A symptom-based model to predict colorectal cancer in low-resource countries: Results from a prospective study of patients at high risk for colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer (CRC) rates in low-resource countries, which typically lack CRC screening programs, are rising. This study determined whether a risk model for patients with rectal bleeding could identify patients with curable CRC. METHODS: This prospective, cross-sectional study evaluated a model constructed from data from 1 hospital and validated at 2 other hospitals. The primary endpoint was the ability of the model to predict CRC, as diagnosed by colonoscopy, from clinical characteristics. The secondary endpoint was to determine the percentage of patients who had CRC. RESULTS: Consecutive patients who were 45 years old or older and had self-reported rectal bleeding for more than 1 week were evaluated. From January 2014 to July 2016, 362 patients answered a questionnaire and underwent colonoscopy. In the validation cohort, 56% of patients with rectal bleeding, weight loss, and changes in bowel habits had CRC, whereas 2% of patients with bleeding alone did. Overall, 18.2% of the patients had CRC, and 8.6% had adenomas. The proportion of CRC patients with potentially curable stage II or III disease was 74%, whereas the historical rate was 36%. The combination of rectal bleeding with both symptoms significantly predicted CRC in the validation set (odds ratio, 12.8; 95% confidence interval, 4.6-35.4; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: In low-resource settings, patients with rectal bleeding, weight loss, and changes in bowel habits should be classified as high risk for CRC. Patients with a high risk score should be prioritized for colonoscopy to increase the number of patients diagnosed with potentially curable CRC. Cancer 2018;124:2766-2773. © 2018 American Cancer Society.

Establishing a Cancer Research Consortium in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: Challenges Faced and Lessons Learned.

PURPOSE: There is an increasing effort in the global public health community to strengthen research capacity in low- and middle-income countries, but there is no consensus on how best to approach such endeavors. Successful consortia that perform research on HIV/AIDS and other infectious diseases exist, but few papers have been published detailing the challenges faced and lessons learned in setting up and running a successful research consortium. METHODS: Members of the African Research Group for Oncology (ARGO) participated in generating lessons learned regarding the foundation and maintenance of a cancer research consortium in Nigeria. RESULTS: Drawing on our experience of founding ARGO, we describe steps and key factors needed to establish a successful collaborative consortium between researchers from both high- and low-income countries. In addition, we present challenges we encountered in building our consortium, and how we managed those challenges. Although our research group is focused primarily on cancer, many of our lessons learned can be applied more widely in biomedical or public health research in low-income countries. CONCLUSIONS: As the need for cancer care in LMICs continues to grow, the ability to create sustainable, innovative, collaborative research groups will become vital. Assessing the successes and failures that occur in creating and sustaining research consortia in LMICs is important for expansion of research and training capacity in LMICs.

Feasibility and performance of the fecal immunochemical test (FIT) for average-risk colorectal cancer screening in Nigeria.

INTRODUCTION: There is a paucity of prospective data on the performance of the fecal immunochemical test (FIT) for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening in sub-Saharan Africa. The aim of this exploratory analysis was to evaluate the feasibility and performance of FIT in Nigeria. METHODS: This was a prospective, single-arm study. A convenience sample of asymptomatic, average-risk individuals between 40-75 years of age were enrolled at Obafemi Awolowo University Teaching Hospital. Study participants returned in 48 hours with a specimen for ova and parasite (O&P) and qualitative FIT (50ug/g) testing. Participants with a positive FIT had follow-up colonoscopy and those with intestinal parasites were provided treatment. RESULTS: Between May-June 2019, 379 individuals enrolled with a median age of 51 years (IQR 46-58). In total, 87.6% (n = 332) returned for FIT testing. FIT positivity was 20.5% (95% CI = 16.3%-25.2%). Sixty-one (89.7%) of participants with a positive FIT had a follow-up colonoscopy (n = 61), of whom 9.8% (95%CI:3.7-20.2%) had an adenoma and 4.9% (95%CI:1.0-13.7%) had advanced adenomas. Presence of intestinal parasites was inversely related to FIT positivity (6.5% with vs. 21.1% without parasites, p = 0.05). Eighty-two percent of participants found the FIT easy to use and 100% would recommend the test to eligible family or friends if available. CONCLUSIONS: Asymptomatic, FIT-based CRC screening was feasible and well tolerated in this exploratory analysis. However, the high FIT positivity and low positive predictive value for advanced neoplasia raises concerns about its practicality and cost effectiveness in a low-resource setting such as Nigeria.