VA/DoD Clinical Practice Guideline: Diagnosis and Treatment of Low Back Pain.

DESCRIPTION: In September 2017, the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) and U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) approved the joint Clinical Practice Guideline (CPG) for Diagnosis and Management of Low Back Pain. This CPG was intended to provide healthcare providers a framework by which to evaluate, treat, and manage patients with low back pain (LBP). METHODS: The VA/DoD Evidence-Based Practice Work Group convened a joint VA/DoD guideline development effort that included a multidisciplinary panel of practicing clinician stakeholders and conformed to the Institute of Medicine's tenets for trustworthy clinical practice guidelines. The guideline panel developed key questions in collaboration with the ECRI Institute, which systematically searched and evaluated the literature through September 2016, developed an algorithm, and rated recommendations by using the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) system. A patient focus group was also convened to ensure patient values and perspectives were considered when formulating preferences and shared decision making in the guideline. RECOMMENDATIONS: The VA/DOD LBP CPG provides evidence-based recommendations for the diagnostic approach, education and self-care, non-pharmacologic and non-invasive therapy, pharmacologic therapy, dietary supplements, non-surgical invasive therapy, and team approach to treatment of low back pain.

Diagnosis and Treatment of Low Back Pain: Synopsis of the 2021 US Department of Veterans Affairs and US Department of Defense Clinical Practice Guideline.

ABSTRACT: Low back pain is a significant issue in the US Department of Veterans Affairs and Department of Defense populations as well as the general US population at large. This type of pain can be distressing to those who experience its effects, leading patients to seek relief of their symptoms. In 2022, leadership within the US Department of Veterans Affairs and US Department of Defense approved a joint clinical practice guideline for the management of low back pain. The guideline provides evidence-based recommendations for assessing and managing low back pain. Development of the guideline included a systematic evidence review, which was guided by 12 key questions. A multidisciplinary team, which included clinical stakeholders, reviewed the evidence that was retrieved and developed 39 recommendations using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation system. The scope of the clinical practice guideline is broad; however, the authors have focused on key recommendations that are important for clinicians in the evaluation and nonoperative treatment of low back pain, including pharmacologic therapies and both noninvasive and invasive nonpharmacologic treatments.

Use of Non-Specific Knee Diagnoses and Incidence of Obscure Knee Injuries in a Large Government Health System.

Purpose: Within a large government health system, to assess the practice of using non-specific diagnoses for knee disorders and determine how often they appear as the only diagnosis without more specificity. The secondary purpose was to identify the incidence of obscure knee disorders diagnosed: pes anserine bursitis, prepatellar bursitis, pigmented villonodular synovitis, and plica syndrome. Patients and Methods: Eligible beneficiaries of the Military Health System (MHS) seeking care for a knee disorder between 1 January 2009 and 31 December 2013 with at least 2-year follow-up. Data were sourced from the MHS Data Repository. The study outcomes were 1) utilization rate of non-specific knee diagnosis codes, 2) proportion of cases that never received a specific knee diagnosis, 3) incidence of obscure knee pathology in this cohort. Results: There were 127,570 beneficiaries seeking care for knee pain during this period. While the majority (99.7%) initially received a non-specific knee diagnosis, these occurred in isolation for only 16.5% of the cases (n=20,042) over two-year follow-up. The use of non-specific codes was similar between military and civilian clinic settings (45.3% and 47.0%, respectively, of all knee disorders diagnosed), which appears to reflect clinical practice in which diagnoses become more specified over time and diagnostic workup aims to exclude competing diagnoses. The incidence of obscure knee pathology was small (0.2% to 4.0%). Conclusion: Most of the cohort (99.7%) received a non-specific diagnosis at their initial visit, but only 15% did not eventually receive a more specific diagnostic code. These findings suggest that diagnoses may become more specific over time as condition-specific signs and symptoms become more evident, and diagnostic workup excludes competing diagnoses. A better understanding of diagnostic patterns and criteria for knee pain will improve the quality and interpretation from epidemiological studies.

When Exception to Policy Is Exceptional Policy: How Booking Physical Therapy Appointments Too Far in the Future May Adversely Impact Access to Care, Business Optimization, and Readiness.

INTRODUCTION: Physical therapy (PT) is a high-volume service that treats musculoskeletal injury and improves return-to-duty rates. Our experience suggests that no-show (NS) and patient cancellation (PC) rates increase the further appointment that is booked in the future, impede access to care, and increase the healthcare delivery costs. The article's purpose is to examine PT National Capitol Region (NCR) appointment data to inform appointment policies. METHODS: We utilized one year of retrospective Military Health System Management and Reporting Tool and Composite Health Care System Ad Hoc Data Pulls to review NCR PT appointment data to evaluate the effect of timing on NS and PC rates. RESULTS: We analyzed 797 new appointments at Walter Reed National Military Medical Center. Data revealed that 16% of patients seen within 10 days NS or PC; 22% of patients seen between 11 and 20 days NS or PC; 28% of patients seen 21 to 30 days NS or PC; and 25% of patients seen over 30 days after consultation NS or PC. We analyzed 182,134 PT appointments (all types) in the NCR. The NS rate was 11.1% (range 8.4-14.9%). CONCLUSIONS: At Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, 17% of new appointments were lost when they were booked over 20 days in advance; additionally, NS and PC rates were greatest after 20 days from consultation.

Meralgia paresthetica due to body armor wear in U.S. soldiers serving in Iraq: a case report and review of the literature.

Meralgia paresthetica is a disorder of the lateral femoral cutaneous nerve that results in symptoms of anterolateral thigh paresthesias and dysesthesias without associated loss of reflexes or motor weakness. Chronic meralgia paresthetica, not related to traumatic or lesion-producing compression of the nerve, is associated with obesity, pregnancy, tight-fitting garments, as well as specific duty uniform belts used by police officers and carpenters. Cases are presented in which two U.S. soldiers in Iraq experienced symptoms of meralgia paresthetica, most likely due to repetitive wear of protective body armor. Although use of protective body armor is proven to be lifesaving, modifications to improve current equipment may help to decrease morbidities such as meralgia paresthetica.

Investigation of abdominal muscle thickness changes after spinal manipulation in patients who meet a clinical prediction rule for lumbar stabilization.

STUDY DESIGN: Prospective case series. OBJECTIVES: To investigate changes in abdominal muscle thickness with ultrasound imaging, after spinal manipulative therapy (SMT), in a subgroup of patients with low back pain (LBP) who meet a proposed clinical prediction rule for lumbar stabilization exercise (LSE). BACKGROUND: The characteristics of a subgroup of patients with LBP who respond clinically to LSE has been proposed. Although the pathoanatomical characteristics of this subgroup have not been determined, clinicians often assume that this type of LBP is related, in part, to neuromuscular deficits of the lateral abdominal muscles. Recent evidence suggests that SMT may facilitate abdominal muscle activity and, therefore, enhance exercises targeting these deficits. METHODS: Nineteen patients (mean age ± SD, 32.5 ± 7.8 years; 11 female) with LBP, who met the criteria for LSE, underwent ultrasound imaging of the transversus abdominis (TrA) and internal oblique (IO) muscles before, immediately after, and 3 to 4 days after lumbopelvic SMT. Measurements of resting thickness, contracted thickness during the abdominal drawing-in maneuver, and percent thickness change from rest to contraction of the TrA and IO muscles were analyzed with repeated-measures analysis of variance. Numeric pain rating scale and Oswestry Disability Index data were also collected. RESULTS: No significant differences in resting, contracted, or percent thickness change in the TrA or IO were found over the 3 time periods. There were statistically significant reductions in numeric pain rating scale and Oswestry Disability Index scores, but mean differences failed to meet the minimal clinically important difference. CONCLUSION: The results provide preliminary evidence that TrA and IO muscle resting and contracted thicknesses do not change post-SMT in patients with LBP in the LSE subgroup. In addition, while reductions in pain and disability were noted, they were not clinically meaningful.

Association between back, neck, and upper extremity musculoskeletal pain and the individual body armor.

The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between back, neck, and upper extremity (UE) musculoskeletal pain and the wear of individual body armor, physical training (PT), and work tasks. We conducted a cross-sectional randomized-survey design in which 1,187 surveys were distributed to U.S. Soldiers in Iraq; 863 were completed. The survey was a three-page questionnaire covering demographics, body armor wear, PT, and reports of neck, back, and UE musculoskeletal pain before and during deployment. The results of the survey revealed a substantial increase in the incidence of back, neck, and UE pain during deployment, and approximately twice as many Soldiers attributed their musculoskeletal pain to wearing body armor than to job tasks and PT. In addition, there was a significant positive correlation between Soldiers who wore the body armor for four hours or more a day and self-reported musculoskeletal complaints. These results demonstrate a need to consider the potential adverse effects of individual body armor on combat Soldiers.