Genetic Subtypes of Apert Syndrome Are Associated With Differences in Airway Morphology and Early Upper Airway Obstruction.

BACKGROUND: Apert syndrome is predominantly caused by 2 paternally inherited gain-of-function mutations in the FGFR2 gene, Pro253Arg, and Ser252Trp. Studies comparing phenotypic features between these 2 mutations have established differences in syndactyly severity and incidence of cleft palate. Obstructive sleep apnea can be debilitating in a subset of patients with Apert syndrome, yet is not well understood. This study aims to determine whether FGFR2 mutations impart differential effects on airway physiology and morphology. METHODS: Patients with Apert syndrome and confirmatory molecular testing were reviewed for polysomnography, nasal endoscopy, microlaryngoscopy and bronchoscopy, and computed tomography imaging. Obstructive apnea-hypopnea index and oxygen saturation nadir, nasal airway volumes, choanal cross-sectional area, and midfacial cephalometric dimensions were compared across mutation types. RESULTS: Twenty-four patients (13 Ser252Trp, 11 Pro253Arg) were included. Severe obstructive sleep apnea (obstructive apnea-hypopnea index>10) occurred in 8 (62%) patients with Ser252Trp mutations compared with 1 (9%) patient with Pro253Arg mutations ( P =0.009). Computed tomography imaging at 1 year of age demonstrated that nasopharyngeal airway volumes were 5302±1076 mm 3 in the Ser252Trp group and 6832±1414 mm 3 in the Pro253Arg group ( P =0.041). Maxillary length (anterior nasal spine-posterior nasal spine, P =0.026) and basion-anterior nasal spine ( P =0.007) were shorter in patients with Ser252Trp mutations. CONCLUSIONS: The findings suggest that the Ser252Trp mutation in Apert syndrome is associated with higher severity obstructive sleep apnea and decreased nasopharyngeal airway volume. Heightened clinical awareness of these associations may inform treatment planning and family counseling.

Sociodemographic Disparities in Craniosynostosis: A Systematic Review.

OBJECTIVE: Given the consequences of delayed treatment and diagnosis of craniosynostosis, this study reviews the literature on sociodemographic risk factors and disparities associated with delayed craniosynostosis treatment. DESIGN: A systematic review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. A literature search of PubMed/Medline and Embase was performed by two independent reviewers. Included studies discussed craniosynostosis health disparities. Demographic characteristics and outcomes were analyzed. SETTING: Not applicable. PATIENTS: Patients with craniosynostosis. INTERVENTIONS: Standard surgical intervention for craniosynostosis. RESULTS: Our literature search yielded 273 studies, of which 18 were included for analysis. Included studies represented data from 31 256 U.S. patients with craniosynostosis. Sixty percent of patients (n = 16 510) were White, 13.8% were Hispanic/Latino, 6.2% were Black/African American, 1.3% were Asian, 0.3% were American Indian or Alaska Native, and 0.1% were Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander. Average age at surgery was 6.36 months for White patients, 10.63 months for Black patients, and 9.18 months for Hispanic patients. Minority racial and/or ethnic status was a risk factor for delayed presentation, and increased incidence of open surgery, complication rates, hospital charges, operative time, anesthesia duration, and hospital length of stay. Government-funded health insurance was associated with delayed intervention and increased complications. CONCLUSIONS: Minority craniosynostosis patients experience delays in intervention and increased complication rates. Our findings highlight the importance of expedited and equitable referrals, screenings, and treatment, and the need for a standardized approach to investigating longitudinal demographic and outcomes data in this population.

Clinical and operative risk factors for complications after Apert hand syndactyly reconstruction.

This study evaluated how Apert hand syndactyly presentations and reconstructive techniques influence reconstruction outcomes. All cases at a major paediatric hospital between 2007 and 2022 were analysed, including 98 web space reconstructions in 17 patients. Overall, 62% of hands developed complications and 15% required revision surgery. Upton hand type was significantly associated with postoperative complication incidence, specifically including range-of-motion deficits, flexion contracture, web creep and revision surgery. More severe syndactylies may benefit from additional measures to reduce complications. Rectangular commissural flaps showed 1.9 times greater complication risk than interdigitating triangular flaps, including 11.2 times greater risk of web creep. Zigzag volar finger flaps showed 1.8 times greater complication risk than straight-line incisions, including 3.8 times greater risk of web creep. Our study showed that interdigitating triangular commissural flaps and straight-line volar finger incisions are preferable to rectangular commissural and zigzag finger flaps in most cases of Apert hand syndactyly to minimize complications. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

The Impact of Senior Author Profile on Publication Level of Evidence in Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery.

Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery (PRS) incorporated the level of evidence (LOE) pyramid in 2011 to highlight evidence-based medicine in plastic surgery. This study aimed to assess the relationship between the profile of senior authors publishing in PRS and the LOE of publications. Methods: All accepted publications by American senior authors to PRS between January 2018 and March 2020 were classified by LOE. Demographic, educational, and career data on all senior authors were collected using publicly available online resources. Results: A total of 1030 articles were screened' of which 266 (25.8%) were eligible for LOE classification with the following distribution: I, 0.8%; II, 14.3%; III, 45.1%; IV, 33.1%; and V, 7.1%. Senior author demographic factors, including gender and race/ethnicity, did not significantly impact LOE (P > 0.05 for all). An advanced degree was associated with more publications per year, and only a PhD (P = 0.022) and board certification (P = 0.012) were associated with a higher LOE of publications (P = 0.022). Physicians working in an academic setting were significantly more likely to publish level III evidence than their private/community-based counterparts (P = 0.006). Breast papers constituted the highest proportion of level III evidence (41.4%; P < 0.001). Conclusions: Most publications in PRS contain level III-IV evidence. Senior author gender, race, and ethnicity did not impact LOE of publications. Plastic surgery board certification, possession of a PhD, and academic practice setting were associated with higher LOE of publications.