Real-world safety and effectiveness of mepolizumab for patients with eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (EGPA) in Japan: 48-week interim analysis of the MARS study.

OBJECTIVES: : Assess real-world, long-term safety/effectiveness of mepolizumab for eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (EGPA) in Japan. METHODS: : MARS (GSK ID:213684/NCT04551989) is an ongoing 96-week study of patients with EGPA who received 4-weekly mepolizumab 300 mg subcutaneously for ≥96 weeks before study entry (baseline) and continued treatment. This interim analysis included safety from baseline to Week 48 (observation period) and clinical outcomes before mepolizumab and during the observation period. RESULTS: : Of 118 patients enrolled, 29% (34/118) experienced adverse events (AEs) of which 13% (15/118) experienced serious AEs; none were considered mepolizumab-related. Median oral corticosteroid (OCS) dose decreased from 6.9 (pre-mepolizumab) to 3.0 (baseline) and 2.0 mg/day (Weeks 45-48); the proportion of patients receiving no OCS increased from 8% to 32% and 38%, respectively. Patients experiencing clinical symptoms decreased from 94% (pre-mepolizumab) to 73% (baseline) and 67% (Week 48). During the observation period, 5% of patients experienced EGPA relapse; rates of EGPA-related hospitalisations, EGPA-related emergency room/unscheduled visits and asthma exacerbations were 0.05, 0.09 and 0.08 event/person-year, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: : Results of mepolizumab treatment for ≥144 weeks (before baseline plus observation) were consistent with the known safety profile and allowed OCS dose reduction while improving disease control versus pre-treatment among patients with EGPA.

Reduction in asthma exacerbation rate after mepolizumab treatment initiation in patients with severe asthma: A real-world database study in Japan.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the changes in asthma exacerbation, as well as in oral corticosteroid (OCS) use, exacerbation-related healthcare resource utilization (HRU), and healthcare costs before and after mepolizumab treatment initiation in patients with severe asthma who started treatment with mepolizumab in a real-world clinical setting in Japan. METHODS: A retrospective, observational, self-controlled study was conducted in Japan using a hospital-based administrative claims database. Patients who were diagnosed with asthma and who were new users of mepolizumab were included in the study. The primary outcome was the incidence rate of any asthma exacerbation/patient-year during the 12-month period before (baseline period) and after (follow-up period) the first mepolizumab prescription. Secondary outcome measures included the proportion of patients with ≥1 any asthma exacerbation, patients with exacerbation requiring hospitalization, the incidence rate of exacerbations requiring hospitalization/patient-year, the median daily OCS dose (OCS sparing effect), exacerbation-related HRU (hospitalization length, the proportion of patients with emergency visits, and the number of emergency/outpatient visits), and associated costs. RESULTS: Of the 377 patients included, 56.2% were ≥65 years of age. Following the first mepolizumab prescription, incidence rates for any asthma exacerbation were reduced by 40.6% (4.00/patient-year to 2.38/patient-year; the incidence rate ratio [95% confidence interval]: 0.60 [0.53-0.67]; p < 0.0001) from the baseline to follow-up periods. The incidence rate of exacerbations requiring hospitalization was reduced by 55.8% (0.37/patient-year to 0.16/patient-year) from the baseline to follow-up periods. The proportion of patients experiencing any exacerbation decreased from 84.4% to 57.8% and those requiring hospitalization decreased from 23.9% to 10.3% both from the baseline to follow-up periods. The median daily OCS dose decreased by 44.6% (median [interquartile range]: 6.7 [4.7-9.9] mg/day to 3.3 [0.9-5.6] mg/day) from the last baseline quarter to the 4th quarter of the follow-up period. All exacerbation-related HRUs decreased from the baseline to follow-up periods. Inpatient cost reduced by >50% (123,279 Japanese Yen [JPY]/patient-year vs. 57,283 JPY/patient-year), reducing the total cost by 80,716 JPY from the baseline to follow-up periods. CONCLUSION: Mepolizumab was effective in treating patients with severe asthma by reducing the incidence rates of exacerbations and exacerbation requiring hospitalization, OCS dose, exacerbation-related HRU, and cost in routine clinical practice in Japan.

Efficacy and safety of mepolizumab in Japanese patients with severe eosinophilic asthma.

BACKGROUND: The MENSA trial assessed the efficacy and safety of mepolizumab in patients with severe eosinophilic asthma. This report describes the efficacy and safety of mepolizumab in Japanese patients from MENSA. METHODS: A post hoc analysis of the Japanese subgroup from the randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, double-dummy, Phase III MENSA trial (NCT01691521). Patients ≥12 years with severe eosinophilic asthma received mepolizumab 75 mg intravenously (IV), 100 mg subcutaneously (SC), or placebo, every 4 weeks for 32 weeks. The primary endpoint was the annualized rate of exacerbations. Secondary and other endpoints included annualized rate of exacerbations requiring emergency department (ED) visit/hospitalization, morning peak expiratory flow (PEF), St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) score and eosinophil counts. Adverse events (AEs) were monitored. RESULTS: In the Japanese subgroup (N = 50), the rate of clinically significant exacerbations was reduced by 90% (rate ratio [RR]: 0.10; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.02-0.57; P = 0.010) with mepolizumab IV and 62% (RR: 0.38; 95% CI: 0.12-1.18; P = 0.094) with mepolizumab SC, versus placebo. No exacerbations requiring ED visit/hospitalization were reported with mepolizumab IV; exacerbations were reduced by 73% (RR: 0.27; 95% CI: 0.06-1.29; P = 0.102) with mepolizumab SC versus placebo. Compared with placebo, mepolizumab IV and SC numerically increased morning PEF from baseline by 40 L/min and 13 L/min, improved quality of life by greater than the minimal clinically important difference (SGRQ: 9.5 [P = 0.083] and 7.9 [P = 0.171] points) and reduced eosinophil counts. AE incidence was similar between treatments. Results were broadly consistent with the overall population. CONCLUSIONS: Mepolizumab was efficacious and well tolerated in Japanese patients with severe eosinophilic asthma, producing similar responses to the overall MENSA population.

Safety and efficacy of fluticasone furoate nasal spray in Japanese children 2 to <15 years of age with perennial allergic rhinitis: a multicentre, open-label trial.

BACKGROUND: Fluticasone furoate nasal spray (FFNS) is a glucocorticoid developed for the treatment of allergic rhinitis (AR). This study aimed to assess the safety, efficacy, and systemic exposure of FFNS in Japanese children with perennial AR (PAR). METHODS: In this multicentre, open-label, phase 3 study, 61 children aged 2 to <15 years were treated with FFNS 55 µg, once daily for 12 weeks. Nasal and ocular symptoms were scored by parents/guardians/patients and recorded in a patient's daily diary. In addition, rhinoscopy findings, including mucosal swelling, were scored by the investigators as an efficacy measure. As a safety measure, adverse events and clinical laboratory data were evaluated. RESULTS: An adverse event was reported by 67% of patients during the treatment and follow-up period, all of which were mild in intensity. The most commonly reported adverse events were nasopharyngitis and acute sinusitis (acute rhinosinusitis). There were no serious adverse events. FFNS 55 µg improved nasal symptom scores and rhinoscopy findings compared with the baseline. Ocular symptom scores were also improved compared with the baseline in FFNS 55 µg in a sub-group of patients with any ocular symptoms at baseline. FFNS 55 µg was shown to be well tolerated over the 12-week treatment period. Majority of patients receiving FFNS 55 µg had unquantifiable plasma levels of fluticasone furoate (FF). CONCLUSIONS: Twelve-week treatment with FFNS 55 µg, once daily, is well tolerated and effective with low systemic exposure in Japanese children aged 2 to <15 years with PAR.

Efficacy and safety of fluticasone furoate nasal spray in Japanese children with perennial allergic rhinitis: a multicentre, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Fluticasone furoate nasal spray (FFNS) is a glucocorticoid developed for the treatment of allergic rhinitis (AR). This is the first randomized clinical trial to assess the efficacy and safety of FFNS in Japanese children with perennial AR (PAR). METHODS: In this multicentre, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, phase III study, 261 children aged 6 to <15 years were treated with FFNS 55µg, once daily or placebo for two weeks. Nasal and ocular symptoms were rated by parents/guardians/patients in the patient daily diary. The primary endpoint was the mean change from baseline in the three total nasal symptom score (3TNSS). In addition, rhinoscopic findings were rated by the investigators as an efficacy measure. As a safety measure, adverse events and clinical chemistry and hematology were evaluated. RESULTS: Mean change from baseline over the entire treatment period in 3TNSS was greater in the FFNS 55µg group compared with placebo, and the difference was statistically significant (p < 0.001). Significant improvements in rhinoscopic findings of swelling of inferior turbinate mucosa and quantity of nasal discharge were also observed. The total ocular symptom score (TOSS) was reduced significantly in the FFNS 55µg group, compared with placebo, in the second week in a subgroup of patients with baseline TOSS > 0. The incidence of adverse events was similar between FFNS 55µg(18%) and placebo (19%). CONCLUSIONS: Two-week treatment with FFNS 55µg, once daily is effective and tolerable in Japanese children aged 6 to <15 years with PAR.

Comparison of fluticasone furoate and fluticasone propionate for the treatment of Japanese cedar pollinosis.

Fluticasone furoate nasal spray (FFNS) is a novel, enhanced-affinity glucocorticoid administered in a unique side-actuated device for the treatment of allergic rhinitis. No previous clinical studies have compared the efficacy of FFNS with another intranasal steroid. The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of FFNS, 110 microg/day, once daily with fluticasone propionate nasal spray (FPNS), 200 microg/day, twice daily in patients with Japanese cedar pollinosis to support the regulatory filing in Japan. In this multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, parallel-group study, patients (>or=16 years old) were randomized to receive 2 weeks of treatment with FFNS (n = 151), FFNS placebo (n = 72), FPNS (n = 148), or FPNS placebo (n = 75). FFNS once daily was noninferior to FPNS twice daily in mean change from baseline in three total nasal symptom scores (3TNSS; sneezing, rhinorrhea, and nasal congestion; -1.23 +/- 0.140 and -1.06 +/- 0.142, respectively). Compared with placebo, FFNS was superior in reducing 3TNSS (p < 0.001). Both FFNS and FPNS showed similar mean changes from baseline in 4TNSS (3TNSS and nasal itching) and individual nasal symptom scores. The onset of action for FFNS was observed from the 1st day of treatment, whereas in the FPNS group it was observed on the 2nd day. There were similar improvements in rhinoscopy findings, activity of daily life interference, and patient-rated overall evaluation to therapy in the FFNS and FPNS groups. FFNS was well tolerated. Treatment with once-daily FFNS was effective and noninferior to twice-daily FPNS in reducing nasal symptoms. Faster onset of action for FFNS was observed.