Body composition after endoscopic lung volume reduction with endobronchial valves: A prospective study.

INTRODUCTION: Patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and emphysema experience malnutrition and pulmonary cachexia. Endoscopic lung volume reduction (ELVR) with endobronchial valves has not only improved lung function, exercise capacity, and quality of life, but also influenced body weight. Only a few data are available on body composition changes after ELVR. METHODS: This single-center prospective study of patients with advanced COPD investigates body composition before and after endoscopic valve treatment using multifrequency bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA). The following parameters were evaluated in addition to clinical data and routine tests: body weight, body mass index (BMI), basal metabolic rate, total body water, body fat, cell percentage, phase angle, intracellular water (ICW), extracellular water (ECW), extracellular mass (ECM), body cell mas (BCM), lean body mass (LBM = ECM + BCM) and fat-free mass index. RESULTS: A total of 23 patients (mean emphysema index 37.2 ± 7.5 %, BMI 23.4 ± 4.3 kg/m²) experienced improvements in lung function and exercise capacity with ELVR. Complete lobar atelectasis was achieved in 39.1% of participants. A non-statistically significant increase in body weight and BMI was observed after ELVR (p = 0.111 and p = 0.102). BIA measurement revealed a worsening of phase angle, cell percentage and ECM/BCM and thus of body composition, but without statistical significance. This is mainly due to a statistically significant increase in ECM, ECW, and ICW (all p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: ELVR demonstrated no beneficial changes in body composition, although patients tend to gain weight. A larger cohort is warranted to confirm these findings. .

Bronchoscopic Measurement of Collateral Ventilation: State of the Art.

Endoscopic lung volume reduction procedure with valves is a well-studied treatment option for advanced lung emphysema to target lung hyperinflation in carefully selected patients with COPD. Before valve implantation, collateral ventilation (CV) of the target lobe needs to be assessed to obtain an optimal treatment effect. The analysis of CV according to current standards occurs via an in vivo assessment with the Chartis®system (PulmonX Inc., Redwood City, CA, USA) and a computed tomography (CT) scan of the thorax with interlobar fissure analysis. The focus of this review is to provide detailed information about the Chartis®procedure and interpretation of Chartis® phenotypes. As a main tool in the assessment of CV and being a safe procedure, the Chartis® assessment should be performed by default to confirm interlobar fissure analysis in most emphysema patients. Based on the obtained results, lung volume reduction therapy options should be discussed in an interdisciplinary emphysema conference.

Differentiating COPD and asthma using quantitative CT imaging and machine learning.

BACKGROUND: There are similarities and differences between chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and asthma patients in terms of computed tomography (CT) disease-related features. Our objective was to determine the optimal subset of CT imaging features for differentiating COPD and asthma using machine learning. METHODS: COPD and asthma patients were recruited from Heidelberg University Hospital (Heidelberg, Germany). CT was acquired and 93 features were extracted: percentage of low-attenuating area below -950 HU (LAA950), low-attenuation cluster (LAC) total hole count, estimated airway wall thickness for an idealised airway with an internal perimeter of 10 mm (Pi10), total airway count (TAC), as well as airway inner/outer perimeters/areas and wall thickness for each of five segmental airways, and the average of those five airways. Hybrid feature selection was used to select the optimum number of features, and support vector machine learning was used to classify COPD and asthma. RESULTS: 95 participants were included (n=48 COPD and n=47 asthma); there were no differences between COPD and asthma for age (p=0.25) or forced expiratory volume in 1 s (p=0.31). In a model including all CT features, the accuracy and F1 score were 80% and 81%, respectively. The top features were: LAA950, outer airway perimeter, inner airway perimeter, TAC, outer airway area RB1, inner airway area RB1 and LAC total hole count. In the model with only CT airway features, the accuracy and F1 score were 66% and 68%, respectively. The top features were: inner airway area RB1, outer airway area LB1, outer airway perimeter, inner airway perimeter, Pi10, TAC, airway wall thickness RB1 and TAC LB10. CONCLUSION: COPD and asthma can be differentiated using machine learning with moderate-to-high accuracy by a subset of only seven CT features.

Endoscopic Options for Moderate COPD, Chronic Bronchitis, and Uncontrolled Asthma.

Until now, interventional therapies for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease have been available in the form of lung volume reduction procedures as end-stage options. Currently, the range of indications is expanding to include earlier stages of the diseases. Lung denervation is available for moderate COPD, and patients with chronic bronchitis are being evaluated for endoscopic goblet cell ablation. Rheoplasty, metered spray cryo technique, and Karakoca resector balloon are used for this indication. But also, for patients with severe uncontrolled asthma, several techniques are available today. In addition to thermoplasty as a long-proven procedure, new and currently under investigation is the targeted lung denervation.Most of these techniques are currently being tested in large pivotal trials and it will soon become clear in which phenotype which technique will be used in the different forms and stages of obstructive diseases. The current paper presents the techniques and the currently available literature.

Endoscopic Valve Therapy in COPD Patients with Hypercapnia.

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic valve therapy has been established as a therapeutic option for patients with severe emphysema. Several randomized controlled trials confirmed the efficacy of this therapeutic approach in COPD patients without significant collateral ventilation. However, patients with clinical relevant hypercapnia were excluded from these trials. AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: Patients with hypercapnia who underwent endoscopic valve treatment were enrolled in this retrospective analysis. The efficacy of valve treatment and its impact on blood gases were analysed. METHODS: COPD patients with mild to severe hypercapnia (pCO2 ≥45 mm Hg) who were treated by endoscopic valve placement at the Thoraxklinik, University of Heidelberg, were enrolled in this retrospective trial. Lung function test (vital capacity [VC], forced expiratory volume in 1 s [FEV1], residual volume [RV]), blood gases (pO2, pCO2), and 6-minute-walk test (6-MWT) were assessed prior to intervention and at 3 and 6 months following valve implantation. RESULTS: 129 patients (mean age 64 ± 7 years) with severe COPD (mean FEV1 26 ± 12% of predicted, mean RV 285 ± 22% of predicted) with hypercapnia (pCO2 ≥45 mm Hg, mean pCO2 50 ± 5 mm Hg) underwent endoscopic valve treatment. 3 and 6 months following intervention, statistical significant improvement was observed in VC, FEV1, RV, and 6-MWT (all p < 0.001). Blood gas analysis revealed a significant improvement of mean pCO2 at 3- and 6-month follow-up (both p < 0.001). 40% of the patients had normal pCO2 values 3 and 6 months following intervention. CONCLUSION: COPD patients with hypercapnia should not be excluded from valve treatment, as the hyperinflation reduction improves the respiratory mechanics and thus leading to improvement of hypercapnia.

Systematic Review of Pooling Sputum as an Efficient Method for Xpert MTB/RIF Tuberculosis Testing during the COVID-19 Pandemic.

GeneXpert-based testing with Xpert MTB/RIF or Ultra assays is essential for tuberculosis diagnosis. However, testing may be affected by cartridge and staff shortages. More efficient testing strategies could help, especially during the coronavirus disease pandemic. We searched the literature to systematically review whether GeneXpert-based testing of pooled sputum samples achieves sensitivity and specificity similar to testing individual samples; this method could potentially save time and preserve the limited supply of cartridges. From 6 publications, we found 2-sample pools using Xpert MTB/RIF had 87.5% and 96.0% sensitivity (average sensitivity 94%; 95% CI 89.0%-98.0%) (2 studies). Four-sample pools averaged 91% sensitivity with Xpert MTB/RIF (2 studies) and 98% with Ultra (2 studies); combining >4 samples resulted in lower sensitivity. Two studies reported that pooling achieved 99%-100% specificity and 27%-31% in cartridge savings. Our results show that pooling may improve efficiency of GeneXpert-based testing.

Saliva Alternative to Upper Respiratory Swabs for SARS-CoV-2 Diagnosis.

PCR of upper respiratory specimens is the diagnostic standard for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection. However, saliva sampling is an easy alternative to nasal and throat swabbing. We found similar viral loads in saliva samples and in nasal and throat swab samples from 110 patients with coronavirus disease.

Endobronchial Ultrasound Elastography for Differentiating Benign and Malignant Lymph Nodes.

BACKGROUND: Endobronchial ultrasound elastography that provides information on tissue stiffness may help distinguish malignant from benign mediastinal and hilar lymph nodes. OBJECTIVES: In this prospective trial, we assessed the diagnostic value of elastographic images and the interobserver agreement in its evaluation. METHOD: Elastographic images from 77 lymph nodes in 65 patients were reviewed by 3 pneumologists. The elastographic image was classified based on the predominant colour: predominantly green, intermediary, and predominantly blue. With 2 or 3 interobserver matches, the corresponding elastographic image was correlated with the pathological result obtained from endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) and/or other invasive procedures. RESULTS: All 3 reviewers had agreement in classifying elastographic images in 45% (35/77). Overall, the interobserver agreement among the 3 readers for classifying elastographic pattern was found to be moderate (Fleiss Kappa index = 0.519; 95% CI = [0.427; 0.611]). On cytological/histological evaluation, 55 lymph nodes were malignant and 22 were benign. In classifying "green" as benign and "blue" as malignant, the sensitivity and specificity were 71% (95% CI = [54%; 85%]) and 67% (95%-CI = [35%; 90%]), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Elastography will not replace invasive EBUS-TBNA due to a moderate interobserver agreement and insufficient sensitivity and specificity. However, elastography will, maybe, present an additional feature to identify malignant lymph nodes in the context of clinical, radiological, and cytological results.

Efficacy and Safety of the 9-mm Intrabronchial Valve in Patients with Advanced Emphysema.

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic valve therapy aims at lung volume reduction that is associated with improved lung function, exercise tolerance and quality of life in emphysema patients. The size of intrabronchial valves of the Spiration® Valve System (SVS) selected to achieve lobar occlusion may have an influence on treatment outcomes. METHODS: 49 severe emphysema patients (M/F: 24/25, age: 64 ± 7 years), with complete interlobar fissures on the side intended to be treated, underwent treatment with at least one 9-mm intrabronchial valve implantation at 3 centers and were followed up at 30, 90 and 180 days after intervention. Changes in pulmonary function tests (PFT), 6-min walk test (6MWT), modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) dyspnea scale and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease assessment test scores as well as possible complications were recorded. RESULTS: Forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) improved significantly over the 6-month period of the study, and the proportion of patients achieving a minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for FEV1 was 46.4% at 6 months. Regarding the remaining PFT values, the changes were not statistically significant at 6 months, but when looking at the MCIDs, 44.4% of the patients achieved the MCID decrease for residual volume. The 6MWT distance also improved statistically significantly, and an MCID increase of ≥26 m was reached by 41.7% of the patients. Furthermore, there was a statistically significant improvement in the mMRC score. The incidence of pneumothoraxes requiring drainage was 26.5% while a valve dislocation rate of 24% was observed but only in the lower lobes. CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic lung volume reduction with the 9-mm SVS valves was associated with statistically significant but modest improvement of FEV1, mMRC and 6MWT up to 6 months after intervention. These results were accompanied by an anticipated and acceptable risk profile. The relative increased incidence of device dislocation observed needs to be further elucidated.

Survival after Endoscopic Valve Therapy in Patients with Severe Emphysema.

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic valve therapy leads to an improvement of lung function, exercise tolerance, and quality of life in a selected cohort of patients with advanced emphysema. So far, only few data exist on the long-term outcome. OBJECTIVES: This analysis evaluated the impact of valve therapy on the survival of emphysema patients. METHODS: Survival rates of emphysema patients who underwent valve therapy were assessed according to their radiological outcome following valve placement. RESULTS: From 2005 to 2013, 449 emphysema patients (mean age 64 ± 7 years) underwent valve therapy and were followed for a mean time of 37.3 ± 21.3 months. A total of 128 patients (29%) developed complete lobar atelectasis, 34 out of these also experienced a pneumothorax; 50 patients (11%) developed pneumothorax without lobar atelectasis, and 261 patients (58%) target lobe volume reduction or no volume change. Patients with atelectasis showed significantly better baseline forced expiratory volume in 1 second (%), residual volume (L), total lung capacity (L), and transfer factor for carbon monoxide (%; all p < 0.05), but there was no significant difference in the BODE score (p = 0.195). Patients with valve-induced lobar atelectasis had a significant survival benefit compared to patients without atelectasis (p = 0.009; 5-year survival rate 65.3 vs. 43.9%). The advent of pneumothorax in 84 patients did not influence survival (p = 0.52). CONCLUSIONS: Lobar atelectasis following endoscopic valve therapy is associated with a survival benefit.

Endoscopic Valve Removal >180 Days since Implantation in Patients with Severe Emphysema.

BACKGROUND: Valve implantation provides a reversible effective therapy in a selected group of emphysema patients. Knowing predictors for successful therapy, the rate of treatment failure has decreased. Some patients, however, do not benefit, so that the valves may have to be removed. OBJECTIVES: To assess implant-related events, complications during valve removal, and clinical outcome after endoscopic procedure. METHODS: The data of 76 consecutive emphysema patients who underwent valve removal > 6 months since implantation were collected. RESULTS: Seventy-six patients (mean age 62 years, 54% male) underwent removal of all valves after a mean time of 624 days (193-3,043 days) since implantation. Granulation tissue was observed in 39.5% (30/76) and significant secretion in 34.2% (26/76). In 5.3% (4/76), valve removal was complicated requiring another bronchoscopy in 2 of them. In 5.3% (4/76) of the patients, one valve could not be removed and remained in situ. Bleeding requiring intervention occurred in 3.9% (3/76) during valve removal. Following bronchoscopy, there was a need for antibiotics in 34.2% (26/76), glucocorticosteroids in 1.3% (1/76), and both in 6.6% (5/76) due to productive cough or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) exacerbation. Due to respiratory failure, invasive ventilation or noninvasive ventilation was necessary in 2.6% (2/76) and 6.6% (5/76), respectively, following procedure. No statistical significant change in lung function was observed following valve removal. CONCLUSIONS: Valve removal after > 6 months since implantation is feasible and associated with an acceptable safety profile. However, close monitoring of these patients with limited pulmonary reserve is recommended with particular attention to COPD exacerbations and respiratory failure.

Lung Volume Reduction with Vapor Ablation in the Presence of Incomplete Fissures: 12-Month Results from the STEP-UP Randomized Controlled Study.

BACKGROUND: Emphysema patients with collateral ventilation (CV) will not benefit from valve therapy, the most common endoscopic lung volume reduction procedure. A recent randomized controlled trial (STEP-UP) of the alternative bronchoscopic thermal vapor ablation (BTVA) included patients with (CV+) and without interlobar CV (CV-). OBJECTIVES: This analysis evaluated the efficacy and safety of the CV+ population following BTVA. METHOD: A post hoc fissure analysis of the baseline computed tomography of all treatment and control patients was performed with the VIDA Diagnostics Apollo software. A patient was considered to be CV+ if either of the treated upper lobes was adjacent to a fissure that was <90% complete. The primary endpoints, forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) and St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ-C), were calculated for these CV+ patients following BTVA and safety results summarized. RESULTS: 78% (35/45) of the patients in the treatment arm and 79% (19/24) of the patients in the control arm were found to be CV+. At 12 months, the FEV1 improvement of the treatment arm was 9.2%, as compared with a decrease of 5.4% in the control group, resulting in a mean between-group difference of 14.6% (p = 0.0137). The improvement in SGRQ-C of the treatment arm as compared to the control arm was 8.4 points (p = 0.0712). An increase in respiratory related serious adverse events was observed immediately following treatment, but most resolved with routine care. CONCLUSION: BTVA can achieve safe and clinically meaningful improvement in pulmonary function and quality of life in patients with CV. These randomized controlled trial subgroup results offer proof of a viable solution for CV+ patients.

Endoscopic lung volume reduction with endobronchial valves in patients with severe emphysema and established pulmonary hypertension.

BACKGROUND: One of the most common forms of pulmonary hypertension (PH) is that associated with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). So far, patients with severe emphysema and established PH have been excluded from endoscopic lung volume reduction (ELVR) therapy due to the risk of right heart decompensation. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this pilot study was to evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of ELVR using one-way endobronchial valves (EBV) in this specific group of patients. METHODS: We prospectively included 6 patients with COPD, severe heterogeneous emphysema, and established PH who underwent right heart catheterization and clinical assessments before and 90 days after ELVR with unilateral EBV placement. RESULTS: This study was not powered to measure any statistical differences in endpoints. Ninety days after ELVR, the symptoms, lung function, and hemodynamics improved in 5 out of 6 patients (1 patient normalized and 1 slightly worsened). The mean hemodynamics improved from baseline to 90 days after ELVR as follows: mean pulmonary artery pressure, -2.5 ± 3.5 mm Hg; pulmonary arterial wedge pressure, -4.3 ± 8.3 mm Hg; cardiac index, +0.3 ± 0.6 l/min/m(2), and 6-min walk distance, +59 ± 99 m. ELVR was performed without PH-related complications in all patients. CONCLUSION: To our knowledge, this is the first prospective, single-center pilot study to evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of ELVR in patients with established PH. ELVR was feasible and resulted in an improvement of clinical and hemodynamic parameters in 5 out of 6 patients. These results have to be further confirmed in larger-scale controlled studies.

Effectiveness of endobronchial coil treatment for lung volume reduction in patients with severe heterogeneous emphysema and bilateral incomplete fissures: a six-month follow-up.

BACKGROUND: Treatment with lung volume reduction coils (LVRC) may be effective in patients with severe heterogeneous emphysema and incomplete fissures. OBJECTIVE: We hypothesized that LVRC placement improves pulmonary function, exercise tolerance and quality of life in these patients. METHODS: Twenty-six patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), 13 males and 13 females, aged 66 ± 8 years with heterogeneous emphysema and incomplete fissures were included in this retrospective analysis. The coils were implanted unilaterally in the upper or lower lobe. Patients were followed up at 30, 90 and 180 days after treatment and changes in pulmonary function test and 6-minute-walk-test (6MWT) values as well as scores for the modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) dyspnea scale and the St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) were recorded. RESULTS: FEV1 improved significantly at 90 days and tended to decrease at the 180-day follow-up (0.67 ± 0.17 vs. 0.78 ± 0.25 vs. 0.73 ± 0.21 liters, respectively, p < 0.001). The 6MWT score had improved significantly at 90 days and had tended to decrease at the 180-day follow-up (216 ± 107 vs. 262 ± 97 vs. 262 ± 112 m, respectively, p = 0.001). SGRQ was significantly improved at 90 days. Multivariate analysis showed that worse 6MWT performance at baseline was independently associated with a greater improvement in 6MWT at the 90-day follow-up. The total complication rate was 54% (n = 14) and included light hemorrhage in 6 patients, COPD exacerbation in 6, pneumothorax in 1 and both COPD exacerbation and pneumothorax in 1 patient. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to show that LVRC in patients with heterogeneous emphysema and incomplete fissures improves exercise capacity, quality of life and lung function up to 90 days after the intervention. Further studies are needed to assess the long-term effects of LVRC in these patients.

Design of the multicentre randomised controlled BENTO trial to demonstrate patient-relevant benefit of bronchoscopic lung volume reduction using thermal vapour ablation in the German healthcare system for patients with upper lobe emphysema: a study protocol.

INTRODUCTION: Application of vapour ablation as a novel approach to lung volume reduction has positive effects in patients with severe emphysema. The BENTO study is a randomised, controlled, open, multicentre trial, to assess the effects of bronchoscopic thermal vapour ablation (BTVA) in the German healthcare system. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Patients with bilateral heterogeneous emphysema of the upper lobes in Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) stage 3/4 will be enrolled in this trial and will receive either standard medical management alone (according to GOLD guidelines) or BTVA treatment with the InterVapor system together with standard medical management. Patients will be randomised in a 2:1 ratio (treatment group:control group). A total of 224 patients will be enrolled at 15 study sites. The primary endpoint is the change in patient-reported disease-specific quality of life, as measured by the St George's Respiratory Questionnaire for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients between randomisation and the 9-month follow-up visit. Secondary endpoints include adverse events, mortality, vital status, changes in lung function parameters, exercise capacity and other efficacy measures at 3, 9 and 12 months.The BENTO trial was commissioned by the German Federal Joint Committee, to demonstrate that this approach is an efficient and safe treatment option in the German healthcare system. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The protocol has been approved by the lead ethics committee in Germany (Ethics Committee of the Medical Faculty of Heidelberg) and until present also by the following ethics committees: Ethics Committee of the Medical Faculty of Duisburg-Essen, Ethics Committee of the Medical Faculty of Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg, Ethics Committee of the State Medical Association of Hessen, Ethics Commission of the State Office for Health and Social Affairs of the State of Berlin, Ethics Committee of the Medical Faculty of Greifswald. The results will be published in a peer-reviewed journal. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT05717192.

Utility of rehabilitation prior to bronchoscopic lung volume reduction: post hoc analysis of the VENT trial.

Background and objective: Rehabilitation programmes are a valuable treatment modality for patients with COPD to increase exercise capacity and quality of life. The utility of pulmonary rehabilitation prior to bronchoscopic lung volume reduction (BLVR) is unclear. Methods: We performed a post hoc analysis of the Valve for Emphysema Palliation Trial (VENT) trial, the first multicentre randomised trial comparing the safety and efficacy of BLVR. Patients completed a pulmonary rehabilitation programme prior to BLVR over 6-10 weeks and maintained by daily practice, consisting of endurance training, strength training and upper/lower limb exercise. Lung function and exercise parameters (6-min walk distance (6MWD)) were assessed before and after rehabilitation and we tried to identify predictors for pulmonary rehabilitation benefit. Results: Lung function and exercise capacity of 403 patients (mean±sd age 63.3±7.4 years, 37.5% female, mean±sd forced expiratory volume in 1 s 30.1±7.6 L) were analysed. Exercise capacity significantly improved from 331.6±98.8 m to 345.6±95.3 m (p<0.001) in 6-min walk testing (6MWT), with 40.3% showing clinically meaningful improvements. Patients also experienced less dyspnoea after 6MWT, while pulmonary function parameters did not change significantly overall. Patients with lower exercise capacity at screening (6MWD <250 m) benefited more from pulmonary rehabilitation. The indication and prerequisites for BLVR were still present in all patients after pulmonary rehabilitation. Conclusion: The national mandatory requirements for rehabilitation prior to BLVR, which apply to all COPD patients, should be reconsidered and specified for COPD patients who really benefit.

Endobronchial lung volume reduction with valves reduces exacerbations in severe emphysema patients.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Exacerbations drive the progression of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Endoscopic lung volume reduction (ELVR) with valves is an established treatment option for patients with severe emphysema. Post-interventional exacerbations are observed in 8-17% of cases. Whether the exacerbation rate changes in the medium term after ELVR, is not known. METHODS: This is a single-center retrospective analysis of severe emphysema patients with endobronchial valve implantation. The number of exacerbations before and after ELVR was compared, including lung function parameters, exercise capacity and degree of lung volume reduction. The primary endpoint of the study was the number of exacerbations one year after ELVR compared to one year before ELVR. RESULTS: 129 patients (mean age 64.1 ± 7.7 years, 57% female, mean FEV1 0.8 ± 0.2 l, mean RV 243.4 ± 54.9 %) with ELVR in the years 2016-2019 and complete exacerbation history were analyzed. Patients experienced a mean of 2.5 ± 2.2 moderate and severe exacerbations in the year before ELVR. The number of exacerbations decreased significantly to 1.8 ± 2.2 exacerbations in the first year after ELVR (p = 0.009). The decrease in exacerbation rate was associated with the development of complete lobar atelectasis (r = 0.228. p = 0.009). Accordingly, in 41 patients with complete lobar atelectasis, the decrease in exacerbation rate was higher from 2.8 ± 2.0 to 1.4 ± 1.8 exacerbations (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: ELVR with valves appears promising to reduce the exacerbation rate in COPD patients, especially when the full treatment benefit of complete lobar atelectasis is achieved.

Endobronchial Valve Replacements in Patients with Advanced Emphysema After Endoscopic Lung Volume Reduction.

Purpose: Up to 41% of patients with endobronchial valve implantation need revision bronchoscopies and valve replacements most likely due to valve dysfunction or lack of benefit. So far, no data is available whether valve replacements lead to the desired lobar volume reduction and therapy benefit. Patients and Methods: We conducted a single-center retrospective analysis of patients with endobronchial valve implantation and at least one valve replacement. Indications and number of revision bronchoscopies and valve replacements were evaluated. Therapy benefit regarding lung function and exercise capacity as well as development of complete lobar atelectasis was investigated and possible predictors identified. Results: We identified 73 patients with 1-12 revision bronchoscopies and 1-5 valve replacements. The main indication for revision bronchoscopy in this group was lack of therapy benefit (44.2%). Lung function and exercise capacity showed improvements in about one-third of patients even years after the initial implantation. A total of 26% of all patients showed a complete lobar atelectasis at the end of the observation period, 56.2% had developed lung volume reduction. The logistic regression revealed the development of a previous complete lobar atelectasis as predictor for a complete lobar atelectasis at final follow-up. Oral cortisone long-term therapy was also shown as predictive factor. The probability for a final complete lobar atelectasis was 69.2% if a lobar atelectasis had developed before. Conclusion: Valve replacements are more likely to be beneficial in patients who develop a re-aeration of a previous lobar atelectasis following valve implantation. Every decision for revision bronchoscopy must be taken carefully.