Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Assunto da revista
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand ; 67(3): 347-355, 2023 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36547262

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: In open abdominal surgery, continuous epidural analgesia is commonly used method for postoperative analgesia. However, ultrasound (US)-guided fascial plane blocks may be a reasonable alternative. METHODS: In this randomized controlled trial, we compared posterior quadratus lumborum block (QLB) with epidural analgesia for postoperative pain after open radical cystectomy (ORC). Adult patients aged 18-85 with bladder cancer (BC) scheduled for open RC were randomized in two groups. Exclusion criteria were complicated diabetes mellitus type I, lack of cooperation, and persistent pain for reasons other than BC. In one group, a bilateral US-guided single injection posterior QLB was performed with 3.75 mg/ml ropivacaine 20 ml/side. In the other group, continuous epidural analgesia with ropivacaine was used. Basic analgesia was oral paracetamol 1000 mg three times daily, and long-acting opioid twice daily in both groups. All patients had patient-controlled rescue analgesia with oxycodone. Postoperative cumulative rescue opioid consumption was recorded for the day of surgery, and the following 2 postoperative days (POD 0-2). Secondary outcomes were postoperative pain and nausea and vomiting. RESULTS: In total, 20 patients (QLB), and 19 patients (epidural analgesia) groups, were included in the analyses. Cumulative rescue opioid consumption on POD 0, being of duration 9-12 h, was 14 mg (7.6-33.3) in the QLB group versus 6.1 mg (2.0-16.1) in the epidural analgesia group, p = 0.089, and as doses, 8 doses (3.6-15.7) versus 4 doses (1.3-8.5), p = .057. On POD 1 consumption was 25.3 mg (11.0-52.9) versus 18.0 mg (14.4-43.7), p = .749, and as doses 12 (5.5-23.0) versus 10 (8-20), p > .9, respectively. On POD 2 consumption was 19.1 mg (7.9-31.0) versus 18.0 mg (5.4-27.6) p = .749, and as doses 8.5 (5.2-14.7) versus 11 (3.0-18.0) p > .9, respectively. CONCLUSION: Opioid consumption did not differ significantly between posterior QLB and an epidural infusion with ropivacaine for the first 2 postoperative days following RC. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT03328988.


Assuntos
Analgesia Epidural , Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária , Adulto , Humanos , Ropivacaina , Analgesia Epidural/efeitos adversos , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapêutico , Cistectomia/efeitos adversos , Dor Pós-Operatória/tratamento farmacológico , Dor Pós-Operatória/etiologia , Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária/cirurgia , Anestésicos Locais , Ultrassonografia de Intervenção/métodos
2.
Eur J Anaesthesiol ; 38(2): 115-129, 2021 Feb 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33186305

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Ultrasound-guided quadratus lumborum block (QLB) is a truncal block with several technique variations. It has been reported as providing effective analgesia for postoperative pain. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this review was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of QLB for postoperative analgesia. The primary outcome was cumulative opioid consumption at 24 h postoperatively. The main secondary outcomes were the time to the first rescue opioid analgesic, pain scores at 24 h postoperatively and the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV). DESIGN: This was a systematic review and meta-analyses of observational studies and randomised controlled trials (RCTs). PRISMA-P guidelines were followed, and the review was registered in PROSPERO. GRADE was used to assess the quality of evidence. DATA SOURCES: The search was performed from several databases (Ovid MEDLINE, PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, CINAHL and the Cochrane CENTRAL) from inception up to June 2019. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: RCTs and prospective observational studies that investigated the postoperative analgesic properties of US-guided single shot QLB in adult patients undergoing abdominal or hip surgery were included. QLB was compared with other analgesics. RESULTS: Twenty-seven studies constituting 1557 patients were reviewed. Twelve studies with 803 patients were included in the meta-analysis on the primary outcome. Overall opioid consumption at 24 h postoperatively was reduced [mean difference, -11.15 (95% CI, -15.33 to -6.97) mg, I2 = 99%, moderate certainty in GRADE] and the time to the first opioid analgesic was longer in patients with QLB: 7 studies with 499 patients, mean difference, 189.32 (95% CI, 114.4 to 264.23) min, I2 = 98%. There were no differences in pain grades. The incidence of PONV was lower in patients with QLB [11 studies with 744 patients, OR 0.40 (95% CI, 0.27 to 0.58), I2 = 7%]. Reported complications and adverse effects of QLB were minimal. CONCLUSION: QLB reduced postoperative opioid consumption, prolonged the time to the first rescue opioid analgesic and diminished the incidence of PONV. QLB appears to be an applicable option for postoperative analgesia after abdominal and hip surgery. REGISTRATION NUMBER: PROSPERO, https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, CRD42016039921.


Assuntos
Analgesia , Bloqueio Nervoso , Adulto , Analgésicos Opioides/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Bloqueio Nervoso/efeitos adversos , Estudos Observacionais como Assunto , Dor Pós-Operatória/diagnóstico , Dor Pós-Operatória/epidemiologia , Dor Pós-Operatória/prevenção & controle , Ultrassonografia de Intervenção
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA