pandemic. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of health maintenance and disease management screening rates among primary care patients before and during the pandemic. PARTICIPANTS: Over 150,000 patients of a large, academic health system. MAIN MEASURES: Six quality measures were analyzed: colon cancer, breast cancer, cervical cancer, diabetes Hgb A1C, diabetes eye, and diabetes nephropathy monitoring. Based on US Preventative Services Task Force screening guidelines, we determined which patients were due for at least one of the quality measures. We tracked completion rates during three time periods: pre-pandemic (January 1-March 3, 2020), stay-at-home (March 4-May 8, 2020), and phased reopening (May 9-July 8, 2020). Differences in quality measure completion rates were evaluated using mixed-effects logistic regression models. KEY RESULTS: Compared to pre-pandemic rates, completion of all health screenings declined during the stay-at-home period: mammograms (OR: 0.34; 95% CI: 0.31-0.37), cervical cancer (OR: 0.83; 95% CI: 0.76-0.91), colorectal cancer (OR: 0.25; 95% CI: 0.23-0.28), diabetes eye (OR: 0.34; 95% CI: 0.29-0.41), diabetes Hgb A1c (OR: 0.41; 95% CI: 0.37-0.46), and diabetes nephropathy (OR: 0.46, 95% CI: 0.41-0.53). During phased reopening, completion of all quality measures increased compared to the stay-at-home period, except for cervical cancer screening (OR: 0.83; 95% CI: 0.76-0.92). There was a persistent reduction in completion of all quality measures, except for diabetic nephropathy monitoring (OR: 0.99; 95% CI: 0.89-1.09), during phased reopening compared to pre-pandemic. CONCLUSIONS: Healthcare screening rates were reduced during the early part of the COVID-19 pandemic and did not fully recover to pre-pandemic rates by July 2020. Future research should aim to clarify the long-term impacts of delayed health screenings. New interventions should be considered for expanding remote preventative health services.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , Prestação Integrada de Cuidados de Saúde , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Detecção Precoce de Câncer , Feminino , Humanos , Pandemias/prevenção & controle , Atenção Primária à Saúde , Indicadores de Qualidade em Assistência à Saúde , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration currently uses the nasopharyngeal swab specimen as the reference standard for evaluation of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) assays. We propose that the patient-infected status algorithm is a superior way to classify whether an individual is infected or not infected.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Teste para COVID-19 , Técnicas de Laboratório Clínico , Humanos , NasofaringeRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Prophylactic administration of doxycycline is regarded as a potential new public health strategy to combat the rising rates of Chlamydia trachomatis infections and syphilis among men who have sex with men. We conducted a survey-based study to evaluate how community members and health care providers in Southern California would perceive doxycycline preexposure/postexposure prophylaxis (PrEP/PEP) to predict its acceptability and identify potential areas of concern. METHODS: We conducted an online cross-sectional survey among community members who identify as men who have sex with men and health care providers with prescribing authority in Southern California to investigate the current attitudes toward doxycycline PrEP/PEP, including their willingness to accept. We analyzed the data using descriptive statistics and binary logistic regression. RESULTS: Among 212 enrolled community member participants, 67.5% indicated they would take doxycycline PrEP/PEP if offered by their provider. Higher acceptability was significantly associated with several characteristics, including recent history of bacterial sexually transmitted infection diagnosis and current use of HIV PrEP. For health care providers, 89.5% of 76 enrolled participants expressed willingness to prescribe doxycycline PrEP/PEP to their patients if recommended by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, but only 43.4% were willing if not. Both community members and health care providers demonstrated high levels of concern toward possible drug resistance. CONCLUSIONS: Doxycycline PrEP/PEP as a preventive strategy against chlamydial infections and syphilis would likely be accepted among community members and health care providers. Clear guidelines from public health officials and further clarification on the strategy's potential impact on developing drug resistance may be necessary to ensure successful implementation.
Assuntos
Infecções por HIV , Profilaxia Pré-Exposição , Minorias Sexuais e de Gênero , Sífilis , Atitude , Chlamydia trachomatis , Estudos Transversais , Doxiciclina/uso terapêutico , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Pessoal de Saúde , Homossexualidade Masculina , Humanos , Masculino , Sífilis/tratamento farmacológico , Sífilis/epidemiologia , Sífilis/prevenção & controleRESUMO
Cryptococcosis is a fungal infection that is rarely reported in patients without human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection, especially when the central nervous system (CNS) or pulmonary system is not involved. We report a case of isolated colonic cryptococcosis without disseminated disease in a 64-year-old immunocompetent woman without HIV infection who presented with chronic diarrhea and no episodes of fever or weight loss. The diagnosis was based on histopathology examination. Furthermore, we performed a literature review showing that few reports have been published so far and in the case of colonic cryptococcal infection, the prognosis is favorable among HIV-uninfected patients.
Assuntos
Antifúngicos/administração & dosagem , Colo/microbiologia , Criptococose/microbiologia , Criptococose/diagnóstico , Criptococose/tratamento farmacológico , Criptococose/imunologia , Cryptococcus neoformans/efeitos dos fármacos , Cryptococcus neoformans/genética , Cryptococcus neoformans/isolamento & purificação , Cryptococcus neoformans/fisiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-IdadeRESUMO
To investigate the role of serum cytokine assays to distinguish between active from treated syphilis among serofast patients, we recruited individuals into a prospective cohort study. Participants underwent routine syphilis screening. We selected specimens from a majority cohort of serofast participants with treated and active syphilis. We analyzed specimens with a 62-cytokine multiplex bead-based enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Cytokines, brain-derived neurotrophic factor and tumor necrosis factor ß, were most predictive. We built a decision tree that was 82.4% accurate, 100% (95% confidence interval, 82%-100%) sensitive, and 45% (18%-75%) specific. Our decision tree differentiated between serum specimens from serofast participants with treated syphilis versus active syphilis.
Assuntos
Fator Neurotrófico Derivado do Encéfalo/sangue , Linfotoxina-alfa/sangue , Sífilis/tratamento farmacológico , Treponema pallidum/imunologia , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Árvores de Decisões , Ensaio de Imunoadsorção Enzimática , Humanos , Estudos Prospectivos , Sífilis/sangue , Sorodiagnóstico da SífilisAssuntos
Aves , Saúde Global , Influenza Aviária , Influenza Humana , Humanos , Influenza Aviária/prevenção & controle , Influenza Aviária/transmissão , Influenza Aviária/epidemiologia , Influenza Humana/prevenção & controle , Influenza Humana/epidemiologia , Animais , Surtos de Doenças/prevenção & controle , Virus da Influenza A Subtipo H5N1Assuntos
Vacinas contra COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Desenvolvimento de Medicamentos , Humanos , SARS-CoV-2RESUMO
US public health preparedness and response to highly pathogenic avian influenza A(H5N1) viruses are assessed in this survey study conducted by the CDC.
Assuntos
Aves , Surtos de Doenças , Virus da Influenza A Subtipo H5N1 , Influenza Aviária , Influenza Humana , Preparação para Pandemia , Animais , Humanos , Surtos de Doenças/prevenção & controle , Influenza Aviária/transmissão , Influenza Humana/prevenção & controle , Saúde Pública , Estados UnidosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Sexual behaviors in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected pregnant women in South Africa are not well understood. METHODS: Human immunodeficiency virus-infected pregnant women were recruited into a prospective cohort at first antenatal care visit. Sociodemographic information and self-collected vulvovaginal swab samples were collected from participants. Vulvovaginal swab samples were tested for Chlamydia trachomatis, Neisseria gonorrhoea, and Trichomonas vaginalis using GeneXpert. We investigated sexual behaviors, alcohol use, factors associated with condomless sex during pregnancy, and prevalent sexually transmitted infection (STI) among our cohort. We report descriptive, univariate and multivariable logistic regression results of sexual behaviors and alcohol use, factors associated with condomless sex at last sex, and having any STI during pregnancy adjusting for a priori confounders. RESULTS: We recruited and enrolled 430 HIV-infected pregnant women. Median age was 30 years; median gestational age was 20 weeks. Eighty-nine percent of women reported sex during pregnancy. At last sex, 68% reported condomless sex; 18% reported having more than 1 sex partner in the past 12 months. Adjusting for age, income and relationship status, condom use at last sex was associated with prior knowledge of HIV status (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 2.46; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.54-3.92) and being in a concordant HIV-positive (aOR, 3.17; 95% CI, 1.84-5.50), or serodiscordant relationship (aOR, 6.50; 95% CI, 3.59-11.80). The prevalence of any STI was 41% (95% CI, 36%-45%). Adjusting for mothers' age and employment, odds of having an STI increased if the woman reported alcohol use during pregnancy (aOR, 1.96; 95% CI, 1.06-3.64) or if the father of the child was a non-cohabiting or casual partner (aOR, 1.42; 95% CI, 0.97-2.03). CONCLUSIONS: Almost all HIV-infected pregnant women were sexually active during pregnancy and most women reported condomless sex at last sex. Condom use was associated with knowledge of serostatus and/or partner's serostatus before first antenatal care visit. Factors associated with having STIs included: alcohol use during pregnancy and father of child being a non-cohabiting partner.
Assuntos
Infecções por HIV , Comportamento Sexual/estatística & dados numéricos , Infecções Sexualmente Transmissíveis/virologia , Adulto , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Infecções por HIV/transmissão , Soropositividade para HIV , Humanos , Neisseria gonorrhoeae/isolamento & purificação , Gravidez , Complicações Infecciosas na Gravidez/virologia , Prevalência , Estudos Prospectivos , África do Sul/epidemiologia , Trichomonas vaginalis/isolamento & purificação , Vagina/microbiologia , Vagina/parasitologiaRESUMO
This study provides survey results from state and territorial public health preparedness directors regarding antiviral shortages during the 2022-2023 respiratory viral season.