Large-scale real-world data analyses of cancer risks among patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) affects 24.5 million people worldwide and has been associated with increased cancer risks. However, the extent to which the observed risks are related to the pathophysiology of rheumatoid arthritis or its treatments is unknown. Leveraging nationwide health insurance claims data with 85.97 million enrollees across 8 years, we identified 92 864 patients without cancers at the time of rheumatoid arthritis diagnoses. We matched 68 415 of these patients with participants without rheumatoid arthritis by sex, race, age and inferred health and economic status and compared their risks of developing all cancer types. By 12 months after the diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis, rheumatoid arthritis patients were 1.21 (95% confidence interval [CI] [1.14, 1.29]) times more likely to develop any cancer compared with matched enrollees without rheumatoid arthritis. In particular, the risk of developing lymphoma is 2.08 (95% CI [1.67, 2.58]) times higher in the rheumatoid arthritis group, and the risk of developing lung cancer is 1.69 (95% CI [1.32, 2.13]) times higher. We further identified the five most commonly used drugs in treating rheumatoid arthritis, and the log-rank test showed none of them is implicated with a significantly increased cancer risk compared with rheumatoid arthritis patients without that specific drug. Our study suggested that the pathophysiology of rheumatoid arthritis, rather than its treatments, is implicated in the development of subsequent cancers. Our method is extensible to investigating the connections among drugs, diseases and comorbidities at scale.

Unmasking the Actual COVID-19 Case Count.

This report presents a novel approach to estimate the total number of COVID-19 cases in the United States, including undocumented infections, by combining the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's influenza-like illness surveillance data with aggregated prescription data. We estimated that the cumulative number of COVID-19 cases in the United States by 4 April 2020 was > 2.5 million.

Systematic Protein Prioritization for Targeted Proteomics Studies through Literature Mining.

There are more than 3.7 million published articles on the biological functions or disease implications of proteins, constituting an important resource of proteomics knowledge. However, it is difficult to summarize the millions of proteomics findings in the literature manually and quantify their relevance to the biology and diseases of interest. We developed a fully automated bioinformatics framework to identify and prioritize proteins associated with any biological entity. We used the 22 targeted areas of the Biology/Disease-driven (B/D)-Human Proteome Project (HPP) as examples, prioritized the relevant proteins through their Protein Universal Reference Publication-Originated Search Engine (PURPOSE) scores, validated the relevance of the score by comparing the protein prioritization results with a curated database, computed the scores of proteins across the topics of B/D-HPP, and characterized the top proteins in the common model organisms. We further extended the bioinformatics workflow to identify the relevant proteins in all organ systems and human diseases and deployed a cloud-based tool to prioritize proteins related to any custom search terms in real time. Our tool can facilitate the prioritization of proteins for any organ system or disease of interest and can contribute to the development of targeted proteomic studies for precision medicine.

A Cloud-Based Metabolite and Chemical Prioritization System for the Biology/Disease-Driven Human Proteome Project.

Targeted metabolomics and biochemical studies complement the ongoing investigations led by the Human Proteome Organization (HUPO) Biology/Disease-Driven Human Proteome Project (B/D-HPP). However, it is challenging to identify and prioritize metabolite and chemical targets. Literature-mining-based approaches have been proposed for target proteomics studies, but text mining methods for metabolite and chemical prioritization are hindered by a large number of synonyms and nonstandardized names of each entity. In this study, we developed a cloud-based literature mining and summarization platform that maps metabolites and chemicals in the literature to unique identifiers and summarizes the copublication trends of metabolites/chemicals and B/D-HPP topics using Protein Universal Reference Publication-Originated Search Engine (PURPOSE) scores. We successfully prioritized metabolites and chemicals associated with the B/D-HPP targeted fields and validated the results by checking against expert-curated associations and enrichment analyses. Compared with existing algorithms, our system achieved better precision and recall in retrieving chemicals related to B/D-HPP focused areas. Our cloud-based platform enables queries on all biological terms in multiple species, which will contribute to B/D-HPP and targeted metabolomics/chemical studies.

Advances in using Internet searches to track dengue.

Dengue is a mosquito-borne disease that threatens over half of the world's population. Despite being endemic to more than 100 countries, government-led efforts and tools for timely identification and tracking of new infections are still lacking in many affected areas. Multiple methodologies that leverage the use of Internet-based data sources have been proposed as a way to complement dengue surveillance efforts. Among these, dengue-related Google search trends have been shown to correlate with dengue activity. We extend a methodological framework, initially proposed and validated for flu surveillance, to produce near real-time estimates of dengue cases in five countries/states: Mexico, Brazil, Thailand, Singapore and Taiwan. Our result shows that our modeling framework can be used to improve the tracking of dengue activity in multiple locations around the world.