Development of a therapeutic anti-HtrA1 antibody and the identification of DKK3 as a pharmacodynamic biomarker in geographic atrophy.

Genetic polymorphisms in the region of the trimeric serine hydrolase high-temperature requirement 1 (HTRA1) are associated with increased risk of age-related macular degeneration (AMD) and disease progression, but the precise biological function of HtrA1 in the eye and its contribution to disease etiologies remain undefined. In this study, we have developed an HtrA1-blocking Fab fragment to test the therapeutic hypothesis that HtrA1 protease activity is involved in the progression of AMD. Next, we generated an activity-based small-molecule probe (ABP) to track target engagement in vivo. In addition, we used N-terminomic proteomic profiling in preclinical models to elucidate the in vivo repertoire of HtrA1-specific substrates, and identified substrates that can serve as robust pharmacodynamic biomarkers of HtrA1 activity. One of these HtrA1 substrates, Dickkopf-related protein 3 (DKK3), was successfully used as a biomarker to demonstrate the inhibition of HtrA1 activity in patients with AMD who were treated with the HtrA1-blocking Fab fragment. This pharmacodynamic biomarker provides important information on HtrA1 activity and pharmacological inhibition within the ocular compartment.

Nonclinical Safety Assessment of FHTR2163, An Antigen-Binding Fragment Against HTRA1 for the Treatment of Geographic Atrophy.

FHTR2163 is an antigen-binding fragment of a humanized immunoglobulin G1 monoclonal antibody directed against high-temperature requirement A serine peptidase 1 (HTRA1) that is being developed as a potential intravitreal (ITV) treatment for patients with geographic atrophy (GA), an advanced form of dry age-related macular degeneration. The nonclinical toxicology program was designed to assess the safety and tolerability of HTRA1 inhibition following ITV administration of FHTR2163 to support ITV administration in patients with GA. FHTR2163 was well tolerated in a single-dose ITV-administered 8-day toxicity study in cynomolgus monkeys following a 50 µL high (>700 mOsm/kg) osmolality formulation up to 12.5 mg/eye; however, 100 µL (2× 50 µL injections) of a high-osmolality formulation resulted in transient retinal detachment. Repeat-dose ITV administration every 2 weeks of FHTR2163 was well tolerated in 8- and 26-week studies with ITV injection of 100 µL (2× 50 µL) of iso-osmolar formulation up to 15 mg/eye, or 50 µL of the high-osmolality formulation up to 12.5 mg/eye. Observed transient and reversible ocular effects included inflammation and perivascular infiltrates, consistent with an immune response attributed to the administration of heterologous (humanized) protein. Overall, FHTR2163 was well tolerated, and the nonclinical package supported the continued clinical development of FHTR2163 in patients with GA.

Intraocular pressure in eyes receiving monthly ranibizumab in 2 pivotal age-related macular degeneration clinical trials.

PURPOSE: To characterize preinjection intraocular pressure (IOP) in eyes receiving monthly ranibizumab versus sham or verteporfin photodynamic therapy (PDT) for age-related macular degeneration (AMD). DESIGN: Post hoc analysis of IOP data from 2 phase 3 clinical trials, the Minimally Classic/Occult Trial of the Anti-VEGF Antibody Ranibizumab in the Treatment of Neovascular AMD (MARINA) and the Anti-VEGF Antibody for the Treatment of Predominantly Classic Choroidal Neovascularization in AMD (ANCHOR) trial. PARTICIPANTS: All safety-evaluable patients who received 1 or more injections of sham or PDT or of ranibizumab and had 1 or more postbaseline IOP measurements recorded for the study eye. METHODS: Preinjection IOP measurements for study eyes (n = 1125) and fellow eyes in MARINA and ANCHOR at baseline and at each monthly visit through month 24 were analyzed. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: End points evaluated were maximum preinjection IOP during the 24-month treatment period; any occurrence of absolute preinjection IOP of 21 mmHg or more, 25 mmHg or more, or 30 mmHg or more; any occurrence of IOP increase of 6 mmHg or more, 8 mmHg or more, or 10 mmHg or more from baseline; any combination of IOP increase of 6 mmHg or more or 8 mmHg or more from baseline with concurrent absolute preinjection IOP of 21 mmHg or more or 25 mmHg or more; glaucoma-related adverse events; new glaucoma medications used for 45 days or more; and glaucoma filtration or laser surgeries. RESULTS: Across treatment groups, 60.1% to 70.9% of study eyes had a maximum preinjection IOP of less than 21 mmHg. Comparing ranibizumab 0.5 mg versus sham or PTD treatment, respectively: 39.9% versus 29.1% and 10.9% versus 5.1% had maximum preinjection IOPs of 21 mmHg or more or 25 mmHg or more, respectively; 44.1% versus 29.9% and 24.2% versus 13.6% had IOP increases from baseline of 6 mmHg or more or 8 mmHg or more, respectively; 26.1% versus 13.6% and 16.8% versus 9.0% had 1 or more IOP increase from baseline of 6 mmHg or more or 8 mmHg or more, respectively, with a concurrent IOP of 21 mmHg or more; 9.6% versus 3.7% and 7.5% versus 2.4% had 1 or more IOP increase from baseline of 6 mmHg or more or 8 mmHg or more, respectively, with a concurrent IOP of 25 mmHg or more. No differences were observed in fellow eyes. CONCLUSIONS: Most ranibizumab-treated eyes did not experience sustained preinjection IOP of 21 mmHg or more (>2 consecutive visits) over 24 months. When evaluating the combined IOP end point, more ranibizumab-treated eyes had 1 or more IOP increase from baseline of 6 mmHg or more or 8 mmHg or more, with concurrent highest IOPs of 21 mmHg or more and 25 mmHg or more versus sham or PDT. Intraocular pressure should be monitored in eyes receiving ranibizumab.

Twenty-four-month efficacy and safety of 0.5 mg or 2.0 mg ranibizumab in patients with subfoveal neovascular age-related macular degeneration.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the 24-month efficacy and safety of intravitreal ranibizumab 0.5 mg and 2.0 mg administered monthly or as needed (pro re nata [PRN]) in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (wet AMD). DESIGN: Twenty-four-month, multicenter, randomized, double-masked, active treatment-controlled phase 3 trial. PARTICIPANTS: Patients (n = 1098) ≥ 50 years of age with treatment-naïve subfoveal wet AMD. METHODS: Patients were randomized to receive intravitreal injections of ranibizumab 0.5 mg or 2.0 mg monthly or PRN after 3 monthly loading doses. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary efficacy end point was the mean change in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) from baseline at month 12. Key secondary end points included mean change in BCVA from baseline at month 24, proportion of patients who gained ≥ 15 letters in BCVA, mean number of ranibizumab injections, and mean change in central foveal thickness from baseline over time by spectral-domain optical coherence tomography. Ocular and systemic safety events also were evaluated through month 24. RESULTS: At month 24, the mean change from baseline in BCVA was (letters) +9.1 (0.5 mg monthly), +7.9 (0.5 mg PRN), +8.0 (2.0 mg monthly), and +7.6 (2.0 mg PRN). The change in mean BCVA from month 12 to 24 was (letters) -1.0, -0.3, -1.2, and -1.0, respectively. The proportion of patients who gained ≥ 15 letters from baseline in BCVA at month 24 was 34.5%, 33.1%, 37.6%, and 34.8%, respectively. The mean number of ranibizumab injections through month 24 was 21.4, 13.3, 21.6, and 11.2, respectively; 5.6 and 4.3 mean injections were required in year 2 in the 0.5 mg and 2.0 mg PRN groups, respectively. The average treatment interval in the 0.5 mg PRN group was 9.9 weeks after 3 monthly loading doses, and 93% of these patients did not require monthly dosing. Ocular and systemic safety profiles over 2 years were similar among all 4 treatment groups and were consistent with previous ranibizumab trials in AMD. CONCLUSIONS: At month 24, mean BCVA improvements were clinically meaningful and similar among all 4 ranibizumab treatment groups. The 0.5 mg PRN group achieved a mean gain of 7.9 letters at month 24 with an average of 13.3 injections (5.6 injections in year 2). No new safety events were identified over 24 months.

Twelve-month efficacy and safety of 0.5 mg or 2.0 mg ranibizumab in patients with subfoveal neovascular age-related macular degeneration.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the 12-month efficacy and safety of intravitreal ranibizumab 0.5 mg and 2.0 mg administered monthly and on an as-needed (PRN) basis in treatment-naïve patients with subfoveal neovascular age-related macular degeneration (wet AMD). DESIGN: A 24-month, phase III, randomized, multicenter, double-masked, dose-response study. PARTICIPANTS: Patients aged ≥ 50 years with subfoveal wet AMD. METHODS: Patients (n = 1098) were randomized to receive ranibizumab 0.5 mg or 2.0 mg intravitreal injections administered monthly or on a PRN basis after 3 monthly loading doses. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary efficacy end point was the mean change from baseline in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) at month 12. Key secondary end points included the mean number of ranibizumab injections, the mean change from baseline in central foveal thickness (CFT) over time, and the proportion of patients who gained ≥ 15 letters of BCVA. Unless otherwise specified, end point analyses were performed using the last-observation-carried-forward method to impute missing data. RESULTS: At month 12, the mean change from baseline in BCVA for the 4 groups was +10.1 letters (0.5 mg monthly), +8.2 letters (0.5 mg PRN), +9.2 letters (2.0 mg monthly), and +8.6 letters (2.0 mg PRN). The proportion of patients who gained ≥ 15 letters from baseline at month 12 in the 4 groups was 34.5%, 30.2%, 36.1%, and 33.0%, respectively. The mean change from baseline in CFT at month 12 in the 4 groups was -172.0 µm, -161.2 µm, -163.3 µm, and -172.4 µm, respectively. The mean number of injections was 7.7 and 6.9 for the 0.5-mg PRN and 2.0-mg PRN groups, respectively. Ocular and systemic safety profiles were consistent with previous ranibizumab trials in AMD and comparable between groups. CONCLUSIONS: At month 12, the ranibizumab 2.0 mg monthly group did not meet the prespecified superiority comparison and the ranibizumab 0.5 mg and 2.0 mg PRN groups did not meet the prespecified noninferiority (NI) comparison. However, all treatment groups demonstrated clinically meaningful visual improvement (+8.2 to +10.1 letters) and improved anatomic outcomes, with the PRN groups requiring approximately 4 fewer injections (6.9-7.7) than the monthly groups (11.2-11.3). No new safety events were observed despite a 4-fold dose escalation in the study. The pHase III, double-masked, multicenter, randomized, Active treatment-controlled study of the efficacy and safety of 0.5 mg and 2.0 mg Ranibizumab administered monthly or on an as-needed Basis (PRN) in patients with subfoveal neOvasculaR age-related macular degeneration (HARBOR) study confirmed that ranibizumab 0.5 mg dosed monthly provides optimum results in patients with wet AMD. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found after the references.

Rare CIDEC coding variants enriched in age-related macular degeneration patients with small low-luminance deficit cause lipid droplet and fat storage defects.

BACKGROUND: The basis of Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) genetic risk has been well documented; however, few studies have looked at genetic biomarkers of disease progression or treatment response within advanced AMD patients. Here we report the first genome-wide analysis of genetic determinants of low-luminance vision deficit (LLD), which is seen as predictive of visual acuity loss and anti-VEGF treatment response in neovascular AMD patients. METHODS: AMD patients were separated into small- and large-LLD groups for comparison and whole genome sequencing was performed. Genetic determinants of LLD were assessed by common and rare variant genetic analysis. Follow-up functional analysis of rare coding variants identified by the burden test was then performed in vitro. RESULTS: We identified four coding variants in the CIDEC gene. These rare variants were only present in patients with a small LLD, which has been previously shown to indicate better prognosis and better anti-VEGF treatment response. Our in vitro functional characterization of these CIDEC alleles revealed that all decrease the binding affinity between CIDEC and the lipid droplet fusion effectors PLIN1, RAB8A and AS160. The rare CIDEC alleles all cause a hypomorphic defect in lipid droplet fusion and enlargement, resulting in a decreased fat storage capability in adipocytes. CONCLUSIONS: As we did not detect CIDEC expression in the ocular tissue affected by AMD, our results suggest that the CIDEC variants do not play a direct role in the eye and influence low-luminance vision deficit via an indirect and systemic effect related to fat storage capacity.

Ranibizumab for macular edema due to retinal vein occlusions: long-term follow-up in the HORIZON trial.

PURPOSE: To assess long-term safety and efficacy of intraocular ranibizumab injections in patients with macular edema after retinal vein occlusion (RVO). DESIGN: Open-label extension trial of the 12-month Ranibizumab for the Treatment of Macular Edema following Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion: Evaluation of Efficacy and Safety (BRAVO) and Central Retinal Vein Occlusion Study: Evaluation of Efficacy and Safety (CRUISE) trials. PARTICIPANTS: We included 304 patients who completed BRAVO and 304 patients who completed CRUISE. METHODS: Patients were seen at least every 3 months and given an intraocular injection of 0.5 mg ranibizumab if they met prespecified retreatment criteria. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcomes were incidence and severity of ocular and nonocular adverse events (AEs). Key efficacy outcomes included mean change from baseline best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) letter score by Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study protocol and central foveal thickness. RESULTS: In patients who completed month 12, the mean number of injections (excluding month 12 injection) in the sham/0.5-, 0.3/0.5-, and 0.5-mg groups was 2.0, 2.4, and 2.1 (branch RVO) and 2.9, 3.8, and 3.5 (central RVO), respectively. The incidence of study eye ocular serious AEs (SAEs) and SAEs potentially related to systemic vascular endothelial growth factor inhibition across treatment arms was 2% to 9% and 1% to 6%, respectively. The mean change from baseline BCVA letter score at month 12 in branch RVO patients was 0.9 (sham/0.5 mg), -2.3 (0.3/0.5 mg), and -0.7 (0.5 mg), respectively. The mean change from baseline BCVA at month 12 in central RVO patients was -4.2 (sham/0.5 mg), -5.2 (0.3/0.5 mg), and -4.1 (0.5 mg), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: No new safety events were identified with long-term use of ranibizumab; rates of SAEs potentially related to treatment were consistent with prior ranibizumab trials. Reduced follow-up and fewer ranibizumab injections in the second year of treatment were associated with a decline in vision in central RVO patients, but vision in branch RVO patients remained stable. Results suggest that during the second year of ranibizumab treatment of RVO patients, follow-up and injections should be individualized and, on average, central RVO patients may require more frequent follow-up than every 3 months.

Phase 1 Study of the Anti-HtrA1 Antibody-binding Fragment FHTR2163 in Geographic Atrophy Secondary to Age-related Macular Degeneration.

PURPOSE: FHTR2163 is a novel antigen-binding fragment (Fab) directed against high-temperature requirement protein A1 (HtrA1). HTRA1 inhibition may preserve retinal integrity and slow disease progression in geographic atrophy (GA) secondary to age-related macular degeneration (AMD). This study examined the safety, pharmacokinetics, immunogenicity, and changes in the HTRA1-specific substrate Dickkop-related protein 3 (DKK3) in patients with GA who received FHTR2163. DESIGN: Phase I, open-label, single ascending dose escalation and multiple-dose expansion study. METHODS: Adults aged ≥ 50 years with GA secondary to AMD with best corrected visual acuity ranging between Snellen 20/125 and 20/400 were enrolled. In the first stage, a single intravitreal injection of FHTR2163 was given in 5 dose-escalation cohorts ranging from 1 to 20 mg (n = 3 patients/cohort; n = 15 total patients). The second stage evaluated the maximum tested dose of 20 mg administered every 4 weeks for 3 doses (n = 13 patients). RESULTS: No dose limiting toxicities or ocular serious AEs were reported. The most frequently reported AEs in the study eye were conjunctival hemorrhage (n = 7), conjunctival hyperemia (n = 4), and eye pain (n = 2). No non-ocular or ocular AEs were assessed as drug related. There were no clinically significant changes in ocular exams. A sustained pharmacodynamic effect of anti-HtrA1 was observed in the aqueous humor, as measured by levels of cleaved DKK3. CONCLUSIONS: FHTR2163, a novel Fab directed against HtrA1, was well tolerated with no DLTs or significant ocular AEs. The molecule when injected intravitreally for 3 doses showed a sustained pharmacodynamic effect at the maximum tested dose of 20 mg.

Impact of Physician-Pharmacist Covisits at a Primary Care Clinic in Patients With Uncontrolled Diabetes.

PURPOSE: A popular method for enhancing medication management within a patient-centered medical home (PCMH) is the physician-pharmacist collaborative management (PPCM) model. To improve efficiency of health-care delivery within 4 federally qualified health centers (FQHCs), the PPCM model was implemented through coordinated physician-pharmacist covisits. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of physician-pharmacist covisits on clinical outcomes among patients with uncontrolled diabetes. METHODOLOGY: This was a retrospective multicenter cohort study including adults (≥18 years old) with uncontrolled type 1 or type 2 diabetes (hemoglobin A1c [HbA1c] ≥ 8 %) who had at least one covisit between January 1, 2013, and October 1, 2016. The primary clinical metric was mean change in HbA1c from baseline to follow-up. Secondary outcomes included adherence to select American Diabetes Association (ADA) Standards of Medical Care. RESULTS: A total of 106 patients were included in this analysis. Patients who were managed in the PPCM model experienced a significant decrease in mean change in HbA1c from baseline to follow-up (-1.75 [2.63], P < .001). There was no significant difference in the proportion of patients receiving recommended vaccinations or cardiovascular (CV) risk reduction medications. CONCLUSION: The results suggest that physician-pharmacist covisits may improve glucose control in patients with uncontrolled diabetes.

Correlation of antidepressant target dose optimization and achievement of glycemic control.

INTRODUCTION: Depression is a recognized cause of disability globally with a propensity to be comorbid in patients with diabetes, leading to poorer health-related outcomes. Although a number of studies have investigated the correlation between improvement in depression and chronic disease, none have reported on achievement of target doses of antidepressant therapies and diabetes control. The objective of this study is to determine the influence of antidepressant dosing optimization on reducing hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c). METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of patients seen at CommUnityCare Health Centers who were initiated on an antidepressant and had uncontrolled diabetes (HbA1c > 7%). Eligible patients were followed for 12 months after initiation and separated into those who achieved target dose and those who did not. Patient health questionnaire scores were collected when available in an attempt to quantify change in depressive symptoms. RESULTS: A total of 178 patients met inclusion criteria with 76 achieving an optimal dose (target group) and 102 patients below optimal dose (control group) at the end of the study period. Patients in both groups were similar at baseline with an HbA1c of 9.29% compared to 9.24% in the target and control groups, respectively. At the end of the study period, more patients in the target group achieved an HbA1c < 7% (22.9%, n = 48 vs 4.3%, n = 23, respectively; P < .05). DISCUSSION: These results suggest that optimization of antidepressant dosing in patients with diabetes may lead to an increased likelihood of reaching goal HbA1c < 7% although correlation to improvement of depression remains unknown.

Time trend analysis of mastoidectomy procedures performed in Ontario, 1987-2007.

CONCLUSIONS: There has been a reduction in the number of modified radical mastoidectomy and revision mastoidectomy surgeries per head of population in Ontario between 1987 and 2007, we believe that this represents a true reduction in prevalence of cholesteatoma. The increase of cases performed at the University Hospital Network, Toronto (UHN) may represent a shift to subspecialization in the treatment of chronic ear disease. OBJECTIVE: To analyze the trends in mastoid operations for chronic middle ear disease in the Canadian province of Ontario between 1987 and 2007 and to determine whether an increasing proportion of these procedures are being performed in tertiary referral centres. METHODS: The year on year population and number of mastoid procedures performed per year in Ontario and at the UHN between 1987 and 2007 were obtained from Statistics Canada and the Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care, Ontario, respectively. Population-adjusted rates of mastoid surgery for Ontario and the UHN. These data were collated and graphically represented for trend analysis. RESULTS: The population-adjusted number of mastoid procedures for Ontario declined from 7.1 cases per 100,000 in 1986 to 4.1 cases per 100,000 in 2006. During this time the number of both modified radical mastoidectomies and revision mastoid surgeries at UHN increased.

Sunitinib (Sutent): a novel agent for the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma.

OBJECTIVE: To provide a review of the clinical data supporting the use of sunitinib (Sutent), a multitargeted, small molecule, tyrosine kinase inhibitor, with focus on its approved indication for the treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma in patients with metastatic disease requiring drug therapy. DATA SOURCE: : A MEDLINE search of the medical literature was conducted using the terms 'sunitinib' and 'SU11248'. References from the articles were reviewed and relevant sources were included. DATA SUMMARY: The introduction of dual tyrosine kinase receptor inhibitors is a novel approach to treating advanced metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) by preventing angiogenesis and tumor growth. Based on its ability to inhibit several targets involved in angiogenesis and endothelial cell proliferation, sunitinib offers patients with mRCC an alternative for treatment. A recent Phase III study evaluating sunitinib as first-line therapy showed a significant difference when compared to interferonalfa (IFN-alpha) for a progression-free survival of 11 months in the sunitinib arm and 5 months in the IFN-alpha arm (hazard ratio 0.42; 95% CI 0.32-0.54; P50.001). Two Phase II trials determined sunitinib was effective as second-line therapy in mRCC patients who failed previous cytokine treatment. Partial response rates were 40% (95% CI 28%-53%) and 34% (95% CI 25%-44%). Multiple ongoing trials are currently underway to evaluate sunitinib for first-line therapy in mRCC.